Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Measuring the Influence of Political Actors on the Federal Budget

  • BEN HAMMOND (a1) and LEAH ROSENSTIEL (a1)

Abstract

When estimating the political determinants of the federal budget, scholars face a choice between using measures of funding and measures of spending as their outcome of interest. We examine the consequences of this choice. In particular, we argue that spending outcomes may serve as a poor test of the research questions scholars seek to answer, since spending data conflate competing budgetary influences, are downstream measures of the appropriations that originated them, and induce measurement error. To test our claim, we compare the spending data used in a recent study (Berry and Fowler 2016: American Journal of Political Science 60 (3): 692–708) with an original data set of military construction appropriations. While an analysis of the spending data produces a null result, the same analysis using the appropriations data provides strong evidence that legislators use their committee positions to distribute pork. Our findings have broad implications for studies that use measures of spending in the congressional and presidency literatures.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Ben Hammond, Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Politics, Princeton University, blh2@princeton.edu.
Leah Rosenstiel, Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Politics, Princeton University, leahsr@princeton.edu.

Footnotes

Hide All

We thank Brandice Canes-Wrone, Adam Dynes, Nathan Gibson, Patricia Kirkland, Asya Magazinnik, Nolan McCarty, Marc Ratkovic, the editor, and two anonymous referees for their invaluable feedback. June Hwang and Will Lowe provided guidance assigning military bases to congressional districts. We are especially grateful to Christopher Berry and Anthony Fowler for their helpful comments. All errors are our own. Replication files are available at the American Political Science Review Dataverse: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/UN3KML.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Albouy, David. 2013. “Partisan Representation in Congress and the Geographic Distribution of Federal Funds.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 95 (1): 127–41.
Alexander, Dan, Berry, Christopher R., and Howell, William G.. 2015. “Distributive Politics and Legislator Ideology.” The Journal of Politics 78 (1): 214–31.
Alvarez, R. Michael, and Saving, Jason L.. 1997. “Congressional Committees and the Political Economy of Federal Outlays.” Public Choice 92 (1): 55–73.
Anzia, Sarah F., and Berry., Christopher R. 2011. “The Jackie (and Jill) Robinson Effect: Why Do Congresswomen Outperform Congressmen?American Journal of Political Science 55 (3): 478–93.
Balla, Steven J., Lawrence, Eric D., Maltzman, Forrest, and Sigelman, Lee. 2002. “Partisanship, Blame Avoidance, and the Distribution of Legislative Pork.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (3): 515–25.
Berry, Christopher R., Burden, Barry C., and Howell, William G.. 2010. “The President and the Distribution of Federal Spending.” American Political Science Review 104 (4): 783–799.
Berry, Christopher R., and Fowler, Anthony. 2016. “Cardinals or Clerics? Congressional Committees and the Distribution of Pork.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (3): 692–708.
Bickers, Kenneth N., and Stein, Robert M.. 1991. Federal Domestic Outlays, 1983–1990: A Data Book. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
Bickers, Kenneth N., and Stein, Robert M.. 2000. “The Congressional Pork Barrel in a Republican Era.” The Journal of Politics 62 (4): 1070–86.
Canes-Wrone, Brandice. 2006. Who Leads Whom? Presidents, Policy, and the Public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Carroll, Royce, and Kim, Henry A.. 2010. “Party Government and the ‘Cohesive Power of Public Plunder’.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (1): 34–44.
Cox, Gary, and McCubbins, Mathew. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Data Transparency: Oversight Needed to Address Underreporting and Inconsistencies on Federal Award Website. 2014. GAO-14-476. Government Accountability Office, June.
Dynes, Adam M., and Huber, Gregory A.. 2015. “Partisanship and the Allocation of Federal Spending: Do Same-Party Legislators or Voters Benefit from Shared Party Affiliation with the President and House Majority?American Political Science Review 109 (1): 172–86.
Ferejohn, John A. 1974. Pork Barrel Politics; Rivers and Harbors Legislation, 1947–1968. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Gordon, Sanford C. 2011. “Politicizing Agency Spending Authority: Lessons from a Bush-Era Scandal.” American Political Science Review 105 (4): 717–34.
Gordon, Sanford C., and Kang, Woo Chang. 2015. “Distributive Politics: Federal Outlays.” In Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: Interdisciplinary Directions, eds. Scott, Robert and Kosslyn, Stephen. New York: Wiley, 1–16.
Howell, William G., Jackman, Saul P., and Rogowski, Jon C.. 2013. The Wartime President: Executive Influence and the Nationalizing Politics of Threat. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Hudak, John Joseph. 2014. Presidential Pork: White House Influence over the Distribution of Federal Grants. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Kiewiet, D.Roderick, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1991. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kriner, Douglas L., and Reeves, Andrew. 2012. “The Influence of Federal Spending on Presidential Elections.” American Political Science Review 106 (2): 348–66.
Kriner, Douglas L., and Reeves, Andrew. 2015. The Particularistic President: The Politics of Federal Grant Spending . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, Frances E. 2003. “Geographic Politics in the U.S. House of Representatives: Coalition Building and Distribution of Benefits.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (4): 714–28.
Martin, Gregory J. 2018. “Dividing the Dollar with Formulas.” The Journal of Politics 80 (2), 479–93.
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Payne, A. Abigail. 2007. “The Effects of Congressional Appropriation Committee Membership on the Distribution of Federal Research Funding to Universities.” Economic Inquiry 41 (2): 325–45.
Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Weingast, Barry R., and Marshall, William J.. 1988. “The Industrial Organization of Congress; or, Why Legislatures, like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets.” Journal of Political Economy 96 (1): 132–63.
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Hammond and Rosenstiel Supplementary Materials
Hammond and Rosenstiel Supplementary Materials

 PDF (348 KB)
348 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Hammond and Rosenstiel Supplementary Materials
Dataset

 Unknown

Measuring the Influence of Political Actors on the Federal Budget

  • BEN HAMMOND (a1) and LEAH ROSENSTIEL (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed