Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation


Competition is a defining element of democracy. One of the most noteworthy events over the last quarter-century in U.S. politics is the change in the nature of elite party competition: The parties have become increasingly polarized. Scholars and pundits actively debate how these elite patterns influence polarization among the public (e.g., have citizens also become more ideologically polarized?). Yet, few have addressed what we see as perhaps more fundamental questions: Has elite polarization altered the way citizens arrive at their policy opinions in the first place and, if so, in what ways? We address these questions with a theory and two survey experiments (on the issues of drilling and immigration). We find stark evidence that polarized environments fundamentally change how citizens make decisions. Specifically, polarization intensifies the impact of party endorsements on opinions, decreases the impact of substantive information and, perhaps ironically, stimulates greater confidence in those—less substantively grounded—opinions. We discuss the implications for public opinion formation and the nature of democratic competition.

Corresponding author
James N. Druckman is Payson S. Wild Professor, Department of Political Science, Northwestern University, Scott Hall, 601 University Place, Evanston, IL 60208 (
Erik Peterson is a graduate student, Department of Political Science, Stanford University, Encina Hall West, 616 Serra Street, Stanford, CA 94305 (
Rune Slothuus is Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, Bartholins Alle 7, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark (
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Lene Aarøe . 2011. “Investigating Frame Strength.” Political Communication 28 (April): 207–26.

Kevin Arceneaux . 2008. “Can Partisan Cues Diminish Democratic Accountability?Political Behavior 30 (June): 139–60.

Larry Bartels 2002. “Beyond the Running Tally.” Political Behavior 24 (June): 117–50.

Lindsley G Boiney ., Jane Kennedy , and Pete Nye . 1997. “Instrumental Bias in Motivated Reasoning: More When More is Needed.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 72 (October): 124.

Toby Bolsen , and Fay Lomax Cook . 2008. “Public Opinion on Energy Policy, 1974–2006.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72 (2): 364–88.

Paul R Brewer . 2001. “Value Words and Lizard Brains.” Political Psychology 22 (March): 4564.

Logan Dancey and Paul Goren . 2010. “Party Identification, Issue Attitudes, and the Dynamics of Political Debate.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (July): 686–99.

James N Druckman . 2012. “The Politics of Motivation.” Critical Review: A Journal of Politics andSociety 24 (2): 199216.

James N. Druckman , and Toby Bolsen . 2011. “Framing, Motivated Reasoning, and Opinions about Emergent Technologies.” Journal of Communication 61 (August): 659–88.

James N. Druckman , Cari Lynn Hennessy , Kristi St. Charles , and Jonathan Weber . 2010. “Competing Rhetoric over Time.” Journal of Politics 72 (January): 136–48.

James N. Druckman , and Thomas J. Leeper . 2012a. “Learning More from Political Communication Experiments: Pretreatment and Its Effects.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (October): 875–96.

James N. Druckman , and Kjersten R. Nelson . 2003. “Framing and Deliberation.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (October): 729–45.

Morris P. Fiorina , and Samuel J. Abrams . 2008. “Political Polarization in the American Public.” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (June): 563–88.

Regula Hänggli , and Hanspeter Kriesi . 2010. “Political Framing Strategies and Their Impact on Media Framing in a Swiss Direct-Democratic Campaign.” Political Communication 27 (2): 141–57.

Shanto Iyengar , Gurav Sood , and Yphtach Lelkes . 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (3): 405–31.

Jennifer Jerit . 2009. “How Predictive Appeals Affect Policy Opinions.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (April): 411–26.

Ziva Kunda . 1990. “The Case for Motivated Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin 108 (November): 480–98.

Edward L. Lascher , and John L. Korey . 2011. “The Myth of the Independent Voter, California Style.” California Journal of Politics and Policy 3 (January).

Howard Lavine , Christopher Johnston , and Marco Steenbergen . 2012. The Ambivalent Partisan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Matthew S. Levendusky 2010. “Clearer Cues, More Consistent Voters.” Political Behavior 32 (1): 111–31.

Diane M. Mackie , Leila T. Worth , and Arlene G. Asuncion . 1990. “Processing of Persuasive In-group Messages.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58 (May): 812–22.

Stephen P. Nicholson 2011. “Dominating Cues and the Limits of Elite Influence.” Journal of Politics 73 (October): 1165–77.

Stephen P. Nicholson 2012. “Polarizing Cues.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (January): 5266.

Lilach Nir . 2011. “Motivated Reasoning and Public Opinion Perception.” Public Opinion Quarterly 75 (3): 504–32.

John W. Payne , James R. Bettman , and Eric J. Johnson . 1993. The Adaptive Decision Maker. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Michael Bang Petersen , Rune Slothuus , and Lise Togeby . 2010. “Political Parties and Value Consistency in Public Opinion Formation.” Public Opinion Quarterly 74 (3): 530–50.

David Redlawsk . 2002. “Hot Cognition or Cool Consideration.” Journal of Politics 64 (November): 1021–44.

Rune Slothuus . 2010. “When Can Political Parties Lead Public Opinion?Political Communication 27 (May): 158–77.

Rune Slothuus , and Claes H. de Vreese . 2010. “Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Issue Framing Effects.” Journal of Politics 72 (3): 630–45.

Eric R. A. N. Smith 2002. Energy, the Environment, and Public Opinion. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield.

Joanne R. Smith , Deborah J. Terry , Timothy R. Crosier , and Julie M. Duck . 2005. “The Importance of the Relevance of the Issue to the Group in Voting Intentions.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 27 (2): 163–70.

Paul M. Sniderman , Richard A. Brody , and Philip E. Tetlock . 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Charles S. Taber , and Milton Lodge . 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (July): 755–69.

John E. Transue , Daniel J. Lee , and John H. Aldrich . 2009. “Treatment Spillover Effects across Survey Experiments.” Political Analysis 17 (2): 143–61.

Joseph Daniel Ura , and Christopher R. Ellis . 2012. “Partisan Moods.” Journal of Politics 74 (January): 277–91.

Penny S. Visser , George Y. Bizer , and Jon A. Krosnick . 2006. “Exploring the Latent Structure of Strength-Related Attitude Attributes.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 38. Ed. M. Zanna . San Diego: Academic Press.

Natalie A Wyer . 2010. “Selective Self-Categorization.” Journal of Social Psychology 150 (September): 452–70.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 65
Total number of PDF views: 483 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1598 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 28th March 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.