Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 71
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Dioso-Villa, Rachel 2016. Is the Expert Admissibility Game Fixed?: Judicial Gatekeeping of Fire and Arson Evidence. Law & Policy, Vol. 38, Issue. 1, p. 54.

    Skiple, Jon Kåre Grendstad, Gunnar Shaffer, William R. and Waltenburg, Eric N. 2016. Supreme Court Justices’ Economic Behaviour: A Multilevel Model Analysis. Scandinavian Political Studies, Vol. 39, Issue. 1, p. 73.

    Bradbury, Michael E. and Harrison, Julie A. 2015. The FASB's Dissenting Opinions. Accounting Horizons, Vol. 29, Issue. 2, p. 363.

    Budziak, Jeffrey and Lempert, Daniel 2015. Assessing Threats to Inference with Simultaneous Sensitivity Analysis: The Case of US Supreme Court Oral Arguments. Political Science Research and Methods, p. 1.

    Ceron, Andrea and Mainenti, Marco 2015. Toga Party: The Political Basis of Judicial Investigations against MPs in Italy (1983–2013). South European Society and Politics, Vol. 20, Issue. 2, p. 223.

    Garoupa, Nuno and Grembi, Veronica 2015. Judicial review and political partisanship: Moving from consensual to majoritarian democracy. International Review of Law and Economics, Vol. 43, p. 32.

    Goerke, Laszlo and Neugart, Michael 2015. Lobbying and dismissal dispute resolution systems. International Review of Law and Economics, Vol. 41, p. 50.

    Nelson, Michael J. 2015. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences.

    Banks, Christopher P. and Tauber, Steven 2014. U.S. District Court Decision-Making in USA PATRIOT Act Cases after September 11. Justice System Journal, Vol. 35, Issue. 2, p. 139.

    Cowart, Tammy W. Lirely, Roger and Avery, Sherry 2014. Two Methodologies for Predicting Patent Litigation Outcomes: Logistic Regression Versus Classification Trees. American Business Law Journal, Vol. 51, Issue. 4, p. 843.

    Hefeker, Carsten and Neugart, Michael 2014. Policy deviations, uncertainty, and the European Court of Justice. European Journal of Law and Economics,

    Lee, Jongkon 2014. Public Meetings for Efficient Administrative Performance in the United States. Public Performance & Management Review, Vol. 37, Issue. 3, p. 388.

    Nery Ferreira, Pedro Fernando Almeida and Mueller, Bernardo 2014. How judges think in the Brazilian Supreme Court: Estimating ideal points and identifying dimensions. EconomiA, Vol. 15, Issue. 3, p. 275.

    Donner, Christopher M. 2013. Presidential Influence on Police Practices: The U.S. President’s Indirect Impact on Fourth Amendment Case Outcome Through Supreme Court Appointments. American Journal of Criminal Justice, Vol. 38, Issue. 3, p. 422.

    Epstein, Lee and Knight, Jack 2013. Reconsidering Judicial Preferences. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 16, Issue. 1, p. 11.

    Garoupa, N. Gomez-Pomar, F. and Grembi, V. 2013. Judging under Political Pressure: An Empirical Analysis of Constitutional Review Voting in the Spanish Constitutional Court. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Vol. 29, Issue. 3, p. 513.

    Keith, Linda Camp Holmes, Jennifer S. and Miller, Banks P. 2013. Explaining the Divergence in Asylum Grant Rates among Immigration Judges: An Attitudinal and Cognitive Approach. Law & Policy, Vol. 35, Issue. 4, p. 261.

    Masood, Ali S. and Songer, Donald R. 2013. Reevaluating the Implications of Decision-Making Models. Journal of Law and Courts, Vol. 1, Issue. 2, p. 363.

    Niblett, Anthony 2013. Tracking inconsistent judicial behavior. International Review of Law and Economics, Vol. 34, p. 9.

    Brigham, John 2012. Special Issue: The Discourse of Judging.


On the Nature of Supreme Court Decision Making

  • Tracey E. George (a1) and Lee Epstein (a2)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 September 2013

How does the U.S. Supreme Court reach decisions? Since the 1940s, scholars have focused on two distinct explanations. The legal model suggests that the rule of law (stare decisis) is the key determinant. The extralegal model posits that an array of sociological, psychological, and political factors produce judicial outcomes. To determine which model better accounted for judicial decisions, we used Supreme Court cases involving the imposition of the death penalty since 1972 and estimated and evaluated the models' success in accounting for decisional outcomes. Although both models performed quite satisfactorily, they possessed disturbing weaknesses. The legal perspective overpredicted liberal outcomes, the extralegal model conservative ones. Given these results, we tested another proposition, namely that extralegal and legal frameworks present codependent, not mutually exclusive, explanations of decision making. Based on these results, we offer an integrated model of Supreme Court decision making that contemplates a range of political and environmental forces and doctrinal constraints.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

John H. Aldrich , and Forrest D. Nelson . 1984. Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series, no. 45. Beverly Hills: Sage.

David G. Barnum 1985. “The Supreme Court and Public Opinion: Judicial Decision Making in the Post-New Deal Period.” Journal of Politics 47:652–65.

Lawrence Baum . 1989b. “Comparing the Policy Positions of Supreme Court Justices of Different Periods.” Western Political Quarterly 42:509–21.

Saul Brenner , Timothy M. Hagle , and Harold J. Spaeth . 1990Increasing the Size of Minimum Winning Original Coalitions on the Warren Court.” Polity. 23:309–18.

Edward S. Corwin 1924. “Constitutional Law in 1922–23.” American Political Science Review 18:4978.

Robert E. Cushman 1929. “Constitutional Law in 1927–28.” American Political Science Review 23:78101.

Robert E. Cushman 1938. “Constitutional Law in 1936–37.” American Political Science Review 32:278310.

Lee Epstein , Thomas G. Walker , and William J. Dixon . 1989. “The Supreme Court and Criminal Justice Disputes: A Neo-institutional Perspective.” American Journal of Political Science 33:825841.

Franklin M. Fisher 1958. “The Mathematical Analysis of Supreme Court Decisions and the Abuse of Quantitative Methods.” American Political Science Review 52:321–38.

Marc Galanter . 1974. “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculation on the Limits of Legal Change.” Law and Society Review 9:95160.

James L. Gibson 1978. “Judges' Role Orientations, Attitudes, and Decisions: An Interactive Model.” American Political Science Review 72:911–24.

Charles A. Johnson 1987. “Law, Politics, and Judicial Decision Making: Lower Federal Court Uses of Supreme Court Decisions.” Law and Society Review 21:325–40.

Fred Kort . 1973. “Regression Analysis and Discriminant Analysis: An Application of R. A. Fisher's Theorem to Data in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 67:555–59.

Philip Kurland . 1972. “1971 Term: The Year of the Stewart-White Court.” In 1972 Supreme Court Review. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Robin F. Marra , Charles W. Ostrom Jr.,, and Dennis M. Simon . 1990. “Foreign Policy and Presidential Popularity.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 34:588623.

Timothy J. O'Neill 1981. “The Language of Equality in a Democratic Order.” American Political Science Review 75:626–35.

Charles W. Ostrom Jr.,, and Brian L. Job . 1986. “The President and the Political Use of Force.” American Political Science Review 80:541–66.

Jan Palmer . 1982. “An Econometric Analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court's Certiorari Decisions.” Public Choice 39:387–98.

Richard Posner . 1981. “The Present Situation in Legal Scholarship.” Yale Law Journal 90:1113–30.

Roscoe Pound . 1931. “The Call for a Realist Jurisprudence.” Harvard Law Review 44:697711.

Jeffrey A. Segal 1984. “Predicting Supreme Court Cases Probabilistically: The Search and Seizure Cases, 1962–1984.” American Political Science Review 78:891900.

Jeffrey A. Segal 1986. “Supreme Court Justices as Human Decision Makers: An Individual-level Analysis of the Search and Seizure Cases.” Journal of Politics 48:938–55.

Jeffrey A. Segal , and Albert D. Cover . 1989. “Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices.” American Political Science Review 83:557–65.

Martin Shapiro . 1972. “Toward a Theory of Stare Decisis.” Journal of Legal Studies 1:125–34.

Harold J. Spaeth 1961. “An Approach to the Study of Attitudinal Differences as an Aspect of Judicial Behavior.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 6:5482.

C. Neal Tate . 1981. “Personal Attribute Models of Voting Behavior of U.S. Supreme Court Justices: Liberalism in Civil Liberties and Economic Decisions, 1946–1978.” American Political Science Review 75:355–67.

C. Neal Tate , and Roger Handberg . 1991. “Time Binding and Theory Building in Personal Attribute Models of Supreme Court Voting Behavior, 1916–1988.” American Journal of Political Science 35:460–81.

S. Sidney Ulmer . 1960. “The Analysis of Behavior Patterns in the Supreme Court of the United States.” Journal of Politics 22:429–47.

S. Sidney Ulmer . 1986. “Are Social Background Models Time Bound?American Political Science Review 80:957–67.

Neil Vidmar , and Phoebe Ellsworth . 1974. “Public Opinion and the Death Penalty.” Stanford Law Review 26:1245–70.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *