Norton, James and Miller, Kristie 2017. A psychologistic theory of metaphysical explanation. Synthese,
Wen, Xuefeng 2017. Judgment aggregation in nonmonotonic logic. Synthese,
Dietrich, Franz 2016. Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation. Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 95, p. 113.
Nehring, Klaus Pivato, Marcus and Puppe, Clemens 2016. Unanimity overruled: Majority voting and the burden of history. Journal of Theoretical Politics, Vol. 28, Issue. 4, p. 552.
Pigozzi, Gabriella 2015. The Logic of Group Decisions: Judgment Aggregation. Journal of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 44, Issue. 6, p. 755.
Lehtinen, Aki 2015. Strategic Voting and the Degree of Path-Dependence. Group Decision and Negotiation, Vol. 24, Issue. 1, p. 97.
Dietrich, Franz 2015. Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others. Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 160, p. 463.
Baumeister, Dorothea Erdélyi, Gábor Erdélyi, Olivia J. and Rothe, Jörg 2015. Complexity of manipulation and bribery in judgment aggregation for uniform premise-based quota rules. Mathematical Social Sciences, Vol. 76, p. 19.
Jakimowicz, A. 2015. Path Dependence in Neoclassical Economic Growth Theory. Acta Physica Polonica A, Vol. 127, Issue. 3a, p. A-86.
Porello, D. and Endriss, U. 2014. Ontology merging as social choice: judgment aggregation under the open world assumption. Journal of Logic and Computation, Vol. 24, Issue. 6, p. 1229.
Nehring, Klaus Pivato, Marcus and Puppe, Clemens 2014. The Condorcet set: Majority voting over interconnected propositions. Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 151, p. 268.
O'Madagain, Cathal 2014. CAN GROUPS HAVE CONCEPTS? SEMANTICS FOR COLLECTIVE INTENTIONS. Philosophical Issues, Vol. 24, Issue. 1, p. 347.
Grossi, Davide and Pigozzi, Gabriella 2014. Judgment Aggregation: A Primer. Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, Vol. 8, Issue. 2, p. 1.
Dietrich, Franz 2014. Scoring rules for judgment aggregation. Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 42, Issue. 4, p. 873.
Howlett, Michael and Goetz, Klaus H. 2014. Introduction: time, temporality and timescapes in administration and policy. International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 80, Issue. 3, p. 477.
Nehama, Ilan 2013. Approximately classic judgement aggregation. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 68, Issue. 1-3, p. 91.
Dietrich, Franz and List, Christian 2013. Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case. Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 40, Issue. 4, p. 1067.
List, Christian 2012. The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review. Synthese, Vol. 187, Issue. 1, p. 179.
O’Madagain, Cathal 2012. Group Agents: Persons, Mobs, or Zombies?. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, Vol. 20, Issue. 2, p. 271.
I model sequential decisions over multiple interconnected propositions and investigate path-dependence in such decisions. The propositions and their interconnections are represented in propositional logic. A sequential decision process is path-dependent if its outcome depends on the order in which the propositions are considered. Assuming that earlier decisions constrain later ones, I prove three main results: First, certain rationality violations by the decision-making agent—individual or group—are necessary and sufficient for path-dependence. Second, under some conditions, path-dependence is unavoidable in decisions made by groups. Third, path-dependence makes decisions vulnerable to strategic agenda setting and strategic voting. I also discuss escape routes from path-dependence. My results are relevant to discussions on collective consistency and reason-based decision-making, focusing not only on outcomes, but also on underlying reasons, beliefs, and constraints.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.
Full text views reflects the number of PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.