Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Hobbes on the Causes of War: A Disagreement Theory

  • ARASH ABIZADEH (a1)
Abstract

Hobbesian war primarily arises not because material resources are scarce; or because humans ruthlessly seek survival before all else; or because we are naturally selfish, competitive, or aggressive brutes. Rather, it arises because we are fragile, fearful, impressionable, and psychologically prickly creatures susceptible to ideological manipulation, whose anger can become irrationally inflamed by even trivial slights to our glory. The primary source of war, according to Hobbes, is disagreement, because we read into it the most inflammatory signs of contempt. Both cause and remedy are therefore primarily ideological: The Leviathan's primary function is to settle the meaning of the most controversial words implicated in social life, minimize public disagreement, neutralize glory, magnify the fear of death, and root out subversive doctrines. Managing interstate conflict, in turn, requires not only coercive power, but also the soft power required to shape characters and defuse the effects of status competition.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Arash Abizadeh is Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, McGill University, 855 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2T7 (arash.abizadeh@mcgill.ca).
References
Hide All
Baumgold, Deborah. 1988. Hobbes's Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beitz, Charles R. 1999. Political Theory and International Relations. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bull, Hedley. 1981. “Hobbes and the International Anarchy.” Social Research 48 (4): 717–38.
Caws, Peter, ed. 1989. The Causes of Quarrel: Essays on Peace, War, and Thomas Hobbes. Boston: Beacon Press.
Collins, Jeffrey R. 2005. The Allegiance of Thomas Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Copeland, Dale C. 2000. “The Constructivist Challenge to Structural Realism: A Review Essay.” International Security 25 (2): 187212.
Freud, Sigmund. 1989. Civilization and Its Discontents. Std. ed. Ed. Strachey, J.. New York: W.W. Norton.
Gauthier, David. 1969. The Logic of Leviathan: The Moral and Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gauthier, David. 1987. “Taming Leviathan.” Philosophy andPublic Affairs 16 (3): 280–98.
Gert, Bernard. 1967. “Hobbes and Psychological Egoism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 28 (4): 503–20.
Glaser, Charles L. 1997. “The Security Dilemma Revisited.” World Politics 50 (1):171201.
Grieco, Joseph M. 1988. “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism.” International Organization 42 (3): 485507.
Hampton, Jean. 1986. Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hanson, Donald W. 1993. “Science, Prudence, and Folly in Hobbes's Political Theory.” Political Theory 21 (4): 643–64.
Hobbes, Thomas. 1839. “De Corpore.” In The English Works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury. Vol. 1. Ed. Molesworth, W.. London: John Bohn.
Hobbes, Thomas. 1961. Opera Philosophica Quae Latine Scripsit Omnia 1839–1845. 5 vols. Ed. Molesworth, S. W.. Aalen, Germany: Scientia Verlag.
Hobbes, Thomas. 1990. Behemoth, or the Long Parliament, ed. Tönnies, F.. Chicago: Chicago Univerity Press.
Hobbes, Thomas. 1994. The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic: Part I, Human Nature, Part II, De Corpore Politico, with Three Lives. Ed. Gaskin, J.C.A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hobbes, Thomas. 1996. Leviathan. Rev. student ed. Ed. Tuck, R.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hobbes, Thomas. 1998. On the Citizen. Ed. Tuck, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holmes, Stephen. 1990. “Introduction.” In Behemoth, or The Long Parliament, ed. Tönnies, F.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, viil.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations: Remaking of World Order. New York: Touchstone.
James, Susan. 1997. Passion and Action: The Emotions in Seventeenth-century Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jesseph, Douglas. 1996. “Hobbes and the Method of Natural Science.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes, ed. Sorell, T.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 86107.
Johnston, David. 1986. The Rhetoric of Leviathan: Thomas Hobbes and the Politics of Cultural Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kavka, Gregory S. 1983. “Hobbes's War of All against All.” Ethics 93: 291310.
Kavka, Gregory S. 1986. Hobbesian Moral and Political Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Keohane, Robert O. 1993. “Institutional Theory and the Realist Challenge after the Cold War.” In Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, ed. Baldwin, D. A.. New York: Columbia University Press, 269300.
Kraynak, Robert P. 1982. “Hobbes's Behemoth and the Argument for Absolutism.” American Political Science Review 76 (4): 837–47.
Lecler, Joseph. 1955. Histoire de la Tolérance au Siècle de la Réforme. 2 vols. Paris: Editions Montaigne.
Levy, Jack S. 1989. “The Causes of War: A Review of Theories and Evidence.” In Behavior, Society, and Nuclear War. Vol. 1, eds. Tetlock, Philip E., Husbands, Jo L., Jervis, Robert, Stern, Paul C., and Tilly, Charles. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 209303.
Lloyd, S. A. 1992. Ideals as Interests in Hobbes's Leviathan: The Power of Mind over Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Malcolm, Noel. 2002. Aspects of Hobbes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
McNeilly, F. S. 1968. The Anatomy of Leviathan. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1946. Scientific Man vs. Power Politics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1948. Politics among Nations. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Pettit, Philip. 2008. Made with Words: Hobbes on Language, Mind, and Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Philpott, Daniel. 2009. “Has the Study of Global Politics Found Religion?Annual Review of Political Science 12 (1): 183202.
Powell, Robert. 1991. “Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations Theory.” American Political Science Review 85 (4): 1303–20.
Rathbun, Brian C. 2007. “Uncertain about Uncertainty: Understanding the Multiple Meanings of a Crucial Concept in International Relations Theory.” International Studies Quarterly 51 (3): 533.
Ripstein, Arthur. 1989. “Hobbes on World Government and the World Cup.” In Hobbes: War among Nations, eds. Airaksinen, T. and Bertman, M. A.. Aldershot, UK: Avebury, 112–19.
Robin, Corey. 2004. Fear: The History of a Political Idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rudolph, Ross. 1986. “Conflict, Egoism and Power in Hobbes.” History of the Political Thought 7 (1): 7388.
Schiller, Marvin. 1972. “Political Authority, Self-defense, and Pre-emptive War.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1 (4): 409–26.
Skinner, Quentin. 2002. Visions of Politics, Volume III: Hobbes and Civil Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Slomp, Gabriella. 1998. “From Genus to Species: The Unravelling of Hobbesian Glory.” History of Political Thought 19 (4): 552–69.
Slomp, Gabriella. 2007. “Hobbes on Glory and Civil Strife.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes's Leviathan, ed. Springborg, P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 129–47.
Strauss, Leo. 1963. The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and Its Genesis. Trans. Sinclair, E.M.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Thivet, Dephine. 2008. “Thomas Hobbes: A Philosopher of War or Peace?British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (4): 701–21.
Thomas, Keith. 1965. “The Social Origins of Hobbes's Political Thought.” In Hobbes Studies, ed. Brown, K. C.. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 185236.
Tricaud, François. 1988. “Hobbes's Conception of the State of Nature from 1640 to 1651: Evolution and Ambiguities.” In Perspectives on Thomas Hobbes, eds. Rogers, G. A. J. and Ryan, A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 107–24.
Tuck, Richard. 1989. Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tuck, Richard. 1993. Philosophy and Government, 1572–1651. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tuck, Richard. 1998. “Introduction.” In On the Citizen, ed. Tuck, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, viiixxxiii.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Wendt, Alexander. 1992. “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46 (2): 391425.
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, Michael C. 1996. “Hobbes and International Relations.” International Organization 50 (2): 213–36.
Williams, Michael C. 2005. The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wohlforth, William C. 2008. “Unipolarity, Status Competition, and Great Power War.” World Politics 61 (1): 3857.
Wolin, Sheldon S. 2006. Politics and Vision: Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought, expanded ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Zarka, Yves Charles. 1995. Hobbes et la pensée politique moderne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed