Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Gender Inequality in Deliberative Participation

  • CHRISTOPHER F. KARPOWITZ (a1), TALI MENDELBERG (a2) and LEE SHAKER (a3)
Abstract

Can men and women have equal levels of voice and authority in deliberation or does deliberation exacerbate gender inequality? Does increasing women's descriptive representation in deliberation increase their voice and authority? We answer these questions and move beyond the debate by hypothesizing that the group's gender composition interacts with its decision rule to exacerbate or erase the inequalities. We test this hypothesis and various alternatives, using experimental data with many groups and links between individuals’ attitudes and speech. We find a substantial gender gap in voice and authority, but as hypothesized, it disappears under unanimous rule and few women, or under majority rule and many women. Deliberative design can avoid inequality by fitting institutional procedure to the social context of the situation.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Christopher F. Karpowitz is Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Brigham Young University, P.O. Box 25545, Provo, UT 84602 (ckarpowitz@byu.edu).
Tali Mendelberg is Associate Professor, Department of Politics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 (talim@princeton.edu).
Lee Shaker is Assistant Professor, Department of Communication, Portland State University, P.O. Box 751, Mailstop COMM, Portland, OR 97201 (lshaker@pdx.edu).
References
Hide All
Aries, Elizabeth. 1976. “Interaction Patterns and Themes of Male, Female, and Mixed Groups.” Small Group Behavior 7: 718.
Aries, Elizabeth. 1998. “Gender Differences in Interaction: A Reexamination.” In Sex Differences and Similarities in Communication: Critical Essays and Empirical Investigations of Sex and Gender in Interaction, eds. Canary, Daniel J. and Dindia, Kathryn. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2136.
Baron, Reuben M., and Kenny, David A.. 1986. “Moderator-Mediator Variables Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6): 1173–82.
Bouas, Kelly S., and Komorita, S. S.. 1996. “Group Discussion and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22: 1144–50.
Bowers, William J., Steiner, Benjamin D., and Sandys, Marla. 2001. “Death Sentencing in Black and White: An Empirical Analysis of Jurors’ Race and Jury Racial Composition.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 3: 171275.
Burns, Nancy, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Verba, Sidney. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Political Participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bryan, Frank M. 2004. Real Democracy: The New England Town Meeting and How it Works. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Carlock, C. Jesse, and Martin, Patricia Y.. 1977. “Sex Composition and the Intensive Group Experience.” Social Work 22: 2732.
Carroll, Susan J., ed. 2001. The Impact of Women in Public Office. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Chambers, Simone. 1996. Reasonable Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Chatman, Jennifer A., and O'Reilly, Charles A.. 2004. “Asymmetric Reactions to Work Group Sex Diversity among Men and Women.” Academy of Management Journal 47: 193208.
Choi, Seung-Whan. 2009. “The Effect of Outliers on Regression Analysis: Regime Type and Foreign Direct Investment.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 4: 153–65.
Cohen, Joshua. l989. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy.” In The Good Polity, eds. Hamlin, Alan P. and Pettit, Phillip. Oxford: Blackwell, 1734
Craig, Jane M., and Sherif, Carolyn W.. 1986. “The Effectiveness of Men and Women in Problem-solving Groups as a Function of Gender Composition.” Sex Roles 14 (7/8): 453–66.
Cramer Walsh, Katherine. 2007. Talking about Race: Community Dialogues and the Politics of Difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Croson, Rachel, and Gneezy, Uri. 2009. “Gender Differences in Preferences.” Journal of Economic Literature 47 (2): 448–74.
Crowder-Meyer, Melody. 2007. “Gender Differences in Policy Preferences and Priorities.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago. http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p196573_index.html (accessed May 19, 2011).
Crowder-Meyer, Melody. 2010. “Local Parties, Local Candidates, and Women's Representation: How County Parties Affect Who Runs for and Wins Political Office.” Ph.D. diss. Princeton University.
Devine, Dennis J., Clayton, Laura, Dunford, Benjamin B., Seying, Rasmy, and Price, Jennifer. 2001. “Jury Decision Making: 45 Years of Empirical Research on Deliberating Groups.” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 73 (3): 622727.
Dindia, Kathryn, and Allen, Mike. 1992. “Sex Differences in Self-disclosure: A Meta-analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 112: 106–24.
Eagly, Alice H. 1987. Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ellis, Donald G. 1982. “Relational Stability and Change in Women's Consciousness-raising Groups.” Women's Studies in Communication 5: 7787.
Esterling, Kevin M., Fung, Archon, and Lee, Taeku. 2009. “How Much Disagreement is Good for Democratic Deliberation? The California Speaks Health Care Reform Experiment.” Presented at the Annual West Coast Experimental Political Science Conference, Del Mar, CA.
Fishkin, James S. 1995. The Voice of the People. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Fishkin, James S., He, Baogang, Luskin, Robert C., and Siu, Alice. 2010. “Deliberative Democracy in an Unlikely Place: Deliberative Polling in China.” British Journal of Political Science 40: 435–48.
Fiske, Susan T. 2010. “Venus and Mars, or Down to Earth: Stereotypes and Realities of Gender Differences.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 5 (6): 688–92
Fraser, Nancy. 1992. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” In Habermas and the Public Sphere, ed. Calhoun, Craig. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 109–42.
Frohlich, Norman, and Oppenheimer, Joe. 1990. “Choosing Justice in Experimental Democracies with Production.” American Political Science Review 84 (2): 461–77.
Frohlich, Norman, and Oppenheimer, Joe. 1992. Choosing Justice: An Experimental Approach to Ethical Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Frohlich, Norman, Oppenheimer, Joe, and Eavy, Cheryl, 1987. “Laboratory Results on Rawls's Distributive Justice.” British Journal of Political Science 17: 121.
Fung, Archon. 2003. “Deliberation Where You Least Expect It: Citizen Participation in Government.” Connections (Fall): 30–33.
Fung, Archon. 2007. “Democratic Theory and Political Science: A Pragmatic Method of Constructive Engagement.” American Political Science Review 101: 443–58.
Gastil, John, Deess, E. Pierre, Weiser, Phil, and Meade, Jordan. 2008. “Jury Service and Electoral Participation: A Test of the Participation Hypothesis.” Journal of Politics 70: 116.
Giles, Howard, Mulac, Anthony, Bradac, James J., and Johnson, Patricia. 1987. “Speech Accommodation Theory: The First Decade and Beyond.” Communication Yearbook 10: 1348.
Grunenfelder, Rita, and Baechtiger, Andre. 2007. “Gendered Deliberation? How Men and Women Deliberate in Legislatures.” Presented at the European Consortium for Political Research Joint Sessions, Helsinki.
Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of The Public Sphere: An Inquiry Into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Trans. Burger, T. with the assistance of Lawrence, F.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hannagan, Rebecca J., and Larimer, Christopher. 2011. “Out-group Threat and Gender Balance in Policymaking Groups.” Presented at the 2nd European Conference on Politics and Gender, Budapest.
Hansen, Susan B. 1997. “Talking about Politics: Gender and Contextual Effects on Political Proselytizing.” Journal of Politics 59: 73103.
Hastie, Reid, Penrod, Steven D., and Pennington, Nancy. 1983. Inside the Jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hickerson, Andrea, and Gastil, John. 2008. “Assessing the Difference Critique of Deliberation: Gender, Emotion, and the Jury Experience.” Communication Theory 18: 281303.
Huckfeldt, Robert, and Sprague, John. 1995. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Humphreys, Macartan, Masters, William A., and Sandbu, Martin E.. 2006. “Democratic Deliberations: Results from a Field Experiment in São Tomé and Príncipe.” World Politics 58: 583622.
Imai, Kosuke, Keele, Luke, and Tingley, Dustin. 2010. “A General Approach to Causal Mediation Analysis.” Psychological Methods 15 (4): 309–34.
Jacobs, Lawrence R., Cook, Fay L., and Delli Carpini, Michael X.. 2009. Talking Together: Public Deliberation and Political Participation in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Johnson, Cathryn. 1994. “Gender, Legitimate Authority, and Leader-Subordinate Conversations.” American Sociological Review 59: 122–35.
Johnson, Richard A., and Schulman, Gary I.. 1989. “Gender-role Composition and Role Entrapment in Decision-making Groups.” Gender and Society 3: 355–72.
Kameda, Tatsuya 1991. “Procedural Influence in Small-group Decision Making: Deliberation Style and Assigned Decision Rule.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61: 245–56.
Kanter, Rosabeth M. 1977a. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic.
Kanter, Rosabeth M. 1977b. Work and Family in the United States: A Critical Review and Policy Agenda. Frontiers of Social Science Series. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Kaplan, Martin F., and Miller, Charles E.. 1987. “Group Decision-making and Normative versus Informational Influence: Effects of Type of Issue and Assigned Decision Rule.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53: 306–13.
Karpowitz, Christopher F., Raphael, Chad, and Hammond IV, Allen S.. 2009. “Deliberative Democracy and Inequality: Two Cheers for Enclave Deliberation among the Disempowered.” Politics and Society 37: 576615.
Kathlene, Lyn. 1994. “Power and Influence in State Legislatures: The Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing Debates.” American Political Science Review 88: 560–76.
Krook, Mona L. 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Macedo, Stephen, Alex-Assensoh, Yvette, Berry, Jeffrey M., Brintnall, Michael, Campbell, David E., Fraga, Luis Ricardo, Fung, Archon, et al. 2005. Democracy at Risk: How Political Choices Undermine Citizen Participation, and What We Can Do about It. Washington, DC: Brookings Press.
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1983. Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’Journal of Politics 61: 628–57.
Mansbridge, Jane J., Hartz-Karp, Janette, Amengual, Matthew, and Gastil, John. 2006. “Norms of Deliberation: An Inductive Study.” Journal of Public Deliberation 2 (1): 7293.
Massie, Tajuana, Johnson, Susan W., and Gubala, Sara M.. 2002. “The Influence of Gender and Race on Judicial Decisions in the United States Courts of Appeals.” Presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Meeting, Chicago.
Mathis, Jerome. 2011. “Deliberation with Evidence.” American Political Science Review 105: 516–29.
Maltz, Daniel, and Borker, Ruth. 1982. “A Cultural Approach to Male-Female Miscommunication.” In Language and Social Identity, ed. Gumperz, John. New York: Cambridge University Press, 281312.
McCarrick, Anne K., Manderscheid, Ronald W., and Silbergeld, Sam. 1981. “Gender Differences in Competition and Dominance during Married-couples Group Therapy.” Social Psychology Quarterly 44: 164–77.
McDermott, Rose. 2011. “Internal and External Validity.” In Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, eds. Druckman, James N., Green, Donald P., Kuklinski, James H., and Lupia, Arthur. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2740.
Mendelberg, Tali. 2002. “The Deliberative Citizen: Theory and Evidence.” In Political Decision-making, Deliberation, and Participation, ed. Delli Carpini, Michael X.. San Diego: Elsevier Science, 151–93.
Mendelberg, Tali, and Karpowitz, Christopher F.. 2007. “Deliberating about Justice.” In Deliberation, Participation, and Democracy: Can the People Govern?, ed. Rosenberg, Shawn. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 101–29.
Merelman, Richard M., Streich, Greg, and Martin, Paul. 1998. “Unity and Diversity in American Political Culture: An Exploratory Study of the National Conversation on American Pluralism and Identity.” Political Psychology 19: 781807.
Miller, Judi B. 1985. “Patterns of Control in Same-sex Conversations: Differences between Women and Men.” Women's Studies in Communication 8: 6299.
Morton, Rebecca M., and Williams, Kenneth C.. 2010. Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Moscovici, Serge. 1980. “Toward a Theory of Conversion Behavior.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 13: 209–39.
Moscovici, Serge. 1985. “Innovation and Minority Influence.” In The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2, eds. Lindzey, G. and Aronson, E.. New York: Random House, 347412.
Neblo, Michael A., Esterling, Kevin M., Kennedy, Ryan P., Lazer, David M.J., and Sokhey, Anand E.. 2010. “Who Wants to Deliberate—and Why?American Political Science Review 104: 566–83.
Nemeth, Charlan J. 1977. “Interactions between Jurors as a Function of Majority vs. Unanimity Decision Rules.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 7: 3856.
Pateman, Carole. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Piliavin, Jane A., and Martin, Rachel R.. 1978. “The Effects of the Sex Composition of Groups on Style of Social Interaction.” Sex Roles 4: 281–96.
Rapoport, Ronald B. 1981. “The Sex Gap in Political Persuading: Where the ‘Structured Principle’ Works.” American Journal of Political Science 25 (1): 3248.
Reskin, Barbara F., McBrier, Debra B., and Kmec, Julie A.. 1999. “The Determinants and Consequences of Workplace Sex and Race Composition.” Annual Review of Sociology 25: 335–61.
Ridgeway, Cecilia L. 1982. “Status in Groups: The Importance of Motivation.” American Sociological Review 47: 7688.
Ridgeway, Cecilia L., and Smith-Lovin, Lynn. 1999. “The Gender System and Interaction.” Annual Review of Sociology 25: 191216.
Rosenberg, Shawn. 2007. “Rethinking Democratic Deliberation: The Limits and Potential of Citizen Participation.” Polity 39: 335–60.
Ryfe, David M. 2005. “Does Deliberative Democracy Work?Annual Review of Political Science 8: 4971.
Sanders, Lynn. 1997. “Against Deliberation.” Political Theory 25 (3): 347–76.
Sapiro, Virginia. 2003. “Theorizing Gender in Political Psychology Research.” In Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, eds. Sears, David O., Huddy, Leonie, and Jervis, Robert. New York: Oxford University Press, 601–36.
Shapiro, Robert Y., and Mahajan, Harpreet. 1986. “Gender Differences in Policy Preferences: A Summary of Trends from the 1960s to the 1980s.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50 (1): 4246.
Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Smith-Lovin, Lynn, and Brody, Charles. 1989. “Interruptions in Group Discussions: The Effects of Gender and Group Composition.” American Sociological Review 54: 424–35.
Strodtbeck, Fred L., James, Rita M., and Hawkins, Charles. 1957. “Social Status in Jury Deliberations.” American Sociological Review 22: 713–19.
Sunstein, Cass. 2002. Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do. London: Oxford University Press.
Tannen, Deborah. 1990. You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: Ballantine Books.
Thompson, Dennis F. 2008. “Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 11:497520.
van Knippenberg, Daan, and Schippers, Michaela C.. 2007. “Work Group Diversity.” Annual Review of Psychology 58: 515–41.
Williams, Melissa S. 2000. “The Uneasy Alliance of Group Representation in Deliberative Democracy.” In Citizenship in Diverse Societies, eds. Kymlicka, Will and Norman, Wayne. London: Oxford University Press, 124–54.
Young, Iris M. 1996. “Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy.” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of The Political, ed. Benhabib, Seyla. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 120–36
Young, Iris M. 2001. “Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy.” Political Theory 29: 670–90.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Karpowitz et al. supplementary material
Appendix

 PDF (2.4 MB)
2.4 MB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 162
Total number of PDF views: 762 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 4942 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th April 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.