Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

“Drawing the Line of Equality”: Hannah Mather Crocker on Women's Rights

  • EILEEN HUNT BOTTING (a1) and SARAH L. HOUSER (a1)
Abstract

Hannah Mather Crocker was the leading American political theorist between 1800 and 1820 to engage the controversial question of sex equality. In the wake of the postrevolutionary backlash against political radicalism, she became a subtle rhetorician of women's rights. She accepted how her cultural context placed limits on the realization of women's rights, yet she did not analytically conflate these temporal limits with women's capacities to contribute to their polity. She sought to normatively defend and gently extend American women's ongoing informal political participation in the postrevolutionary era and challenged the separate spheres discourse that aimed to restrict it. Through the first comprehensive study of Crocker's oeuvre, this article provides new insight into the political role and rhetorical style of women's rights discourse and women's activism in the early republic and uncovers Crocker's philosophical legacies for scholars who seek to reconcile the standpoints of equality and difference feminism.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Eileen Hunt Botting is Thomas J. and Robert T. Rolfs Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556 (ehunt@nd.edu).
Sarah L. Houser is a doctoral student, Department of Political Science, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556 (shouser@nd.edu).
References
Hide All
BakerPaula. 1984. “The Domestication of Politics: Women and American Political Society, 1780–1920.” The American Historical Review 89 (June): 62047.

BedermanGail. 1995. Manliness and Civilization: A Cultural History of Gender and Race in the United States, 1880–1917. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

BottingEileen Hunt, and CareyChristine. 2004. “Wollstonecraft's Philosophical Impact on Nineteenth-Century American Women's Rights Advocates.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (October): 70722.

BransonSusan. 2001. These Fiery Frenchified Dames: Women and Political Culture in Early National Philadelphia. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

BrownChandos. 1995. “Mary Wollstonecraft, or the Female Illuminati: The Campaign against Women and ‘Modern Philosophy’ in the Early Republic.” Journal of the Early Republic 15 (Fall): 389424.

CressLawrence. 1987. “‘Cool and Serious Reflection’: Federalist Attitudes towards War in 1812.” Journal of the Early Republic 7 (Summer): 12345.

KelleyMary. 2003. “‘A More Glorious Revolution’: Women's Antebellum Reading Circles and the Pursuit of Public Influence.” The New England Quarterly 76 (June): 16396.

UlrichLaurel. 1976. “Vertuous Women Found: New England Ministerial Literature, 1668–1735,” American Quarterly 28 (Spring): 2040.

WallaceJames D. 1990. “Hawthorne and the Scribbling Women Reconsidered.” American Literature 62 (June): 20122.

ZagarriRosemary. 1998. “The Rights of Man and Woman in Post-Revolutionary America.” The William and Mary Quarterly, Series 3, 55 (April): 20330.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 17
Total number of PDF views: 37 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 437 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.