Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Rawls and the Forgotten Figure of the Most Advantaged: In Defense of Reasonable Envy toward the Superrich

  • JEFFREY EDWARD GREEN (a1)
  • Please note a correction has been issued for this article.

Abstract

This article aims to correct the widespread imbalance in contemporary liberal thought, which makes explicit appeal to the “least advantaged” without parallel attention to the “most advantaged” as a distinct group in need of regulatory attention. Rawls's influential theory of justice is perhaps the paradigmatic instance of this imbalance, but I show how a Rawlsian framework nonetheless provides three justifications for why implementers of liberal justice—above all, legislators—should regulate the economic prospects of a polity's richest citizens: as a heuristic device for ensuring that a system of inequalities not reach a level at which inequalities cease being mutually advantageous, as protection against excessive inequalities threatening civic liberty, and as redress for a liberal society's inability to fully realize fair equality of opportunity with regard to education and politics. Against the objection that such arguments amount to a defense of envy, insofar as they support policies that in certain instances impose economic costs on the most advantaged with negative or neutral economic impact on the rest of society, I attend to Rawls's often overlooked distinction between irrational and reasonable forms of envy, showing that any envy involved in the proposed regulation of the most advantaged falls within this latter category.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Jeffrey Edward Green is the Janice and Julian Bers Assistant Professor in the Social Sciences, University of Pennsylvania. 208 S. 37th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104 (jegr@sas.upenn.edu).

References

Hide All
Ackerman, Bruce, and Alstott, Anne. 2000. The Stakeholder Society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Aristotle, . 1932. Politics. Ed. and trans. Rackham, H.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Arneson, Richard. 2000. “Luck Egalitarianism and Prioritarianism.” Ethics 110: 339–49.
Bartels, Larry. 2008. Unequal Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Beramendi, Pablo, and Rueda, David. 2007. “Social Democracy Constrained.” British Journal of Political Science 37 (4): 619–41.
Blom, Raimo, Melin, Harri, and Tanskanen, Eero. 2009. “Social Inequality IV: Finnish Data.” ISSP 2009. http://www.fsd.uta.fi/english/data/catalogue/FSD2514/ (accessed October 25, 2012).
Bowles, Samuel, Gintis, Herbert, and Groves, Melissa Osborne. 2005. Unequal Chances: Family Background and Economic Success. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Broome, John. 1995. Weighing Goods: Equality, Uncertainty, and Time. Oxford: Basil-Blackwell.
Cohen, G.A. 2008. Rescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cohen, Joshua. 2010a. The Arc of the Moral Universe. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
Cohen, Joshua. 2010b. Rousseau: A Free Community of Equals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cooper, D. 1982, “Equality and Envy.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 16: 3547.
Duff, David. 2005. “Abolition of Wealth Transfer Taxes.” Pittsburgh Tax Review 3 (72): 71120.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dworkin, Ronald. 2000. Sovereign Virtue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dworkin, Ronald. 2006. Is Democracy Possible Here? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Edlund, Jonas, and Svallfors, Stefan. 2009. “Social Inequality IV: Swedish Data.” ISSP 2009. http://snd.gu.se/en/catalogue/study/577 (accessed October 25, 2012).
Epstein, Joseph. 2003. Envy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fernández de la Mora, Gonzalo, and De Nicolas, Antonio. 1987. Egalitarian Envy: The Political Foundations of Social Justice. New York: Paragon House.
Fraser, Steve, and Gerstle, Gary, eds. 2005. Ruling America: A History of Wealth and Power in a Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Freeman, Samuel. 2007a. Justice and the Social Contract. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Freeman, Samuel. 2007b. Rawls. London: Routledge.
Freud, S., 1949. Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego. Strachey, Trans. J.. New York: Liveright.
Gilens, Martin. 2000. Why Americans Hate Welfare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gilens, Martin. 2005. “Inequality and Democratic Responsiveness.” Public Opinion Quarterly 69: 778–96.
Graetz, Michael, and Shapiro, Ian. 2005. Death by a Thousand Cuts: The Fight over Taxing Inherited Wealth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hacker, Jacob, and Pierson, Paul. 2010. Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer—and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Hansen, Mogens Herman. 1991. The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes. Oxford: Blackwell.
Harrington, James. 1977. The Political Works of James Harrington. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hochschild, Jennifer. 1986. What's Fair? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jacobs, Lawrence, and Skocpol, Theda, eds. 2005. Inequality and American Democracy: What We Knows and What We Need to Learn. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Jefferson, Thomas. 1984. Writings. Ed. Petersen, Merill D.. New York: Library of America.
Krugman, Paul. 2003. The Great Unraveling: Losing Our Way in the New Century. New York: Norton.
Lane, Robert E. 1986. “Market Justice, Political Justice.” American Political Science Review 80 (2): 383402.
Lehning, Percy B. 2009. John Rawls: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lintott, A.W. 1999. The Constitution of the Roman Republic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Lupu, Noam, and Pontusson, Jonas. 2011. “The Structure of Inequality and the Politics of Distribution.” American Political Science Review 105 (1): 316–36.
Maffettone, Sebastian. 2011. Rawls: An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity.
Mandle, Jon. 2009. Rawls's “A Theory of Justice”: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martin, Bill, and Wajcman, Judy, 2004. “Understanding Class Inequality in Australia.” In Social Inequalities in Comparative Perspective, eds. Devine, Fiona and Waters, Mary. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 163–90.
McCall, Leslie, and Kenworthy, Lane. 2009. “Americans’ Social Policy Preferences in the Era of Rising Inequality.” Perspectives on Politics 7 (3): 459–84.
McCormick, John. 2006. “Contain the Wealthy and Patrol the Magistrates: Restoring Elite Accountability to Popular Government.” American Political Science Review 100 (2): 147–63.
Mill, J.S. 1998. On Liberty and Other Essays. Ed. Gray, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Millar, Fergus. 1998. The Crowd in Rome in the Late Republic. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat, baron de. 1979. The Spirit of the Laws. Ed. and trans. Cohler, Anne, Miller, Basia, and Stone, Harold. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
More, Thomas. 1965. Utopia in The Complete Works of St. Thomas More, vol. IV. Eds. Surtz, Edward and Hexter, J. H.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Nietzsche, Friedrich, 1998. On the Genealogy of Morality. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Norman, Richard. 2002. “Equality, Envy, and the Sense of Justice.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (1): 4353.
Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
Nussbaum, Martha. 2006. Frontiers of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ober, Josiah. 1989. Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Page, Benjamin, and Jacobs, Lawrence. 2009. Class War? What Americans Really Think about Economic Inequality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Phillips, Kevin. 2002. Wealth and Democracy. New York: Broadway.
Plato, . 1989. The Collected Dialogues, ed. Hamilton, E.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Pogge, Thomas. 1989. Realizing Rawls. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Pogge, Thomas. 2007 John Rawls: His Life and Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rawls, John. 1958. “Justice as Fairness.” In CP.
Rawls, John. 1963a. “Constitutional Liberty and the Concept of Justice.” In CP.
Rawls, John. 1963b. “The Sense of Justice.” In CP.
Rawls, John. 1967. “Distributive Justice.” In CP.
Rawls, John. 1968. “Distributive Justice: Some Addenda.” In CP.
Rawls, John. 1969. “The Justification of Civil Disobedience.” In CP.
Rawls, John. 1971a. A Theory of Justice [T]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, John. 1971b. “Justice as Reciprocity.” In CP.
Rawls, John. 1975. “A Kantian Conception of Equality.” In CP.
Rawls, John. 1999a. Collected Papers [CP]. Ed. Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, John. 1999b Theory of Justice: Revised Edition [rev]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, John. 2000. Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, John. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement [R]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, John. 2005. Political Liberalism: Expanded Edition [PL]. New York: Columbia University Press.
Roller, Edeltraud, and Rudi, Tatjana. 2008. “Explaining Level and Equality of Political Participation: The Role of Social Capital, Socioeconomic Modernity, and Political Institutions.” In Social Capital in Europe: Similarity of Countries and Diversity of People?, ed. Meulemann, Heiner. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill, 251–83.
Sacks, Peter. 2007. Tearing Down the Gates: Confronting the Class Divide in American Education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Scheffler, Samuel. 2003. “What is Egalitarianism?Philosophy & Public Affairs 31 (1): 539.
Scherer, Matthew. 2006. “Saint John: The Miracle of Secular Reason.” In Political Theologies: Public Religions in a Post-secular World, eds. de Vries, Hent and Lawrence, E. Sullivan. New York: Fordham University Press.
Scheve, Kenneth, and Stasavage, David. 2012. “Democracy, War and Wealth: Lessons from Two Centuries of Inheritance Taxation.” American Political Science Review 106 (1): 81102.
Schoeck, Helmut. 1969. Envy: A Theory of Social Behavior. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
Simmons, A. John. 2010. “Ideal and Nonideal Theory.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 38 (1): 536.
Skopek, Nora, Bucholz, Sandra, and Blossfeld, Hans-Peter. 2011. “Wealth Inequality in Europe and the Delusive Egalitarianism of Scandinavian Countries.” Bamberg University. Working paper. http://www.soziologie-blossfeld.de/Skopek-Nora.165.0.html (accessed October 25, 2012).
Smith, Eliot R., and Kluegel, James. 1986. Beliefs about Inequality. New York: A. de Gruyter.
Taylor, Robert S. 2011. Reconstructing Rawls. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Temkin, Larry. 2003. “Egalitarianism Defended.” Ethics 113 (July): 764–82.
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 2000. Democracy in America, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tomlin, Patrick. 2008. “Envy, Facts and Justice: A Critique of the Treatment of Envy in Justice as Fairness.” Res Publica 14: 101–16.
Van Parijs, Philippe. 2003. “Difference Principles.” In Cambridge Companion to John Rawls, ed. Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 200–40.
Verba, Sidney, Nie, Norman H., and Kim, Jae-on. 1978. Participation and Political Equality: A Seven-nation Comparison. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Voice, Paul. 2011. Rawls Explained: From Fairness to Utopia. Chicago: Open Court.
Winters, Jeffrey. 2011. Oligarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Winters, Jeffrey, and Page, Benjamin. 2009. “Oligarchy in the United States?Perspectives on Politics 7: 731–51.
Wyatt, Chris. 2008. The Difference Principle beyond Rawls. New York: Continuum.
Young, Robert. 1989. “Egalitarianism and Envy.” Philosophical Studies 52: 261–76.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

A correction has been issued for this article: