Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Montesquieu's Teaching on the Dangers of Extreme Corrections: Japan, the Catholic Inquisition, and Moderation in The Spirit of the Laws

  • NATHANIEL GILMORE (a1) and VICKIE B. SULLIVAN (a2)
Abstract

Explicitly and implicitly in The Spirit of the Laws, Montesquieu binds together the Japanese who persecute Christians and the Inquisitors of Catholicism who persecute heretics. In seeking purity, both sets of vehement reformers impose atrocious punishments. In so binding the abuses of the East and West together, the work is an expression neither of Orientalism nor of Eurocentrism as conventionally understood. Although Montesquieu thus offers a critical approach to Europe's vulnerability to reformers who go to extremes, whether pious zealots who seek to perpetuate Christianity or zealous Enlightenment philosophes who would seek to eradicate it, many commentators have focused on the work's apparent neutrality with regard to the various cultural phenomena it examines. The key to understanding Montesquieu's reserved tone lies in his commitment to moderation. Given the West's continuing vulnerability to extremism of various types, Montesquieu's moderate teaching on the need for moderation in corrections remains pressingly relevant.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Nathaniel Gilmore is Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, Sidney Smith Hall, Room 3018, 100 St. George Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3G3 (NGilmore17@gmail.com). Phone: 647-229-3867; Fax: 207-363-6401.
Vickie B. Sullivan is Cornelia M. Jackson Professor, Department of Political Science, Packard Hall, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155 (vickie.sullivan@tufts.edu). Phone: 617-627-2328; Fax: 617-627-3660.
Footnotes
Hide All

An earlier version of this article was presented at the American Political Science Association convention in 2015 in San Francisco. We thank our respondent at that presentation Khalil Habib as well as Robert Devigne and Dennis Rasmussen for their helpful comments on earlier drafts. Our argument benefitted from the advice and suggestions of the reviewers and editors of the APSR. We are also grateful to Deborah Schildkraut and Samuel R. Sommers for offering insights from their respective areas of expertise. Finally, we thank Alexander Trubowitz for his editorial assistance.

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Guillaume Ansart . 2009. “Variations on Montesquieu: Raynal and Diderot's Histoire des deux Indes and the American Revolution.” Journal of the History of Ideas 70:3 (July): 399420.

Robert C. Bartlett 2001. “On the Politics of Faith and Reason: The Project of Enlightenment in Pierre Bayle and Montesquieu.” The Journal of Politics 63:1 (February): 128.

Ronald Beiner . 2010. Civil Religion: A Dialogue in the History of Political Thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Paul O. Carrese 2003. The Cloaking of Power: Montesquieu, Blackstone, and the Rise of Judicial Activism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Paul O. Carrese 2016. Democracy in Moderation: Montesquieu, Tocqueville, and Sustainable Liberalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Annelien de Dijn . 2014. “Was Montesquieu a Liberal Republican?Review of Politics 76:1 (Winter): 2141.

F. T. H. Fletcher 1933. “Montesquieu's Influence on Anti-Slavery Opinion in England.” The Journal of Negro History 18:4 (October): 414–25.

Thomas Hegghammer . 2013. “Should I Stay or Should I Go?: Explaining Variation in Western Jihadists’ Choice between Domestic and Foreign Fighting.” The American Political Science Review 107:1 (February): 115.

John M. Hobson 2012. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Donald R. Kelley 1990. The Human Measure: Social Thought in the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

R. Koebner 1951. “Despot and Despotism: Vicissitudes of a Political Term.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 14:3–4: 275302.

Sharon Krause . 2000. “The Spirit of Separate Powers in Montesquieu.” Review of Politics 62:2 (Spring): 231–65.

Manus I. Midlarsky 2011. Origins of Political Extremism: Mass Violence in the Twentieth Century and Beyond. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Thomas L. Pangle 2010. The Theological Basis of Liberal Modernity in Montesquieu's “Spirit of the Laws.” Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Dennis C. Rasmussen 2014. The Pragmatic Enlightenment: Recovering the Liberalism of Hume, Smith, Montesquieu, and Voltaire. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Joan-Pau Rubiés . 2005. “Oriental Despotism and European Orientalism: Botero to Montesquieu.” Journal of Early Modern History 9 (1): 109–80.

Vickie B. Sullivan 2017. Montesquieu and the Despotic Ideas of Europe: An Interpretation of “The Spirit of the Laws.” Chicago: University of Chicago Press, forthcoming.

Mark H. Waddicor 1970. Montesquieu and the Philosophy of Natural Law. The Hague: Martinus Nijhhoff.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 37 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 180 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 5th June 2017 - 24th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.