Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-w5vf4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-06T16:47:22.282Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explaining Government Growth in the U.S. States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

James C. Garand
James C. Garand*
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite the explosive increase in the research program on government growth in recent years, little work has been done on government growth disaggregated to the subnational level. I examine the empirical validity of five competing models of government growth for the fifty U.S. states from 1945 to 1984: Wagner's Law, fiscal illusion, party control, bureau voting, and intergovernmental grant. Government size is defined in terms of state government spending as a proportion of total state economic output, with separate implicit price deflators being employed for the public and private sectors. Based on a longitudinal test of these competing models, the analysis uncovers strong empirical support for the bureau voting and intergovernmental grant models, moderately weak support for the Wagner's Law model, and virtually no support for the fiscal illusion and party control explanations. These findings have important implications for the study of government growth in general and, more specifically, in the states.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 82 , Issue 3 , September 1988 , pp. 837 - 849
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1988 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Beck, Morris. 1976. The Expanding Public Sector: Some Contrary Evidence. National Tax Journal 29:15–21.Google Scholar
Berry, William, and Lowery, David. 1984a. The Measurement of Government Size: Implications for the Study of Government Growth, Journal of Politics 46:1103–1206.Google Scholar
Berry, William, and Lowery, David. 1984b. The Growing Cost of Government: A Test of Two Explanations. Social Science Quarterly 65: 735–49.Google Scholar
Borcherding, Thomas E. 1977. The Sources of Growth of Public Expenditures in the United States, 1902–1970. In Budgets and Bureaucrats, ed. author. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Bush, Winston C. and Denzau, Arthur. 1977. The Voting Behavior of Bureaucrats and Public Sector Growth. In Budgets and Bureaucrats: The Sources of Government Growth, ed. Borcherding, Thomas E.. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, David. 1978. The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis, American Political Science Review 72:1243–61.Google Scholar
Courant, Paul, Gramlish, Edward, and Rubinfield, Daniel. 1980. Why Voters Support Tax Limitation Amendments: The Michigan Case. National Tax Journal 33:1–20.Google Scholar
Dawson, Richard, and Robinson, James. 1963. Interparty Competition, Economic Variables, and Welfare Politics in the American States. Journal of Politics 35:264–89.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Enrick, Norbert. 1964. A Further Study of Income Tax Consciousness. National Tax Journal 17: 57–74.Google Scholar
Garand, James C. 1985. Partisan Change and Shifting Expenditure Priorities in the American States, 1945–1978. American Politics Quarterly 13:355–92.Google Scholar
Garand, James C. 1987. Government Growth in the American States: Decomposing Real Growth and Deflator Effects. Louisiana State University. Typescript.Google Scholar
Goetz, Charles. 1977. Fiscal Illusion in State and Local Finance. In Budgets and Bureaucrats, ed. Borcherding, Thomas E.. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Hibbs, Douglas. 1974. Problems of Statistical Estimation and Causal Inference in Time Series Regression Models. In Sociological Methodology 1973–1974, ed. Cortner, Herbert L.. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Kau, James, and Rubin, Paul. 1981. The Size of Government. Public Choice 2:261–74.Google Scholar
Larkey, Patrick, Stolp, C., and Winer, Mark. 1981. Theorizing about the Growth of Government: A Research Assessment. Journal of Public Policy 1: 157–220.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael, and Rice, Tom. 1985. Government Growth in the United States. Journal of Politics 47:2–30.Google Scholar
Lowery, David, and Berry, William. 1983. The Growth of Government in the United States: An Empirical Assessment of Competing Explanations. American Journal of Political Science 27: 665–94.Google Scholar
Lowery, David, Konda, Thomas, and Garand, James C.. 1984. Spending in the States: A Test of Six Models. Western Political Quarterly 37: 48–66.Google Scholar
Mann, Arthur. 1980. Wagner's Law: An Econometric Test for Mexico, 1925–1976. National Tax Journal 33:189–201.Google Scholar
Niskanen, William. 1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Charles. 1978. Time Series Analysis: Regression Techniques. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Peacock, Alan, and Wiseman, Jack. 1967. The Growth of Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tarschys, Daniel. 1975. The Growth of Public Expenditures: Nine Modes of Explanation. Scandinavian Political Studies 1:9–31.Google Scholar
Wagner, Adolf. 1877. Finanzwissenschaft. Leipzig: C. F. Winter.Google Scholar
Wagner, Richard. 1976. Revenue Structure, Fiscal Illusion, and Budgetary Choice. Public Choice 25:45–61.Google Scholar
Winters, Richard. 1976. Party Control and Policy Change. American Journal of Political Science 20:596–636.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.