Skip to main content
×
Home

How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation

  • JAMES N. DRUCKMAN (a1), ERIK PETERSON (a2) and RUNE SLOTHUUS (a3)
Abstract

Competition is a defining element of democracy. One of the most noteworthy events over the last quarter-century in U.S. politics is the change in the nature of elite party competition: The parties have become increasingly polarized. Scholars and pundits actively debate how these elite patterns influence polarization among the public (e.g., have citizens also become more ideologically polarized?). Yet, few have addressed what we see as perhaps more fundamental questions: Has elite polarization altered the way citizens arrive at their policy opinions in the first place and, if so, in what ways? We address these questions with a theory and two survey experiments (on the issues of drilling and immigration). We find stark evidence that polarized environments fundamentally change how citizens make decisions. Specifically, polarization intensifies the impact of party endorsements on opinions, decreases the impact of substantive information and, perhaps ironically, stimulates greater confidence in those—less substantively grounded—opinions. We discuss the implications for public opinion formation and the nature of democratic competition.

Copyright
Corresponding author
James N. Druckman is Payson S. Wild Professor, Department of Political Science, Northwestern University, Scott Hall, 601 University Place, Evanston, IL 60208 (druckman@northwestern.edu).
Erik Peterson is a graduate student, Department of Political Science, Stanford University, Encina Hall West, 616 Serra Street, Stanford, CA 94305 (erik.peterson@stanford.edu).
Rune Slothuus is Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, Bartholins Alle 7, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark (slothuus@ps.au.dk).
References
Hide All
Aarøe Lene. 2011. “Investigating Frame Strength.” Political Communication 28 (April): 207–26.
American Political Science Association. Committee on Political Parties. 1950. “Toward a More Responsible Two-party System.”
Arceneaux Kevin. 2008. “Can Partisan Cues Diminish Democratic Accountability?Political Behavior 30 (June): 139–60.
Bartels Larry 2002. “Beyond the Running Tally.” Political Behavior 24 (June): 117–50.
Boiney Lindsley G., Kennedy Jane, and Nye Pete. 1997. “Instrumental Bias in Motivated Reasoning: More When More is Needed.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 72 (October): 124.
Bolsen Toby, and Cook Fay Lomax. 2008. “Public Opinion on Energy Policy, 1974–2006.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72 (2): 364–88.
Boudreau Cheryl. N.d. “Gresham's Law of Cue-Taking.” Political Communication. Forthcoming.
Brader Ted. 2006. Campaigning for Hearts and Minds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Brewer Paul R. 2001. “Value Words and Lizard Brains.” Political Psychology 22 (March): 4564.
Bullock John G. 2011. “Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate.” American Political Science Review 105 (August): 496515.
Chong Dennis, and Druckman James N.. 2007. “Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies.” American Political Science Review 101 (November): 637–55.
Chong Dennis, and Druckman James N.. 2010. “Dynamic Public Opinion.” American Political Science Review 104 (November): 663–80.
Chong Dennis, and Druckman James N.. 2011. “Identifying Frames in Political News.” In Sourcebook for Political Communication Research, eds. Bucy Erik P. and Lance Holbert R.. New York: Routledge, 238–67.
Chong Dennis, and Druckman James N.. N.d. “Strategies of Counter-framing.” Journal of Politics. Forthcoming.
Dancey Logan and Goren Paul. 2010. “Party Identification, Issue Attitudes, and the Dynamics of Political Debate.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (July): 686–99.
Druckman James N. 2004. “Political Preference Formation.” American Political Science Review 98 (November): 671–86.
Druckman James N. 2010. “Competing Frames in a Political Campaign.” In Winning with Words, eds. Schaffner Brian F. and Sellers Patrick J.. New York: Routledge, 101–20.
Druckman James N. 2011. “What's It All About?: Framing in Political Science.” In Perspectives on Framing, ed. Keren Gideon. New York: Psychology Press/Taylor and Francis, 279302.
Druckman James N. 2012. “The Politics of Motivation.” Critical Review: A Journal of Politics andSociety 24 (2): 199216.
Druckman James N., and Bolsen Toby. 2011. “Framing, Motivated Reasoning, and Opinions about Emergent Technologies.” Journal of Communication 61 (August): 659–88.
Druckman James N., Fein Jordan, and Leeper Thomas J.. 2012. “A Source of Bias in Public Opinion Stability.” American Political Science Review 106 (May): 430–54.
Druckman James N., Lynn Hennessy Cari, Charles Kristi St., and Weber Jonathan. 2010. “Competing Rhetoric over Time.” Journal of Politics 72 (January): 136–48.
Druckman James N., and Leeper Thomas J.. 2012a. “Learning More from Political Communication Experiments: Pretreatment and Its Effects.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (October): 875–96.
Druckman James N., and Leeper Thomas J.. 2012b. “Is Public Opinion Stable?Daedalus 106: 430–54.
Druckman James N., and Nelson Kjersten R.. 2003. “Framing and Deliberation.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (October): 729–45.
Fiorina Morris P., and Abrams Samuel J.. 2008. “Political Polarization in the American Public.” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (June): 563–88.
Goren Paul, Federico Christopher M., and Caul Kittilson Miki. 2009. “Source Cues, Partisan Identities, and Political Value Expression.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (October): 805–20.
Green Donald P., Palmquist Bradley, and Schickler Eric. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hänggli Regula, and Kriesi Hanspeter. 2010. “Political Framing Strategies and Their Impact on Media Framing in a Swiss Direct-Democratic Campaign.” Political Communication 27 (2): 141–57.
Hetherington Marc. 2009. “Putting Polarization in Perspective.” British Journal of Political Science 39 (April): 413–48.
Iyengar Shanto, Sood Gurav, and Lelkes Yphtach. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (3): 405–31.
Jacobson Gary C. 2008. A Divider, Not a Uniter. New York: Pearson.
Jerit Jennifer. 2009. “How Predictive Appeals Affect Policy Opinions.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (April): 411–26.
Johnson Dominic D. P., and Fowler James H.. 2011. “The Evolution of Overconfidence.” Nature 447 (September): 317–20.
Krauss Clifford, and Broder John M.. 2012. “Oil Drilling in the Gulf Rebounds as Prices Promote Exploration.” New York Times, March 5.
Kunda Ziva. 1990. “The Case for Motivated Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin 108 (November): 480–98.
Lascher Edward L., and Korey John L.. 2011. “The Myth of the Independent Voter, California Style.” California Journal of Politics and Policy 3 (January).
Lavine Howard, Johnston Christopher, and Steenbergen Marco. 2012. The Ambivalent Partisan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levendusky Matthew S. 2010. “Clearer Cues, More Consistent Voters.” Political Behavior 32 (1): 111–31.
Lupia Arthur. 1994. “Shortcuts versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections.” American Political Science Review 88 (March): 6376.
Mackie Diane M., Worth Leila T., and Asuncion Arlene G.. 1990. “Processing of Persuasive In-group Messages.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58 (May): 812–22.
Mansbridge Jane. 1983. Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McCarty Nolan, Rosenthal Howard, and Poole Keith T.. 2006. Polarized America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nelson Thomas E., Clawson Rosalee A., and Oxley Zoe M.. 1997. “Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance.” American Political Science Review 91 (3): 567–83.
Nicholson Stephen P. 2011. “Dominating Cues and the Limits of Elite Influence.” Journal of Politics 73 (October): 1165–77.
Nicholson Stephen P. 2012. “Polarizing Cues.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (January): 5266.
Nicholson Stephen P., and Heit Evan. 2012. “The Partisan Foundations of Citizen Competence.” University of California, Merced. Typescript.
Nir Lilach. 2011. “Motivated Reasoning and Public Opinion Perception.” Public Opinion Quarterly 75 (3): 504–32.
O'Keefe Daniel J. 2002. Persuasion. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Payne John W., Bettman James R., and Johnson Eric J.. 1993. The Adaptive Decision Maker. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Petersen Michael Bang, Skov Martin, Serritzlew Søren, and Thomas Ramsøy. N.d. “Motivated Reasoning and Political Parties: Evidence for Increased Processing in the Face of Party Cues.” Political Behavior. Forthcoming
Petersen Michael Bang, Slothuus Rune, and Togeby Lise. 2010. “Political Parties and Value Consistency in Public Opinion Formation.” Public Opinion Quarterly 74 (3): 530–50.
Peterson Erik. 2011. “Competitive Partisan Issue Framing.” Undergraduate honors thesis. Northwestern University.
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press Political Survey. 2011. iPOLL Databank, Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut (April 22, 2011).
Pew Research Center/National Journal Congressional Connection Poll. 2010. iPOLL Databank, Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut (April 22, 2011).
Prior Markus. 2007. “Is Partisan Bias in Perceptions of Objective Conditions Real?” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
Redlawsk David. 2002. “Hot Cognition or Cool Consideration.” Journal of Politics 64 (November): 1021–44.
Schattschneider E. E. 1960. The Semisovereign People. Hindsdale, IL: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Slothuus Rune. 2010. “When Can Political Parties Lead Public Opinion?Political Communication 27 (May): 158–77.
Slothuus Rune. 2011. “Assessing the Influence of Political Parties on Public Opinion.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Istanbul, Turkey.
Slothuus Rune, and Vreese Claes H. de. 2010. “Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Issue Framing Effects.” Journal of Politics 72 (3): 630–45.
Smith Eric R. A. N. 2002. Energy, the Environment, and Public Opinion. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield.
Smith Joanne R., Terry Deborah J., Crosier Timothy R., and Duck Julie M.. 2005. “The Importance of the Relevance of the Issue to the Group in Voting Intentions.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 27 (2): 163–70.
Sniderman Paul M., Brody Richard A., and Tetlock Philip E.. 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sniderman Paul M., and Stiglitz Edward H.. 2012. The Reputational Premium. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sniderman Paul, and Theriault Sean M.. 2004. “The Structure of Political Argument and the Logic of Issue Framing.” In Studies in Public Opinion: Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error, and Change, eds. Saris W. E. and Sniderman P. M.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 133–65.
Taber Charles S., and Lodge Milton. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (July): 755–69.
Transue John E., Lee Daniel J., and Aldrich John H.. 2009. “Treatment Spillover Effects across Survey Experiments.” Political Analysis 17 (2): 143–61.
Ura Joseph Daniel, and Ellis Christopher R.. 2012. “Partisan Moods.” Journal of Politics 74 (January): 277–91.
Visser Penny S., Bizer George Y., and Krosnick Jon A.. 2006. “Exploring the Latent Structure of Strength-Related Attitude Attributes.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 38. Ed. Zanna M.. San Diego: Academic Press.
White Jonathan, and Ypi Lea. 2011. “On Partisan Political Justification.” American Political Science Review 105 (May): 381–96.
Wyer Natalie A. 2010. “Selective Self-Categorization.” Journal of Social Psychology 150 (September): 452–70.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 120
Total number of PDF views: 970 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 3130 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.