Skip to main content

Presidential Influence in an Era of Congressional Dominance

  • JON C. ROGOWSKI (a1)

Research on presidential power focuses almost exclusively on the modern era, while earlier presidents are said to have held office while congressional dominance was at its peak. In this article, I argue that nineteenth-century presidents wielded greater influence than commonly recognized due to their position as head of the executive branch. Using an original dataset on the county-level distribution of U.S. post offices from 1876 to 1896, I find consistent evidence that counties represented by a president’s copartisans in the U.S. House received substantially more post offices than other counties, and that these advantages were especially large under divided government and in electorally important states. These results are robust across model specifications and when examining the Senate. The findings challenge key components of the congressional dominance and modern presidency theses, and have important implications for scholarship on interbranch relations, bureaucratic politics, and American political development.

Corresponding author
Jon C. Rogowski is Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Campus Box 1063, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130 (
Hide All
Adler, William D. 2013. “Generalissimo of the Nation”: War Making and the Presidency in the Early Republic.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 43 (2): 412–26.
Alger, Russell Alexander. 1901. The Spanish American War. New York: Harper and Brothers.
Bailey, Jeremy D. 2007. Thomas Jefferson and Executive Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Berry, Christopher R., Burden, Barry, and Howell, William G.. 2010. “The President and the Distribution of Federal Spending.” American Political Science Review 104 (4): 783–99.
Blevins, Cameron. 2014. “The Post Office Window.” Stanford University Typescript.
Bryce, James. 1995 (1888). The American Commonwealth. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
Carpenter, Daniel P. 2000. “State Building through Reputation Building: Policy Innovation and Coalitions of Esteem at the Post Office, 1883–1912.” Studies in American Political Development 14 (2): 121–55.
Carpenter, Daniel P. 2001. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Networks, Reputations and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Christenson, Dino, Kriner, Douglas L., and Reeves, Andrew. 2014. “Presidential Politics and the Influence of Federal Spending on Senate Elections.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, August 28–31.
Cohen, Jeffrey. 1982. “The Impact of the Modern Presidency on Presidential Success in the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 7 (4): 515–32.
Cohen, Jeffrey E. 2012. The President’s Legislative Policy Agenda, 1789–2002. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cushing, Marshall. 1893. The Story of Our Post Office: The Greatest Government Department in All Its Phases. Boston: A.M. Thayer and Company.
Deering, Christopher J., and Smith, Steven S.. 1997. Committees in Congress. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
de Santis, Vincent. 1963. “American Politics in the Gilded Age.” The Review of Politics 25 (4): 551–61.
Dynes, Adam, and Huber, Gregory A.. 2015. “Partisanship and the Allocation of Federal Spending: Do Same-Party Legislators or Voters Benefit from Shared Party Affiliation?American Political Science Review 109 (1): 172–86.
Ellis, Richard J., and Walker, Alexis. 2007. “Policy Speech in the Nineteenth Century Rhetorical Presidency: The Case of Zachary Taylor’s 1849 Tour.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 37 (2): 248–69.
Ferejohn, John A. 1974. Pork Barrel Politics: Rivers and Harbors Legislation, 1947–1968. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Fowler, Dorothy G. 1945. “Congressional Dictation of Local Appointments.” Journal of Politics 7 (1): 2557.
Fuller, Wayne E. 2003. Morality and the Mail in Nineteenth-Century America. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Gailmard, Sean, and Patty, John W.. 2012. Learning While Governing: Expertise and Accountability in the Executive Branch. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Galvin, Daniel J. 2014. “Presidents as Agents of Change.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 44 (1): 95119.
Galvin, Daniel J., and Shogan, Colleen. 2004. “Presidential Politicization and Centralization Across the Modern-Traditional Divide.” Polity 36 (3): 477504.
Greenstein, Fred I. 1982. The Hidden-Hand Presidency: Eisenhower as Leader. New York: Basic Books.
Howell, William G., Jackman, Saul P., and Rogowski, Jon C.. 2013. The Wartime President. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
James, Scott C. 2000. Presidents, Parties, and the State: A Party System Perspective on Democratic Regulatory Choice, 1884–1936. New York: Cambridge University Press.
James, Scott C. 2005. The Evolution of the Presidency: Between the Promise and the Fear. In Institutions of American Democracy: The Executive Branch, eds. Aberbach, Joel D. and Peterson, Mark A.. New York: Oxford University Press.
James, Scott C. 2006. “Patronage Regimes and American Party Development from ‘The Age of Jackson’ to the Progressive Era.” British Journal of Political Science 36 (1): 3960.
John, Richard R. 1995. Spreading the News: The American Postal System from Franklin to Morse. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Katznelson, Ira, and Lapinski, John S.. 2006. “At the Crossroads: Congress and American Political Development.” Perspectives on Politics 4 (2): 243–60.
Keller, Morton. 1977. Affairs of State: Public Life in Late Nineteenth-Century America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kernell, Samuel, and McDonald, Michael P.. 1999. “Congress and America’s Political Development: The Transformation of the Post Office from Patronage to Service.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (3): 792811.
Klinghard, Daniel P. 2005. “Grover Cleveland, William McKinley, and the Emergence of the President as Party Leader.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 35 (4): 736–60.
Klinghard, Daniel P. 2010. The Nationalization of American Political Parties, 1880–1896. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Korzi, Michael J. 2004. A Seat of Popular Leadership: The Presidency, Political Parties, and Democratic Government. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
Kriner, Douglas L., and Reeves, Andrew. 2015. “Presidential Particularism and Divide-the-Dollar Politics.” American Political Science Review 109 (1): 155–71.
Lapinski, John S. 2008. “Policy Substance and Performance in American Lawmaking, 1877–1994.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (2): 235–51.
Laracey, Mel. 2002. Presidents and the People: The Partisan Story of Going Public. College Station, TX: Texas A & M University Press.
Letters and Messages of Rutherford B. Hayes, President of the United States . 1881. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Levitt, Steven D., and Snyder, James M. Jr. 1995. “Political Parties and the Distribution of Federal Outlays.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (4): 958–80.
Lowi, Theodore J. 1972. “Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice.” Public Administration Review 32 (4): 298310.
Lowi, Theodore J. 1986. The Personal President: Power Invested, Promise Unfulfilled. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Mashaw, Jerry L. 2010. “Federal Administration and Administrative Law in the Gilded Age.” Yale Law Journal 119 (7): 1362–472.
Mayo, Laurence, ed. 1923. America of Yesterday as Reflected in the Journal of John Davis Long. Boston: The Atlantic Monthly Press.
McCarty, Nolan M. 2000. “Presidential Pork: Executive Veto Power and Distributive Politics.” American Political Science Review 84 (1): 117–29.
Mebane, Walter R., and Wawro, Gregory J.. 2002. “Presidential Pork Barrel Politics.” Cornell University.
Moe, Terry. 1985. “The Politicized Presidency.” In The New Direction in American Politics, ed. Chubb, John and Peterson, Paul G.. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Moe, Terry M. 1987. “An Assessment of the Positive Theory of ‘Congressional Dominance’.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 12 (4): 475520.
Moe, Terry, and Howell, William. 1999. “The Presidential Power of Unilateral Action.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15 (1): 132–79.
Neustadt, Richard E. 1990. Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents: The Politics of Leadership from Roosevelt to Reagan. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Parker, George F. 1909. Recollections of Grover Cleveland. New York: The Century Company.
Polsby, Nelson W. 1968. “The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review 62 (1): 144–68.
Polsby, Nelson W. 1983. Consequences of Party Reform. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rogowski, Jon C. 2015. “Presidential Incentives, Bureaucratic Control, and Party Building in the Republican Era.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 45 (4): 796811.
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1987. “The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power.” American Political Science Review 81 (1): 85104.
Skocpol, Theda. 1993. “America’s First Social Security System: The Expansion of Benefits for Civil War Veterans.” Political Science Quarterly 108 (1): 85116.
Skowronek, Stephen. 1982. Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Skowronek, Stephen. 1992. “Franklin Roosevelt and the Modern Presidency.” Studies in American Political Development 6 (2): 322–58.
Skowronek, Stephen. 1993. The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to George Bush. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Skowronek, Stephen. 2002. “Presidency and American Political Development: A Third Look.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 32 (4): 743–52.
Stein, Robert M., and Bickers, Kenneth N.. 1995. Perpetuating the Pork Barrel: Policy Subsystems and American Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stewart, Charles H. 1989. Budget Reform Politics: The Design of the Appropriations Process. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, William A. 1899. Ohio In Congress From 1803 To 1901. Columbus, OH: The 20th Century Publishing Company.
Wawro, Gregory J., and Katznelson, Ira. 2014. “Designing Historical Social Scientific Inquiry: How Parameter Heterogeneity Can Bridge the Methodological Divide between Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (2): 526–46.
Weingast, Barry R. 1979. “A Rational Choice Perspective on Congressional Norms.” American Journal of Political Science 23 (2): 245–62.
White, Leonard D. 1958. The Republican Era: 1869–1901. New York: Macmillan.
Whittington, Keith E., and Carpenter, Daniel P.. 2003. “Executive Power in American Institutional Development.” Perspectives on Politics 1 (3): 495513.
Wilson, Rick K. 1986. “An Empirical Test of Preferences for the Political Pork Barrel: District Level Appropriations for River and Harbor Legislation, 1889–1913.” American Journal of Political Science 30 (4): 729–54.
Wilson, Woodrow. 1885. Congressional Government: A Study in American Politics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Wilson, Woodrow. 1908. Constitutional Government in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.
Young, Christopher J. 2011. “Connecting the President and the People: Washington’s Neutrality, Genet’s Challenge, and Hamilton’s Fight for Public Support.” Journal of the Early Republic 31 (3): 435–66.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Rogowski supplementary material
Tables A.1-A.7

 PDF (340 KB)
340 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed