Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 30
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    ​Castillo-Manzano, José I. López-Valpuesta, Lourdes and Sánchez-Braza, Antonio 2016. Going a long way? On your bike! Comparing the distances for which public bicycle sharing system and private bicycles are used. Applied Geography, Vol. 71, p. 95.

    Colson, K. Ellicott Rudolph, Kara E. Zimmerman, Scott C. Goin, Dana E. Stuart, Elizabeth A. Laan, Mark van der and Ahern, Jennifer 2016. Optimizing matching and analysis combinations for estimating causal effects. Scientific Reports, Vol. 6, p. 23222.

    Gerardi, Dino McConnell, Margaret A. Romero, Julian and Yariv, Leeat 2016. GET OUT THE (COSTLY) VOTE: INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN FOR GREATER PARTICIPATION. Economic Inquiry, p. n/a.

    Lamare, J. Ryan 2016. Labor Unions and Political Mobilization: Diminishing Returns of Repetitious Contact. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Vol. 55, Issue. 2, p. 346.

    Janz, Nicole 2015. Bringing the Gold Standard into the Classroom: Replication in University Teaching. International Studies Perspectives, p. n/a.

    Lazer, David M. Sokhey, Anand E. Neblo, Michael A. Esterling, Kevin M. and Kennedy, Ryan 2015. Expanding the Conversation: Multiplier Effects From a Deliberative Field Experiment. Political Communication, Vol. 32, Issue. 4, p. 552.

    Wang, Pengyuan Sun, Wei Yin, Dawei Yang, Jian and Chang, Yi 2015. Proceedings of the Eighth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining - WSDM '15. p. 67.

    Gemenis, Kostas and Rosema, Martin 2014. Voting Advice Applications and electoral turnout. Electoral Studies, Vol. 36, p. 281.

    Bølstad, Jørgen Dinas, Elias and Riera, Pedro 2013. Tactical Voting and Party Preferences: A Test of Cognitive Dissonance Theory. Political Behavior, Vol. 35, Issue. 3, p. 429.

    Cutts, David and Widdop, Paul 2013. Was Labour Penalised where it Stood All Women Shortlist Candidates? An Analysis of the 2010 UK General Election. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, Vol. 15, Issue. 3, p. 435.

    Diamond, Alexis and Sekhon, Jasjeet S. 2013. Genetic Matching for Estimating Causal Effects: A General Multivariate Matching Method for Achieving Balance in Observational Studies. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 95, Issue. 3, p. 932.

    Nikolaev, Alexander G. Jacobson, Sheldon H. Cho, Wendy K. Tam Sauppe, Jason J. and Sewell, Edward C. 2013. Balance Optimization Subset Selection (BOSS): An Alternative Approach for Causal Inference with Observational Data. Operations Research, Vol. 61, Issue. 2, p. 398.

    Winters, Matthew S. Testa, Paul and Fredrickson, Mark M. 2012. New Advances in Experimental Research on Corruption.

    Matland, Richard E. and Tezcür, Güneş Murat 2011. Women as Candidates: An Experimental Study in Turkey. Politics & Gender, Vol. 7, Issue. 03, p. 365.

    Stevens, Daniel and Bishin, Benjamin G. 2011. Getting Out the Vote: Minority Mobilization in a Presidential Election. Political Behavior, Vol. 33, Issue. 1, p. 113.

    Krosnick, Jon A. Visser, Penny S. and Harder, Joshua 2010. Handbook of Social Psychology.

    Hansen, Ben B. and Bowers, Jake 2009. Attributing Effects to a Cluster-Randomized Get-Out-the-Vote Campaign. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 104, Issue. 487, p. 873.

    Imai, Kosuke 2009. Statistical analysis of randomized experiments with non-ignorable missing binary outcomes: an application to a voting experiment. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), Vol. 58, Issue. 1, p. 83.

    Ladd, Jonathan McDonald and Lenz, Gabriel S. 2009. Exploiting a Rare Communication Shift to Document the Persuasive Power of the News Media. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 53, Issue. 2, p. 394.

    Langbein, Laura 2009. Beyond random assignment for internal validity and beyond social research for random assignment. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 28, Issue. 1, p. 173.


Do Get-Out-the-Vote Calls Reduce Turnout? The Importance of Statistical Methods for Field Experiments

  • KOSUKE IMAI (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 May 2005

In their landmark study of a field experiment, Gerber and Green (2000) found that get-out-the-vote calls reduce turnout by five percentage points. In this article, I introduce statistical methods that can uncover discrepancies between experimental design and actual implementation. The application of this methodology shows that Gerber and Green's negative finding is caused by inadvertent deviations from their stated experimental protocol. The initial discovery led to revisions of the original data by the authors and retraction of the numerical results in their article. Analysis of their revised data, however, reveals new systematic patterns of implementation errors. Indeed, treatment assignments of the revised data appear to be even less randomized than before their corrections. To adjust for these problems, I employ a more appropriate statistical method and demonstrate that telephone canvassing increases turnout by five percentage points. This article demonstrates how statistical methods can find and correct complications of field experiments.

Corresponding author
Kosuke Imai is Assistant Professor, Department of Politics, Princeton University, Princeton NJ, 08544 (kimai@Princeton.Edu;
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *