Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Power to Nudge

  • ANDREAS T. SCHMIDT (a1)
Abstract

Nudging policies rely on behavioral science to improve people's decisions through small changes in the environments within which people make choices. This article first seeks to rebut a prominent objection to this approach: furnishing governments with the power to nudge leads to relations of alien control, that is, relations in which some people can impose their will on others—a concern which resonates with republican, Kantian, and Rousseauvian theories of freedom and relational theories of autonomy. I respond that alien control can be avoided, if nudging is suitably transparent and democratically controlled. Moreover, such transparency and democratic control are institutionally feasible. Building on this response, I then provide a novel and surprising argument for more nudging: democratically controlled public policy nudging can often contain the power of private companies to nudge in uncontrolled and opaque ways. Therefore, reducing alien control often requires more rather than less nudging in public policy.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Andreas T. Schmidt is Assistant Professor, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Groningen, Oude Boteringestraat 52, 9712 GL Groningen, The Netherlands (a.t.schmidt@rug.nl).
Footnotes
Hide All

I would like to thank Mark Budolfson, Luc Bovens, Cameron Langford, Alecia McGregor, and four referees for helpful comments and discussions.

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

George A. Akerlof , and Robert J. Shiller . 2015. Phishing for Phools: The Economics of Manipulation and Deception. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Luc Bovens . 2009. “The Ethics of Nudge.” In Preference Change: Approaches from Philosophy, Economics and Psychology, eds. Till Grüne-Yanoff and Sven Ove Hansson , 207–19. Berlin and New York: Springer Science & Business Media.

Ian Carter . 1999. A Measure of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gidon Felsen , and Peter B. Reiner . 2015. “What Can Neuroscience Contribute to the Debate Over Nudging?” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6 (3): 469–79.

Marilyn Friedman . 2003. Autonomy, Gender, Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Michael Garnett . 2013. “Taking the Self out of Self-Rule.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (1): 2133.

Michael Garnett . 2014. “The Autonomous Life: A Pure Social View.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (1): 143–58.

Gerd Gigerenzer . 1996. “On Narrow Norms and Vague Heuristics: A Reply to Kahneman and Tversky.” Psychological Review 103 (3): 592–6.

Tom Goodwin . 2012. “Why We Should Reject ‘Nudge.’Politics 32 (2): 8592.

Till Grüne-Yanoff . 2012. “Old Wine in New Casks: Libertarian Paternalism Still Violates Liberal Principles.” Social Choice and Welfare 38 (4): 635–45.

Daniel M. Hausman , and Brynn Welch . 2010. “Debate: To Nudge or Not to Nudge.” Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (1): 123–36.

Peter John , Graham Smith , and Gerry Stoker . 2009. “Nudge Nudge, Think Think: Two Strategies for Changing Civic Behaviour.” The Political Quarterly 80 (3): 361–70.

Rhys Jones , Jessica Pykett , and Mark Whitehead . 2011a. “The Geographies of Soft Paternalism in the UK: The Rise of the Avuncular State and Changing Behaviour after Neoliberalism.” Geography Compass 5 (1): 5062.

Rhys Jones , Jessica Pykett , and Mark Whitehead . 2011b. “Governing Temptation: Changing Behaviour in an Age of Libertarian Paternalism.” Progress in Human Geography 35 (4): 483501.

Matthew H. Kramer 2003. The Quality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kristjan Kristjánsson . 1996. Social Freedom: The Responsibility View. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Will Leggett . 2014. “The Politics of Behaviour Change: Nudge, Neoliberalism and the State.” Policy & Politics 42 (1): 319.

George Loewenstein , Cindy Bryce , David Hagmann , and Sachin Rajpal . 2015. “Warning: You Are About To Be Nudged.” Behavioral Science & Policy 1 (1): 3542.

David Miller . 1983. “Constraints on Freedom.” Ethics 94 (1): 6686.

Chris Mills . 2015. “The Heteronomy of Choice Architecture.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6 (3): 495509.

Dragos C. Petrescu , Gareth J. Hollands , Dominique-Laurent Couturier , Yin-Lam Ng , and Theresa M. Marteau . 2016. “Public Acceptability in the UK and USA of Nudging to Reduce Obesity: The Example of Reducing Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Consumption.” PLoS One 11 (6): 118.

Philip Pettit . 1996. “Freedom as Antipower.” Ethics 106 (3): 576604.

Philip Pettit . 2002. “Keeping Republican Freedom Simple: On a Difference with Quentin Skinner.” Political Theory 30 (3): 339–56.

Philip Pettit . 2012. On the People's Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Philip Pettit . 2013. “Two Republican Traditions.” In Republican Democracy: Liberty, Law and Politics, eds. Andreas Niederberger and Philipp Schink . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 169204.

Riccardo Rebonato . 2014. “A Critical Assessment of Libertarian Paternalism.” Journal of Consumer Policy 37 (3): 357–96.

Christian F. Rostbøll 2016. “Kant, Freedom as Independence, and Democracy.” The Journal of Politics 78 (3): 792805.

Yashar Saghai . 2013. “Salvaging the Concept of Nudge.” Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (8): 487–93.

Andreas T. Schmidt 2016. “Abilities and the Sources of Unfreedom.” Ethics 127 (1): 179207.

Ronen Shnayderman . 2012. “Liberal vs. Republican Notions of Freedom.” Political Studies 60 (1): 4458.

Ronen Shnayderman . 2013. “Social Freedom, Moral Responsibility, Actions and Omissions.” Philosophical Quarterly 63 (253): 716–39.

Hillel Steiner . 1974. “Individual Liberty.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 75: 3350.

Cass R. Sunstein 1988. “Beyond the Republican Revival.” The Yale Law Journal 97 (8): 1539–90.

Cass R. Sunstein 2015c. “Nudges, Agency, and Abstraction: A Reply to Critics.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6 (3): 511–29.

Amos Tversky , and Daniel Kahneman . 1981. “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science 211 (4481): 453–58.

Mark D. White 2013. The Manipulation of Choice: Ethics and Libertarian Paternalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Mark Whitehead , Rhys Jones , and Jessica Pykett . 2011. “Governing Irrationality, or a More Than Rational Government? Reflections on the Rescientisation of Decision Making in British Public Policy.” Environment and Planning A 43 (12): 2819–37.

Douglas Glen Whitman , and Mario J. Rizzo . 2015. “The Problematic Welfare Standards of Behavioral Paternalism.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6 (3): 409–25.

T. M. Wilkinson 2013. “Nudging and Manipulation.” Political Studies 61 (2): 341–55.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 29
Total number of PDF views: 435 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1640 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 19th April 2017 - 21st September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.