Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 75
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Bailey, Michael A. Hopkins, Daniel J. and Rogers, Todd 2016. Unresponsive and Unpersuaded: The Unintended Consequences of a Voter Persuasion Effort. Political Behavior, Vol. 38, Issue. 3, p. 713.

    Barton, Jared Castillo, Marco and Petrie, Ragan 2016. Negative campaigning, fundraising, and voter turnout: A field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 121, p. 99.

    Crepaz, Markus M. L. Jazayeri, Karen Bodnaruk and Polk, Jonathan 2016. What's Trust Got to Do With It? The Effects of In-Group and Out-Group Trust on Conventional and Unconventional Political Participation. Social Science Quarterly,

    Eckles, Dean Kizilcec, René F. and Bakshy, Eytan 2016. Estimating peer effects in networks with peer encouragement designs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 113, Issue. 27, p. 7316.

    Graves, Lucas Nyhan, Brendan and Reifler, Jason 2016. Understanding Innovations in Journalistic Practice: A Field Experiment Examining Motivations for Fact-Checking. Journal of Communication, Vol. 66, Issue. 1, p. 102.

    Lafuerza, Luis F. Dyson, Louise Edmonds, Bruce and McKane, Alan J. 2016. Simplification and analysis of a model of social interaction in voting. The European Physical Journal B, Vol. 89, Issue. 7,

    Lamare, J. Ryan 2016. Labor Unions and Political Mobilization: Diminishing Returns of Repetitious Contact. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Vol. 55, Issue. 2, p. 346.

    Nyhuis, Martin Gosselt, Jordy F. and Rosema, Martin 2016. The psychology of electoral mobilization: a subtle priming experiment. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, Vol. 26, Issue. 3, p. 293.

    Thomas, Amos Owen 2016. Voter empowerment for emerging democracies: Mobilising the marginalised in Peru. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing,

    Anderson, Derrick M. and Edwards, Barry C. 2015. Unfulfilled Promise: Laboratory experiments in public management research. Public Management Review, Vol. 17, Issue. 10, p. 1518.

    Duvanova, Dinissa Semenov, Alexander and Nikolaev, Alexander 2015. Do social networks bridge political divides? The analysis of VKontakte social network communication in Ukraine. Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 31, Issue. 3, p. 224.

    Jacobson, Gary C. 2015. How Do Campaigns Matter?. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 18, Issue. 1, p. 31.

    Kendall, Chad Nannicini, Tommaso and Trebbi, Francesco 2015. How Do Voters Respond to Information? Evidence from a Randomized Campaign†. American Economic Review, Vol. 105, Issue. 1, p. 322.

    Klofstad, Casey A. 2015. Exposure to Political Discussion in College is Associated With Higher Rates of Political Participation Over Time. Political Communication, Vol. 32, Issue. 2, p. 292.

    Lazer, David M. Sokhey, Anand E. Neblo, Michael A. Esterling, Kevin M. and Kennedy, Ryan 2015. Expanding the Conversation: Multiplier Effects From a Deliberative Field Experiment. Political Communication, Vol. 32, Issue. 4, p. 552.

    Linton, Allen L. and Sinclair, Betsy 2015. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences.

    Minozzi, William Neblo, Michael A. Esterling, Kevin M. and Lazer, David M. J. 2015. Field experiment evidence of substantive, attributional, and behavioral persuasion by members of Congress in online town halls. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 112, Issue. 13, p. 3937.

    Nyhan, Brendan and Reifler, Jason 2015. The Effect of Fact-Checking on Elites: A Field Experiment on U.S. State Legislators. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 59, Issue. 3, p. 628.

    Shi, Ying 2015. Cross-cutting Messages and Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Same-Sex Marriage Amendment. Political Communication, p. 1.

    Song, Hyunjin and Eveland, William P. 2015. The Structure of Communication Networks Matters: How Network Diversity, Centrality, and Context Influence Political Ambivalence, Participation, and Knowledge. Political Communication, Vol. 32, Issue. 1, p. 83.


Is Voting Contagious? Evidence from Two Field Experiments

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 February 2008

Members of the same household share similar voting behaviors on average, but how much of this correlation can be attributed to the behavior of the other person in the household? Disentangling and isolating the unique effects of peer behavior, selection processes, and congruent interests is a challenge for all studies of interpersonal influence. This study proposes and utilizes a carefully designed placebo-controlled experimental protocol to overcome this identification problem. During a face-to-face canvassing experiment targeting households with two registered voters, residents who answered the door were exposed to either a Get Out the Vote message (treatment) or a recycling pitch (placebo). The turnout of the person in the household not answering the door allows for contagion to be measured. Both experiments find that 60% of the propensity to vote is passed onto the other member of the household. This finding suggests a mechanism by which civic participation norms are adopted and couples grow more similar over time.

Corresponding author
David W. Nickerson is Professor, University of Notre Dame, Department of Political Science, 217 O'Shaughnessy Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556 (
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Joshua D. Angrist , Guido W. Imbens , and Donald B. Rubin . 1996. “Identification of Casual Effects Using Instrumental Variables.Journal of the American Statistical Association 91 (June): 444–55.

Paul Allen Beck . 1991. “Voters Intermediation Environments in the 1988 Presidential Contest.Public Opinion Quarterly 55 (Fall): 371–94.

Russel J. Dalton , and Martin P. Wattenberg , eds. 2002. Parties without Partisans: Political Processes in Advanced Industrialized Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press.

Donald P. Green , Alan S. Gerber , and David W. Nickerson . 2003. “Getting Out the Vote in Local Elections: Results from Six Door-to-Door Canvassing Experiments.Journal of Politics 65 (November): 1083–96.

Bernadette C. Hayes , and Clive S. Bean . 1992. “The Impact of Spousal Characteristics on Political Attitudes in Australia.Public Opinion Quarterly 56 (Winter): 524–29.

Robert Huckfeldt , and John Sprague . 1991. “Discussant Effects on Vote Choice: Intimacy, Structure, and Interdependence.Journal of Politics 53 (February): 122–58.

Elihu Katz . 1957. “The Two-Step Flow of Communication: An Up-To-Date Report on an Hypothesis.Public Opinion Quarterly 21 (1): 6178.

Christopher B. Kenny 1994. “The Microenvironment of Attitude Change.” Journal of Politics 56 (August), 715–28.

Casey A. Klofstad 2007. “Talk Leads to Recruitment: How Discussions about Politics and Current Events Increase Civic Participation.Political Research Quarterly 60 (June): 180–91.

Charles F. Manski 1993. “Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem.Review of Economic Studies 60 (July): 531–42.

Scott D. McClurg 2004. “Indirect Mobilization: The Social Consequences of Party Contacts in an Election Campaign.American Politics Research 32 (July): 406–43.

Melissa Michelson . 2003. “Getting Out the Latino Vote: How door-to-door canvassing influences voter turnout in rural Central California.Political Behavior 25 (September): 247–63.

Daniel J. Myers 1997. “Racial Rioting in the 1960S: An Event History Analysis of Local Conditions.American Sociological Review 62 (February): 94112.

David W. Nickerson 2005. “Scaleable Protocols Offer Efficient Design for Field Experiments.Political Analysis 13 (Summer): 233–52.

David W. Nickerson 2006. “Volunteer Phone Calls Can Increase Turnout: Evidence from Eight Field Experiments.American Politics Research 34 (May): 271–92.

David W. Nickerson 2007. “Quality is Job One: Volunteer and Professional Phone Calls.American Journal of Political Science 51 (April): 269–82.

David W. Nickerson , Ryan K. Friedrichs , and David C. King . 2006. “Partisan Mobilization Campaigns in the Field: Results from a Statewide Mobilization Campaign in Michigan.Political Research Quarterly 59 (March): 8597.

Richard G. Niemi , Roman Hedges , and M. Kent Jennings . 1977. “The Similarity of Husbands' and Wives' Political Views.American Politics Quarterly 5 (2): 133–48.

Thomas R. Palfrey , and Rosenthal Howard . 1983. “A Strategic Calculus of Voting.Public Choice 41 (1): 753.

John P. Robinson 1976. “Interpersonal Influence in Election Campaigns: Two Step-Flow Hypotheses.Public Opinion Quarterly 40 (Summer): 304–19.

Bruce I. Sacerdote 2001. “Peer Effects With Random Assignment.Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (May): 681704.

John Wilson , and Marc Musick . 1997. “Who Cares? Toward an Integrated Theory of Volunteer Work.American Sociological Review 62 (October): 694713.

Alan S. Zuckerman , and Laurence A. Kotler-Berkowitz . 1998. “Politics and Society: Political Diversity and Uniformity in Households as a Theoretical Puzzle.” Comparative Political Studies 31 (August): 464–97.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *