Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Durkheim on Social Justice: The Argument from “Organic Solidarity”

  • LISA HERZOG (a1)
Abstract

This article reintroduces a long-forgotten argument into the debate about social justice: Durkheim's argument from “organic solidarity,” as presented in The Division of Labor in Society. “Organic solidarity” is solidarity based on differentiation. According to Durkheim, it grows out of the division of labor, but only if the latter happens “spontaneously.” Social inequality creates obstacles to such spontaneity because it distorts prices, such that they are perceived as unjust, and it undermines equality of opportunity. Hence, Durkheim's argument connects commutative justice and distributive justice. The article argues that Durkheim's argument is plausible, interesting, and relevant for today. After presenting the argument, discussing its structure and methodology, and evaluating its plausibility by drawing on related contemporary debates, it focuses on the problem of the perception of social justice and the possibility of ideological distortions. It concludes by sketching the research program that follows from Durkheim's argument.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Lisa Herzog is an Assistant Professor of Political Philosophy and Theory at the Technical University of Munich, School of Governance, Richard-Wagner-Straße 1, 80333 München, Germany (lisa.herzog@hfp.tum.de)
Footnotes
Hide All

I would like to thank Andrew Walton and Mark Reiff as well as the members of the research colloquium at the Centre Walras Pareto, Université de Lausanne, for comments on earlier drafts and very helpful discussions. The editors and three reviewers of the APSR have provided me with extremely helpful comments and suggestions, for which I am very grateful.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Arneson, Richard. 2015. “Equality of Opportunity”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/equal-opportunity/.
Bowring, Finn. 2016. “The Individual and Society in Durkheim: Unpicking the Contradictions.” European Journal of Social Theory 19 (1): 2138.
Chambers, Clare. 2009. “Each Outcome is Another Opportunity: Problems with the Moment of Equal Opportunity.” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 8 (4): 374400.
Cladis, Mark S. 1992. A Communitarian Defense of Liberalism: Emile Durkheim and Contemporary Social Theory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Cladis, Mark S. 2008. “Beyond Solidarity? Durkheim and Twenty-First Century Democracy in a Global Age.” In: The Cambridge Companion to Durkheim, eds. Jeffrey, C. Alexander and Philip Smith, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 383409.
Cohen, G.A. 2008. Rescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cotterrell, Roger. 2010. “Durkheim on Justice, Morals and Politics.” In Émile Durkheim: Justice, Morality and Politics, ed. Cotterrell, R., xi–xxiv. Farnham: Ashgate.
Cotterrell, Roger. 2011. “Justice, Dignity, Torture, Headscarves: Can Durkheim's Sociology Clarify Legal Values?Social & Legal Studies 20 (1): 320.
Cristi, Marcela. 2012. “Durkheim on Moral Individualism, Social Justice, and Rights: A Gendered Construction of Rights.” Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie 37 (4): 409–38.
Durkheim, Émile. 1933 [1893]. The Division of Labor in Society, translated by Simpson, George. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Durkheim, Émile. 1969 [1898]. “Durkheim's ‘Individualism and the Intellectuals’, introduced by Steven Lukes.” Political Studies XVII (1): 1430.
Dzur, Albert W. 2008. Democratic Professionalism: Citizen Participation and the Reconstruction of Professional Ethics. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Elegido, Juan Manuel. 2009. “The Just Price: Three Insights from the Salamanca School.” Journal of Business Ethics 90: 2946.
Elegido, Juan Manuel. 2015. “The Just Price as the Price Obtainable in an Open Market. “Journal of Business Ethics 130: 557–72.
Estlund, Cynthia. 2003. Working Together. How Workplace Bonds Strengthen a Diverse Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S., and Fehr, E.. 2001. “Are People Conditionally Cooperative? Evidence from a Public Goods Experiment.” Economics Letters 71 (3): 397404.
Fishkin, Joseph. 2014. Bottlenecks. A New Theory of Equal Opportunity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fleischacker, Samuel. 2004. A Short History of Distributive Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gelderblom, Derik. 2005. “The Just Community: Emile Durkheim on Liberalism and Society.” In Theories of Social and Economic Justice, ed. der Walt, Aj van. Stellenbosch: Sun Press, 108–27.
Geuss, Raymond. 2008. Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Giddens, Anthony. 1978. Durkheim. Hassocks: The Harvester Press Limited.
Giddens, Anthony, ed. 1986. Durkheim on Politics and the State. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Granovetter, Mark. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” The American Journal of Sociology 91 (3): 481510.
Heath, Joseph. 2009. “The Uses and Abuses of Agency Theory.” Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (4): 497528.
Herzog, Lisa, and Zacka, Bernardo. 2017. “Fieldwork in Political Theory. Five Arguments for an Ethnographic Sensibility.” British Journal of Political Science, first view.
Johnson, E. A. J. 1938. “Just Price in an Unjust World.” International Journal of Ethics 48 (2): 165–81.
Kahneman, Daniel, Knetsch, Jack L., and Thaler, Richard H.. 1986. “Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics.” Journal of Business 59 (4): 285300.
Koehn, Daryl, and Wilbratte, Barry. 2015. “A Defense of a Thomistic Concept of the Just Price.” Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (3): 501–26.
Kraus, Michael W., and Jacinth, J.X. Tan. 2015. “Americans overestimate social class mobility.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 58: 101--11.
Kunda, Gideon. 1996. Engineering Culture. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Lukes, Steven. 1985. Emile Durkheim: His Life and Work, a Historical and Critical Study. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Norton, Michael I., and Ariely, Dan. 2011. “Building a Better America – One Wealth Quintile at a Time.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 6 (1): 912.
Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Poggi, Gianfranco. 2000. Durkheim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pope, Whitney, and Johnson, Barclay D.. 1983. “Inside Organic Solidarity.” American Sociological Review 48 (5): 681–92.
Rawls, John. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Revised edition. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Rawls, John. 2003. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge/MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, Anne. 2003. “Conflict as a Foundation for Consensus: Contradictions of Industrial Capitalism in Book III of Durkheim's Division of Labor .” Critical Sociology 29 (3): 295335.
Reiff, Mark R. 2013. Exploitation and Economic Justice in the Liberal Capitalist State. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ronzoni, Miriam. 2008. “What Makes a Basic Structure Just?Res Publica 14: 203–18.
Ronzoni, Miriam. 2009. “The Global Order: A Case of Background Injustice? A Practice-Dependent Account.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 37 (3): 229–56.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1997. The Social Contract’ and Other Later Political Writings, ed. Gourevitch, Victor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sen, Amartya. 2006. “What Do We Want From A Theory Of Justice?The Journal of Philosophy 53 (5): 215–38.
Sherman, Rachel. 2007. Class Acts: Service and Inequality in Luxury Hotels. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Simmons, A. John. 2010. “Ideal and Nonideal Theory.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 38 (1), 536.
Sirianni, Carmen J. 1984. “Justice and the division of labour: a reconsideration of Durkheim's Division of Labour in Society .” The Sociological Review 32 (3): 449–70.
Stanley, Jason. 2015. How Propaganda Works. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Stedman Jones, Susan. 2001. Durkheim Reconsidered. Cambridge: Polity.
Stiglitz, Joseph. 2013. “Equal Opportunity, Our National Myth.” New York Times (February 16), https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/02/16/equal-opportunity-our-national-myth/.
Sullivan, William. M. 2005. Work and Integrity: the Crisis and Promise of Professionalism in America. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Tiryakian, Edward A. 2008. “Durkheim, solidarity, and September 11.” In The Cambridge Companion to Durkheim, eds. Alexander, Jeffrey C. and Smith, Philip. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 305–21.
Walton, Andrew, with Camia, Valeria. 2013. “Fraternal Society in Rawls’ Property-Owning Democracy.” Analyse & Kritik 01/2013: 163–86.
Wertheimer, Alan. 1996. Exploitation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wilkinson, Richard G., and Pickett, Kate. 2009. The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better. London: Allen Lane.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 80
Total number of PDF views: 459 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1773 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 7th November 2017 - 25th May 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.