Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Does Exposure to the Refugee Crisis Make Natives More Hostile?

  • DOMINIK HANGARTNER (a1), ELIAS DINAS (a2), MORITZ MARBACH (a3), KONSTANTINOS MATAKOS (a4) and DIMITRIOS XEFTERIS (a5)...

Abstract

Although Europe has experienced unprecedented numbers of refugee arrivals in recent years, there exists almost no causal evidence regarding the impact of the refugee crisis on natives’ attitudes, policy preferences, and political engagement. We exploit a natural experiment in the Aegean Sea, where Greek islands close to the Turkish coast experienced a sudden and massive increase in refugee arrivals, while similar islands slightly farther away did not. Leveraging a targeted survey of 2,070 island residents and distance to Turkey as an instrument, we find that direct exposure to refugee arrivals induces sizable and lasting increases in natives’ hostility toward refugees, immigrants, and Muslim minorities; support for restrictive asylum and immigration policies; and political engagement to effect such exclusionary policies. Since refugees only passed through these islands, our findings challenge both standard economic and cultural explanations of anti-immigrant sentiment and show that mere exposure suffices in generating lasting increases in hostility.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Does Exposure to the Refugee Crisis Make Natives More Hostile?
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Does Exposure to the Refugee Crisis Make Natives More Hostile?
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Does Exposure to the Refugee Crisis Make Natives More Hostile?
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.

Corresponding author

*Dominik Hangartner, Associate Professor, Center for Comparative and International Studies, ETH Zurich; Immigration Policy Lab, Stanford University and ETH Zurich; and Department of Government, London School of Economics, d.hangartner@lse.ac.uk.
Elias Dinas, Swiss Chair in Federalism, Democracy and International Governance, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies and Department of Social and Political Sciences, European University Institute; and Associate Professor, Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Oxford, elias.dinas@eui.eu.
Moritz Marbach, PostDoc, Center for Comparative and International Studies, ETH Zurich; and Immigration Policy Lab, Stanford University and ETH Zurich, moritz.marbach@gess.ethz.ch.
**Konstantinos Matakos, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Economy, King's College London, konstantinos.matakos@kcl.ac.uk.
††Dimitrios Xefteris, Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, University of Cyprus, xefteris.dimitrios@ucy.ac.cy.

Footnotes

Hide All

The survey was fielded by the Survey Unit of the University of Macedonia according to our sampling frame and in line with the ethics policy of the London School of Economics and Political Science for human subjects research. DH, ED, MM, KM, and DX conceived and designed the research; ED, DH, and KM designed the survey; ED, KM, MM, DX, and DH helped with data collection; MM and DH performed statistical analyses; and DH, MM, KM, and ED wrote the manuscript. We thank Alexandra Dufresne, Marc Helbling, Dan Hopkins, and David Laitin for detailed comments. This paper benefited from the questions and suggestions from numerous seminar and conference participants. The usual disclaimer applies. ED and KM acknowledge financial support from the British Academy for a Small Leverhulme Grant (project number CTR00340) and DH support from the Leverhulme Trust. Replication files are available at the American Political Science Review Dataverse: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/XGVQDT.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Allport, Gordon W. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Bansak, Kirk, Hainmueller, Jens, and Hangartner, Dominik. 2016. “How Economic, Humanitarian, and Religious Concerns Shape European Attitudes toward Asylum Seekers.” Science 354 (6309): 217–22.
Bansak, Kirk, Hainmueller, Jens, and Hangartner, Dominik. 2017. “Europeans Support a Proportional Allocation of Asylum Seekers.” Nature Human Behaviour 1 (7): 0133.
Barlow, Fiona Kate, Paolini, Stefania, Pedersen, Anne, Hornsey, Matthew J., Radke, Helena R. M., Harwood, Jake, Rubin, Mark, and Sibley, Chris G.. 2012. “The Contact Caveat: Negative Contact Predicts Increased Prejudice More than Positive Contact Predicts Reduced Prejudice.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38 (12): 1629–43.
Barlow, Fiona Kate, Louis, Winnifred R., and Hewstone, Miles. 2009. “Rejected! Cognitions of Rejection and Intergroup Anxiety as Mediators of the Impact of Cross-Group Friendships on Prejudice.” British Journal of Social Psychology 48 (3): 389405.
Berg, Justin Allen. 2009. “Core Networks and Whites? Attitudes toward Immigrants and Immigration Policy.” Public Opinion Quarterly 73 (1): 731.
Blalock, Hubert M. 1967. Toward a Theory of Minority-Group Relations. New York: Wiley.
Blumer, Herbert. 1958. “Race Prejudice as a Sense of Group Position.” Pacific Sociological Review 1 (1): 37.
Bobo, Lawrence. 1983. “Whites’ Opposition to Busing: Symbolic Racism or Realistic Group Conflict?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 (6): 1196–210.
Bobo, Lawrence, and Hutchings, Vincent L.. 1996. “Perceptions of Racial Group Competition: Extending Blumer’s Theory of Group Position to a Multiracial Social Context.” American Sociological Review 61 (6): 951–72.
Brader, Ted. 2006. Campaigning for Hearts and Minds: How Emotional Appeals in Political Ads Work. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Brader, Ted, Valentino, Nicholas A., and Suhay, Elizabeth. 2008. “What Triggers Public Opposition to Immigration? Anxiety, Group Cues, and Immigration Threat.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (4): 959–78.
Branton, Regina, Dillingham, Gavin, Dunaway, Johanna, and Miller, Beth. 2007. “Anglo Voting on Nativist Ballot Initiatives: The Partisan Impact of Spatial Proximity to the US-Mexico Border.” Social Science Quarterly 88 (3): 882–97.
Brown, Rupert. 2000. “Social Identity Theory: Past Achievements, Current Problems and Future Challenges.” European Journal of Social Psychology 30 (6): 745–78.
Cavaille, Charlotte and Ferwerda, Jeremy. 2018. “How Distributional Conflict over In-Kind Benefits Generates Support for Anti-Immigrant Parties.” Working Paper.
Chernozhukov, Victor, and Hansen, Christian. 2005. “An IV Model of Quantile Treatment Effects.” Econometrica 73 (1): 245–61.
Connor, Walker. 1994. Ethnonationalism: The Quest for Understanding. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Dinas, Elias, Matakos, Konstantinos, Xefteris, Dimitrios, and Hangartner, Dominik. Forthcoming. “Waking up the Golden Dawn: Does Exposure to the Refugee Crisis Increase Support for Extreme-Right Parties?Political Analysis.
Enos, Ryan D. 2014. “Causal Effect of Intergroup Contact on Exclusionary Attitudes.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (10): 3699–704.
Facchini, Giovanni, and Mayda, Anna Maria. 2009. “Does the Welfare State Affect Individual Attitudes toward Immigrants? Evidence across Countries.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 91 (2): 295314.
Feldman, Stanley, and Stenner, Karen. 1997. “Perceived Threat and Authoritarianism.” Political Psychology 18 (4): 741–70.
Finseraas, Henning, and Kotsadam, Andreas. 2017. “Does Personal Contact with Ethnic Minorities Affect Anti-Immigrant Sentiments? Evidence from a Field Experiment.” European Journal of Political Research 56 (3): 703–22.
Forbes, Hugh Donald. 1997. Ethnic Conflict: Commerce, Culture, and the Contact Hypothesis. New Haven Yale University Press.
Golder, Matt. 2003. “Explaining Variation in the Success of Extreme Right Parties in Western Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 36 (4): 432–66.
Gravelle, Timothy B. 2016. “Party Identification, Contact, Contexts, and Public Attitudes toward Illegal Immigration.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80 (1): 125.
Gravelle, Timothy B. 2018. “Partisanship, Local Context, Group Threat, and Canadian Attitudes towards Immigration and Refugee Policy.” Migration Studies 6 (3): 448–67.
Hainmueller, Jens, and Hopkins, Daniel J.. 2014. “Public Attitudes toward Immigration.” Annual Review of Political Science 17: 225–49.
Hainmueller, Jens, Hangartner, Dominik, and Pietrantuono, Giuseppe. 2017. “Catalyst or Crown: Does Naturalization Promote the Long-Term Social Integration of Immigrants?American Political Science Review 111 (2): 256–76.
Hardin, Russell. 1997. One for All: The Logic of Group Conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hetherington, Marc J., & Weiler, Jonathan D.. 2009. Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hopkins, Daniel J. 2010. “Politicized Places: Explaining Where and When Immigrants Provoke Local Opposition.” American Political Science Review 104 (1): 4060.
Ivarsflaten, Elisabeth. 2005. “Threatened by Diversity: Why Restrictive Asylum and Immigration Policies Appeal to Western Europeans.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 15 (1): 2145.
Kaufmann, Eric, and Harris, Gareth. 2015. “‘White Flight’ or Positive Contact? Local Diversity and Attitudes to Immigration in Britain.” Comparative Political Studies 48 (12): 1563–90.
Keeter, Scott, Hatley, Nick, Kennedy, Courtney, and Lau, Arnold. 2017. “What Low Response Rates Mean for Telephone Surveys.” Working Paper, Pew Research Center.
Marbach, Moritz, and Ropers, Guido. 2018. “Not in My Backyard: Do Increases in Immigration Cause Political Violence?” Working Paper.
Mayda, Anna Maria. 2006. “Who Is against Immigration? A Cross-Country Investigation of Individual Attitudes toward Immigrants.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 88 (3): 510–30.
McConnell, Allen R., and Leibold, Jill M.. 2001. “Relations Among the Implicit Association Test, Discriminatory Behavior, and Explicit Measures of Racial Attitudes.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 37 (5): 435–42.
McLaren, Lauren M. 2003. “Anti-Immigrant Prejudice in Europe: Contact, Threat Perception, and Preferences for the Exclusion of Migrants.” Social Forces 81 (3): 909–36.
Neumayer, Eric. 2005. “Bogus Refugees? The Determinants of Asylum Migration to Western Europe.” International Studies Quarterly 49 (3): 389409.
Olsson, Ulf. 1979. “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Polychoric Correlation Coefficient.” Psychometrika 44 (4): 443–60.
Paluck, Elizabeth Levy, and Green, Donald P.. 2009. “Prejudice Reduction: What Works? A Review and Assessment of Research and Practice.” Annual Review of Psychology 60: 339–67.
Paluck, Elizabeth L., Green, Seth A., and Green, Don. 2018. “The Contact Hypothesis Re-evaluated.” Behavioral Public Policy, Forthcoming.
Pettigrew, Thomas F. 1998. “Intergroup Contact Theory.” Annual Review of Psychology 49 (1): 6585.
Pettigrew, Thomas F., and Tropp, Linda R.. 2006. “A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90 (5): 751.
Pettigrew, Thomas F., and Tropp, Linda R.. 2008. “How Does Intergroup Contact Reduce Prejudice? Meta-Analytic Tests of Three Mediators.” European Journal of Social Psychology 38 (6): 922–34.
Putnam, Robert D. 2007. “E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-First Century the 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture.” Scandinavian Political Studies 30 (2): 137–74.
Ravenstein, Ernst Georg. 1885. “The Laws of Migration.” Journal of the Statistical Society of London 48 (2): 167235.
Revilla, Melanie A, Saris, Willem E., and Krosnick, Jon A.. 2014. “Choosing the Number of Categories in Agree–Disagree Scales.” Sociological Methods & Research 43 (1): 7397.
Salmon, Charles T., and Nichols, John Spicer. 1983. “The Next-Birthday Method of Respondent Selection.” Public Opinion Quarterly 47 (2): 270–6.
Scacco, Alexandra, and Warren, Shana S.. 2018. “Can Social Contact Reduce Prejudice and Discrimination? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Nigeria.” American Political Science Review 112 (3): 654–77.
Scheve, Kenneth F., and Slaughter, Matthew J.. 2001. “Labor Market Competition and Individual Preferences over Immigration Policy.” Review of Economics and Statistics 83 (1): 133–45.
Schlueter, Elmar, and Scheepers, Peer. 2010. “The Relationship between Outgroup Size and Anti-Outgroup Attitudes: A Theoretical Synthesis and Empirical Test of Group Threat -and Intergroup Contact Theory.” Social Science Research 39 (2): 285–95.
Sniderman, Paul M., Hagendoorn, Louk, and Prior, Markus. 2004. “Predisposing Factors and Situational Triggers: Exclusionary Reactions to Immigrant Minorities.” American Political Science Review 98 (1): 3549.
Steinmayr, Andreas. 2018. “Contact Matters: Exposure to Refugees and Voting for the Far-Right.” Working Paper.
Stenner, Karen. 2005. The Authoritarian Dynamic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stock, James H., and Yogo, Motohiro. 2002. “Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression.” Working Paper 284, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Sturgis, Patrick, Brunton-Smith, Ian, Kuha, Jouni, and Jackson, Jonathan. 2014. “Ethnic Diversity, Segregation and the Social Cohesion of Neighbourhoods in London.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 37 (8): 1286–309.
UNHCR. 2016. “Emergency Information Sharing Web Portal.” Available at http://data.unhcr.org/mediterranean/documents.php.
Van Laar, Colette, Levin, Shana, Sinclair, Stacey, and Sidanius, Jim. 2005. “The Effect of University Roommate Contact on Ethnic Attitudes and Behavior.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 41 (4): 329–45.
Vertier, Paul, and Viskanic, Max. 2018. “Dismantling the ‘Jungle’: Migrant Relocation and Extreme Voting in France.” CESifo Working Paper Series 6927, CESifo Group Munich.
Wike, Richard, Stokes, Bruce, and Simmons, Katie. 2016. “Europeans Fear Wave of Refugees Will Mean More Terrorism, Fewer Jobs.” In Pew Research Center, Available at: http://pewrsr.ch/29ziWV3.
Zorlu, Aslan. 2017. “Attitudes toward Asylum Seekers in Small Local Communities.” International Migration 55 (6): 1436.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Hangartner et al. supplementary material
Online Appendix

 PDF (323 KB)
323 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Hangartner et al. Dataset
Dataset

 Unknown

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed