Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 8
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Fukumoto, Kentaro and Horiuchi, Yusaku 2016. Identifying the effect of mobilization on voter turnout through a natural experiment. Electoral Studies, Vol. 44, p. 192.

    Garmann, Sebastian 2016. Concurrent elections and turnout: Causal estimates from a German quasi-experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 126, p. 167.

    Hidalgo, F. Daniel and Nichter, Simeon 2016. Voter Buying: Shaping the Electorate through Clientelism. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 60, Issue. 2, p. 436.

    Lucardi, Adrián and Micozzi, Juan Pablo 2016. The Effect of the Electoral Calendar on Politicians' Selection into Legislative Cohorts and Legislative Behavior in Argentina, 1983-2007. Legislative Studies Quarterly,

    Skovoroda, Rodion and Lankina, Tomila 2016. Fabricating votes for Putin: new tests of fraud and electoral manipulations from Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs, p. 1.

    YASUI, KIYOTAKA and NAKAI, RYO 2016. An Opportunity for Backing Down: Looking for an Electoral Connection to Audience Costs. Japanese Journal of Political Science, Vol. 17, Issue. 02, p. 168.

    Horiuchi, Yusaku Saito, Jun and Yamada, Kyohei 2015. Removing Boundaries, Losing Connections: Electoral Consequences of Local Government Reform in Japan. Journal of East Asian Studies, Vol. 15, Issue. 01, p. 99.

    Enikolopov, R. Korovkin, V. Petrova, M. Sonin, K. and Zakharov, A. 2013. Field experiment estimate of electoral fraud in Russian parliamentary elections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 110, Issue. 2, p. 448.


Making Outsiders' Votes Count: Detecting Electoral Fraud through a Natural Experiment

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 17 August 2011

Weak electoral registration requirements are commonly thought to encourage electoral participation, but may also promote electoral fraud. As one possibility, candidates and their supporters can more easily mobilize voters who do not reside within the district to register there fraudulently and vote for that district's candidates. We statistically detect this classic type of electoral fraud for the first time, by taking advantage of a natural experimental setting in Japanese municipal elections. We argue that whether or not a municipal election was held in April 2003 can be regarded as an “as-if” randomly assigned treatment. A differences-in-differences analysis of municipality–month panel data shows that the increase in the new population just prior to April 2003 is significantly larger in treatment municipalities (with an election) than in control ones (without an election). The estimated effects are decisive enough to change the electoral results when the election is competitive. We argue that our approach—“election timing as treatment”—can be applied to investigate not only this type of electoral fraud but also electoral connections in other countries.

Corresponding author
Kentaro Fukumoto is Professor, Department of Political Science, Gakushuin University, 1-5-1 Mejiro, Toshima, Tokyo 171-8588, Japan (
Yusaku Horiuchi is Associate Professor, Crawford School of Economics and Government, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, J.G. Crawford Building, No. 132, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia (
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Sarah Birch . 2007. “Electoral Systems and Election Misconduct.” Comparative Political Studies 40 (12): 1533–56.

Gray W. Cox , and J. Morgan Kousser . 1981. “Turnout and Rural Corruption: New York as a Test Case.” American Journal of Political Science 25 (4): 646–63.

Thad Dunning . 2008. “Improving Causal Inference: Strengths and Limitations of Natural Experiments.” Political Research Quarterly 61 (2): 282–93.

J. A. Fisher 1999. “The Probability of Being Decisive.” Public Choice 101: 267–83.

Yusaku Horiuchi . 2005. Institutions, Incentives and Electoral Participation in Japan: Cross-level and Cross-national Perspectives. London: Routledge Curzon.

Yusaku Horiuchi . 2009. “Understanding Japanese Politics from a Local Perspective.” International Political Science Review 30 (5): 565–73.

Fabrice Lehoucq . 2003. “Electoral Fraud: Causes, Types and Consequences.” Annual Review of Political Science 6: 233–56.

Benjamin Nyblade , and Steven R. Reed . 2008. “Who Cheats? Who Loots? Political Competition and Corruption in Japan, 1947–1993.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (4): 926–41.

Torsten Persson , Guido Tabellini , and Francesco Trebbi . 2003. “Electoral Rules and Corruption.” Journal of the European Economic Association 1 (4): 958–89.

Kamal Sadiq . 2005. “When States Prefer Non-citizens over Citizens: Conflict over Illegal Immigration into Malaysia.”International Studies Quarterly 49 (1): 101–22.

Kenneth A. Shepsle , Robert P. Van Houweling , Samuel J. Abrams , and Peter C. Hanson . 2009. “The Senate Electoral Cycle and Bicameral Appropriations Politics.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (2): 343–59.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *