Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Pitch Perfect: Vocal Pitch and the Emotional Intensity of Congressional Speech

  • BRYCE J. DIETRICH (a1), MATTHEW HAYES (a2) and DIANA Z. O’BRIEN (a2)

Abstract

Although audio archives are available for a number of political institutions, the data they provide receive scant attention from researchers. Yet, audio data offer important insights, including information about speakers’ emotional states. Using one of the largest collections of natural audio ever compiled—74,158 Congressional floor speeches—we introduce a novel measure of legislators’ emotional intensity: small changes in vocal pitch that are difficult for speakers to control. Applying our measure to MCs’ floor speeches about women, we show that female MCs speak with greater emotional intensity when talking about women as compared with both their male colleagues and their speech on other topics. Our two supplementary analyses suggest that increased vocal pitch is consistent with legislators’ broader issue commitments, and that emotionally intense speech may affect other lawmakers’ behavior. More generally, by demonstrating the utility of audio-as-data approaches, our work highlights a new way of studying political speech.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Pitch Perfect: Vocal Pitch and the Emotional Intensity of Congressional Speech
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Pitch Perfect: Vocal Pitch and the Emotional Intensity of Congressional Speech
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Pitch Perfect: Vocal Pitch and the Emotional Intensity of Congressional Speech
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Bryce J. Dietrich, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Iowa, bryce-dietrich@uiowa.edu, http://www.brycejdietrich.com.
Matthew Hayes, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Rice University, matthew.hayes@rice.edu, http://www.matthewjhayes.com.
Diana Z. O’Brien, Albert Thomas Associate Professor Political Science, Department of Political Science, Rice University, dzobrien@rice.edu, http://dianaobrien.com.

Footnotes

Hide All

We are grateful to the anonymous referees at the American Political Science Review and Ken Benoit, who was an insightful and a supportive editor throughout the review process. We also thank Nichole Bauer, Logan Dancey, John Hibbing, Kris Kanthak, Joel Sievert, Danielle Thomson, and conference participants at MPSA (Chicago, IL) and CPAC (Washington University in St. Louis) for their comments and suggestions. Authors’ names listed in an alphabetical order. Replication files are available at the American Political Science Review Dataverse: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/M4ARI7.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Anderson, Rindy C., and Klofstad, Casey A.. 2012. “Preference for Leaders with Masculine Voices Holds in the Case of Feminine Leadership Roles.” PLoS One 7 (12): e51216.
Anderson, Rindy C., Klofstad, Casey A., Mayew, William J., and Venkatachalam, Mohan. 2014. “Vocal Fry May Undermine the Success of Young Women in the Labor Market.” PLoS One 9 (5): e97506.
Austen-Smith, David. 1990. “Information Transmission in Debate.” American Journal of Political Science 34 (1): 124–52.
Bachorowski, Jo-Anne, and Owren, Michael J.. 1995. “Vocal Expression of Emotion: Acoustic Properties of Speech Are Associated with Emotional Intensity and Context.” Psychological Science 6 (4): 219–24.
Banse, Rainer, and Scherer, Klaus R.. 1996. “Acoustic Profiles in Vocal Emotion Expression.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 (3): 614–36.
Bezooyen, Renee van. 1984. Characteristics of Vocal Expressions of Emotion. Dordrecht, Holland: Foris Publication.
Boersma, Paul. 1993. “Accurate Short-Term Analysis of the Fundamental Frequency and the Harmonics-To-Noise Ratio of a Sampled Sound.” Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences 17: 97–110.
Boyd, Christina L., Epstein, Lee, and Martin, Andrew D.. 2010. “Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (2): 389–411.
Brody, Leslie. 2009. Gender, Emotion, and the Family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Burden, Barry C. 2007. Personal Roots of Representation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Carli, Linda L., LaFleur, Suzanne J., and Loeber, Christopher C.. 1995. “Nonverbal Behavior, Gender, and Influene.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68 (6): 1030.
Carroll, Susan J. 2002. Representing Women: Congresswomen’s Perceptions of Their Representational Roles. In Women Transforming Congress, ed. Cindy Simon Rosenthal. University of Oklahoma Press Norman, 50–68.
Chaturvedi, Richa. 2016. “A Closer Look at the Gender Gap in Presidential Voting.” Pew Research July 28.
Clinton, Joshua, Jackman, Simon, and Rivers, Douglas. 2004. “The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data.” American Political Science Review 98 (2): 355–70.
Davitz, Joel R. 1964. The Communication of Emotional Meaning. New York: McGraw Hill.
Debruyne, Frans, Decoster, Wivine, Van Gijsel, Annemie, and Vercammen, Julie. 2002. “Speaking Fundamental Frequency in Monozygotic and Dizygotic Twins.” Journal of Voice 16 (4): 466–71.
DePaulo, Bella M., Lindsay, James J., Malone, Brian E., Muhlenbruck, Laura, Charlton, Kelly, and Cooper, Harris. 2003. “Cues to Deception.” Psychological Bulletin 129 (1): 74–118.
Diermeier, Daniel, Godbout, Jean-François, Yu, Bei, and Kaufmann, Stefan. 2012. “Language and Ideology in Congress.” British Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 31–55.
Dietrich, Bryce J., O’Brien, Diana, and Yao, Jielu. 2019. “Do Representatives Emphasize Some Groups More Than Others? Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. Chicago, IL: Midwest Political Science Association, 1–40.
Dietrich, Bryce J., Enos, Ryan D., and Sen, Maya. 2019. “Emotional Arousal Predicts Voting on the US Supreme Court.” Political Analysis 27 (2): 237–43.
Ekman, Paul, O’Sullivan, Maureen, Friesen, Wallace V., and Scherer, Klaus R.. 1991. “Invited Article: Face, Voice, and Body in Detecting Deceit.” Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 15 (2): 125–35.
Elkins, Aaron, Zafeiriou, Stefanos, Pantic, Maja, and Burgoon, Judee. 2014. Unobtrusive Deception Detection. In The Oxford Handbook of Affective Computing, eds. Calvo, Rafael A., D’Mello, Sidney, Gratch, Johnathan, and Kappas, Arvid. New York, NY: Oxford University Press chapter 38, 503–15.
Fenno, Richard F. 1977. “U.S. House Members in Their Constituencies: An Exploration.” American Political Science Review 71 (3): 883–917.
Gerner, Deborah J., Schrodt, Philip A., Francisco, Ronald A., and Weddle, Judith L.. 1994. “Machine Coding of Event Data Using Regional and International Sources.” International Studies Quarterly 38 (1): 91–119.
Gerrity, Jessica C., Osborn, Tracy, and Mendez, Jeanette Morehouse. 2007. “Women and Representation: A Different View of the District?Politics and Gender 3 (2): 179–200.
Goffman, Erving. 1959. Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York, NY: Anchor.
Goggin, Stephen N., and Theodoridis, Alexander G.. 2017. “Disputed Ownership: Parties, Issues, and Traits in the Minds of Voters.” Political Behavior 39 (3): 675–702.
Grimmer, Justin. 2013. Representational Style in Congress: What Legislators Say and Why It Matters. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Grimmer, Justin, and Stewart, Brandon M.. 2013. “Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts.” Political Analysis 21 (3): 267–97.
Hall, Judith A., Carter, Jason D., and Horgan, Terrence G.. 2000. Gender Differences in Nonverbal Communication of Emotion. In Gender and Emotion: Social Psychological Perspectives, ed. Fischer, Agneta. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 97–117.
Hall, Richard L. 1998. Participation in Congress. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Harris, Douglas B. 2005. “Orchestrating Party Talk: A Party-Based View of One-Minute Speeches in the House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 30 (1): 127–41.
Heath, Roseanna, Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., and Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M.. 2005. “Women on the Sidelines: Women’s Representation on Committees in Latin American Legislatures.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (2): 420–36.
Herrnson, Paul S., Lay, J. Celeste, and Stokes, Atiya Kai. 2003. “Women Running ‘as Women’: Candidate Gender, Campaign Issues, and Voter-Targeting Strategies.” The Journal of Politics 65 (1): 244–55.
Hogg, Michael A. 1985. “Masculine and Feminine Speech in Dyads and Groups: A Study of Speech Style and Gender Salience.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 4 (2): 99–112.
Hopkins, Daniel J., and King, Gary. 2010. “A Method of Automated Nonparametric Content Analysis for Social Science.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (1): 229–47.
Jones, Bryan D., Larsen-Price, Heather, and Wilkerson, John. 2009. “Representation and American Governing Institutions.” The Journal of Politics 71 (1): 277–90.
Kanthak, Kristin, and Krause, George A.. 2012. The Diversity Paradox: Political Parties, Legislatures, and the Organizational Foundations of Representation in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
Karpowitz, Christopher F., and Mendelberg, Tali. 2014. The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kathlene, Lyn. 1994. “Power and Influence in State Legislative Policymaking: The Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing Debates.” American Political Science Review 88 (3): 560–76.
Kathlene, Lyn. 1995. “Alternative Views of Crime: Legislative Policymaking in Gendered Terms.” The Journal of Politics 57 (3): 696–723.
King, Gary, and Lowe, Will. 2003. “An Automated Information Extraction Tool for International Conflict Data with Performance as Good as Human Coders: A Rare Events Evaluation Design.” International Organization 57 (3): 617–42.
Kingdon, John W. 1989. Congressmen’s Voting Decisions. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Klofstad, Casey A. 2016. “Candidate Voice Pitch Influences Election Outcomes.” Political Psychology 37 (5): 725–38.
Klofstad, Casey A., Anderson, Rindy C., and Nowicki, Stephen. 2015. “Perceptions of Competence, Strength, and Age Influence Voters to Select Leaders with Lower-Pitched Voices.” PLoS One 10 (8): e0133779.
Klofstad, Casey A., Anderson, Rindy C., and Peters, Susan. 2012. “Sounds Like a Winner: Voice Pitch Influences Perception of Leadership Capacity in Both Men and Women.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences 279 (1738): 2698–704.
Kraut, Robert E. 1978. “Verbal and Nonverbal Cues in the Perception of Lying.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36 (4): 380–91.
Krook, Mona Lena. 2015. “Empowerment versus Backlash: Gender Quotas and Critical Mass Theory.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 3 (1): 184–8.
Laukka, Petri, Juslin, Patrik, and Bresin, Roberto. 2005. “A Dimensional Approach to Vocal Expression of Emotion.” Cognition & Emotion 19 (5): 633–53.
Laver, Michael, Benoit, Kenneth, and Garry, John. 2003. “Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data.” American Political Science Review 97 (2): 311–31.
Levy, Dena, Tien, Charles, and Aved, Rachelle. 2001. “Do Differences Matter? Women Members of Congress and the Hyde Amendment.” Women & Politics 23 (1): 105–27.
Maltzman, Forrest, and Sigelman, Lee. 1996. “The Politics of Talk: Unconstrained Floor Time in the U.S. House of Representatives.” The Journal of Politics 58 (3): 819–30.
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes’.” The Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.
Mauss, Iris B., and Robinson, Michael D.. 2009. “Measures of Emotion: A Review.” Cognition & Emotion 23 (2): 209–37.
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Mendelberg, Tali, Karpowitz, Christopher F., and Oliphant, J. Baxter. 2014. “Gender Inequality in Deliberation: Unpacking the Black Box of Interaction.” Perspectives on Politics 12 (1): 18–44.
Morris, Jonathan S. 2001. “Reexamining the Politics of Talk: Partisan Rhetoric in the 104th House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26 (1): 101–21.
Osborn, Tracy, and Mendez, Jeanette Morehouse. 2010. “Speaking as Women: Women and Floor Speeches in the Senate.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 31 (1): 1–21.
Owren, Michael J., and Bachorowski, Jo-Anne. 2007. Measuring Emotion-Related Vocal Acoustics. In Handbook of Emotion Elicitation and Assessment, eds. Coan, James A. and Allen, John J. B.. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 239–65.
Pearson, Kathryn, and Dancey, Logan. 2011a. “Elevating Women’s Voices in Congress Speech Participation in the House of Representatives.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (4): 910–23.
Pearson, Kathryn, and Dancey, Logan. 2011b. “Speaking for the Underrepresented in the House of Representatives: Voicing Women’s Interests in a Partisan Era.” Politics and Gender 7 (4): 493–519.
Petrocik, John R. 1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 825–50.
Petrocik, John R., Benoit, William L., and Hansen, Glenn J.. 2003. “Issue Ownership and Presidential Campaigning, 1952–2000.” Political Science Quarterly 118 (4): 599–626.
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1985. “A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 29 (2): 357–84.
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2001. “D-nominate after 10 Years: A Comparative Update to Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26 (1): 5–29.
Proksch, Sven-Oliver, and Slapin, Jonathan B.. 2012. “Institutional Foundations of Legislative Speech.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (3): 520–37.
Przybyla, Beata D., Horii, Yoshiyuki, and Crawford, Michael H.. 1992. “Vocal Fundamental Frequency in a Twin Sample: Looking for a Genetic Effect.” Journal of Voice 6 (3): 261–6.
Puts, David Andrew, Gaulin, Steven J. C., and Verdolini, Katherine. 2006. “Dominance and the Evolution of Sexual Dimorphism in Human Voice Pitch.” Evolution and Human Behavior 27: 283–96.
Quinn, Kevin M., Monroe, Burt L., Colaresi, Michael, Crespin, Michael H., and Radev, Dragomir R.. 2010. “How to Analyze Political Attention with Minimal Assumptions and Costs.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (1): 209–28.
Reingold, Beth. 1992. “Concepts of Representation Among Female and Male State Legislators.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17 (4): 509–37.
Roberts, Margaret E., Stewart, Brandon M., and Tingley, Dustin. 2014. “Stm: R Package for Structural Topic Models.” R Package 1: 1–12.
Roberts, Margaret E., Stewart, Brandon M., Tingley, Dustin, Lucas, Christopher, Leder-Luis, Jetson, Kushner Gadarian, Shana, Albertson, Bethany, and Rand, David G.. 2014. “Structural Topic Models for Open-Ended Survey Responses.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (4): 1064–82.
Roberts, Margaret E., Stewart, Brandon M., Tingley, Dustin, and Airoldi, Edoardo M.. 2013. The Structural Topic Model and Applied Social Science. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems Workshop on Topic Models: Computation, Application, and Evaluation.
Russell, James A. 1980. “A Circumplex Model of Affect.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (6): 1161.
Scherer, Klaus R. 2013. “Vocal Markers of Emotion: Comparing Induction and Acting Elicitation.” Computer Speech & Language 27 (1): 40–58.
Schiller, Wendy J. 1995. “Senators as Political Entrepreneurs: Using Bill Sponsorship to Shape Legislative Agendas.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 186–203.
Schuller, Björn, Batliner, Anton, Steidl, Stefan, and Seppi, Dino. 2011. “Recognising Realistic Emotions and Affect in Speech: State of the Art and Lessons Learnt from the First Challenge.” Speech Communication 53 (9–10): 1062–87.
Shogan, Colleen J. 2001. “Speaking Out.” Women & Politics 23 (1): 129–46.
Snyder, James M., and Groseclose, Tim. 2000. “Estimating Party Influence in Congressional Roll-Call Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (2): 193–211.
Stewart, Charles III, and Woon, Jonathan. 2016. Congressional Committee Assignments, 103rd to 114th Congresses, 1993–2017: House. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Sulkin, Tracy. 2005. Issue Politics in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Swers, Michele L. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Titze, Ingo R. 2000. Principles of Voice Production. Iowa City, IA: National Center for Voice and Speech.
Volden, Craig, Wiseman, Alan E., and Wittmer, Dana E.. 2018. “Women’s Issues and Their Fates in the US Congress.” Political Science Research and Methods 6 (4): 679–96.
Walsh, Katherine Cramer. 2002. Enlarging Representation: Women Bringing Marginalized Perspectives to Floor Debate in the House of Representatives. In Women Transforming Congress, ed. Rosenthal, Cindy Simon. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 370–96.
Woon, Jonathan. 2009. “Issue Attention and Legislative Proposals in the US Senate.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 34 (1): 29–54.
Zuckerman, Miron, and Driver, Robert E.. 1985. Telling Lies: Verbal and Nonverbal Correlates of Deception. In Multichannel Integrations of Nonverbal Behavior, eds. Siegman, Aaron W. and Feldstein, Stanley. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum, chapter 3, 129–47.
Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Dietrich et al. Dataset
Dataset

 Unknown
PDF
Supplementary materials

Dietrich et al. supplementary material
Dietrich et al. supplementary material 1

 PDF (6.0 MB)
6.0 MB

Pitch Perfect: Vocal Pitch and the Emotional Intensity of Congressional Speech

  • BRYCE J. DIETRICH (a1), MATTHEW HAYES (a2) and DIANA Z. O’BRIEN (a2)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed