Skip to main content

The Impartiality of International Judges: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights

  • ERIK VOETEN (a1)

Can international judges be relied upon to resolve disputes impartially? If not, what are the sources of their biases? Answers to these questions are critically important for the functioning of an emerging international judiciary, yet we know remarkably little about international judicial behavior. An analysis of a new dataset of dissents in the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) yields a mixed set of answers. On the bright side, there is no evidence that judges systematically employ cultural or geopolitical biases in their rulings. There is some evidence that career insecurities make judges more likely to favor their national government when it is a party to a dispute. Most strongly, the evidence suggests that international judges are policy seekers. Judges vary in their inclination to defer to member states in the implementation of human rights. Moreover, judges from former socialist countries are more likely to find violations against their own government and against other former socialist governments, suggesting that they are motivated by rectifying a particular set of injustices. I conclude that the overall picture is mostly positive for the possibility of impartial review of government behavior by judges on an international court. Like judges on domestic review courts, ECtHR judges are politically motivated actors in the sense that they have policy preferences on how to best apply abstract human rights in concrete cases, not in the sense that they are using their judicial power to settle geopolitical scores.

Corresponding author
Erik Voeten is Peter F. Krogh Assistant Professor of Geopolitics and Global Justice, Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service and Government Department, Georgetown University, 301 InterCultural Center, 37th & O Streets, N.W. Washington, DC 20057 (
Hide All
Abbott, Kenneth W., Keohane, Robert O., Moravcsik, Andrew, Slaughter, Anne-Marie, and Snidal, Duncan. 2000. “The Concept of Legalization.” International Organization 54 (3): 401–19.
Alter, Karen J. 2006. “Delegation to International Courts and the Limits of Recontracting Political Power.” In Delegation under Anarchy, eds. Hawkins, Darren, Neilson, Daniel, Tierney, Michael J., and Lake, David A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 312–38.
Alter, Karen J. 2008. “Agents or Trustees? International Courts in Their Political Context.European Journal of International Relations 1: 3363.
Alter, Karen J., and Meunier-Aitsahalia, Sophie. 1994. “Judicial Politics in the European Community: European Integration and the Pathbreaking Cassis de Dijon decision.” Comparative Political Studies 24 (4): 535–61.
Arfken, George B. 1985. Mathematical Methods for Physicists, 3rd ed. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Arold, Nina-Louisa. 2007. “The European Court of Human Rights as an Example of Convergence.” Nordic Journal of International Law 76: 305–22.
Bailey, Michael A., and Maltzman, Forrest. 2008. “Does Legal Doctrine Matter? Unpacking Law and Policy Preferences on the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 102 (3): 369–84.
Balas, Aron, Porta, Rafael La, Shleifer, Andrei, and Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio. 2008. “The Divergence of Legal Procedures.” (August 19, 2008)
Baum, Lawrence. 1994. “What Judges Want: Judges' Goals and Judicial Behavior.Political Research Quarterly 47: 749–68.
Bowring, Bill. 2007. “Russia's Relations with the Council of Europe under Increasing Strain.” 28 February 2007. (August 19, 2008)
Bruinsma, Fred J. 2006. “Judicial Identities in the European Court of Human Rights.” In Multilevel Governance in Enforcement and Adjudication, eds. Hoek, Aukje van, Hol, A. M., Jansen, O., Rijpkema, P., and Widdershoven, R.. Antwerp, Belgium: Intersentia, 203–40.
Bruinsma, Fred J., and de Blois, Matthijs. 1997. “Rules of Law from Westport to Wladiwostok: Separate Opinions in the European Court of Human Rights.The Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 15 (2): 175–86.
CarrubbaClifford, J. Clifford, J., Gabel, Matthew, and Hankla, Charles. 2008. “Judicial Behavior under Political Constraints: Evidence from the European Court of Justice.” American Political Science Review 102 (4): 435–52.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dworkin, Ronald. 2003. “The Judge's New Role: Should Personal Convictions Count?Journal of International Criminal Justice 1: 412.
Epstein, Lee, and Knight, Jack. 1997. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Feld, Lars P. P., and Voigt, Stefan. 2003. “Economic Growth and Judicial Independence: Cross Country Evidence Using a New Set of Indicators.” European Journal of Political Economy 19 (3): 497527.
Flauss, J-F. 1998. “Radioscopie de l'élection de la nouvelle Cour européenne des droits de l'hommeRevue Trimestrielle des droits de l'homme 9: 435–64.
Frankel, Marvin E. 1975. “The Search for Truth: An Umpireal View.University of Pennsylvania Law Review 123 (5): 1031–59.
Garrett, Geoffrey, Kelemen, Daniel, and Schulz, Heiner. 1998. “The European Court of Justice, National Governments and Legal Integration in the European Union.” International Organization 52 (1): 149–76.
Garrett, Geoffrey, and Weingast, Barry. 1993. “Ideas, Interests and Institutions: Constructing the EC's Internal Market.” In Ideas and Foreign Policy, eds. Goldstein, J. and Keohane, R.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 173206.
Gartzke, Erik. 1998. “Kant We All Just Get Along: Opportunity, Willingness and the Democratic Peace.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 127.
Gibney, Mark, 2003. “Political Terror-Scores 1980–2002.” (February 1, 2007)
Gleditsch, Kristian S. 2002. “Expanded Trade and GDP Data.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 46: 712–24.
Goldstein, Judith L., Kahler, Miles, Keohane, Robert O., and Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2001. Legalization and World Politics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hall, , Melinda, G. 2001. “Voluntary Retirements from State Supreme Courts: Assessing Democratic Pressures to Relinquish the Bench.” Journal of Politics 63 (4): 1112–40.
Helmke, Gretchen, and Sanders, Mitchell S. 2006. “Modeling Motivations: A Method for Inferring Judicial Goals from Behavior.Journal of Politics 68 (4): 867–78.
Hensley, Thomas R. 1968. “National Bias and the International Court of Justice.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 568–86.
Hoffmann, Stanley. 1977. “The Hell of Good Intentions.Foreign Policy 29: 326.
Huber, Gregory A., and Gordon, Sanford. 2004. “Accountability and Coercion: Is Justice Blind When It Runs for Office?American Journal of Political Science 48 (2): 247–63.
Husa, J. 2004. “Classification of Legal Families Today: Is It Time for a Memorial Hymn?Revue Internationale de Droit Compare 56 (1): 13.
Jackson, Donald W. 1997. The United Kingdom Confronts the European Convention on Human Rights. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
Kelsen, Hans. 1928. “La Garantie juridictionnelle de la Constitution [The jurisdictional protection of the Constitution].” Revue du Droit Public 44: 197257.
Keohane, Robert O., Andrew Moravcsik, and Anne-Marie Slaughter. 2000. “Legalized Dispute Resolution: Interstate and Transnational.”International Organization 54: 457–88.
Kuijer, Martin. 1997. “Voting Behaviour and National Bias in the European Court of Human Rights.” Leiden Journal of International Law 10 (1): 4967.
La Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert W.. 1998. “Law and Finance.” Journal of Political Economy 106 (6): 1113–55.
La Porta, Rafael, deSilanes, Florencio Lopez, Florencio, , Pop-Eleches, Cristian, and Shleifer, Andrei, Andrei, . 2004. “Judicial Checks and Balances.Journal of Political Economy 112 (2): 445–70.
La Porta, Rafael, Shleifer, Andrei, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, and Vishny, R.. 1999. “The Quality of Government.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization.
Legrand, P. 1996. “European Legal Systems Are Not Converging.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 45: 5281.
Majone, Giandomenico. 2001. “Two Logics of Delegation: Agency and Fiduciary Relations in EU Governance.” European Union Politics 2 (1): 103–21.
Martin, Andrew D., and Quinn, Kevin M.. 2002. “Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999.” Political Analysis 10: 134–53.
Matscher, Fransz. 1993. “Methods of Interpretation of the Convention. In The European System for the Protection of Human Rights, eds. McDonald, R., Matscher, F., and Petzold, H.. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 6381.
McKaskle, Paul L. 2005. “The European Court of Human Rights: What It Is, How It Works, and Its Future.” University of San Francisco Law Review 40 (1): 184.
Merills, John G. 1998. Judge Sir Gerald Fitzmaurice and the Discipline of International Law. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
Meron, Theodor. 2005. “Judicial Independence and Impartiality on International Criminal Tribunals.” American Journal of International Law 99: 359–69.
Milanovic, Marko, and Papic, Tatjana. N.d. “As Bad As It Gets: The European Court of Human Rights’ Behrami and Saramati Decision and General International Law.” International Law and Comparative Law Quarterly Forthcoming.
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2000. “The Origin of Human Rights Regimes.” International Organization 54 (2): 217–53.
Mowbray, Alastair. 2005. “The Creativity of the European Court of Human Rights.” Human Rights Law Review 5 (1): 5779.
Posner, Eric A., and de Figueiredo, Miguel. 2005. “Is the International Court of Justice Biased?Journal of Legal Studies 34: 599630.
Posner, Richard A. 1993. “What Do Judges and Justices Maximize? (The Same Thing Everybody Else Does).” Supreme Court Economic Review 3: 141.
Prott, Lyndell V. 1979. The Latent Power of Culture and the International Judge. Abingdon: Professional Books.
Reimann, M. 2002. “The Process and Failure of Comparative Law in the Second Half of the Twentieth Century.” American Journal of Comparative Law 50: 671700.
Renteln, Allison Dundes. 1998. “Cultural Bias in International Law.” American Society of International Law. Proceedings 92: 232–43.
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2004. “The Politics of International Law.” In The Politics of International Law, ed. Reus-Smith, Christian. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1444.
Rothenberg, Larry S., and Sanders, M. S.. 2000. “Severing the Electoral Connection: Shirking in Contemporary Congress.” American Journal of Political Science.
Schubert, Glendon. 1965. The Judicial Mind: The Attitudes and Ideologies of Supreme Court Justices 1946–63. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Schubert, Glendon A. 1977. “Political Culture and Judicial Ideology: Some Cross–Cultural and Subcultural Comparisons.” Comparative Political Studies 9: 363408.
Schubert, Glendon A., and Danelski, David J. (eds.). 1969. Comparative Judicial Behavior: Cross-Cultural Studies of Political Decision-Making in the East and West. New York: Oxford University Press.
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Shapiro, Martin. 1981. Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Shapiro, Martin. 1994. “Judges as Liars.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 17: 155–65.
Shapiro, Martin, and Sweet, Alec Stone. 2002. On Law, Politics, and Judicialization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Stephan, Paul B. 2002. “Courts, Tribunals and Legal Unification—The Agency Problem.” Chicago Journal of International Law 333 (3): 333–52.
Stone Sweet, Alec. 2000. Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
Stone Sweet, Alec. 2007. “The Politics of Constitutional Review in Europe.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 5 (1): 6992.
Terris, Daniel, Romano, Cesare P. R., and Swigart, Leigh. 2007. The International Judge: An Introduction to the Men and Women Who Decide the World's Cases. New York: Oxford University Press.
Voeten, Erik. 2007. “The Politics of International Judicial Appointments: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights.”International Organization 61 (4): 669701.
Wenner, Manfred, Wenner, Lettie M., and Flango, V. Eugene. 1978. “Austrian and Swiss Judges: A Comparative Study.” Comparative Politics 10: 499518.
World Development Indicators Online. Available from (August 15, 2006)
Yourow, Howard Charles. 1995. The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Dynamics of European Human Rights Jurisprudence. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
Zorn, Christopher. 2001. “Generalized Estimating Equation Models for Correlated Data: A Review with Applications.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (2): 470–90.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 12
Total number of PDF views: 433 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1134 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th March 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.