Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 29
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Cameron, Deborah and Shaw, Sylvia 2016. Gender, Power and Political Speech.

    Carlson, Taylor N. and Settle, Jaime E. 2016. Political Chameleons: An Exploration of Conformity in Political Discussions. Political Behavior,

    Dowding, Keith 2016. Emotional appeals in politics and deliberation. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, p. 1.

    LINDELL, MARINA BÄCHTIGER, ANDRÉ GRÖNLUND, KIMMO HERNE, KAISA SETÄLÄ, MAIJA and WYSS, DOMINIK 2016. What drives the polarisation and moderation of opinions? Evidence from a Finnish citizen deliberation experiment on immigration. European Journal of Political Research,

    Mendelberg, Tali and Karpowitz, Christopher F. 2016. Power, Gender, and Group Discussion. Political Psychology, Vol. 37, p. 23.

    Mendelberg, Tali and Karpowitz, Christopher F. 2016. Women's authority in political decision-making groups. The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 27, Issue. 3, p. 487.

    Ngo, Diana KL Sherry, Tisamarie B and Bauhoff, Sebastian 2016. Health system changes under pay-for-performance: the effects of Rwanda’s national programme on facility inputs. Health Policy and Planning, p. czw091.

    Nielsen, Julie Hassing 2016. Do Group Decision Rules Affect Trust? A Laboratory Experiment on Group Decision Rules and Trust. Scandinavian Political Studies, Vol. 39, Issue. 2, p. 115.

    Stadelmann-Steffen, Isabelle and Dermont, Clau 2016. How Exclusive is Assembly Democracy? Citizens' Assembly and Ballot Participation Compared. Swiss Political Science Review, Vol. 22, Issue. 1, p. 95.

    Ugarriza, Juan E. and Nussio, Enzo 2016. There is No Pill for Deliberation: Explaining Discourse Quality in Post-conflict Communities. Swiss Political Science Review, Vol. 22, Issue. 1, p. 145.

    Volden, Craig Wiseman, Alan E. and Wittmer, Dana E. 2016. Women’s Issues and Their Fates in the US Congress. Political Science Research and Methods, p. 1.

    bates, stephen and savigny, heather 2015. introduction: women in european political science. European Political Science, Vol. 14, Issue. 2, p. 75.

    Cook, Alison and Glass, Christy 2015. Diversity begets diversity? The effects of board composition on the appointment and success of women CEOs. Social Science Research, Vol. 53, p. 137.

    Druckman, James N. 2015. Communicating Policy-Relevant Science. PS: Political Science & Politics, Vol. 48, Issue. S1, p. 58.

    Grose, Christian R. Malhotra, Neil and Parks Van Houweling, Robert 2015. Explaining Explanations: How Legislators Explain their Policy Positions and How Citizens React. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 59, Issue. 3, p. 724.

    Hannagan, Rebecca J. Larimer, Christopher W. and Hibbing, Matthew V. 2015. Sex differences, personality, and ideology: a deeper investigation via contexts in a study of local politics. Politics, Groups, and Identities, p. 1.

    Karpowitz, Christopher F. Mendelberg, Tali and Mattioli, Lauren 2015. Why women's numbers elevate women's influence, and when they do not: rules, norms, and authority in political discussion. Politics, Groups, and Identities, Vol. 3, Issue. 1, p. 149.

    Kokkonen, A. Dahlberg, S. Harteveld, E. and van der Brug, W. 2015. Group Gender Composition and Tolerance of Immigrants' Rights. European Sociological Review, Vol. 31, Issue. 1, p. 65.

    Naurin, Daniel 2015. Generosity in intergovernmental negotiations: The impact of state power, pooling and socialisation in the Council of the European Union. European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 54, Issue. 4, p. 726.

    Nielsen, Julie Hassing 2015. Research Methods in European Union Studies.


Gender Inequality in Deliberative Participation

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 09 August 2012

Can men and women have equal levels of voice and authority in deliberation or does deliberation exacerbate gender inequality? Does increasing women's descriptive representation in deliberation increase their voice and authority? We answer these questions and move beyond the debate by hypothesizing that the group's gender composition interacts with its decision rule to exacerbate or erase the inequalities. We test this hypothesis and various alternatives, using experimental data with many groups and links between individuals’ attitudes and speech. We find a substantial gender gap in voice and authority, but as hypothesized, it disappears under unanimous rule and few women, or under majority rule and many women. Deliberative design can avoid inequality by fitting institutional procedure to the social context of the situation.

Corresponding author
Christopher F. Karpowitz is Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Brigham Young University, P.O. Box 25545, Provo, UT 84602 (
Tali Mendelberg is Associate Professor, Department of Politics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 (
Lee Shaker is Assistant Professor, Department of Communication, Portland State University, P.O. Box 751, Mailstop COMM, Portland, OR 97201 (
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Elizabeth Aries . 1976. “Interaction Patterns and Themes of Male, Female, and Mixed Groups.” Small Group Behavior 7: 718.

Reuben M. Baron , and David A. Kenny . 1986. “Moderator-Mediator Variables Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6): 1173–82.

Kelly S. Bouas , and S. S. Komorita . 1996. “Group Discussion and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22: 1144–50.

Jennifer A. Chatman , and Charles A. O'Reilly . 2004. “Asymmetric Reactions to Work Group Sex Diversity among Men and Women.” Academy of Management Journal 47: 193208.

Seung-Whan Choi . 2009. “The Effect of Outliers on Regression Analysis: Regime Type and Foreign Direct Investment.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 4: 153–65.

Jane M. Craig , and Carolyn W. Sherif . 1986. “The Effectiveness of Men and Women in Problem-solving Groups as a Function of Gender Composition.” Sex Roles 14 (7/8): 453–66.

Katherine Cramer Walsh . 2007. Talking about Race: Community Dialogues and the Politics of Difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Rachel Croson , and Uri Gneezy . 2009. “Gender Differences in Preferences.” Journal of Economic Literature 47 (2): 448–74.

Kathryn Dindia , and Mike Allen . 1992. “Sex Differences in Self-disclosure: A Meta-analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 112: 106–24.

Donald G. Ellis 1982. “Relational Stability and Change in Women's Consciousness-raising Groups.” Women's Studies in Communication 5: 7787.

James S. Fishkin , Baogang He , Robert C. Luskin , and Alice Siu . 2010. “Deliberative Democracy in an Unlikely Place: Deliberative Polling in China.” British Journal of Political Science 40: 435–48.

Susan T. Fiske 2010. “Venus and Mars, or Down to Earth: Stereotypes and Realities of Gender Differences.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 5 (6): 688–92

Norman Frohlich , and Joe Oppenheimer . 1990. “Choosing Justice in Experimental Democracies with Production.” American Political Science Review 84 (2): 461–77.

Norman Frohlich , Joe Oppenheimer , and Cheryl Eavy , 1987. “Laboratory Results on Rawls's Distributive Justice.” British Journal of Political Science 17: 121.

Archon Fung . 2007. “Democratic Theory and Political Science: A Pragmatic Method of Constructive Engagement.” American Political Science Review 101: 443–58.

John Gastil , E. Pierre Deess , Phil Weiser , and Jordan Meade . 2008. “Jury Service and Electoral Participation: A Test of the Participation Hypothesis.” Journal of Politics 70: 116.

Amy Gutmann , and Dennis Thompson . 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Susan B. Hansen 1997. “Talking about Politics: Gender and Contextual Effects on Political Proselytizing.” Journal of Politics 59: 73103.

Reid Hastie , Steven D. Penrod , and Nancy Pennington . 1983. Inside the Jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Andrea Hickerson , and John Gastil . 2008. “Assessing the Difference Critique of Deliberation: Gender, Emotion, and the Jury Experience.” Communication Theory 18: 281303.

Robert Huckfeldt , and John Sprague . 1995. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Macartan Humphreys , William A. Masters , and Martin E. Sandbu . 2006. “Democratic Deliberations: Results from a Field Experiment in São Tomé and Príncipe.” World Politics 58: 583622.

Kosuke Imai , Luke Keele , and Dustin Tingley . 2010. “A General Approach to Causal Mediation Analysis.” Psychological Methods 15 (4): 309–34.

Lawrence R. Jacobs , Fay L. Cook , and Michael X. Delli Carpini . 2009. Talking Together: Public Deliberation and Political Participation in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Cathryn Johnson . 1994. “Gender, Legitimate Authority, and Leader-Subordinate Conversations.” American Sociological Review 59: 122–35.

Richard A. Johnson , and Gary I. Schulman . 1989. “Gender-role Composition and Role Entrapment in Decision-making Groups.” Gender and Society 3: 355–72.

Tatsuya Kameda 1991. “Procedural Influence in Small-group Decision Making: Deliberation Style and Assigned Decision Rule.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61: 245–56.

Martin F. Kaplan , and Charles E. Miller . 1987. “Group Decision-making and Normative versus Informational Influence: Effects of Type of Issue and Assigned Decision Rule.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53: 306–13.

Christopher F. Karpowitz , Chad Raphael , and Allen S. Hammond IV . 2009. “Deliberative Democracy and Inequality: Two Cheers for Enclave Deliberation among the Disempowered.” Politics and Society 37: 576615.

Lyn Kathlene . 1994. “Power and Influence in State Legislatures: The Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing Debates.” American Political Science Review 88: 560–76.

Mona L. Krook 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Jane J. Mansbridge 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’Journal of Politics 61: 628–57.

Jerome Mathis . 2011. “Deliberation with Evidence.” American Political Science Review 105: 516–29.

Anne K. McCarrick , Ronald W. Manderscheid , and Sam Silbergeld . 1981. “Gender Differences in Competition and Dominance during Married-couples Group Therapy.” Social Psychology Quarterly 44: 164–77.

Rose McDermott . 2011. “Internal and External Validity.” In Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, eds. James N. Druckman , Donald P. Green , James H. Kuklinski , and Arthur Lupia . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2740.

Tali Mendelberg , and Christopher F. Karpowitz . 2007. “Deliberating about Justice.” In Deliberation, Participation, and Democracy: Can the People Govern?, ed. Shawn Rosenberg . New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 101–29.

Richard M. Merelman , Greg Streich , and Paul Martin . 1998. “Unity and Diversity in American Political Culture: An Exploratory Study of the National Conversation on American Pluralism and Identity.” Political Psychology 19: 781807.

Judi B. Miller 1985. “Patterns of Control in Same-sex Conversations: Differences between Women and Men.” Women's Studies in Communication 8: 6299.

Rebecca M. Morton , and Kenneth C. Williams . 2010. Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Serge Moscovici . 1980. “Toward a Theory of Conversion Behavior.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 13: 209–39.

Michael A. Neblo , Kevin M. Esterling , Ryan P. Kennedy , David M.J. Lazer , and Anand E. Sokhey . 2010. “Who Wants to Deliberate—and Why?American Political Science Review 104: 566–83.

Charlan J. Nemeth 1977. “Interactions between Jurors as a Function of Majority vs. Unanimity Decision Rules.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 7: 3856.

Carole Pateman . 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jane A. Piliavin , and Rachel R. Martin . 1978. “The Effects of the Sex Composition of Groups on Style of Social Interaction.” Sex Roles 4: 281–96.

Ronald B. Rapoport 1981. “The Sex Gap in Political Persuading: Where the ‘Structured Principle’ Works.” American Journal of Political Science 25 (1): 3248.

Barbara F. Reskin , Debra B. McBrier , and Julie A. Kmec . 1999. “The Determinants and Consequences of Workplace Sex and Race Composition.” Annual Review of Sociology 25: 335–61.

Cecilia L. Ridgeway 1982. “Status in Groups: The Importance of Motivation.” American Sociological Review 47: 7688.

Cecilia L. Ridgeway , and Lynn Smith-Lovin . 1999. “The Gender System and Interaction.” Annual Review of Sociology 25: 191216.

Shawn Rosenberg . 2007. “Rethinking Democratic Deliberation: The Limits and Potential of Citizen Participation.” Polity 39: 335–60.

David M. Ryfe 2005. “Does Deliberative Democracy Work?Annual Review of Political Science 8: 4971.

Lynn Sanders . 1997. “Against Deliberation.” Political Theory 25 (3): 347–76.

Robert Y. Shapiro , and Harpreet Mahajan . 1986. “Gender Differences in Policy Preferences: A Summary of Trends from the 1960s to the 1980s.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50 (1): 4246.

Lynn Smith-Lovin , and Charles Brody . 1989. “Interruptions in Group Discussions: The Effects of Gender and Group Composition.” American Sociological Review 54: 424–35.

Fred L. Strodtbeck , Rita M. James , and Charles Hawkins . 1957. “Social Status in Jury Deliberations.” American Sociological Review 22: 713–19.

Dennis F. Thompson 2008. “Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 11:497520.

Daan van Knippenberg , and Michaela C. Schippers . 2007. “Work Group Diversity.” Annual Review of Psychology 58: 515–41.

Melissa S. Williams 2000. “The Uneasy Alliance of Group Representation in Deliberative Democracy.” In Citizenship in Diverse Societies, eds. Will Kymlicka and Wayne Norman . London: Oxford University Press, 124–54.

Iris M. Young 2001. “Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy.” Political Theory 29: 670–90.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *