Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Representation Rethought: On Trustees, Delegates, and Gyroscopes in the Study of Political Representation and Democracy

  • ANDREW REHFELD (a1)
Abstract

The trustee/delegate problem purportedly expresses how closely a representative's votes in the legislature should correspond to their constituents' preferences. In this article, I argue that the usual formulation of this debate collapses three distinctions—aims, source of judgment, and responsiveness—and thus obscures the underlying complexity of the phenomenon. Given its tripartite formulation, the collapse of these distinctions into a binary “trustee/delegate” formulation obscures a more complex political landscape with eight—rather than two—ideal types. Furthermore, once unpacked, we can see that the distinctions operate entirely independent of the location of authority, leading to the seemingly paradoxical instructed trustees and independent delegates. I also claim that the three distinctions apply to any decision maker, and thus, the attribution of this problem as distinctive of democratic political representation is an important overstatement. The article thus contributes to a more general theory of political representation that can be applied in nonelectoral and nondemocratic contexts increasingly relevant to global politics.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Andrew Rehfeld is Associate Professor of Political Science, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899 (rehfeld@wustl.edu).
References
Hide All
Amy Douglass. 1993. Real Voices New Choices. New York: Columbia University Press.
Ankersmit F. R. 2002. Political Representation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Applebaum, Arthur Isak. 1999. Ethics for Adversaries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Beerbohm Eric. 2007. Democratic Complicity. Ph.D. diss. Department of Politics, Princeton University.
Brunell Thomas L. 2006. “Rethinking Redistricting: How Drawing Uncompetitive Districts Eliminates Gerrymanders, Enhances Representation, and Improves Attitudes Toward Congress.” PS: Political Science & Politics 39 (January): 7785.
Brunell Thomas L. 2008. Redistricting and Representation: Why Conpetitive Elections Are Bad for America. New York: Routledge.
Burke Edmund. 1774. “Speech to the Electors of Bristol.” In Works, New York: Harpers. 446–8.
Cicero Marcus Tullius. 1999. Cicero: On the Commonwealth and On the Laws (Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought), ed. Zetzel James E. G.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Dahl Robert A. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Dovi Suzanne. 2007. The Good Representative. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Dworkin Ronald. 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Elkin Stephen. 2006. Reconstructing the Commercial Republic. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Estlund David M. 2008. Democratic Authority. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Fasolt Constantin. 1991. “Quod Omnes Tangit Ab Omnibus Approbari Debet: The Words and the Meaning.” In In Iure Veritas: Studies in Canon Law in Memory of Schafer Williams, eds. Bowman Steven and Cody Blanche. Cincinnati: University of Cincinnati College of Law.
Fearon James D. 1999. “Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types versus Sanctioning Poor Performance.” In Democracy, Accountability and Representation. eds. Przeworski Adam, Stokes Susan C., and Manin Bernard. Cambridge Studies in the Theory of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 5597.
Gelman Andrew, and King Gary. 1994. “Enhancing Democracy Through Legislative Redistricting.” American Political Science Review 88 (September): 541–59.
Goertz Gary. 2006. Social Science Concepts: A User's Guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Guinier Lani. 1994. The Tyranny of the Majority: Fundamental Fairness in Representative Democracy. New York: Free Press.
Gutmann Amy, and Thompson Dennis. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Hart H. L. A. 1961. The Concept of Law. London: Oxford University Press.
Hajnal Zoltan L. 2009. “Who Loses in American Democracy? A Count of Votes Demonstrates the Limited Representation of African Americans.” American Political Science Review 103 (1): 3758.
Kenyon Cecilia ed. 1966. The Anti-Federalists. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
Kurland Philip B., and Lerner Ralph, eds. 1987. The Founders Constitution. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Locke John. [1690] 1988. “Second Treatise of Government.” In Two Treatises of Government. ed. Laslett Peter. Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lovett Francis. 2004. “Can Justice Be Based on Consent.” Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (March): 79101.
Lublin David. 1997. The Paradox of Representation. Prrinceton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mair Peter. 2006. “Ruling the Void? The Hollowing of Western Democracy.” New Left Review (Nov/Dec): 2551.
Mansbridge Jane N.d. “A ‘Selection Model’ of Political Representation.” Journal of Political Philosophy. Forthcoming.
Mansbridge Jane. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97 (4): 515–28.
Pettit Philip. 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Claredon Press.
Phillips Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pitkin Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Przeworski Adam, Stokes Susan C., and Manin Bernard, eds. 1999. Democracy, Accountability and Representation. Cambridge Studies in the Theory of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Putnam Hillary. 2002. The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rakove Jack. 1996. Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Raz Joseph. 1979. The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rawls John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rehfeld Andrew. 2003. “Review of Ankersmit, F. R., Political Representation. (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2002).” Ethics (July): 865–8.
Rehfeld Andrew. 2005. The Concept of Constituency: Political Representation, Democratic Legitimacy and Institutional Design. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rehfeld Andrew. 2006. “Toward a General Theory of Political Representation.” The Journal of Politics 68 (February): 121.
Rehfeld Andrew. 2009a. Political Representation: An Explanatory Account. Manuscript. Department of Political Science, Washington University in St. Louis.
Rehfeld Andrew. 2009b. “On Quotas and Qualifications for Office.” In Political Representation and Democratic Self Rule, eds. Shapiro Ian, Stokes Susan, and Wood Elisabeth. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Richie Robert, and Steven Hill. 1999. Relecting All of Us: The Case for proportional Representation. eds. Cohen Joshua and Rogers Joel. Boston: Beacon Press.
Rousseau Jean-Jacques. [1762] 1978. On the Social Contract. ed. Masters Roger D.. Trans. Masters Judith R.. New York: St. Mary's.
Sabl Andrew. 2002. Ruling Passions: Political Offices and Democratic Ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Shapiro Ian. 2005. “Gross Concepts in Political Argument.” In The Flight from Reality in the Human Sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 152–77.
Simmons A. John. 1979. Moral Principles and Political Obligations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sunstein Cass. 1993. The Partial Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Thompson Dennis. 2005. Restoring Responsibility: Ethics in Government, Business, and Health Care. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Truman David. 1953. The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Urbinati Nadia. 2008. Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
Vermeule Adrian. 2007. Mechanisms of Democracy: Institutional Design Writ Small. New York: Oxford University Press.
Williams Melissa. 1999. Voice, Trust, Memory: Marginalized Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Young Iris Marion. 2000. Democracy and Inclusion. New York: Oxford University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 25
Total number of PDF views: 399 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1107 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.