Skip to main content

How Sudden Censorship Can Increase Access to Information


Conventional wisdom assumes that increased censorship will strictly decrease access to information. We delineate circumstances when increases in censorship expand access to information for a substantial subset of the population. When governments suddenly impose censorship on previously uncensored information, citizens accustomed to acquiring this information will be incentivized to learn methods of censorship evasion. These evasion tools provide continued access to the newly blocked information—and also extend users’ ability to access information that has long been censored. We illustrate this phenomenon using millions of individual-level actions of social media users in China before and after the block of Instagram. We show that the block inspired millions of Chinese users to acquire virtual private networks, and that these users subsequently joined censored websites like Twitter and Facebook. Despite initially being apolitical, these new users began browsing blocked political pages on Wikipedia, following Chinese political activists on Twitter, and discussing highly politicized topics such as opposition protests in Hong Kong.

Corresponding author
William R. Hobbs is a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Network Science Institute, Northeastern University, S360 Huntington Avenue, 1010-177, Boston, MA 02115 (,
Margaret E. Roberts is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego, Social Sciences Building 301, 9500 Gilman Drive #0521, La Jolla, CA 92093-0521 (,
Hide All

We thank the following people for helpful comments and suggestions on this work: Alexei Abrahams, Eli Berman, Allen Carlson, Dean Eckles, James Fowler, Lei Guang, Navid Hassanpour, Ruixue Jia, Holger Kern, Gary King, Shuhei Kurizaki, Jennifer Pan, Maria Petrova, Susan Shirk, Zachary Steinert-Threlkeld, Brian Tsay, Yiqing Xu, Jason Wu, and David Yang. We specifically thank Zachary Steinert-Threlkeld for graciously supplying geolocated Twitter data from China and Pablo Barberá who helped us access geolocated Instagram data. Thanks to Yingjie Fan for excellent research assistance. We thank joint funding from the Policy Design and Evaluation Lab and Center for Global Transformation at UC San Diego and the Hellman Fellows Fund. Replication files can be found on the American Political Science Review Dataverse:

Hide All
Barberá, Pablo, Wang, Ning, Bonneau, Richard, Jost, John T., Nagler, Jonathan, Tucker, Joshua, and Bailón, Sandra Gonz̃ález. 2015. “The Critical Periphery in the Growth of Social Protests.” PLOS ONE 10 (11): e0143611.
Becker, Gary S. 1968. “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach.” Journal of Political Economy 76 (2): 169217.
Brown, William W., and Reynolds, Morgan O.. 1973. “Crime and “Punishment”: Risk Implications.” Journal of Economic Theory 6 (5): 508–14.
Chen, Yuyu, and Yang, David Y.. 2017. “1984 or the Brave New World? Evidence from a Field Experiment on Media Censorship in China” (working paper).
Chwe, Michael Suk-Young. 2001. Rational Ritual: Culture, Coordination, and Common Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Davenport, Christian. 2005. “Repression and Mobilization: Insights from Political Science and Sociology.” In Repression and Mobilization, eds. Davenport, Christian, Johnson, Hank, and Mueller, Carol. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, vixlii.
Davenport, Christian. 2007. “State Repression and Political Order.” Annual Review Political Science 10: 123.
Deibert, Ronald, Palfrey, John, Rohozinski, Rafal, Zittrain, Jonathan, and Haraszti, Miklos. 2010. Access Controlled: The Shaping of Power, Rights, and Rule in Cyberspace. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Diamond, Larry. 2010. “Liberation Technology.” Journal of Democracy 21 (3): 6983.
Edmond, Chris. 2013. “Information Manipulation, Coordination, and Regime Change.” The Review of Economic Studies 80 (4): 1422–58.
Egorov, Georgy, Guriev, Sergei, and Sonin, Konstantin. 2009. “Why Resource-Poor Dictators Allow Freer Media: A Theory and Evidence from Panel Data.” American Political Science Review 103 (4): 645–68.
Eide, Erling, Rubin, Paul H., and Shepherd, Joanna Mehlop. 2006. Economics of Crime. Hanover: Now Publishers Inc.
Enikolopov, Ruben, Petrova, Maria, and Zhuravskaya, Ekaterina. 2011. “Media and Political Persuasion: Evidence from Russia.” American Economic Review 101 (7): 3253–85.
Francisco, Ronald A. 2005. The Dictator’s Dilemma. In Repression and Mobilization, eds. Davenport, Christian, Johnson, Hank, and Mueller, Carol. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 5881.
Geddes, Barbara, and Zaller, John. 1989. “Sources of Popular Support for Authoritarian Regimes.” American Journal of Political Science 33 (2): 319–47.
Gohdes, Anita R. 2015. “Pulling the Plug: Network Disruptions and Violence in Civil Conflict.” Journal of Peace Research 52 (3): 352–67.
González-Bailón, Sandra, Borge-Holthoefer, Javier, Rivero, Alejandro, and Moreno, Yamir. 2011. “The Dynamics of Protest Recruitment Through an Online Network.” Scientific Reports 1 (197).
Hassanpour, Navid. 2014. “Media Disruption and Revolutionary Unrest: Evidence From Mubarak’s Quasi-Experiment.” Political Communication 31 (1): 124.
Hess, David, and Martin, Brian. 2006. “Repression, Backfire, and the Theory of Transformative Events.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 11 (2): 249–67.
Howard, Philip N. 2010. The Digital Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Information Technology and Political Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Huang, Haifeng. 2015. “Propaganda as Signaling.” Comparative Politics 47 (4): 419–44.
Jansen, Sue Curry, and Martin, Brian. 2003. “Making Censorship Backfire.” Counterpoise 7 (3): 515.
Jansen, Sue Curry, and Martin, Brian. 2015. “The Streisand Effect and Censorship Backfire.” International Journal of Communication 9: 656–71.
Kalathil, Shanthi, and Boas, Taylor C.. 2010. Open Networks, Closed Regimes: The Impact of the Internet on Authoritarian Rule. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Kelly, Sanja, Cook, Sarah G., and Truong, Mai. 2012. Freedom on the Net 2012: A Global Assessment of Internet and Digital Media. Washington D.C.: Freedom House.
Kern, Holger Lutz, and Hainmueller, Jens. 2009. “Opium for the Masses: How Foreign Media Can Stabilize Authoritarian Regimes.” Political Analysis 17 (4): 377–99.
King, Gary, Pan, Jennifer, and Roberts, Margaret E.. 2013. “How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression.” American Political Science Review 107 (2): 118.
King, Gary, Pan, Jennifer, and Roberts, Margaret E.. 2014. “Reverse-Engineering Censorship in China: Randomized Experimentation and Participant Observation.” Science 345 (6199): 110.
King, Gary, Pan, Jennifer, and Roberts, Margaret E.. 2017. “How the Chinese Government Fabricates Social Media Posts for Strategic Distraction, Not Engaged Argument.” American Political Science Review 111 (3): 484501.
Kuran, Timur. 1991. “Now Out of Never: The Element of Surprise in the East European Revolution of 1989.” World Politics 44 (1): 748.
Kuran, Timur. 1997. Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Leetaru, Kalev, Wang, Shaowen, Cao, Guofeng, Padmanabhan, Anand, and Shook, Eric. 2013. “Mapping the Global Twitter Heartbeat: The Geography of Twitter.” First Monday 18 (5).
Lessig, Lawrence. 1999. Code: And Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.
Lohmann, Susanne. 1994. “The Dynamics of Informational Cascades: The Monday Demonstrations in Leipzig, East Germany, 1989-1991.” World Politics 47 (1): 42101.
Lorentzen, Peter. 2014. “China’s Strategic Censorship.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (2): 402–14.
Lynch, Marc. 2011. “After Egypt: The Limits and Promise of Online Challenges to the Authoritarian Arab State.” Perspectives on Politics 9 (2): 301–10.
MacCoun, Robert J. 2010. “What Can We Learn from the Dutch Cannabis Coffeeshop Experience?”RAND (working paper), 1–32.
MacKinnon, Rebecca. 2012. Consent of the Networked: The Worldwide Struggle For Internet Freedom. New York: Basic Books.
Manning, Christopher D., Raghavan, Prabhakar, and Schütze, Hinrich. 2008. Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martin, Brian. 2007. “Slow Injustice.” Social Alternatives 26 (4): 59.
Miller, Blake. 2017. “The Limits of Commercialized Censorship in China” (working paper).
Millward, Stephen. June 30, 2011. “Google+ Not Actually Blocked in China, Just Being Slowly Throttled.” TechAsia,
Miron, Jeffrey A., and Zwiebel, Jeffrey. 1991. “Alcohol Consumption During Prohibition.” The American Economic Review 81 (2): 242–7.
Moore, Will H. 1998. “Repression and Dissent: Substitution, Context, and Timing.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (3): 851–73.
Morozov, Evgeny. 2011. The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. New York: PublicAffairs.
Nabi, Zubair. 2014. “Resistence Censorship is Futile.” First Monday 19 (11).
Pierskalla, Jan Henryk. 2010. “Protest, Deterrence, and Escalation: The Strategic Calculus of Government Repression.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 54 (1): 117–45.
Pierskalla, Jan H., and Hollenbach, Florian M.. 2013. “Technology and Collective Action: The Effect of Cell Phone Coverage on Political Violence in Africa.” American Political Science Review 107 (2): 207–24.
Rasler, Karen. 1996. “Concessions, Repression, and Political Protest in the Iranian Revolution.” American Sociological Review 61 (1): 132–52.
Ritter, Emily Hencken. 2014. “Policy Disputes, Political Survival, and the Onset and Severity of State Repression.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 58 (1): 143–68.
Roberts, Margaret E. 2018. Censored: Distraction and Diversion Inside China’s Great Firewall. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Roberts, James A., Yaya, Luc, and Manolis, Chris. 2014. “The Invisible Addiction: Cell-Phone Activities and Addiction Among Male and Female College Students.” Journal of Behavioral Addictions 3 (4): 254–65.
Rød, Espen Geelmuyden, and Weidmann, Nils B.. 2015. “Empowering Activists or Autocrats? The Internet in Authoritarian Regimes.” Journal of Peace Research 52 (3): 338–51.
Salganik, Matthew J. 2017. Bit by Bit: Social Research in the Digital Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Shirk, Susan L. 2011. Changing Media, Changing China. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shirky, Clay. 2008. Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations. New York: Penguin Press.
Song, Sonya Yan, Faris, Robert, and Kelly, John. 2015. “Beyond the Wall: Mapping Twitter in China.” Berkman Center Research Publication (2015-14).
Stern, Rachel E., and Hassid, Jonathan. 2012. “Amplifying Silence: Uncertainty and Control Parables in Contemporary China.” Comparative Political Studies 45 (10): 1230–54.
Steinert-Threlkeld, Zachary C. 2017. “Spontaneous Collective Action: Peripheral Mobilization During the Arab Spring.” American Political Science Review 111 (2): 379403.
Stockmann, Daniela. 2012. Media Commercialization and Authoritarian Rule in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tilly, Charles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Tufekci, Zeynep, and Wilson, Christopher. 2012. “Social Media and the Decision to Participate in Political Protest: Observations from Tahrir Square.” Journal of Communication 62 (2): 363–79.
Uzzi, Brian, and Spiro, Jarrett. 2005. “Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem.” American Journal of Sociology 111 (2): 447504.
Yang, Guobin. 2013. Social Dynamics in the Evolution of China’s Internet Content Control Regime. In Routledge Handbook of Media Law, eds. Price, Monroe E, Verhulst, Stefaan, and Morgan, Libby. New York: Routledge, 285302.
Yang, Guobin. 2014. “Internet Activism & the Party-State in China.” Daedalus 143 (2): 110–23.
Zhang, Xiaoquan, and Zhu, Feng. 2011. “Group Size and Incentives to Contribute: A Natural Experiment at Chinese Wikipedia.” The American Economic Review 101 (4): 1601–15.
Zuckerman, Ethan. 2015. “Cute Cats to the Rescue? Participatory Media and Political Expression.” In From Voice to Influence: Understanding Citizenship in a Digital Age, eds. Allen, Danielle and Light, Jennifer S.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 131–54.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Hobbs and Roberts Dataverse

Supplementary materials

Hobbs and Roberts supplementary material
Hobbs and Roberts supplementary material 1

 PDF (348 KB)
348 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 23
Total number of PDF views: 221 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 4131 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 2nd April 2018 - 19th April 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.