Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Illustrative Education of Rousseau's Emile

  • JOHN T. SCOTT (a1)
Abstract

Rousseau's mission as an author was to make his readers see what he saw in his philosophical “illumination,” yet his task is a paradoxical one, for he must persuade his readers that they are deceived by what they see before their own eyes and must learn to see anew. In order to transform the perspective of his reader, Rousseau throughout his works uses visual imagery and rhetorical devices invoking vision that represents both the correct view of human nature and virtue and the obstacles to learning to see ourselves properly. As a former engraver's apprentice, he was particularly interested in educating his reader through actual images such as frontispieces or illustrations. The aim of this article is to offer an interpretation of the engravings that illustrate Emile, or On Education, in order to investigate how Rousseau educates his reader through challenging the reader's preconceptions concerning human nature and replacing traditional exemplars of human nature and virtue with a new exemplar seen in his imaginary pupil.

Copyright
Corresponding author
John T. Scott is Professor in the Department of Political Science, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95615 (jtscott@ucdavis.edu).
References
Hide All
BloomAllan. 1979. “Introduction” to Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Emile, or On Education, ed. and trans. Bloom Allan. New York: Basic Books.
ColemanPatrick. 1977. “Characterizing Rousseau's Emile .” Modern Language Notes 92: 761–78.
DeneenPatrick. J. 2000. The Odyssey of Political Theory: The Politics of Departure and Return. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
GenetteGérard. 1997. Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation, trans. Lewin Jane E. and Macksey Richard. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Original ed., Seuils. Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1987.
KavanaughThomas. 1987. Writing the Truth: Authority and Desire in Rousseau. Berkeley: University of California Press.
KellyChristopher. 1987. “‘To Persuade without Convincing’: The Language of Rousseau's Legislator.” American Journal of Political Science 31 (May): 321–35.
LabrosseClaude. 1985. Lire au XVIIIe Siècle: ‘La Nouvelle Héloïse’ et ses Lecteurs. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon and CNRS.
MallLaurence. 2002. Emile, ou les Figures de la Fiction. SVEC 2002:04. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.
MarshallDavid. 2005. The Frame of Art: Fictions of Aesthetic Experience, 1750–1815. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
MastersRoger D. 1968. The Political Philosophy of Rousseau. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
MichelIsabelle. 2003. “Les Illustrations de l’Emile au XVIIIe Siècle: Questions d’Iconographie.” Annales de la Société Jean-Jacques Rousseau 2003. Geneva: Droz, 529–65.
OkinSusan Moller. 1979. Women in Western Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
ParkerPatricia. 1987. Literary Fat Ladies: Rhetoric, Gender, Property. London: Methuen.
Plato. 1998. Phaedrus. Trans. Nichols James H.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
RamonCatherine. 2003. “Autour des Sujets d’Estampes de La Nouvelle Héloïse: Estampes Dramatiques et Tableaux Romanesques.” Annales de la Société Jean-Jacques Rousseau 2003. Geneva: Droz, 511–28.
RousseauJean-Jacques. 1959–95. Oeuvres Complètes, 5 vols. Paris: Gallimard, Bibliothèque de la Pléïade.
RousseauJean-Jacques. 1964. First and Second Discourses, ed. Masters Roger D. trans. Judith R. Masters and Roger D. Masters. New York: St. Martin's.
RousseauJean-Jacques. 1965–91. Correspondence Complète, ed. Leigh Ralph A., 50 vols. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.
RousseauJean-Jacques. 1978. On the Social Contract with Geneva Manuscript and Political Economy, ed. Masters Roger D., trans. Judith R. Masters. New York: St. Martin's.
RousseauJean-Jacques. 1979. Emile, or On Education, ed. and trans. Bloom Allan. New York: Basic Books.
RousseauJean-Jacques. 1990–2011. Collected Writings of Rousseau, ed. Masters Roger D. and Kelly Christopher, 10 vols. Hanover, NH: Dartmouth/University Press of New England.
SchaefferDenise. 2002. “The Utility of Ink: Rousseau and Robinson Crusoe.” Review of Politics 64 (Winter): 121–48.
SchaefferDenise. 2013. Rousseau on Education, Judgment, and Freedom. State College: Penn State University Press.
ScottJohn T. 2012. “Do You See What I See? The Education of the Reader in Rousseau's Emile .” The Review of Politics 74 (Summer): 443–63.
SherRichard B. 2008. The Enlightenment and the Book: Scottish Authors and Their Publishers in Eighteenth-Century Britain, Ireland and America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
SkinnerQuentin. 2008. Hobbes and Republican Liberty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
StewartPhilip. 1989. “ Julie et ses Legends.” Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century 260: 257–78.
StewartPhilip. 1992. Engraven Desire: Eros, Image, and Text in the French Eighteenth Century. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
VanpéeJanie. 1990. “Rousseau's Emile ou de l’Éducation: A Resistance to Reading.” Yale French Studies 77: 156–76.
WeissPenny A. 1993. Gendered Community: Rousseau, Sex, and Politics. New York: New York University Press.
ZerilliLinda M.G. 1994. Signifying Woman: Culture and Chaos in Rousseau, Burke, and Mill. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 79
Total number of PDF views: 201 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 661 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.