Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Issue Yield: A Model of Party Strategy in Multidimensional Space

  • LORENZO DE SIO (a1) and TILL WEBER (a2)

Parties in pluralist democracies face numerous contentious issues, but most models of electoral competition assume a simple, often one-dimensional structure. We develop a new, inherently multidimensional model of party strategy in which parties compete by emphasizing policy issues. Issue emphasis is informed by two distinct goals: mobilizing the party's core voters and broadening the support base. Accommodating these goals dissolves the position-valence dichotomy through a focus on policies that unite the party internally while also attracting support from the electorate at large. We define issue yield as the capacity of an issue to reconcile these criteria, and then operationalize it as a simple index. Results of multilevel regressions combining population survey data and party manifesto scores from the 2009 European Election Study demonstrate that issue yield governs party strategy across different political contexts.

Corresponding author
Lorenzo De Sio is Assistant Professor, LUISS Guido Carli University, Department of Political Science, Viale Romania 32, 00197 Rome, Italy (
Till Weber is Assistant Professor, Baruch College, City University of New York, Department of Political Science, 1 Bernard Baruch Way, Box B5-280, New York, NY 10010 (
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

James Adams . 1998. “Partisan Voting and Multiparty Spatial Competition: The Pressure for Responsible Parties.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 10 (1): 531.

James Adams , Lawrence Ezrow , and Zeynep Somer-Topcu . 2011. “Is Anybody Listening? Evidence that Voters Do Not Respond to European Parties’ Policy Statements during Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (2): 370–82.

Stephen Ansolabehere , and James M. Snyder . 2000. “Valence Politics and Equilibrium in Spatial Election Models.” Public Choice 103 (3): 327–36.

Éric Bélanger , and Bonnie M. Meguid . 2008. “Issue Salience, Issue Ownership, and Issue-Based Vote Choice.” Electoral Studies 27 (3): 477–91.

Thomas Brambor , William Roberts Clark , and Matt Golder . 2006. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analysis.” Political Analysis 14 (1): 6382.

Harold D. Clarke , David Sanders , Marianne C. Stewart , and Paul Whiteley . 2009. Performance Politics and the British Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Otis D. Duncan , and Beverly Davis . 1953. “An Alternative to Ecological Correlation.” American Sociological Review 18 (6): 665–66.

Lawrence Ezrow . 2010. Linking Citizens and Parties: How Electoral Systems Matter for Electoral Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Scott L. Feld , and Bernard Grofman . 1991. “Incumbency Advantage, Voter Loyalty and the Benefit of the Doubt.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 3 (2): 115–37.

Jane Green , and Sara B. Hobolt . 2008. “Owning the Issue Agenda: Party Strategies and Vote Choices in British Elections.” Electoral Studies 27 (3): 460–76.

Bernard Grofman . 2010. “Constraints on the Turnout Gap between High and Low Knowledge (or Income) Voters: Combining the Duncan-Davis Method of Bounds with the Taagepera Method of Bounds.” Electoral Studies 29 (4): 673–77.

Gary Marks , Liesbet Hooghe , Marco R. Steenbergen , and Ryan Bakker . 2007. “Crossvalidating Data on Party Positioning on European Integration.” Electoral Studies 26 (1): 2338.

Bonnie M. Meguid 2008. Party Competition between Unequals: Strategies and Electoral Fortunes in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wolfgang C. Müller , and Kaare Strøm . 1999. Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richard D. McKelvey 1986. “Covering, Dominance, and Institution-Free Properties of Social Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 30 (2): 283314.

John R. Petrocik 1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 825–50.

Karlheinz Reif , and Hermann Schmitt . 1980. “Nine Second-Order National Elections: A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results.” European Journal of Political Research 8 (1): 344.

Jan Rovny . 2012. “Who Emphasizes and Who Blurs? Party Strategies in Multidimensional Competition.” European Union Politics 13 (2): 269–92.

Norman Schofield , and Itai Sened . 2006. Multiparty Democracy: Elections and Legislative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wouter Van der Brug . 2004. “Issue Ownership and Party Choice.” Electoral Studies 23 (2): 209–33.

Wouter Van der Brug , Mark N. Franklin , and Gábor Tóka . 2008. “One Electorate or Many? Differences in Party Preference Formation between New and Established European Democracies.” Electoral Studies 27 (4): 589600.

Markus Wagner . 2012a. “When Do Parties Emphasise Extreme Positions? How Strategic Incentives for Policy Differentiation Influence Issue Importance.” European Journal of Political Research 51 (1): 6488.

Markus. Wagner 2012b. “Defining and Measuring Niche Parties.” Party Politics 18 (6): 845–64.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

De Sio and Weber Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material

 PDF (175 KB)
175 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 15
Total number of PDF views: 213 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 667 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.