Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T19:27:12.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Partisan Logic of City Mobilization: Evidence from State Lobbying Disclosures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2020

JULIA A. PAYSON Open the ORCID record for JULIA A. PAYSON [Opens in a new window]
JULIA A. PAYSON*
Affiliation:
New York University
*
Julia A. Payson, Assistant Professor, Department of Politics New York University, julia.payson@nyu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Why do local governments sometimes hire lobbyists to represent them in other levels of government? I argue that such mobilization efforts depend in part on the policy congruence between localities and their elected delegates in the legislature. I provide evidence consistent with this theory by examining how municipal governments in the United States respond to partisan and ideological mismatches with their state legislators—a common representational challenge. Using almost a decade of original panel data on municipal lobbying in all 50 states, I employ difference-in-differences and a regression discontinuity design to demonstrate that cities are significantly more likely to hire lobbyists when their districts elect non-co-partisan state representatives. The results are broadly consistent with a model of intergovernmental mobilization in which local officials purchase advocacy to compensate for the preference gaps that sometimes emerge in multilevel government.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 114 , Issue 3 , August 2020 , pp. 677 - 690
Copyright
© American Political Science Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Acknowledgments: For comments and suggestions I am grateful to Sarah Anzia, Pat Egan, Sandy Gordon, Catherine Hafer, Andrew Hall, Patricia Kirkland, Dimitri Landa, Terry Moe, Becky Morton, Dan Thompson, and Hye Young You. I also thank the anonymous reviewers for useful feedback and participants at the 2018 MIT American Politics Conference, the 2018 NYU Colloquium on Law, Economics, and Politics, the 2019 Princeton Workshop on Lobbying and Institutional Performance, and the 2019 Berkeley Research Workshop in American Politics. Replication files are available at the American Political Science Review Dataverse: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/MYF97D.

References

Abramowitz, Alan I., and Saunders, Kyle L.. 1998. “Ideological Realignment in the US Electorate.” The Journal of Politics 60 (3): 634–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Leech, Beth L.. 1998. Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Leech, Beth L.. 2001. “Interest Niches and Policy Bandwagons: Patterns of Interest Group Involvement in National Politics.” The Journal of Politics 63 (4): 1191–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Christopher R. 2009. Imperfect Union: Representation and Taxation in Multilevel Governments. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Taylor Jackson. 2018. “Travis County Commissioners Adopt Agenda for Upcoming State Legislative Session.” Community Impact Newspaper, November 1. https://communityimpact.com/austin/city-county/2018/10/23/travis-county-commissioners-adopt-agenda-for-upcoming-state-legislative-session/Google Scholar
Calonico, Sebastian, Cattaneo, Matias D., and Titiunik, Rocio. 2014. “Robust Nonparametric Confidence Intervals for Regression-Discontinuity Designs.” Econometrica 82 (6): 2295–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cammisa, Anne M. 1995. Governments as Interest Groups: Intergovernmental Lobbying and the Federal System. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Carey, John M., Niemi, Richard G., and Powell, Lynda W.. 2000. “Incumbency and the Probability of Reelection in State Legislative Elections.” Journal of Politics 62 (3): 671–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Jowei. 2010. “The Effect of Electoral Geography on Pork Barreling in Bicameral Legislatures.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (2): 301–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cigler, Beverly A. 1995. “Not Just Another Special Interest: Intergovernmental Representation.” Interest Group Politics 4: 131–53.Google Scholar
Craver, Jack. 2019. “Exit Eckstein: Travis County’s Retiring Lobbyist Reflects on His Battles at the Legislature.” Austin Monitor, November 1. https://www.austinmonitor.com/stories/2019/11/exit-eckstein-travis-countys-retiring-lobbyist-reflects-on-his-battles-at-the-legislature/Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1961. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
de Benedictis-Kessner, Justin. 2018. “Off-Cycle and Out of Office: Election Timing and the Incumbency Advantage.” The Journal of Politics 80 (1): 119–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Benedictis-Kessner, Justin, and Warshaw, Christopher. 2016. “Mayoral Partisanship and Municipal Fiscal Policy.” Journal of Politics 78 (4): 1124–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Figueiredo, John M., and Silverman, Brian S.. 2006. “Academic Earmarks and the Returns to Lobbying.” Journal of Law & Economics 49 (2): 597–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Figueiredo, John M., and Cameron, Charles M.. 2019. “Endogenous Cost Lobbying: Theory and Evidence.” Working paper, Princeton University. https://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/ccameron/files/ecl_rr1_v2_paper_names.pdfGoogle Scholar
de la Cuesta, Brandon, and Imai, Kosuke. 2016. “Misunderstandings about the Regression Discontinuity Design in the Study of Close Elections.” Annual Review of Political Science 19: 375–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, Katherine Levine, and Kogan, Vladimir. 2016. “Pushing The City Limits: Policy Responsiveness in Municipal Government.” Urban Affairs Review 52 (1): 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Patricia K., and Nownes, Anthony J.. 1999. “Intergovernmental Lobbying in the States.” Politics & Policy 27 (4): 619–34.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Rebecca, and You, Hye Young. 2017. “Cities as Lobbyists.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (4): 864–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Virginia, and Lowery, David. 1996. The Population Ecology of Interest Representation: Lobbying Communities in the American States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, Gene M., and Helpman, Elhanan. 2001. Special Interest Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google Scholar
Grossmann, Matt. 2013. Group Mobilization from the Economy, Society, and Government. Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haider, Donald H. 1974. When Governments Come to Washington: Governors, Mayors, and Intergovernmental Lobbying. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 2000. “Party Polarization in National Politics: The Electoral Connection.” In Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era. Vol. 5, eds. Bond, Jon R. and Fleisher, Richard, 17–18. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Jewell, Malcolm E. 1982. Representation in State Legislatures. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Klarner, Carl, Berry, Williams, Carsey, Thomas, Jewell, Malcolm, Niemi, Richard, Powell, Lynda, Snyder, James. 2013. “State Legislative Election Returns Data, 1967–2010.” Harvard Dataverse, V1. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/LIHUAA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarus, Jeffrey. 2009. “Party, Electoral Vulnerability, and Earmarks in the US House of Representatives.” The Journal of Politics 71 (3): 1050–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, David S., and Lemieux, Thomas. 2010. “Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics.” Journal of EconomicLiterature 48 (2): 281–355.Google Scholar
Leech, Beth L., Baumgartner, Frank R., La Pira, Timothy M., and Semanko, Nicholas A.. 2005. “Drawing Lobbyists to Washington: Government Activity and The Demand for Advocacy.” Political Research Quarterly 58 (1): 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loftis, Matt W., and Kettler, Jaclyn J.. 2015. “Lobbying from inside the System: Why Local Governments Pay for Representation in the US Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 68 (1): 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowery, David, and Brasher, Holly. 2004. Organized Interests and American Government. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Lowery, David, and Gray, Virginia. 1995. “The Population Ecology of Gucci Gulch, or the Natural Regulation of Interest Group Numbers in the American States.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowery, David, and Gray, Virginia. 1998. “The Dominance of Institutions in Interest Representation: A Test of Seven Explanations.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 231–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowery, David, Gray, Virginia, Cluverius, John, and Harden, Jeffrey J.. 2012. “Explaining the Anomalous Growth of Public Sector Lobbying in the American States, 1997–2007.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 43 (4): 580–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowi, Theodore. 1969. The End of Liberalism. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
McCrary, Justin. 2008. “Manipulation of the Running Variable in the Regression Discontinuity Design: A Density Test.” Journal of Econometrics 142 (2): 698–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milbrath, Lester W. 1963. The Washington Lobbyists. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Payson, Julia. 2020. “Cities in the Statehouse: How Local Governments Use Lobbyists to Secure State Funding.” Forthcoming. The Journal of Politics 82 (2): 403–17. https://doi.org/10.1086/706767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Paul E. 1981. City Limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potters, Jan, and Van Winden, Frans. 1990. “Modelling Political Pressure as Transmission of Information.” European Journal of Political Economy 6 (1): 61–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salisbury, Robert H. 1984. “Interest Representation: The Dominance of Institutions.” American Political Science Review 78 (1): 64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semisovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman. 1984. “What Accent the Heavenly Chorus? Political Equality and the American Pressure System.” The Journal of Politics 46 (4): 1006–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shor, Boris, and McCarty, Nolan. 2011. “The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 105 (3): 530–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shor, Boris, and Nolan McCarty 2014. “July 2014 Update: Aggregate Data for Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures.” Harvard Dataverse, V1. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/26799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, Rune J. 2003. “The Political Economy of Intergovernmental Grants: The Norwegian Case.” European Journal of Political Research 42 (2): 163–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Robert M., and Bickers, Kenneth N.. 1994. “Congressional Elections and the Pork Barrel.” The Journal of Politics 56 (2): 377–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tausanovitch, Chris, and Warshaw, Christopher. 2014. “Representation in Municipal Government.” American Political Science Review 108 (3): 605–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teaford, Jon C. 1984. The Unheralded Triumph: City Government in America, 1870–1900. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Truman, David B. 1951. The Governmental Process: Public Interests and Public Opinion. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Payson Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/MYF97D
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Payson supplementary material

Payson supplementary material

Download Payson supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 263.9 KB