Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

On the Nature of Supreme Court Decision Making

  • Tracey E. George (a1) and Lee Epstein (a2)
Abstract

How does the U.S. Supreme Court reach decisions? Since the 1940s, scholars have focused on two distinct explanations. The legal model suggests that the rule of law (stare decisis) is the key determinant. The extralegal model posits that an array of sociological, psychological, and political factors produce judicial outcomes. To determine which model better accounted for judicial decisions, we used Supreme Court cases involving the imposition of the death penalty since 1972 and estimated and evaluated the models' success in accounting for decisional outcomes. Although both models performed quite satisfactorily, they possessed disturbing weaknesses. The legal perspective overpredicted liberal outcomes, the extralegal model conservative ones. Given these results, we tested another proposition, namely that extralegal and legal frameworks present codependent, not mutually exclusive, explanations of decision making. Based on these results, we offer an integrated model of Supreme Court decision making that contemplates a range of political and environmental forces and doctrinal constraints.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

John H. Aldrich , and Forrest D. Nelson . 1984. Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series, no. 45. Beverly Hills: Sage.

David G. Barnum 1985. “The Supreme Court and Public Opinion: Judicial Decision Making in the Post-New Deal Period.” Journal of Politics 47:652–65.

Lawrence Baum . 1989b. “Comparing the Policy Positions of Supreme Court Justices of Different Periods.” Western Political Quarterly 42:509–21.

Saul Brenner , Timothy M. Hagle , and Harold J. Spaeth . 1990Increasing the Size of Minimum Winning Original Coalitions on the Warren Court.” Polity. 23:309–18.

Lee Epstein , Thomas G. Walker , and William J. Dixon . 1989. “The Supreme Court and Criminal Justice Disputes: A Neo-institutional Perspective.” American Journal of Political Science 33:825841.

Marc Galanter . 1974. “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculation on the Limits of Legal Change.” Law and Society Review 9:95160.

Charles A. Johnson 1987. “Law, Politics, and Judicial Decision Making: Lower Federal Court Uses of Supreme Court Decisions.” Law and Society Review 21:325–40.

Philip Kurland . 1972. “1971 Term: The Year of the Stewart-White Court.” In 1972 Supreme Court Review. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Robin F. Marra , Charles W. Ostrom Jr.,, and Dennis M. Simon . 1990. “Foreign Policy and Presidential Popularity.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 34:588623.

Jan Palmer . 1982. “An Econometric Analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court's Certiorari Decisions.” Public Choice 39:387–98.

Richard Posner . 1981. “The Present Situation in Legal Scholarship.” Yale Law Journal 90:1113–30.

Roscoe Pound . 1931. “The Call for a Realist Jurisprudence.” Harvard Law Review 44:697711.

Jeffrey A. Segal 1986. “Supreme Court Justices as Human Decision Makers: An Individual-level Analysis of the Search and Seizure Cases.” Journal of Politics 48:938–55.

Martin Shapiro . 1972. “Toward a Theory of Stare Decisis.” Journal of Legal Studies 1:125–34.

Harold J. Spaeth 1961. “An Approach to the Study of Attitudinal Differences as an Aspect of Judicial Behavior.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 6:5482.

C. Neal Tate , and Roger Handberg . 1991. “Time Binding and Theory Building in Personal Attribute Models of Supreme Court Voting Behavior, 1916–1988.” American Journal of Political Science 35:460–81.

S. Sidney Ulmer . 1960. “The Analysis of Behavior Patterns in the Supreme Court of the United States.” Journal of Politics 22:429–47.

Neil Vidmar , and Phoebe Ellsworth . 1974. “Public Opinion and the Death Penalty.” Stanford Law Review 26:1245–70.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 19 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 664 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.