Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T12:30:28.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Ideology and Subjective Culture: Conceptualization and Empirical Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 1982

Lorand B. Szalay  and
Rita Mae Kelly
Lorand B. Szalay
Affiliation:
Institute of Comparative Social and Cultural Studies
Rita Mae Kelly
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ideology and subjective culture are examined as two systems of behavioral organization well known for their hidden but frequently powerful influences on political choices and behavior. After a brief sketch of a representational theory of behavioral organization, a research strategy based on inferences drawn from the distribution of thousands of free word associations is described and illustrated with results from several international studies. Findings on Slovenian images and frame of reference demonstrate the effects of Marxist doctrines. Korean and American data illustrate differences that are predominantly psychocultural. The analytic method outlined suggests new capabilities for studying ideology and its influence on people's perceptions, their system of representation of the world, and their organization of behavior. It may be used to assess predispositions to adopt democratic principles and procedures. It might also be used to assess the influence of ideological doctrines and their degree of integration with the cultural views and frame of reference. The most natural use will probably be in research in the field of international understanding and communication.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 76 , Issue 3 , September 1982 , pp. 585 - 602
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allport, F. 1961. Theories of perception and the concept of structure. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel, and Verba, Sidney. 1963. The civic culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400874569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobrow, Davis; Chan, Steve; and Kringen, John. 1979. Understanding foreign policy decisions: The Chinese case. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bobrow, Davis; Chan, Steve; and Kringen, John. 1977. Understanding how others treat crises: a multi-method approach. International Studies Quarterly 21:199–223.10.2307/2600152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulding, K. 1971. The image. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Cantril, H. 1971. Patterns of human concern. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Deese, James. 1965. The structure of associations in language and thought. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Downs, R. M., and Stea, D., eds. 1973. Image and environment: cognitive mapping and spacial behavior. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Eysenck, J. J. 1955. The psychology of politics. London: Routledge and Kegan.Google Scholar
Fishbein, M. 1966. The relationship between belief, attitudes, and behavior. In Cognitive Consistency: motivational antecedents and behavioral consequents, Feldman, S., ed. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goodenough, W. 1956. Componential analysis and the study of meaning. Language 32:195–216.10.2307/410665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, William John. 1978. Cross-cultural comparison: Why do it? Why teach it; The university and the city. Selected papers from the 1978 annual meeting of the Council of University Institutes for Urban Affairs, University of Akron, Akron, Ohio.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and misperception in international politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, S. 1973. Cognitive maps in perception and thought. In Image and environment: cognitive mapping and spacial behavior Downs, R. M. and Stea, D.., eds. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Mead, Margaret, and Metreaux, Rhoda. 1953. The study of culture at a distance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. 1967. Psycholinguistic approaches to study of communication. In Journeys in science, ed. Arm, D.. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
Noble, C. 1952. An analysis of meaning. Psychology. Review 54:421–40.10.1037/h0054087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oatley, K. 1979. Perceptions and representation: The theoretical basis of brain research and psychology. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Osgood, C. E.; Suci, G. J.; and Tannanbaum, P. H. 1957. Thd measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Posner, M. I., and Keele, S. W. 1968. On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology 77: 353–63.10.1037/h0025953CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Przeworski, Adam, and Teune, Henry. 1970. The logic of comparative social inquiry. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Reed, C. F. 1969. The solution of hidden-figures: Brightness discrimination and eye movements. Neuropsychologia 7:121–33.10.1016/0028-3932(69)90010-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rokeach, M. 1960. The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rokeach, M. 1966–1967. Attitude change and behavior change. Public Opinion Quarterly 30:529–50.10.1086/267454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, R. M., and Chipman, S. 1970. Second-order isomorphism of internal representations: Shapes of state. Cognitive Psychology 1:1–7.10.1016/0010-0285(70)90002-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, E. J., ed. 1955. Continuity and change in Soviet thought. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674367173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stea, D., and Downs, R. M. 1970. From the outside looking in at the inside looking out. Environment and Behavior 2:3–12.10.1177/001391657000200101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szalay, L. B., and Brent, J. 1967. The analysis of cultural meanings through free verbal associations. Journal of Social Psychology 72:161–87.10.1080/00224545.1967.9922313CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szalay, L. B., and Bryson, J. A. 1973. Measurement of psychocultural distance: A comparison of American blacks and whites. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 26:166–77.10.1037/h0034482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szalay, L. B., and Bryson, J. A. 1974. Psychological meaning: Comparative analyses and theoretical implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 30:860–70.10.1037/h0037607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szalay, L. B., and Deese, J. 1978. Subjective meaning and culture: An assessment through word associations. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum/Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Szalay, L. B.; Kelly, R. M.; and Moon, W. T. 1972. Ideology: Its meaning and measurement. Comparative Political Studies 151–73.10.1177/001041407200500202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szalay, L. B., and Maday, B. C. 1973. Verbal associations in the analysis of subjective culture. Current Anthropology 14:151–73.10.1086/201404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szalay, L. B.; Moon, W. T.; and Bryson, J. A. 1971. Communication lexicon on three South Korean audiences: Social, national, and motivational domains. Kensington, Md.: American Institutes for Research.Google Scholar
Szalay, L. B.; Moon, W. T.; and Bryson, J. A. 1973. Communication lexicon on three South Korean audiences: Domains, family, education, and international relations. Kensington, Md.: American Institutes for Research.Google Scholar
Szalay, L. B.; Moon, W. T., Lysne, D. A.; and Bryson, J. A. 1971. A lexicon of selected U.S.-Korean communication themes. Kensington, Md.: American Institutes for Research, Center for Research in Social Systems.Google Scholar
Szalay, L. B., and Pecjak, Vid. 1979. Comparative analyses of U.S. and Slovenian sociopolitical frames of reference. In Experience forms, Haydu, G., ed. Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Szalay, L. B.; Williams, R. E.; Bryson, J. A.; and West, G. 1976. Priorities, meanings and psychocultural distance of black, white, and Spanish-American groups. Washington, D.C.: American Institutes for Research.Google Scholar
Teune, Henry. 1971. The strategy of comparative inquiry: Methods of assessment and analysis. In Jacob, P. E. et al. Values and the active community: A cross-national study of the influence of local leadership, p. 296.Google Scholar
Tolman, E. C. 1948. Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychology Review 55:189–208.10.1037/h0061626CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Triandis, H. C. 1972. The analysis of subjective culture. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Wallace, A. F. C. 1956. Mazeway resynthesis: A biocultural theory of religious inspiration. Transactions of New York Academy of Science 18:626–38.10.1111/j.2164-0947.1956.tb00491.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whorf, B. 1956. Language, thought and reality. New York: Technological Press and Wiley.Google Scholar