Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Representation Rethought: On Trustees, Delegates, and Gyroscopes in the Study of Political Representation and Democracy

  • ANDREW REHFELD (a1)
Abstract

The trustee/delegate problem purportedly expresses how closely a representative's votes in the legislature should correspond to their constituents' preferences. In this article, I argue that the usual formulation of this debate collapses three distinctions—aims, source of judgment, and responsiveness—and thus obscures the underlying complexity of the phenomenon. Given its tripartite formulation, the collapse of these distinctions into a binary “trustee/delegate” formulation obscures a more complex political landscape with eight—rather than two—ideal types. Furthermore, once unpacked, we can see that the distinctions operate entirely independent of the location of authority, leading to the seemingly paradoxical instructed trustees and independent delegates. I also claim that the three distinctions apply to any decision maker, and thus, the attribution of this problem as distinctive of democratic political representation is an important overstatement. The article thus contributes to a more general theory of political representation that can be applied in nonelectoral and nondemocratic contexts increasingly relevant to global politics.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Andrew Rehfeld is Associate Professor of Political Science, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899 (rehfeld@wustl.edu).
References
Hide All
Amy, Douglass. 1993. Real Voices New Choices. New York: Columbia University Press.
Ankersmit, F. R. 2002. Political Representation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Applebaum, Arthur Isak. 1999. Ethics for Adversaries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Beerbohm, Eric. 2007. Democratic Complicity. Ph.D. diss. Department of Politics, Princeton University.
Brunell, Thomas L. 2006. “Rethinking Redistricting: How Drawing Uncompetitive Districts Eliminates Gerrymanders, Enhances Representation, and Improves Attitudes Toward Congress.” PS: Political Science & Politics 39 (January): 7785.
Brunell, Thomas L. 2008. Redistricting and Representation: Why Conpetitive Elections Are Bad for America. New York: Routledge.
Burke, Edmund. 1774. “Speech to the Electors of Bristol.” In Works, New York: Harpers. 446–8.
Cicero, Marcus Tullius. 1999. Cicero: On the Commonwealth and On the Laws (Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought), ed. Zetzel, James E. G.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Dahl, Robert A. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Dovi, Suzanne. 2007. The Good Representative. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Elkin, Stephen. 2006. Reconstructing the Commercial Republic. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Estlund, David M. 2008. Democratic Authority. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Fasolt, Constantin. 1991. “Quod Omnes Tangit Ab Omnibus Approbari Debet: The Words and the Meaning.” In In Iure Veritas: Studies in Canon Law in Memory of Schafer Williams, eds. Bowman, Steven and Cody, Blanche. Cincinnati: University of Cincinnati College of Law.
Fearon, James D. 1999. “Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types versus Sanctioning Poor Performance.” In Democracy, Accountability and Representation. eds. Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan C., and Manin, Bernard. Cambridge Studies in the Theory of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 5597.
Gelman, Andrew, and King, Gary. 1994. “Enhancing Democracy Through Legislative Redistricting.” American Political Science Review 88 (September): 541–59.
Goertz, Gary. 2006. Social Science Concepts: A User's Guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Guinier, Lani. 1994. The Tyranny of the Majority: Fundamental Fairness in Representative Democracy. New York: Free Press.
Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Hart, H. L. A. 1961. The Concept of Law. London: Oxford University Press.
Hajnal, Zoltan L. 2009. “Who Loses in American Democracy? A Count of Votes Demonstrates the Limited Representation of African Americans.” American Political Science Review 103 (1): 3758.
Kenyon, Cecilia ed. 1966. The Anti-Federalists. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
Kurland, Philip B., and Lerner, Ralph, eds. 1987. The Founders Constitution. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Locke, John. [1690] 1988. “Second Treatise of Government.” In Two Treatises of Government. ed. Laslett, Peter. Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lovett, Francis. 2004. “Can Justice Be Based on Consent.” Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (March): 79101.
Lublin, David. 1997. The Paradox of Representation. Prrinceton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mair, Peter. 2006. “Ruling the Void? The Hollowing of Western Democracy.” New Left Review (Nov/Dec): 2551.
Mansbridge, Jane N.d. “A ‘Selection Model’ of Political Representation.” Journal of Political Philosophy. Forthcoming.
Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97 (4): 515–28.
Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Claredon Press.
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan C., and Manin, Bernard, eds. 1999. Democracy, Accountability and Representation. Cambridge Studies in the Theory of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, Hillary. 2002. The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rakove, Jack. 1996. Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Raz, Joseph. 1979. The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rehfeld, Andrew. 2003. “Review of Ankersmit, F. R., Political Representation. (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2002).” Ethics (July): 865–8.
Rehfeld, Andrew. 2005. The Concept of Constituency: Political Representation, Democratic Legitimacy and Institutional Design. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rehfeld, Andrew. 2006. “Toward a General Theory of Political Representation.” The Journal of Politics 68 (February): 121.
Rehfeld, Andrew. 2009a. Political Representation: An Explanatory Account. Manuscript. Department of Political Science, Washington University in St. Louis.
Rehfeld, Andrew. 2009b. “On Quotas and Qualifications for Office.” In Political Representation and Democratic Self Rule, eds. Shapiro, Ian, Stokes, Susan, and Wood, Elisabeth. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Richie, Robert, and Steven, Hill. 1999. Relecting All of Us: The Case for proportional Representation. eds. Cohen, Joshua and Rogers, Joel. Boston: Beacon Press.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. [1762] 1978. On the Social Contract. ed. Masters, Roger D.. Trans. Masters, Judith R.. New York: St. Mary's.
Sabl, Andrew. 2002. Ruling Passions: Political Offices and Democratic Ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Shapiro, Ian. 2005. “Gross Concepts in Political Argument.” In The Flight from Reality in the Human Sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 152–77.
Simmons, A. John. 1979. Moral Principles and Political Obligations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sunstein, Cass. 1993. The Partial Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Thompson, Dennis. 2005. Restoring Responsibility: Ethics in Government, Business, and Health Care. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Truman, David. 1953. The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Urbinati, Nadia. 2008. Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
Vermeule, Adrian. 2007. Mechanisms of Democracy: Institutional Design Writ Small. New York: Oxford University Press.
Williams, Melissa. 1999. Voice, Trust, Memory: Marginalized Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Democracy and Inclusion. New York: Oxford University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 25
Total number of PDF views: 544 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1412 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.