Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Divide and Conquer or Divide and Concede: How Do States Respond to Internally Divided Separatists?

  • KATHLEEN GALLAGHER CUNNINGHAM (a1)
Abstract

Why do states make concessions to some self-determination movements but not others? This article explores the role of the internal characteristics of these movements, demonstrating that their internal structures play a major role in determining which groups get concessions. Using new data on the structure of self-determination movements and the concessions they receive, I evaluate whether states respond to internally divided movements by trying to “divide and conquer” or “divide and concede.” Consistent with the latter approach, I find that internally divided movements receive concessions at a much higher rate than unitary ones and that the more divided the movement is the more likely it is to receive concessions. Yet, concessions to unitary movements appear to work better to settle these disputes. This suggests that states use concessions not only as a tool to resolve disputes, but also as part of the bargaining process.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Kathleen Gallagher Cunningham is Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Iowa State University, and Senior Researcher, Centre for the Study of Civil War, Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO), 503 Ross Hall, Ames, IA 50010 (kgc@iastate.edu).
References
Hide All
Achen, Christopher H. 2005. “Let's Put Garbage-can Regressions and Garbage-can Probits Where They Belong.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 22 (September): 327–39.
Ayres, R. William. 2000. “A World Flying Apart? Violent Nationalist Conflict and the End of the Cold War.” Journal of Peace Research 37 (January): 105–17.
Bakke, Kristin, and Wibbles, Eric. 2006. “Diversity, Disparity, and Civil Conflict in Federal States.” World Politics 59 (October): 150.
Barry, Brian. 1998. “The Limits of Cultural Politics.” Review of International Studies 24: 307–19.
Beck, Nathaniel, Katz, Jonathan N., and Tucker, Richard. 1998. “Taking Time Seriously in Binary Time-series Cross-section Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (October): 1260–88.
Beissinger, Mark R. 2002. Nationalist Mobilization and the Collapse of the Soviet State. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Berrebi, Claude, and Klor, Esteban F.. 2006. “On Terrorism and Electoral Outcomes: Theory and Evidence from the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (December): 899925.
Bloom, Mia M. 2004. “Palestinian Suicide Bombing: Public Support, Market Share and Outbidding.” Political Science Quarterly 119 (Spring): 6188.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Jones, Bradford S.. 2004. Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists. Analytical Methods for Social Research Series. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Breton, Albert. 1978. “Nationalism and Language Policies.” Canadian Journal of Economics 11 (November): 656–68.
Bueno de Mesquita, Ethan. 2008. “Terrorist Factions.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 3 (December): 399418.
Chiozza, Giacomo, and Goemans, Hein E.. 2004. “International Conflict and the Tenure of Leaders: Is War Still ‘Ex Post’ Inefficient?American Journal of Political Science 48 (July): 604–19.
Clarke, Kevin A. 2005. “The Phantom Menace: Omitted Variable Bias in Econometric Research.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 22 (February): 341–52.
Coggins, Bridget. 2006. “Secession, Recognition and the International Politics of Statehood.” Dissertation. Ohio State University.
Cunningham, David E. 2006. “Veto Players and Civil War Duration.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (September): 875–92.
Cunningham, Kathleen Gallagher. 2007. “Divided and Conquered: Why States and Self-determination Groups Fail in Bargaining over Autonomy.” Dissertation. University of California, San Diego.
Cunningham, Kathleen, Bakke, Kristin, and Seymour, Lee. N.d. “Shirts Today, Skins Tomorrow: Dual Contests and the Effect of Fragmentation in Self-determination Disputes.” Journal of Conflict Resolution. Forthcoming.
Ellingsen, Tanja. 2000. “Colorful Community or Ethnic Witches’ Brew? Multiethnicity and Domestic Conflict during and after the Cold War.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 44 (April): 228–49.
Fearon, James D. 1995. “Rationalist Explanations for War.” International Organization 49 (Summer): 379414.
Fearon, James D., and Laitin, David D.. 2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War.” American Political Science Review 97 (February): 7590.
Fearon, James D., and Laitin, David D.. 2008. “Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, eds. Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David. New York: Oxford University Press, 756–78.
Gilpin, Robert. 1973. “Will Canada Last?Foreign Policy 10 (Spring): 117–31.
Hegre, Håvard. 2008. “Gravitating toward War: Preponderance May Pacify, But Power Kills.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 52 (May): 566–89.
Hirshleifer, Jack. 1991. “The Paradox of Power.” Economics and Politics 3 (November): 177200.
Hirshleifer, Jack. 2001. The Dark Side of the Force: Economic Foundations of Conflict Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1993. “If Not Civilizations, What? Paradigms of the Post–Cold War World.” Foreign Affairs 72 (September/October): 186–94.
Jenne, Erin K. 2006. Ethnic Bargaining: The Paradox of Minority Empowerment. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Jenne, Erin K., Saideman, Stephen M., and Lowe, Will. 2007. “Separatism as a Bargaining Posture: The Role of Leverage in Minority Radicalization.” Journal of Peace Research 44 (September): 539–58.
Kadera, Kelly M., and Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin. 2005. “Manna from Heaven or Forbidden Fruit? The (Ab) Use of Control Variables in Research on International Conflict.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 22 (September): 273–75.
Kalyvas, Stathis N. 2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kalyvas, Stathis N. 2008. “Ethnic Defection in Civil War.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (August): 1043–68.
Kalyvas, Stathis N., and Balcells, Laia. 2010. “International System and Technologies of Rebellion: How the End of the Cold War Shaped Internal Conflict.” American Political Science Review 104 (October): 415–29.
King, Charles. 2004. “The Micropolitics of Social Violence.” World Politics 56 (April): 431–55.
King, Gary, Tomz, Michael, and Wittenberg, Jason. 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (April): 347–61.
Kydd, Andrew, and Walter, Barbara F.. 2002. “Sabotaging the Peace: The Politics of Extremist Violence.” International Organization 56 (Spring): 263–96.
Laitin, David. 1988. “Language Games.” Comparative Politics 20 (April): 289302.
Marshall, Monty G., and Gurr, Ted Robert. 2003. “Peace and Conflict 2003: A Global Survey of Armed Conflicts, Self-determination Movements, and Democracy.” Integrated Network for Social Conflict Research, Center for International Development and Conflict Management. University of Maryland, College Park.
Pearlman, Wendy. 2008/2009. “Spoiling Inside and Out: Internal Political Contestation and the Middle East Peace Process.” International Security 33 (Winter): 79109.
Powell, Robert. 2006. “War as a Commitment Problem.” International Organization 60 (1): 169203.
Ray, James Lee. 2003. “Explaining Interstate Conflict and War: What Should Be Controlled for?Conflict Management and Peace Science 20 (September): 131.
Rosecrance, Richard N., and Stein, Arthur A.. 2006. No More States? Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Safran, William. 1992. “Language, Ideology, and State-building: A Comparison of Policies in France, Israel, and the Soviet Union.” International Political Science Review 13 (October): 397414.
Siqueira, Kevin. 2005. “Political and Militant Wings within Dissident Movements and Organizations.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 49 (April): 218–36.
Spruyt, Hendrick. 2005. Ending Empire: Contested Sovereignty and Territorial Partition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Stedman, Stephen John. 1997. “Spoiler Problems in Peace Processes.” International Security 22 (Fall): 553.
Stein, Arthur A., and Lobell, Steven E.. 1997. “Geostructuralism and International Politics: The End of the Cold War and the Regionalization of International Security.” In Regional Orders: Building Security in a New World, eds. Lake, David A. and Morgan, Patrick M.. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 101–22.
Toft, Monica Duffy. 2003. The Geography of Ethnic Violence: Identity, Interests, and the Indivisibility of Territory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Tsebelis, George. 1995. “Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism.” British Journal of Political Science 25 (July): 289325.
Varshney, Ashutosh. 2002. Ethnic Conflict and Civic Life. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Wagner, Harrison R. 2000. “Bargaining and War.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (July): 469–84.
Wallensteen, Peter, and Axell, Karin. 1993. “Armed Conflict at the End of the Cold War, 1989–92.” Journal of Peace Research 30 (August): 331–46.
Walter, Barbara F. 2006. “Building Reputation: Why Governments Fight Some Separatists But Not Others.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (April): 313–30.
Weinstein, Jeremy. 2007. Inside Rebellion: The Politics of Insurgent Violence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wittman, Donald. 1979. “How a War Ends: A Rational Model Approach.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 23 (December): 743–63.
Wood, Elizabeth. 2003. Insurgent Collective Action and Civil War in El Salvador. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Cunningham supplementary material
Appendix

 Word (225 KB)
225 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 35
Total number of PDF views: 500 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1674 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.