Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Human Nature in Politics: The Dialogue of Psychology with Political Science

  • Herbert A. Simon (a1)
Abstract

This article compares two theories of human rationality that have found application in political science: procedural, bounded rationality from contemporary cognitive psychology, and global, substantive rationality from economics. Using examples drawn from the recent literature of political science, it examines the relative roles played by the rationality principle and by auxiliary assumptions (e.g., assumptions about the content of actors' goals) in explaining human behavior in political contexts, and concludes that the model predictions rest primarily on the auxiliary assumptions rather than deriving from the rationality principle.

The analysis implies that the principle of rationality, unless accompanied by extensive empirical research to identify the correct auxiliary assumptions, has little power to make valid predictions about political phenomena.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Anderson, J.The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1983.
Bradshaw, G. F., Langley, P. W., & Simon, H. A.Studying scientific discovery by computer simulation. Science, 1983, 222 (Dec. 2), 971975.
Carbonell, J. G.Subjective understanding: Computer models of belief systems. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Dept. of Computer Science, 1979.
Crecine, J. P.Governmental problem solving: A computer simulation of municipal budgeting. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1969.
Downs, A.An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row, 1957.
Eastman, D.Political science. In Sills, D. L. (Ed.). International encyclopedia of the social sciences (vol. 12). New York: Macmillan, 1968, pp. 282298.
Ericsson, K., & Simon, H. A.Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1984.
Friedman, M.The methodology of positive economics. In Essays in positive economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953.
Friedman, M.The role of monetary policy. American Economic Review, 1968, 58, 117.
Gerwin, B.Budgeting public funds: The decision process in an urban school district. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1969.
Hibbs, D. A. Jr.Economic outcomes and political support for British governments among occupational classes: A dynamic analysis. American Political Science Review, 1982, 76, 259279.
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
Keynes, J. M.The general theory of employment, interest and money. London: Macmillan, 1936.
van de Kragt, A. J. C., Orbell, J. M., & Dawes, R. M.The minimal contributing set as a solution to public goods problems. American Political Science Review, 1983, 77, 112122.
Lasswell, H.Psychopathology and politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1934.
Lasswell, H.World politics and personal insecurity. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1935.
Lazarsfeld, P. S., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H.The people's choice (2nd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press, 1948.
Lenat, D. B. EURISKO. A program that learns new heuristics and domain concepts. Artificial Intelligence, 1983, 21, 6198.
Lippmann, W.Public opinion. New York: Macmillan (1922/1944).
Lucas, R. E. Jr. Studies in business cycle theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1981.
Lucas, R. E. Jr., & Sargent, T. J. (Eds.). Rational expectation and economic practice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1981.
Mosteller, F., & Wallace, D. W.Influence and disputed authorship: The Federalist. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1964.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A.Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1972.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D.Telling more than we know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 1977, 84, 231259.
Orbell, J. M., Schwartz-Shea, P., & Simmons, R. T.Do cooperators exit more readily than defectors. American Political Science Review, 1984, 76, 753766.
Riker, W. H.The heresthetics of constitution-making. The presidency in 1787, with comments on determinism and rational choice. American Political Science Review, 1984, 78, 116.
Riker, W. H.The two-party system and Duverger's Law: An essay on the history of political science. American Political Science Review, 1982, 76, 753766.
Savage, L. J.The foundation of statistics. New York: Wiley, 1954.
Simon, H. A.Administrative behavior. New York: Free Press, 1947/1976. (a)
Simon, H. A.A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1955, 69, 99118. Reprinted in Simon, H. A.. Models of bounded rationality (vol. 2, chap. 7.2). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1982.
Simon, H. A.From substantive to procedural rationality. In Latsis, S. J. (Ed.). Method and appraisal in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976, pp. 129148. (b)
Simon, H. A.Models of bounded rationality. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1982.
Simon, H. A.Models of thought. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1979.
Simon, H. A.Motivational and emotional controls of cognition. In Models of thought. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1979, chap. 1.3.
Simon, H. A.On the behavioral and rational foundation of economic dynamics. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1984, 5, 3555.
Simon, H. A.Reason in human affairs. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1983.
Wallas, G.Human nature in politics (4th ed.). Gloucester, Mass.: Smith, 1906/1944.
Weatherford, M. S.Economic voting and the “symbolic politics” argument: A reinterpretation and synthesis. American Political Science Review, 1983, 77, 158174.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed