Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Nonrepresentative Representatives: An Experimental Study of the Decision Making of Elected Politicians

  • LIOR SHEFFER (a1), PETER JOHN LOEWEN (a1), STUART SOROKA (a2), STEFAAN WALGRAVE (a3) and TAMIR SHEAFER (a4)...
  • Please note a correction has been issued for this article.
Abstract

A considerable body of work in political science is built upon the assumption that politicians are more purposive, strategic decision makers than the citizens who elect them. At the same time, other work suggests that the personality profiles of office seekers and the environment they operate in systematically amplifies certain choice anomalies. These contrasting perspectives persist absent direct evidence on the reasoning characteristics of representatives. We address this gap by administering experimental decision tasks to incumbents in Belgium, Canada, and Israel. We demonstrate that politicians are as or more subject to common choice anomalies when compared to nonpoliticians: they exhibit a stronger tendency to escalate commitment when facing sunk costs, they adhere more to policy choices that are presented as the status-quo, their risk calculus is strongly subject to framing effects, and they exhibit distinct future time discounting preferences. This has obvious implications for our understanding of decision making by elected politicians.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Nonrepresentative Representatives: An Experimental Study of the Decision Making of Elected Politicians
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Nonrepresentative Representatives: An Experimental Study of the Decision Making of Elected Politicians
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Nonrepresentative Representatives: An Experimental Study of the Decision Making of Elected Politicians
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Lior Sheffer is a PhD Candidate, Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, Sidney Smith Hall, 100 St. George Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3G3, Canada (lior.sheffer@utoronto.ca.)
Peter John Loewen is the Director of the School of Public Policy and Governance and an Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Toronto, 14 Queen's Park Cres. West, Toronto, ON M5S 3K9, Canada (peter.loewen@utoronto.ca).
Stuart Soroka is the Michael W. Traugott Collegiate Professor of Communication Studies and Political Science, University of Michigan, 5370 North Quad, 105 South State Street, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-1285, USA (ssoroka@umich.edu.)
Stefaan Walgrave is a Professor of Political Science, University of Antwerp, Stadscampus, Sint - Jacobstraat 2 - 4, S.LN55.012, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium (stefaan.walgrave@uantwerpen.be.)
Tamir Sheafer is the Dean of the Social Science Faculty and Professor of Political Science and Communication, Hebrew University, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem 91905, Israel (tamir.sheafer@mail.huji.ac.il).
Footnotes
Hide All

We wish to thank Eran Amsalem, Matthew Ayling, Yves Dejaeghere, Lynn Epping, Jeroen Joly, Yogev Karasenty, Julie Sevenans, Tal Shahaf, Kirsten Van Camp, Debby Vos, and Alon Zoizner for their work on this project; the editor and three anonymous reviewers for their thorough and helpful feedback; participants of the 2014 Yale ISPS Conference on Experimental Studies of Elite Behavior, the 2014 International Society of Political Psychology Association conference, the 2016 American Political Science Association and Southern Political Science Association conferences, and the 2016 New York Area Political Psychology Meeting for their invaluable discussion and comments. An earlier version of this article was awarded the CQ Press Award for Best Legislative Studies Section Presented at the 2016 APSA Meeting. This work was supported by the European Research Council [Advanced Grant INFOPOL, No. 295735] and the Research Fund of the University of Antwerp [Grant No. 26827].

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Aberbach, Joel D., Putnam, Robert D., and Rockman, Bert A.. 1981. Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Alesina, Alberto. 1987. “Macroeconomic Policy in a Two-Party System as a Repeated Game.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 102 (3): 651–78.
Anderson, Christopher J. 2003. “The Psychology of Doing Nothing: Forms of Decision Avoidance Result from Reason and Emotion.” Psychological Bulletin 129 (1): 139.
Aragonès, Enriqueta, Postlewaite, Andrew, and Palfrey, Thomas. 2007. “Political Reputations and Campaign Promises.” Journal of the European Economic Association 5 (4): 846–84.
Arceneaux, Kevin. 2012. “Cognitive Biases and the Strength of Political Arguments.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (2): 271–85.
Arkes, Hal R., and Blumer, Catherine. 1985. “The Psychology of Sunk Cost.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 35 (1): 124–40.
Arnold, R. Douglas. 1992. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Ashworth, Scott. 2012. “Electoral Accountability: Recent Theoretical and Empirical Work.” Annual Review of Political Science 15: 183201.
Axelrod, Robert. 2015. Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Barbosa, Saulo Dubard, Gerhardt, Megan W., and Kickul, Jill Richard. 2007. “The Role of Cognitive Style and Risk Preference on Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy and Entrepreneurial Intentions.” Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 13 (4): 86104.
Baron, David P., and Ferejohn, John A.. 1989. “Bargaining in Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 83 (04): 1181–206.
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D.. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Best, Heinrich. 2011. “Does Personality Matter in Politics? Personality Factors as Determinants of Parliamentary Recruitment and Policy Preferences.” Comparative Sociology 10 (6): 928–48.
Boettcher, William A. 2004. “The Prospects for Prospect Theory: An Empirical Evaluation of International Relations Applications of Framing and Loss Aversion.” Political Psychology 25 (3): 331–62.
Boettcher, William A., and Cobb, Michael D.. 2009. “Don’t Let Them Die in Vain Casualty Frames and Public Tolerance for Escalating Commitment in Iraq.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 (5): 677–97.
Brender, Adi, and Drazen, Allan. 2008. “How do Budget Deficits and Economic Growth Affect Reelection Prospects? Evidence from a Large Panel of Countries.” The American Economic Review 98 (5): 2203–20.
Broockman, David E. 2014. “Mobilizing Candidates: Political Actors Strategically Shape the Candidate Pool with Personal Appeals.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 1 (02): 104–19.
Broockman, David E., and Butler, Daniel M.. 2017. “The Causal Effects of Elite Position-Taking on Voter Attitudes: Field Experiments with Elite Communication.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (1): 208–21.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce. 2013. Principles of International Politics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Siverson, Randolph M.. 1995. “War and the Survival of Political Leaders: A Comparative Study of Regime Types and Political Accountability.” American Political Science Review 89 (04): 841–55.
Butler, Daniel M., and Dynes, Adam M.. 2016. “How Politicians Discount the Opinions of Constituents with Whom They Disagree.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (4): 975–89.
Butler, Daniel M., Karpowitz, Christopher F., and Pope, Jeremy C.. 2012. “A Field Experiment on Legislators Home Styles: Service versus Policy.” The Journal of Politics 74 (02): 474–86.
Cai, Hongbin and Treisman, Daniel 2009. “Political Decentralization and Policy Experimentation.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 4 (1): 3558.
Camerer, Colin F., Hogarth, Robin M., Budescu, David V., and Eckel, Catherine. 1999. The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor-Production Framework. In Elicitation of Preferences. New York, NY: Springer, 748.
Capelos, Tereza. 2005. Shield or Stinger: The Role of Party Bonds and Competence Evaluations in Political Predicaments. Technical Report, University of Surrey.
Caprara, Gian Vittorio, Barbaranelli, Claudio, Consiglio, Chiara, Picconi, Laura, and Zimbardo, Philip G.. 2003. “Personalities of Politicians and Voters: Unique and Synergistic Relationships.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84 (4): 849.
Caprara, Gianvittorio, Francescato, Donata, Mebane, Minou, Sorace, Roberta, and Vecchione, Michele. 2010. “Personality Foundations of Ideological Divide: A Comparison of Women Members of Parliament and Women Voters in Italy.” Political Psychology 31 (5): 739–62.
Chabris, Christopher F., Laibson, David, Morris, Carrie L., Schuldt, Jonathon P., and Taubinsky, Dmitry. 2008. “Individual Laboratory-Measured Discount Rates Predict Field Behavior.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 37 (2–3): 237.
Chong, Dennis, and Druckman, James N.. 2007. “Framing Theory.” Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 10: 103–26.
Crandall, Christian S., Eidelman, Scott, Skitka, Linda J., and Morgan, G. Scott. 2009. “Status Quo Framing Increases Support for Torture.” Social Influence 4 (1): 110.
Dafoe, Allan. 2011. “Statistical Critiques of the Democratic Peace: Caveat Emptor.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (2): 247–62.
Dafoe, Allan, Zhang, Baobao, and Caughey, Devin. 2016. “Confounding in Survey Experiments: Diagnostics and Solutions.” Manuscript. http://www.allandafoe.com/confounding.
Dewan, Torun, and Dowding, Keith. 2005. “The Corrective Effect of Ministerial Resignations on Government Popularity.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (1): 4656.
Dewan, Torun, and Spirling, Arthur. 2011. “Strategic Opposition and Government Cohesion in Westminster Democracies.” American Political Science Review 105 (02): 337–58.
Dietrich, Bryce J., Lasley, Scott, Mondak, Jeffery J., Remmel, Megan L., and Turner, Joel. 2012. “Personality and Legislative Politics: The Big Five Trait Dimensions among U.S. State Legislators.” Political Psychology 33 (2): 195210.
DiRenzo, Gordon J. 1967. “Professional Politicians and Personality Structures.” American Journal of Sociology 73 (2): 217–25.
Downs, George W., and Rocke, David M.. 1994. “Conflict, Agency, and Gambling for Resurrection: The Principal-Agent Problem goes to War.” American Journal of Political Science 38 (2): 362–80.
Drazen, Allan. 2000. “The Political Business Cycle after 25 Years.NBER Macroeconomics Annual 15: 75117.
Druckman, James N. 2001. “The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence.” Political Behavior 23 (3): 225–56.
Druckman, James N. 2004. “Political Preference Formation: Competition, Deliberation, and the (Ir)relevance of Framing Effects.” American Political Science Review 98 (04): 671–86.
Druckman, James N., Green, Donald P., Kuklinski, James H., and Lupia, Arthur. 2006. “The Growth and Development of Experimental Research in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 100 (04): 627–35.
Druckman, James N., and Lupia, Arthur. 2000. “Preference Formation.” Annual Review of Political Science 3 (1): 124.
Druckman, James N., and Lupia, Arthur. 2012. “Experimenting with Politics.” Science 335 (6073): 1177–9.
Druckman, James N., and McDermott, Rose. 2008. “Emotion and the Framing of Risky Choice.” Political Behavior 30 (3): 297321.
Dunleavy, Patrick. 2014. Democracy, Bureaucracy and Public Choice: Economic Approaches in Political Science. New York, NY: Routledge.
Dur, Robert A. J. 2001. “Why do Policy Makers Stick to Inefficient Decisions?Public Choice 107 (3–4): 221–34.
Edwards, George C., and Wood, B. Dan. 1999. “Who Influences Whom? The President, Congress, and the Media.” American Political Science Review 93 (02): 327–44.
Enemark, Daniel, Gibson, Clark C., McCubbins, Mathew D., and Seim, Brigitte. 2016. “Effect of Holding Office on the Behavior of Politicians.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (48): 13690–5.
Fatas, Enrique, Neugebauer, Tibor, and Tamborero, Pilar. 2007. “How Politicians Make Decisions: A Political Choice Experiment.” Journal of Economics 92 (2): 167–96.
Fearon, James D. 1995. “Rationalist Explanations for War.” International Organization 49 (03): 379414.
Fearon, James D. 1997. “Signaling Foreign Policy Interests Tying Hands versus Sinking Costs.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (1): 6890.
Fearon, James D. 1999. “Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types versus Sanctioning Poor Performance.” Democracy, Accountability, and Representation 55: 61.
Feldman, Ofer. 1996. “The Political Personality of Japan: An Inquiry into the Belief Systems of Diet Members.” Political Psychology 17 (4): 657–82.
Fernandez, Raquel, and Rodrik, Dani. 1991. “Resistance to Reform: Status Quo Bias in the Presence of Individual-Specific Uncertainty.” The American Economic Review, 1146–55.
Fowler, James H., and Kam, Cindy D.. 2006. “Patience as a Political Virtue: Delayed Gratification and Turnout.” Political Behavior 28 (2): 113–28.
Franzese, Robert J Jr. 2002. “Electoral and Partisan Cycles in Economic Policies and Outcomes.” Annual Review of Political Science 5 (1): 369421.
Fréchette, Guillaume R. 2011. “Laboratory Experiments: Professionals versus Students.’ Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1939219 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1939219.
Frederick, Shane, Loewenstein, George, and O’Donoghue, Ted. 2002. “Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review.” Journal of Economic Literature 40 (2): 351401.
Fu, Qiang, and Li, Ming. 2014. “Reputation-Concerned Policy Makers and Institutional Status Quo Bias.” Journal of Public Economics 110: 1525.
Galle, Brian D. 2012. “Myopia, Fiscal Federalism, and Unemployment Insurance: Time to Reform UI Financing.” Boston College Law School Legal Studies Research Paper (265).
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1993. “The Politics of Structural Change Swedish Social Democracy and Thatcherism in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies 25 (4): 521–47.
Geddes, Barbara. 1996. Politician’s Dilemma: Building State Capacity in Latin America. Vol. 25, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Gerber, Alan S., Huber, Gregory A., Doherty, David, and Dowling, Conor M.. 2011. “The Big Five Personality Traits in the Political Arena.” Annual Review of Political Science 14: 265–87.
Ghadim, Amir K. Abadi, Pannell, David J., and Burton, Michael P.. 2005. “Risk, Uncertainty, and Learning in Adoption of a Crop Innovation.” Agricultural Economics 33 (1): 19.
Gilovich, Thomas, Griffin, Dale, and Kahneman, Daniel. 2002. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Green, Donald P., Palmquist, Bradley, and Schickler, Eric. 2004. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Greenstein, Fred I. 2004. The Presidential Difference: Leadership Style from FDR to George W. Bush. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Grose, Christian R. 2011. Congress in Black and White: Race and Representation in Washington and at Home. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Grose, Christian R., Malhotra, Neil, and Van Houweling, Robert Parks. 2015. “Explaining Explanations: How Legislators Explain their Policy Positions and How Citizens React.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (3): 724–43.
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Hughes, D. Alex, and Victor, David G.. 2013. “The Cognitive Revolution and the Political Psychology of Elite Decision Making.” Perspectives on Politics 11 (02): 368–86.
Hall, Peter A., and Taylor, Rosemary C. R.. 1996. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political Studies 44 (5): 936–57.
Harrison, Glenn W., Lau, Morten I., Rutström, E. Elisabet, and Sullivan, Melonie B.. 2005. “Eliciting Risk and Time Preferences Using Field Experiments: Some Methodological Issues.” Field Experiments in Economics 10: 125218.
Harrison, Glenn W., Lau, Morten I., and Williams, Melonie B.. 2002. “Estimating Individual Discount Rates in Denmark: A Field Experiment.” The American Economic Review 92 (5): 1606–17.
Healy, Andrew, and Malhotra, Neil. 2013. “Retrospective Voting Reconsidered.” Annual Review of Political Science 16: 285306.
Heath, Chip. 1995. “Escalation and De-escalation of Commitment in Response to Sunk Costs: The Role of Budgeting in Mental Accounting.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 62 (1): 3854.
Heß, Moritz, von Scheve, Christian, Schupp, Jürgen, and Wagner, Gert. 2013. “Members of German Federal Parliament More Risk-Loving Than General Population.’ SOEP Paper No. 546. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2253836 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2253836.
Hogarth, Robin M. 2002. “Deciding Analytically or Trusting Your Intuition? The Advantages and Disadvantages of Analytic and Intuitive Thought.’ UPF Economics and Business Working Paper No. 654. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=394920 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.394920.
Howitt, Peter, and Wintrobe, Ronald. 1995. “The Political Economy of Inaction.” Journal of Public Economics 56 (3): 329–53.
Jacobs, Alan M. 2008. “The Politics of When: Redistribution, Investment and Policy Making for the Long Term.” British Journal of Political Science 38 (02): 193220.
Jacobs, Alan M. 2011. Governing for the Long Term: Democracy and the Politics of Investment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jervis, Robert. 1992. “Political Implications of Loss Aversion.” Political Psychology 13 (2): 187204.
Jervis, Robert. 2015. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Johnson, Dominic D. P., McDermott, Rose, Barrett, Emily S., Cowden, Jonathan, Wrangham, Richard, McIntyre, Matthew H., and Rosen, Stephen Peter. 2006. “Overconfidence in Wargames: Experimental Evidence on Expectations, Aggression, Gender and Testosterone.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273 (1600): 2513–20.
Jones, Bryan D. 2001. Politics and the Architecture of Choice: Bounded Rationality and Governance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Jones, Bryan D. 2003. “Bounded Rationality and Political Science: Lessons from Public Administration and Public Policy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13 (4): 395412.
Jones, Bryan D. and Baumgartner, Frank R.. 2005 a. “A Model of Choice for Public Policy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15 (3): 325–51.
Jones, Bryan D., and Baumgartner, Frank R.. 2005 b. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Jost, John T., Banaji, Mahzarin R., and Nosek, Brian A.. 2004. “A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo.” Political Psychology 25 (6): 881919.
Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kahneman, Daniel, Knetsch, Jack L., and Thaler, Richard H.. 1991. “Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1): 193206.
Kalla, Joshua L., and Broockman, David E.. 2016. “Campaign Contributions Facilitate Access to Congressional Officials: A Randomized Field Experiment.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (3): 545–58.
Kanwisher, Nancy. 1989. “Cognitive Heuristics and American Security Policy.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 33 (4): 652–75.
Kayser, Mark Andreas. 2005. “Who Surfs, Who Manipulates? The Determinants of Opportunistic Election Timing and Electorally Motivated Economic Intervention.” American Political Science Review 99 (01): 1727.
Kingdon, John W. 1989. Congressmen’s Voting Decisions. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Kühberger, Anton. 1998. “The Influence of Framing on Risky Decisions: A Meta-Analysis.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 75 (1): 2355.
Lawless, Jennifer L. 2012. Becoming a Candidate: Political Ambition and the Decision to Run for Office. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Lerner, Jennifer S., and Tetlock, Philip E.. 1999. “Accounting for the Effects of Accountability.” Psychological Bulletin 125 (2): 255.
LeVeck, Brad L., Hughes, D. Alex, Fowler, James H., Hafner-Burton, Emilie, and Victor, David G.. 2014. “The Role of Self-Interest in Elite Bargaining.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (52): 18536–41.
Levy, Jack S. 1997. “Prospect Theory, Rational Choice, and International Relations.” International Studies Quarterly 41 (1): 87112.
Levy, Jack S. 2003. “Applications of Prospect Theory to Political Science.” Synthese 135 (2): 215–41.
Levy, Jack S. 2013. “Psychology and Foreign Policy Decision-Making.” The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, 314–6.
Linde, Jona, and Vis, Barbara. 2017. “Do Politicians Take Risks Like the Rest of Us? An Experimental Test of Prospect Theory under MPs.” Political Psychology 38 (1): 101–17.
List, John A. 2003. “Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (1): 4171.
List, John A., and Mason, Charles F.. 2011. “Are CEOs Expected Utility Maximizers?Journal of Econometrics 162 (1): 114–23.
Loewen, Peter, and MacKenzie, Michael. Forthcoming. “Service Representation in a Federal System: A Field Experiment.” Journal of Experimental Political Science.
Loewenstein, George, and Elster, Jon. 1992. Choice Over Time. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Majumdar, Sumon, and Mukand, Sharun W.. 2004. “Policy Gambles.” The American Economic Review 94 (4): 1207–22.
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1995. Democratic Governance. New York, NY: Free Press.
Massey, Frank J Jr. 1951. “The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of Fit.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 46 (253): 6878.
McAfee, R. Preston, Mialon, Hugo M., and Mialon, Sue H.. 2010. “Do Sunk Costs Matter?Economic Inquiry 48 (2): 323–36.
McDermott, Rose. 2001. Risk-Taking in International Politics: Prospect Theory in American Foreign Policy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
McDermott, Rose. 2004. Political Psychology in International Relations. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
McDermott, Rose, Fowler, James H., and Smirnov, Oleg. 2008. “On the Evolutionary Origin of Prospect Theory Preferences.” The Journal of Politics 70 (02): 335–50.
McGraw, Kathleen M. 2000. “Contributions of the Cognitive Approach to Political Psychology.” Political Psychology 21 (4): 805–32.
Meier, Stephan, and Sprenger, Charles D.. 2012. “Time Discounting Predicts Creditworthiness.” Psychological Science 23 (1): 56–8.
Mellers, Barbara, Stone, Eric, Atanasov, Pavel, Rohrbaugh, Nick, Metz, S. Emlen, Ungar, Lyle, Bishop, Michael M., Horowitz, Michael, Merkle, Ed, and Tetlock, Philip. 2015. “The Psychology of Intelligence Analysis: Drivers of Prediction Accuracy in World Politics.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 21 (1): 1.
Mercer, Jonathan. 2005. “Prospect Theory and Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 8: 121.
Miler, Kristina C. 2009. “The Limitations of Heuristics for Political Elites.” Political Psychology 30 (6): 863–94.
Mintz, Alex, Redd, Steven B., and Vedlitz, Arnold. 2006. “Can We Generalize from Student Experiments to the Real World in Political Science, Military Affairs, and International Relations?Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (5): 757–76.
Morton, Rebecca B., and Williams, Kenneth C.. 2010. Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality: From Nature to the Lab. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Nordhaus, William D. 1975. “The Political Business Cycle.” The Review of Economic Studies 42 (2): 169–90.
Norris, Pippa, and Lovenduski, Joni. 1995. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–67.
Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan C., and Manin, Bernard. 1999. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Vol. 2, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, Robert. 1976. The Comparative Study of Political Elites. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Putnam, Robert D. 1988. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games.” International Organization 42 (03): 427–60.
Quattrone, George A., and Tversky, Amos. 1988. “Contrasting Rational and Psychological Analyses of Political Choice.” American Political Science Review 82 (03): 719–36.
Renshon, Jonathan. 2015. “Losing Face and Sinking Costs: Experimental Evidence on the Judgment of Political and Military Leaders.” International Organization 69 (3): 659–95.
Rogoff, Kenneth. 1990. “Equilibrium Political Budget Cycles.” The American Economic Review, 2136.
Samuelson, William, and Zeckhauser, Richard. 1988. “Status quo bias in Decision Making.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1 (1): 759.
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Bonchek, Mark S.. 1997. Analyzing Politics: Rationality, Behavior and Institutions. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
Sherman, Gary D., Lee, Jooa J., Cuddy, Amy J. C., Renshon, Jonathan, Oveis, Christopher, Gross, James J., and Lerner, Jennifer S.. 2012. “Leadership is Associated with Lower Levels of Stress.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 (44): 17903–7.
Simonson, Itamar, and Nye, Peter. 1992. “The Effect of Accountability on Susceptibility to Decision Errors.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 51 (3): 416–46.
Simonson, Itamar, and Staw, Barry M.. 1992. “Deescalation Strategies: A Comparison of Techniques for Reducing Commitment to Losing Courses of Action.” Journal of Applied Psychology 77 (4): 419.
Sleesman, Dustin J., Conlon, Donald E., McNamara, Gerry, and Miles, Jonathan E.. 2012. “Cleaning up the Big Muddy: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Determinants of Escalation of Commitment.” Academy of Management Journal 55 (3): 541–62.
Slovic, Paul Ed. 2000. The Perception of Risk. London, UK: Earthscan Publications.
Soroka, Stuart N. 2014. Negativity in Democratic Politics: Causes and Consequences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Streich, Philip, and Levy, Jack S.. 2007. “Time Horizons, Discounting, and Intertemporal Choice.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 51 (2): 199226.
Swers, Michele L. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Taliaferro, Jeffrey W. 2004. “Power Politics and the Balance of Risk: Hypotheses on Great Power Intervention in the Periphery.” Political Psychology 25 (2): 177211.
Teger, A. 1980. Too Much Invested to Quit. New York: Pergamon.
Tetlock, Philip E., and Boettger, Richard. 1994. “Accountability Amplifies the Status Quo Effect When Change Creates Victims.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 7 (1): 123.
Thaler, Richard. 1980. “Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 1 (1): 3960.
Thaler, Richard. 1981. “Some Empirical Evidence on Dynamic Inconsistency.” Economics Letters 8 (3): 201–7.
Tomz, Michael, Wittenberg, Jason, and King, Gary. 2003. “CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results.” Journal of Statistical Software 8 (1): 130.
Tsebelis, George. 1990. Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics, Vol. 18. Berkeley, CA: Univ of California Press.
Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1981. “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science 211 (4481): 453–8.
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1992. “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5 (4): 297323.
Tyszka, Tadeusz, and Zielonka, Piotr. 2002. “Expert Judgments: Financial Analysts versus Weather Forecasters.” The Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets 3 (3): 152–60.
van Vugt, Mark, and Ronay, Richard. 2014. “The Evolutionary Psychology of Leadership Theory, Review, and Roadmap.” Organizational Psychology Review 4 (1): 7495.
Wängnerud, Lena. 2009. “Women in Parliaments: Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” Annual Review of Political Science 12: 5169.
Weaver, R. Kent. 1986. “The Politics of Blame Avoidance.” Journal of Public Policy 6 (04): 371–98.
Wiegele, Thomas C., and Oots, Kent Layne. 1990. “Type A Behavior and Local Government Elites.” Political Psychology, 721–37.
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Sheffer et al. Dataset
Dataset

 Unknown
PDF
Supplementary materials

Sheffer et al supplementary material
Sheffer et al supplementary material 1

 PDF (234 KB)
234 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 76
Total number of PDF views: 865 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 4693 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 28th December 2017 - 23rd May 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.