Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 4
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Polansky, David 2016. Drawing Out the Leviathan: Kenneth Waltz, Hobbes, and the Neorealist Theory of the State. International Studies Review, Vol. 18, Issue. 2, p. 268.

    Venezia, Luciano 2015. Hobbes on Legal Authority and Political Obligation.

    ABIZADEH, ARASH 2013. PUBLICITY, PRIVACY, AND RELIGIOUS TOLERATION IN HOBBES'S LEVIATHAN. Modern Intellectual History, Vol. 10, Issue. 02, p. 261.

    Mayerfeld, Jamie 2012. No peace without injustice: Hobbes and Locke on the ethics of peacemaking. International Theory, Vol. 4, Issue. 02, p. 269.


Hobbes on the Causes of War: A Disagreement Theory

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 09 May 2011

Hobbesian war primarily arises not because material resources are scarce; or because humans ruthlessly seek survival before all else; or because we are naturally selfish, competitive, or aggressive brutes. Rather, it arises because we are fragile, fearful, impressionable, and psychologically prickly creatures susceptible to ideological manipulation, whose anger can become irrationally inflamed by even trivial slights to our glory. The primary source of war, according to Hobbes, is disagreement, because we read into it the most inflammatory signs of contempt. Both cause and remedy are therefore primarily ideological: The Leviathan's primary function is to settle the meaning of the most controversial words implicated in social life, minimize public disagreement, neutralize glory, magnify the fear of death, and root out subversive doctrines. Managing interstate conflict, in turn, requires not only coercive power, but also the soft power required to shape characters and defuse the effects of status competition.

Corresponding author
Arash Abizadeh is Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, McGill University, 855 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaH3A 2T7 (
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Dale C. Copeland 2000. “The Constructivist Challenge to Structural Realism: A Review Essay.” International Security 25 (2): 187212.

Bernard Gert . 1967. “Hobbes and Psychological Egoism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 28 (4): 503–20.

Charles L. Glaser 1997. “The Security Dilemma Revisited.” World Politics 50 (1):171201.

Joseph M. Grieco 1988. “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism.” International Organization 42 (3): 485507.

Donald W. Hanson 1993. “Science, Prudence, and Folly in Hobbes's Political Theory.” Political Theory 21 (4): 643–64.

Douglas Jesseph . 1996. “Hobbes and the Method of Natural Science.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes, ed. T. Sorell . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 86107.

Gregory S. Kavka 1983. “Hobbes's War of All against All.” Ethics 93: 291310.

Robert P. Kraynak 1982. “Hobbes's Behemoth and the Argument for Absolutism.” American Political Science Review 76 (4): 837–47.

S. A. Lloyd 1992. Ideals as Interests in Hobbes's Leviathan: The Power of Mind over Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Noel Malcolm . 2002. Aspects of Hobbes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Daniel Philpott . 2009. “Has the Study of Global Politics Found Religion?Annual Review of Political Science 12 (1): 183202.

Robert Powell . 1991. “Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations Theory.” American Political Science Review 85 (4): 1303–20.

Brian C. Rathbun 2007. “Uncertain about Uncertainty: Understanding the Multiple Meanings of a Crucial Concept in International Relations Theory.” International Studies Quarterly 51 (3): 533.

Marvin Schiller . 1972. “Political Authority, Self-defense, and Pre-emptive War.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1 (4): 409–26.

Quentin Skinner . 2002. Visions of Politics, Volume III: Hobbes and Civil Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dephine Thivet . 2008. “Thomas Hobbes: A Philosopher of War or Peace?British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (4): 701–21.

Alexander Wendt . 1992. “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46 (2): 391425.

Alexander Wendt . 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Michael C. Williams 1996. “Hobbes and International Relations.” International Organization 50 (2): 213–36.

Michael C. Williams 2005. The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *