Ai, Chunrong, and Norton, Edward C.. 2003. “Interaction Terms in Logit and Probit Models.” Economics Letters
Anderson, Sarah, and Habel, Philip. 2008. “Revisiting Adjusted ADA Scores for the U.S. Congress, 19472007.” Political Analysis
Bailey, Michael A., Kamoie, Brian, and Maltzman, Forrest. 2005. “Signals from the Tenth Justice: The Political Role of the Solicitor General in Supreme Court Decision Making.” American Journal of Political Science
Baum, Lawrence. 1997. The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Bonacich, Phillip. 1972. “Factoring and Weighting Approaches to Clique Identification.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology
Bonacich, Phillip. 2007. “Some Unique Properties of Eigenvector Centrality.” Social Networks
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Christenson, Dino P.. N.d. “Amicus Curiae Networks: Lobbying the Supreme Court.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, January 2010, Atlanta, GA.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Christenson, Dino P.. 2012. “The Evolution and Formation of Amicus Curiae Networks.” Social Networks.
Caldeira, Gregory A., and Wright, John R.. 1988. “Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review
Caldeira, Gregory A., and Wright, John R.. 1990. “Amici Curiae before the Supreme Court: Who Participates, When, and How Much?” Journal of Politics
Collins, Paul M.
2004. “Friends of the Court: Examining the Influence of Amicus Curiae Participation in U.S. Supreme Court Litigation.” Law and Society Review
Collins, Paul M.
2007. “Lobbyists before the U.S. Supreme Court: Investigating the Influence of Amicus Curiae Briefs.” Political Research Quarterly
Collins, Paul M.
2008. Friends of the Supreme Court: Interest Groups and Judicial Decision Making. New York: Oxford University Press.
Collins, Paul M., and Martinek, Wendy L.. N.d. “Judges and Friends: The Influence of Amici Curiae on U.S. Court of Appeals Judges.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April 2011, Chicago, IL.
Corley, Pamela C.
2008. “The Supreme Court and opinion content—The influence of parties’ briefs.” Political Research Quarterly
Dahl, Robert A.
1961. Who Governs?
New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Epstein, Lee, and Kobylka, Joseph F.. 1992. The Supreme Court and Legal Change. Chapel Hill, NC:University of North Carolina Press.
French, John R. P. Jr., and Raven, Bertram. 1959. The Bases of Social Power. In Studies in Social Power, ed. Cartwright, Dorwin. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan, pp. 150–67.
Friedkin, Noah E.
1993. “Structural Bases of Interpersonal Influence in Groups: A Longitudinal Case Study.” American Sociological Review
Galanter, Marc. 1974. “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculation on the Limits of Legal Change.” Law Society Review
Gibson, James L.
1997. “United States Supreme Court Database, Phase II: 1953-1993.” Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
Hansford, Thomas G. N.d. “Using the Amici Network to Measure the Ex Ante Ideological Loading of Supreme Court Cases.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April 2012, Chicago, IL.
Hula, Kevin W.
1999. Lobbying Together: Interest Group Coalitions in Legislative Politics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Johnson, Timothy R., Wahlbeck, Paul J., and Spriggs II, James F.. 2006. “The Influence of Oral Arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review
Kearney, Joseph D., and Merrill, Thomas W.. 2000. “The Influence of Amicus Curiae Briefs on the Supreme Court.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review
Lazarus, Richard J.
2007. “Advocacy Matters Before and Within the Supreme Court: Transforming the Court by Transforming the Bar.” The Georgetown Law Journal
Lynch, Kelly J.
2004. “Best Friends? Supreme Court Law Clerks on Effective Amicus Curiae Briefs.” Journal of Law and Politics
Marcantonio, Donata. 2011. “Knox v. Service Employees International Union: Balancing the First Amendment With Fairness Under Union-Shop Agreements.” Duke Journal of Constitutional Law and Public Policy
Martin, Andrew D., and Quinn, Kevin M.. 2002. “Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court 1953-1999.” Political Analysis
McAtee, Andrea, and McGuire, Kevin T.. 2007. “Lawyers, Justices, and Issue Salience: When and How Do Legal Arguments Affect the U.S. Supreme Court?” Law and Society Review
McGuire, Kevin T.
1994. “Amici Curiae and Strategies for Gaining Access to the Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly
McGuire, Kevin T.
1995. “Repeat Players in the Supreme Court: The Role of Experienced Lawyers in Litigation Success.” Journal of Politics
McGuire, Kevin T.
1998. “Explaining Executive Success in the U.S. Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly
Nicholson, Chris, and Collins, Paul M.. 2008. “The Solicitor General's Amicus Curiae Strategies in the Supreme Court.” American Politics Research
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Peppers, Todd C.
2006. Courtiers of the Marble Palace: The Rise and Influence of the Supreme Court Law Clerk. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Provost, Colin. 2010. “An Integrated Model of U.S. State Attorney General Behavior in Multi-State Litigation.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly
Richards, Mark J., and Kritzer, Herbert M.. 2002. “Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making.” American Political Science Review
Rohde, D. W., and Spaeth, H. J.. 1976. Supreme Court Decision Making. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
Rossotti, J. E., Natelson, L., and Tatalovich, R.. 1997. “Nonlegal advice—The amicus briefs in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.” Judicature
Rozen, Miriam. 2011. “U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and one-time Oklahoma resident shares thoughts on what she reads and what she doesnt.” Accessed 3/29/2012 at http://texaslawyer.typepad.com.
Samuels, Suzanne U.
2004. First among Friends: Interest Groups, the U.S. Supreme Court, and the Right to Privacy. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
Schattschneider, E. E.
1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. Chicago: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J.. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J.. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sheehan, Reginald S., Mishler, William, and Songer, Donald R.. 1992. “Ideology, Status and the Differential Success of Direct Parties before the Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review
Simard, Linda Sandstrom. 2007. “An Empirical Study of Amici Curiae in Federal Court: A Fine Balance of Access, Efficiency, and Adversarialism.” Review of Litigation
Spriggs, James F., and Wahlbeck, Paul J.. 1997. “Amicus Curiae and the Role of Information at the Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly
Sunstein, C. R., Schkade, D., Ellman, L. M., and Sawicki, A.. 2006. Are Judges Political?: An Empirical Analysis of the Federal Judiciary. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Szmer, John, Johnson, Susan W., and Sarver, Tammy A.. 2007. “Does the Lawyer Matter? Influencing Outcomes on the Supreme Court of Canada.” Law and Society Review
Truman, David B.
1951. The Govermental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.