Skip to main content
×
Home

How Does Development Assistance Affect Collective Action Capacity? Results from a Field Experiment in Post-Conflict Liberia

  • JAMES D. FEARON (a1), MACARTAN HUMPHREYS (a2) and JEREMY M. WEINSTEIN (a1)
Abstract

Social cooperation is critical to a wide variety of political and economic outcomes. For this reason, international donors have embraced interventions designed to strengthen the ability of communities to solve collective-action problems, especially in post-conflict settings. We exploit the random assignment of a development program in Liberia to assess the effects of such interventions. Using a matching funds experiment we find evidence that these interventions can alter cooperation capacity. However, we observe effects only in communities in which, by design, both men and women faced the collective action challenge. Focusing on mechanisms, we find evidence that program effects worked through improvements in mobilization capacity that may have enhanced communities’ ability to coordinate to solve mixed gender problems. These gains did not operate in areas where only women took part in the matching funds experiment, possibly because they could rely on traditional institutions unaffected by the external intervention. The combined evidence suggests that the impact of donor interventions designed to enhance cooperation can depend critically on the kinds of social dilemmas that communities face, and the flexibility they have in determining who should solve them.

Copyright
Corresponding author
James D. Fearon is Professor at Stanford University and CIFAR.
Macartan Humphreys is Professor at Columbia University and WZB Berlin Social Science Center (mh2245@columbia.edu).
Jeremy M. Weinstein is Professor at Stanford University.
References
Hide All
Acemoglu Daron. 2010. “Why Development Economics Needs Theory.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 24 (3): 1732.
Agarwal Bina. 2000. “Conceptualising Environmental Collective Action: Why Gender Matters.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 24 (3): 283310.
Andrews Matt. 2013. The Limits of Institutional Reform in Development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Avdeenko Alexandra, and Gilligan Michael J.. 2013. International Interventions to Build Social Capital: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Sudan. Technical report. Working Paper, NYU.
Baldassarri Delia, and Grossman Guy. 2011. “Centralized Sanctioning and Legitimate Authority Promote Cooperation in Humans.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 (27): 11023–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1105456108
Bardhan Pranab. 2002. “Decentralization of Governance and Development.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 (4): 185205.
Barron Patrick, Humphreys Macartan, Paler Laura, and Weinstein Jeremy. 2009. “Community based Reintegration in Aceh.” Indonesian Social Development Papers (12).
Beath Andrew, Christia Fotini, and Enikolopov Ruben. 2013. “Do Elected Councils Improve Governance? Experimental Evidence on Local Institutions in Afghanistan.” 6510. MIT Political Science Department Research Paper No. 2013–24.
Bledsoe Caroline. 1984. “The Political use of Sande Ideology and Symbolism.” American Ethnologist 11 (3): 455–72.
Bowles Samuel, and Gintis Herbert. 2004. “The Evolution of Strong Reciprocity: Cooperation in Heterogeneous Populations.” Theoretical Population Biology 65 (1): 1728.
Casey Katherine, Glennerster Rachel, and Miguel Edward. 2012. “Reshaping Institutions: Evidence on Aid Impacts Using a Pre-Analysis Plan.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 127 (4): 1755–812.
Croson Rachel, and Gneezy Uri. 2009. “Gender Differences in Preferences.” Journal of Economic Literature 47 (2): 448–74.
Dal Bó Pedro, Foster Andrew, and Putterman Louis. 2010. “Institutions and Behavior: Experimental Evidence on the Effects of Democracy.” American Economic Review 100 (5): 2205–29.
Fearon James D., Humphreys Macartan, and Weinstein Jeremy M.. 2009. “Development Assistance, Institution Building, and Social Cohesion after Civil War: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Liberia.” Unpublished manuscript.
Fearon James, Humphreys Macartan, and Weinstein Jeremy. 2014. “Replication Data for: How Does Development Assistance Affect Collective Action Capacity? Results from a Field Experiment in Post-Conflict Liberia.” http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/28006.
Freedman David A. 2008. “On Regression Adjustments to Experiments with Several Treatments.” Annals of Applied Statistics 2: 176–96.
Fuest Veronika. 2008. “‘This is the Time to Get in Front’: Changing Roles and Opportunities for Women in Liberia.” African Affairs 107 (427): 201–24.
Gerber Alan S. and Green Donald P.. 2012. Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation. New York: Norton.
Green Donald P., Ha Shang E., and Bullock John G.. 2010. “Enough Already about Black Box Experiments: Studying Mediation Is More Difficult than Most Scholars Suppose.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 628 (1): 200–8. http://ann.sagepub.com/content/628/1/200.abstract
Hamman John R., Weber Roberto A., and Woon Jonathan. 2011. “An Experimental Investigation of Electoral Delegation and the Provision of Public Goods.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (4): 738–52.
Humphreys Macartan, de la Sierra Raul Sanchez, and van der Windt Peter. 2013. “Exporting Institutions: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Congo.” Unpublished manuscript, Columbia University.
Imai Kosuke, Keele Luke, and Tingley Dustin. 2010. “A General Approach to Causal Mediation Analysis.” Psychological Methods 15: 309–34.
Imai Kosuke, Keele Luke, Tingley Dustin, and Yamamoto Teppei. 2011. “Unpacking the Black Box of Causality: Learning about Causal Mechanisms from Experimental and Observational Studies.” American Political Science Review 105 (4): 765–89.
Kling Jeffrey R., Liebman Jeffrey B., and Katz Lawrence F.. 2007. “Experimental Analysis of Neighborhood Effects.” Econometrica 75 (1): 83119.
Ledyard John O. 1995. Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research. In The Handbook of Experimental Economics, eds. Kagel John H. and Roth Alvin E.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 111–94.
Ludwig Jens, Kling Jeffrey R., and Mullainathan Sendhil. 2011. “Mechanism Experiments and Policy Evaluations.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 25 (3): 1738.
Mansuri Ghazala, and Rao Vijayendra. 2012. Localizing Development: Does Participation Work? Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Murphy William P. 1980. “Secret Knowledge as Property and Power in Kpelle Society: Elders versus Youth.” Africa 50 (2): 193207.
Mutz Diana, and Pemantle Robin. 2011. “The Perils of Randomization Checks in the Analysis of Experiments.” Draft, University of Pennsylvania.
Mwangi Esther, Meinzen-Dick Ruth, and Sun Yan. 2011. “Gender and Sustainable Forest Management in East Africa and Latin America.” Ecology & Society 16 (1) [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art17/.
Nunn Nathan, and Wantchekon Leonard. 2011. “The Slave Trade and the Origins of Mistrust in Africa.” American Economic Review 101 (7): 3221–52.
Ortmann Andreas, and Tichy Lisa K. 1999. “Gender Differences in the Laboratory: Evidence from Prisoner’s Dilemma Games.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 39 (3): 327–39.
Putnam Robert. 1994. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Richards Paul, Archibald Steven, Bruce Beverlee, Modad Watta; Mulbah Edward, Varpilah Tornorlah, and Vincent James. 2005. “Community Cohesion in Liberia: A Post-war Rapid Social Assessment.” Social Development Paper 21. Washington DC: The World Bank http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/docsearch/author/m672218.
Voigtländer Nico, and Voth Hans-Joachim. 2012. “Persecution Perpetuated: The Medieval Origins of Anti-Semitic Violence in Nazi Germany*.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 127 (3): 1339–92.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary Materials

Fearon supplementary material
Fearon supplementary material 1

 PDF (616 KB)
616 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 25
Total number of PDF views: 519 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1201 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.