Baccaro, Lucio Bächtiger, André and Deville, Marion 2016. Small Differences that Matter: The Impact of Discussion Modalities on Deliberative Outcomes. British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 46, Issue. 03, p. 551.
Button, Mark E and Garrett, Jacob 2016. Impartiality in Political Judgment: Deliberative Not Philosophical. Political Studies, Vol. 64, Issue. 1_suppl, p. 35.
Cameron, Deborah and Shaw, Sylvia 2016. Gender, Power and Political Speech.
Carlson, Taylor N. and Settle, Jaime E. 2016. Political Chameleons: An Exploration of Conformity in Political Discussions. Political Behavior, Vol. 38, Issue. 4, p. 817.
Dowding, Keith 2016. Emotional appeals in politics and deliberation. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, p. 1.
Gerber, Marlène Bächtiger, André Shikano, Susumu Reber, Simon and Rohr, Samuel 2016. Deliberative Abilities and Influence in a Transnational Deliberative Poll (EuroPolis). British Journal of Political Science, p. 1.
Hannagan, Rebecca J. Larimer, Christopher W. and Hibbing, Matthew V. 2016. Sex differences, personality, and ideology: a deeper investigation via contexts in a study of local politics. Politics, Groups, and Identities, Vol. 4, Issue. 4, p. 561.
Himmelroos, Staffan Rapeli, Lauri and Grönlund, Kimmo 2016. Talking with like-minded people—Equality and efficacy in enclave deliberation. The Social Science Journal,
Kokkonen, Andrej and Wängnerud, Lena 2016. Women’s Presence in Politics and Male Politicians Commitment to Gender Equality in Politics: Evidence from 290 Swedish Local Councils. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, p. 1.
Kromphardt, Christopher D. 2016. Evaluating the Effect of Law Clerk Gender on Voting at the United States Supreme Court. Justice System Journal, p. 1.
LINDELL, MARINA BÄCHTIGER, ANDRÉ GRÖNLUND, KIMMO HERNE, KAISA SETÄLÄ, MAIJA and WYSS, DOMINIK 2016. What drives the polarisation and moderation of opinions? Evidence from a Finnish citizen deliberation experiment on immigration. European Journal of Political Research,
Mendelberg, Tali and Karpowitz, Christopher F. 2016. Power, Gender, and Group Discussion. Political Psychology, Vol. 37, p. 23.
Mendelberg, Tali and Karpowitz, Christopher F. 2016. Women's authority in political decision-making groups. The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 27, Issue. 3, p. 487.
Ngo, Diana KL Sherry, Tisamarie B and Bauhoff, Sebastian 2016. Health system changes under pay-for-performance: the effects of Rwanda’s national programme on facility inputs. Health Policy and Planning, p. czw091.
Nielsen, Julie Hassing 2016. Do Group Decision Rules Affect Trust? A Laboratory Experiment on Group Decision Rules and Trust. Scandinavian Political Studies, Vol. 39, Issue. 2, p. 115.
O’BRIEN, DIANA Z. and RICKNE, JOHANNA 2016. Gender Quotas and Women's Political Leadership. American Political Science Review, Vol. 110, Issue. 01, p. 112.
Sardelis, Stephanie Drew, Joshua A. and Pavlova, Marina A. 2016. Not “Pulling up the Ladder”: Women Who Organize Conference Symposia Provide Greater Opportunities for Women to Speak at Conservation Conferences. PLOS ONE, Vol. 11, Issue. 7, p. e0160015.
Scanlon, Julie and Lewis, Ruth 2016. Whose sexuality is it anyway? Women’s experiences of viewing lesbians on screen. Feminist Media Studies, p. 1.
Stadelmann-Steffen, Isabelle and Dermont, Clau 2016. How Exclusive is Assembly Democracy? Citizens' Assembly and Ballot Participation Compared. Swiss Political Science Review, Vol. 22, Issue. 1, p. 95.
Stroebe, Katherine Nijstad, Bernard A. and Hemelrijk, Charlotte K. 2016. Female Dominance in Human Groups. Social Psychological and Personality Science, p. 194855061666495.
Can men and women have equal levels of voice and authority in deliberation or does deliberation exacerbate gender inequality? Does increasing women's descriptive representation in deliberation increase their voice and authority? We answer these questions and move beyond the debate by hypothesizing that the group's gender composition interacts with its decision rule to exacerbate or erase the inequalities. We test this hypothesis and various alternatives, using experimental data with many groups and links between individuals’ attitudes and speech. We find a substantial gender gap in voice and authority, but as hypothesized, it disappears under unanimous rule and few women, or under majority rule and many women. Deliberative design can avoid inequality by fitting institutional procedure to the social context of the situation.
This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.
Full text views reflects the number of PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.
Abstract views reflect the number of visits to the article landing page.
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 1st May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.