Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T15:11:34.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improving Quantitative Studies of International Conflict: A Conjecture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2000

Nathaniel Beck ,
Gary King  and
Langche Zeng
Nathaniel Beck
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Gary King
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Langche Zeng
Affiliation:
Harvard University and the George Washington University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We address a well-known but infrequently discussed problem in the quantitative study of international conflict: Despite immense data collections, prestigious journals, and sophisticated analyses, empirical findings in the literature on international conflict are often unsatisfying. Many statistical results change from article to article and specification to specification. Accurate forecasts are nonexistent. In this article we offer a conjecture about one source of this problem: The causes of conflict, theorized to be important but often found to be small or ephemeral, are indeed tiny for the vast majority of dyads, but they are large, stable, and replicable wherever the ex ante probability of conflict is large. This simple idea has an unexpectedly rich array of observable implications, all consistent with the literature. We directly test our conjecture by formulating a statistical model that includes its critical features. Our approach, a version of a “neural network” model, uncovers some interesting structural features of international conflict and, as one evaluative measure, forecasts substantially better than any previous effort. Moreover, this improvement comes at little cost, and it is easy to evaluate whether the model is a statistical improvement over the simpler models commonly used.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 94 , Issue 1 , March 2000 , pp. 21 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barbieri, Katherine. 1996. “Economic Interdependence—A Path to Peace or a Source of Interstate Conflict.” Journal of Peace Research 33 (1): 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barron, A. R. 1993. “Universal Approximation Bounds for Superpositions of a Sigmoid Function.” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 39: 930–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Jackman, Simon. 1998. “Beyond Linearity by Default: Generalized Additive Models.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (2): 596–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, Katz, Jonathan, and Tucker, Richard. 1998. “Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (4): 1260–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Tucker, Richard. 1998. “Democracy and Peace: General Law or Limited Phenomenon?” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, 04.Google Scholar
Bishop, C. M. 1995. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bremer, Stuart. 1992. “Dangerous Dyads: Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Interstate War, 1816–1965.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 36 (06): 309–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce. 1981. The War Trap. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Lalman, David. 1992. War and Reason: Domestic and International Imperatives. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, B., and Titterington, D. M.. 1994. “Neural Networks: A Review from a Statistical Perspective.” Statistical Science 9 (1): 2–54.Google Scholar
Eisinga, Rob, Franses, Philip Hans, and Van Dijk, Dick. 1998. “Timing of Vote Decisions in First and Second Order Dutch Elections 1978–1995: Evidence from Artificial Neural Networks.” Political Analysis 7: 117–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farber, Henry, and Gowa, Joanne. 1998. “Building Bridges Abroad.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (3): 455–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallant, A. Ronald. 1981. “On the Bias in Flexible Functional Forms and an Essentially Unbiased Form: The Fourier Flexible Form.” Journal of Econometrics 15 (2): 211–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geller, Daniel S., and Singer, J. David. 1998. Nations at War: A Scientific Study of International Conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gochman, Charles S., and Maoz, Zeev. 1984. “Militarized Interstate Disputes 1816–1976.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 28 (4): 585–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertz, John, Krogh, Anders, and Palmer, Richard. 1991. Introduction to the Theory of Neural Computation. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Holland, John. 1998. Emergence: From Chaos to Order. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Hornik, Kurt. 1990. “Approximation Capabilities of Multilayer Feed-forward Networks.” Neural Networks 4 (2): 251–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaggers, Keith, and Gurr, Ted Robert. 1996. Polity III: Regime Change and Political Authority, 1800–1994 (computer file) (Study #6695). 2d ICPSR version. Boulder, CO: Keith Jaggers/College Park, MD: Ted Robert Gurr [producers], 1995. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].Google Scholar
Jones, Daniel M., Bremer, Stuart, and Singer, J. David. 1996. “Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816–1992: Rationale, Coding Rules, and Empirical Patterns.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 15 (2): 163–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary. 1989. “Event Count Models for International Relations: Generalizations and Applications.” International Studies Quarterly 33 (2): 123–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, and Murray, Christopher. 2000. “Rethinking Human Security.” Harvard University. Typescript.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Tomz, Michael, and Wittenberg, Jason. 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analysis: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (04): 341–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, and Zeng, Langche. 1999. “Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, 09. (http://GKing.Harvard.edu.)Google Scholar
Kuan, C. M., and White, Halbert. 1994. “Artificial Neural Networks: An Econometric Perspective.” Econometric Reviews 13 (1): 1–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Jack S. 1989. “The Causes of War: A Review of Theories and Evidence.” In Behavior, Society, and Nuclear War, vol. 1, ed. Tetlock, Phillip E., Husbands, Jo L., Jervis, Robert, Stern, Paul C., and Tilly, Charles. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 2120–333.Google Scholar
MacKay, D. J. C. 1992a. “Bayesian Interpolation.” Neural Computation 4 (3): 415–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKay, D. J. C. 1992b. “A Practical Bayesian Framework for Backprop Networks.” Neural Computation 4 (3): 448–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKay, D. J. C. 1992c. “The Evidence Framework Applied to Classification Networks.” Neural Computation 4 (5): 698–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKay, D. J. C. 1994. “Bayesian Methods for Backpropagation Networks.” In Models of Neural Networks, vol. III, chap. 6, ed. Domany, Etan, van Hemmen, J. L., and Schulten, Klaus. New York: Springer-Verlag. Pp. 211–54.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., and Snyder, James. 1997. “A Tale of Two Democratic Peace Critiques: A Reply to Thompson and Tucker.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (3): 457–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maoz, Zeev. 1996. Domestic Sources of Global Change. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maoz, Zeev, and Russett, Bruce. 1993. “Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace: 1946–1986.” American Political Science Review 87 (09): 639–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, Berndt, and Reinhardt, Joachim. 1990. Neural Networks: An Introduction. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagler, Jonathan. 1991. “The Effect of Registration Laws and Education on U.S. Voter Turnout.” American Political Science Review 85 (12): 1393–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neal, R. M. 1996. Bayesian Learning for Neural Networks. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oneal, John R., and Russett, Bruce. 1997. “The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950–1985.” International Studies Quarterly 41 (2): 267–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, James Lee, and Singer, J. David. 1973. “Measuring the Concentration of Power in the International System.” Sociological Methods and Research 1 (4): 403–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Lewis Fry. 1960. Statistics of Deadly Quarrels, ed. Wright, Quincy and Lienau, C. C.. Pittsburgh: Boxwood.Google Scholar
Ripley, Brian D. 1996. Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenau, James N., ed. 1976. In Search of Global Patterns. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, James L., and the PDP Research Group. 1986. Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrodt, Philip. 1995. “Patterns, Rules and Learning: Computational Models of International Behavior.” Unpublished manuscript available at http://polmeth.calpoly.edu. Google Scholar
Signorino, Curtis. 1999. “Strategic Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of International Conflict.” American Political Science Review 93 (06): 279–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Signorino, Curtis, and Ritter, J. M.. 1999. “Tau-b or Not Tau-b: Measuring the Similarity of Foreign Policy Positions.” International Studies Quarterly 43 (1): 115–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, J. David, and Small, Melvin. 1993. National Material Capabilities Data, 1816–1985 (computer file) (Study #9903). Ann Arbor, MI: J. David Singer, University of Michigan, and Melvin Small, Detroit, MI: Wayne State University [producers], 1990. Ann Arbor, MI: InterUniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].Google Scholar
Smith, Alastair. 1998. “A Summary of Political Selection: The Effect of Strategic Choice on the Escalation of International Crises.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (2): 698–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, William R., and Tucker, Richard M.. 1997. “A Tale of Two Democratic Peace Critiques.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (3): 428–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, Richard. 1997. “Dyad-Hard: The Interstate Dyad-Year Dataset Creator.” Political Methodologist 8 (1): 28–9.Google Scholar
Tucker, Richard. 1999. “The Similarity of Alliance Portfolios.” http://www.vanderbilt.edu/~rtucker/data/affinity/alliance/similar/.Google Scholar
Vasquez, John A. 1993. The War Puzzle. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Halbert. 1992. Artificial Neural Networks, Approximation and Learning Theory. Oxford, UK, and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zeng, Langche. 1999. “Prediction and Classification with Neural Network Models.” Sociological Methods and Research 27 (4): 499–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeng, Langche. 2000. “Neural Network Models and Political Data Analysis,” In Political Complexity: Nonlinear Models of Politics, ed. Richards, Diana. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Pp. 239–68.Google Scholar