Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-15T15:24:43.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender, Education, and Enlightened Politics in Plato’s Laws

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2020

LINDA R. RABIEH Open the ORCID record for LINDA R. RABIEH [Opens in a new window]
LINDA R. RABIEH*
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
*
Linda R. Rabieh, Lecturer, Department of Political Science and Concourse Program, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, lrabieh@mit.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Plato’s treatments of women are perplexing because they seem to justify both gender equality and female subordination. Faced with evidence of both, scholars typically ask whether Plato promotes gender equality or patriarchy rather than what a particular treatment of women means in the dialogue to which it belongs. This article seeks to clarify Plato’s treatment of women by focusing on women’s education in the Laws and analyzing it in the context of his Athenian Stranger’s attempt at rational political reform. It argues that in exploring the differences between men and women, Plato shows them to be ones of degree rather than kind and identifies a common human weakness shared by both genders that is the greatest obstacle to his reform. This approach reveals a profound examination of a human problem and an instructive account of the challenges that accompany the quest for gender equality.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 114 , Issue 3 , August 2020 , pp. 911 - 922
Copyright
© American Political Science Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am indebted first of all to Thomas L. Pangle for introducing me many years ago to the rich labyrinth of the Laws and for his probing questions ever since as I have tried to make sense of it. I am also deeply grateful to Robert C. Bartlett, Anna Schmidt Mansfield, and Amy Bonnette Nendza for their incisive comments and generous suggestions on various drafts as well as for the many conversations I have had with them and other friends on the topics discussed here. I would also like to thank the students in my Fall 2018 seminar on the Laws at MIT, especially Sasha Rickard and Christopher Sanfilippo, who offered numerous helpful comments on the version of this paper that emerged from that seminar. Finally, I would like to thank Dr. Leigh Jenco and the three anonymous reviewers who read the essay with extraordinary care and whose numerous and exceedingly thoughtful questions and suggestions led me to improve it in many ways.

References

Annas, Julia. 1981. An Introduction to Plato’s Republic. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Bloom, Allan. 1991. The Republic of Plato. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bobonich, Christopher. 2002. Plato’s Utopia Recast. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 1988. Manhood and Politics: A Feminist Reading in Political Theory. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Bruell, Christopher. 1994. “On Plato’s Political Philosophy,” Review of Politics 56: 261–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, Drucilla. 1995. The Imaginary Domain: Abortion, Pornography, and Sexual Harassment. New York and London: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Crouch, Margaret A. 2001. Thinking about Sexual Harassment: A Guide for the Perplexed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elsesser, Kim. 2019. “The Latest Consequences of #MeToo: Not Hiring Women.” Forbes, September 5. Available from https://www.forbes.com/sites/kimelsesser/2019/09/05/the-latest-consequence-of-metoo-not-hiring-women/.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1981. Public Man Private Woman. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
England, Edwin B., ed. 1921. The Laws of Plato. Manchester, UK: The University Press.Google Scholar
Farley, Lin. 1978. Sexual Shakedown: The Sexual Harassment of Women on the Job. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Forde, Steven. 1997. “Gender and Justice in Plato.” The American Political Science Review 92 (3): 657–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedersdorf, Conor. 2015. “How Sexual Harassment Policies are Diminishing Academic Freedom.” The Atlantic, October 20. Available from https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/10/sexual-harassment-academic-freedom/411427/.Google Scholar
Kipnis, Laura. 2015. “Sexual Paranoia.” Chronicle of Higher Education 61 (25): B6–10.Google Scholar
Kochin, Michael S. 2002. Gender and Rhetoric in Plato’s Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lange, Lynda. 1979. “The Function of Equal Education in Plato’s Republic and Laws.” In The Sexism of Social and Political Theory: Women and Reproduction from Plato to Nietzsche. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 3–15.Google Scholar
Levin, Susan B. 2000. “Plato on Women’s Nature: Reflections on the Laws.” Ancient Philosophy 20: 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, Mark J. 2015. Divine Law and Political Philosophy in Plato’s Laws. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catherine A. 1979. The Sexual Harassment of Working Women: A Case of Sex Discrimination. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catherine A. 2019. Butterfly Politics: Changing the World for Women. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1988. The Subjection of Women, ed. Okin, Susan M.. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Miller, Claire Cain. 2017. “It’s Not Just Mike Pence. Americans Are Wary of Being Alone with the Opposite Sex.” New York Times, July 1. Available from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/01/upshot/members-of-the-opposite-sex-at-work-gender-study.html.Google Scholar
Morrow, Glenn R. 1993. Plato’s Cretan City: A Historical Interpretation of the Laws. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1979. Women in Western Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pangle, Lorraine Smith. 2003. Aristotle and the Philosophy of Friendship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Plato, . 1980. The Laws of Plato, trans. Pangle, Thomas L.. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, Sarah B. 1975. Goddesses, Whores, Wives and Slaves: Women in Classical Antiquity. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Rhode, Deborah L. 2019. “Why #MeToo? What Next?” Duke Law Journal 69: 377–427.Google Scholar
Roochnik, David. 2013. “The ‘Serious Play’ of Book 7 of Plato’s Laws.” In Plato’s Laws: Force and Truth in Politics, eds. Recco, Gregory and Sanday, Eric. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 144–53.Google Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia. 2018. “Sexual Harassment: Performances of Gender, Sexuality, and Power. Perspectives on Politics 16 (4): 1053–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, T. J. 1995. “Plato on Women in the Laws.” In The Greek World, ed. Powell, Anton. Loudon: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 591–609.Google Scholar
Saxonhouse, Arlene. 1984. “Eros and the Female.” Political Theory 12 (1): 5–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxonhouse, Arlene. 1994. “The Philosopher and the Female in the Political Thought of Plato.” In Feminist Interpretations of Plato. University Park, PA: Penn State Press, 67–86.Google Scholar
Schultz, Virginia. 1998. “Reconceptualizing Sexual Harassment.” The Yale Law Journal 107: 1683–1805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, Virginia. 2018. “Reconceptualizing Sexual Harassment Again.” The Yale Law Journal 128. Available from https://www.yalelawjournal.org/forum/reconceptualizing-sexual-harassment-again.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinkler, Justine E. 2012. “Resisting the Enforcement of Sexual Harassment Law.” Law and Social Inquiry 37 (1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuana, Nancy, ed. 1994. Feminist Interpretations of Plato. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
Tolentino, Jia. 2017. “Mike Pence’s Marriage and the Beliefs that Keep Women from Power.” The New Yorker, March 31. Available at https://www.newyorker.com/culture/jia-tolentino/mike-pences-marriage-and-the-beliefs-that-keep-women-from-power.Google Scholar
Gregory, Vlastos. 1994. “Was Plato a Feminist?” In Feminist Interpretations of Plato. University Park, PA: Penn State Press, 11–24.Google Scholar
Volokh, Eugene. 1995. “How Harassment Law Restricts Free Speech.” Rutgers Law Review 47: 563–78.Google Scholar
Wender, Dorothea. 1973. “Plato: Misogynist, Paedophile, Feminist,” Arethusa 6 (1): 75–90.Google Scholar
Zarya, Valentina. 2018. “Since #MeToo the Number of Men Uncomfortable Mentoring Women Has Tripled.” Fortune, February 6. Available from http://fortune.com/2018/02/06/lean-in-sheryl-sandberg/.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Catherine H. 2009. Plato’s Philosophers: The Coherence of the Dialogues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar