Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Ethnoracial Homogeneity and Public Outcomes: The (Non)effects of Diversity

  • ALEXANDER KUSTOV (a1) and GIULIANA PARDELLI (a1)
Abstract

How does ethnoracial demography relate to public goods provision? Many studies find support for the hypothesis that diversity is related to inefficient outcomes by comparing diverse and homogeneous communities. We distinguish between homogeneity of dominant and disadvantaged groups and argue that it is often impossible to identify the effects of diversity due to its collinearity with the share of disadvantaged groups. To disentangle the effects of these variables, we study new data from Brazilian municipalities. While it is possible to interpret the prima facie negative correlation between diversity and public goods as supportive of the prominent “deficit” hypothesis, a closer analysis reveals that, in fact, more homogeneous Afro-descendant communities have lower provision. While we cannot rule out that diversity is consequential in other contexts, our results cast doubt on the reliability of previous findings related to the benefits of local ethnoracial homogeneity for public outcomes.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Alexander Kustov is a PhD Candidate, Department of Politics, Princeton University, 001 Fisher Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544 (akustov@princeton.edu).
Giuliana Pardelli is a PhD Candidate, Department of Politics, Princeton University, 001 Fisher Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544 (pardelli@princeton.edu).
Footnotes
Hide All

The authors’ names appear in alphabetical order. An earlier version of the paper was presented at the 2016 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. We would like to thank our colleagues, editors, and anonymous reviewers who have read and commented on previous drafts of this article. We are especially grateful to Samuel Diaz, Mark Kayser, and Ronald Inglehart for their helpful suggestions, and Joana Naritomi for kindly sharing her data with us. For their useful comments on the previous versions of our larger project on ethnic cleavages and public goods provision, we would also like to thank Rafaela Dancygier, Kosuke Imai, Tali Mendelberg, Grigore Pop-Eleches, Edward Telles, Andreas Wimmer, and Deborah Yashar. All errors and omissions are the sole responsibility of the authors. Replication files are available at the American Political Science Review Dataverse: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AY32JZ.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Abascal, Maria, and Baldassarri, Delia. 2015. “Love Thy Neighbor? Ethnoracial Diversity and Trust Reexamined.” American Journal of Sociology 121 (3): 722–82.
Alesina, Alberto, Baqir, Reza, and Easterly, William. 1999. “Public Goods and Ethnic Divisions.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (4): 1243–84.
Alesina, Alberto, Devleeschauwer, Arnaud, Easterly, William, Kurlat, Sergio, and Wacziarg, Romain. 2003. “Fractionalization.” Journal of Economic Growth 8 (2): 155–94.
Alesina, Alberto, and Glaeser, Edward. 2004. Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bailey, Stanley R. 2009. Legacies of Race: Identities, Attitudes, and Politics in Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bailey, Stanley R., Loveman, Mara, and Muniz, Jeronimo O.. 2013. “Measures of ‘Race’ and the Analysis of Racial Inequality in Brazil.” Social Science Research 42 (1): 106–19.
Baldwin, Kate, and Huber, John D.. 2010. “Economic versus Cultural Differences: Forms of Ethnic Diversity and Public Goods Provision.” American Political Science Review 104 (04): 644–62.
Bertocchi, Graziella. 2016. “The Legacies of Slavery in and out of Africa.” IZA Journal of Migration 5 (24): 119.
Bethell, Leslie, ed. 1984. The Cambridge History of Latin America, Vol. 2: Colonial Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gisselquist, Rachel M. 2014. “Ethnic Divisions and Public Goods Provision, Revisited.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 37 (9): 1605–27.
Guimarães, Antonio Sérgio Alfredo. 2004. Preconceito e Discriminação: Queixas de Ofensas e Tratamento Desigual dos Negros no Brasil. São Paulo: Editora 34.
Habyarimana, James, Humphreys, Macartan, Posner, Daniel N., and Weinstein, Jeremy M.. 2007. “Why Does Ethnic Diversity Undermine Public Goods Provision?American Political Science Review 101 (4): 709–25.
Horowitz, Donald L. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kustov, Alexander. 2017. “How Ethnic Structure Affects Civil Conflict: A Model of Endogenous Grievance.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 34 (6): 660–79.
La Porta, Rafael, Silanes, Florencio Lopez-de, Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert. 1999. “The Quality of Government.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 15 (1): 222–79.
Lieberman, Evan S. 2003. Race and Regionalism in the Politics of Taxation in Brazil and South Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lieberman, Evan S., and Singh, Prerna. 2012. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Ethnic Politics: An Institutional Complement to Demographic, Behavioral, and Cognitive Approaches.” Studies in Comparative International Development 47 (3): 255–86.
Morten, Melanie, and Oliveira, Jaqueline. 2016. “Paving the Way to Development: Costly Migration and Labor Market Integration.” NBER Working Paper 22158.
Naritomi, Joana, Soares, Rodrigo R., and Assunção, Juliano J.. 2012. “Institutional Development and Colonial Heritage within Brazil.” The Journal of Economic History 72 (2): 393422.
Rushton, Michael. 2008. “A Note on the Use and Misuse of the Racial Diversity Index.” Policy Studies Journal 36 (3): 445–59.
Schaeffer, Merlin. 2013. “Can Competing Diversity Indices Inform Us about why Ethnic Diversity Erodes Social Cohesion? A Test of Five Diversity Indices in Germany.” Social Science Research 42 (3): 755–74.
Selway, Joel Sawat. 2011. “The Measurement of Cross-Cutting Cleavages and Other Multidimensional Cleavage Structures.” Political Analysis 19 (1): 4865.
Sidanius, Jim, and Pratto, Felicia. 2001. Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Singh, Prerna. 2015. “Subnationalism and Social Development: A Comparative Analysis of Indian States.” World Politics 67 (3): 506–562.
Singh, Prerna, and Hau, Matthias vom. 2016. “Ethnicity in Time: Politics, History, and the Relationship between Ethnic Diversity and Public Goods Provision.” Comparative Political Studies 49 (10): 1303−40.
Soifer, Hillel David. 2016. “Regionalism, Ethnic Diversity, and Variation in Public Good Provision by National States.” Comparative Political Studies 49 (10): 1341–71.
Stewart, Frances. 2005. “Horizontal Inequalities: A Neglected Dimension of Development.” In Wider Perspectives on Global Development, ed. UNU-WIDER. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 101–35.
Stichnoth, Holger, and Van der Straeten, Karine. 2013. “Ethnic Diversity, Public Spending, and Individual Support for the Welfare State: A Review of the Empirical Literature.” Journal of Economic Surveys 27 (2): 364–89.
Telles, Edward E. 1996. “Identidade Racial, Contexto Urbano e Mobilização Política.” Afro-Ásia 17: 121–38.
Telles, Edward E. 2006. Race in Another America: The Significance of Skin Color in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tilly, Charles. 1999. Durable Inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Vigdor, Jacob L. 2002. “Interpreting Ethnic Fragmentation Effects.” Economics Letters 75: 271–6.
Wimmer, Andreas. 2016. “Is Diversity Detrimental? Ethnic Fractionalization, Public Goods Provision, and the Historical Legacies of Stateness.” Comparative Political Studies 49 (11): 1407–45.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Kustov and Pardelli Dataset
Dataset

 Unknown
PDF
Supplementary materials

Kustov and Pardelli supplementary material
Online Appendix

 PDF (188 KB)
188 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed