Skip to main content
×
Home

The Semblance of Democratic Revolution: Coalitions in Ukraine's Orange Revolution

  • MARK R. BEISSINGER (a1)
Abstract

Using two unusual surveys, this study analyzes participation in the 2004 Orange Revolution in Ukraine, comparing participants with revolution supporters, opponents, counter-revolutionaries, and the apathetic/inactive. As the analysis shows, most revolutionaries were weakly committed to the revolution's democratic master narrative, and the revolution's spectacular mobilizational success was largely due to its mobilization of cultural cleavages and symbolic capital to construct a negative coalition across diverse policy groupings. A contrast is drawn between urban civic revolutions like the Orange Revolution and protracted peasant revolutions. The strategies associated with these revolutionary models affect the roles of revolutionary organization and selective incentives and the character of revolutionary coalitions. As the comparison suggests, postrevolutionary instability may be built into urban civic revolutions due to their reliance on a rapidly convened negative coalition of hundreds of thousands, distinguished by fractured elites, lack of consensus over fundamental policy issues, and weak commitment to democratic ends.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Mark R. Beissinger is Henry W. Putnam Professor, Department of Politics, Princeton University, 237 Corwin Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544-1013 (mbeissin@princeton.edu)
References
Hide All
Alexander Jeffrey C. 2011. Performative Revolution in Egypt: An Essay in Cultural Power. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.
Andrews Rick, and Currim Imran. 2003. “Retention of Latent Segments in Regression-Based Marketing Models.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 20 (4): 315–21.
Arel Dominique. 2002. “Interpreting ‘Nationality’ and ‘Language’ in the 2001 Ukrainian Census.” Post-Soviet Affairs 18 (3): 213–49.
Arel Dominique. 2007. “Why and How It Happened: Orange Ukraine Chooses the West, but Without the East.” In Aspects of the Orange Revolution III: The Context and Dynamics of the 2004 Ukrainian Presidential Election, eds. Bredies Ingmar, Umland Andreas, and Yakushik Valentin. Stuttgart, Germany: Ibidem-Verlag: 3553.
Aslund Anders. 2005. “The Economic Policy of Ukraine After the Orange Revolution.”Eurasian Geography and Economics 46 (5): 327–53.
Beissinger Mark R. 2002. Nationalist Mobilization and the Collapse of the Soviet State. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Beissinger Mark R. 2007. “Structure and Example in Modular Political Phenomena: The Diffusion of Bulldozer/Rose/Orange/Tulip Revolutions.” Perspectives on Politics (June): 259–76.
Beissinger Mark, Jamal Amaney, and Mazur Kevin. 2012. “Who Participates in ‘Democratic’ Revolutions? A Comparison of the Egyptian and Tunisian Revolutions.” Paper prepared for the annual convention of the American Political Science Association. August 29–September 2, New Orleans, LA.
Boix Carles. 2008. “Economic Roots of Civil Wars and Revolutions in the Contemporary World.” World Politics 60 (April): 390437.
Bunce Valerie J., and Wolchik Sharon L.. 2011. Defeating Authoritarian Leaders in Postcommunist Countries. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Dix Robert H. 1984. “Why Revolutions Succeed and Fail.”Polity 16 (3) (Spring): 423–46.
Diuk Nadia. 2006. “The Triumph of Civil Society.” In Revolution in Orange: The Origins of Ukraine's Democratic Breakthrough, Åslund Anders and McFaul Michael. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 6984.
Downs Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
Fearon James, and Laitin David. 2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War.”American Political Science Review 97 (1) (February): 7590.
Fonseca Jaime R. S. 2008. “The Application of Mixture Modeling and Information Criteria for Discovering Patterns of Coronary Heart Disease.” Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods 3 (4): 292303.
Goldstone Jack A. 1994. “Is Revolution Individually Rational?Rationality and Society 6: 139–66.
Goldstone Jack A. 2001. “Toward a Fourth Generation of Revolutionary Theory.”Annual Review of Political Science 4: 139–87.
Goldstone Jack A. 2011. “Cross-class Coalitions and the Making of the Arab Revolts of 2011.” Swiss Political Science Review 17: 457–62.
Goodwin Jeff. 2001. No Other Way Out: States and Revolutionary Movements, 1945–1991. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Granovetter Mark S. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78 (6): 1360–80.
Gurr Ted Robert. 1970. Why Men Rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hale Henry E. 2005. “Regime Cycles: Democracy, Autocracy, and Revolution in Post-Soviet Eurasia.” World Politics 58 (October): 133–65.
Hardin Russell. 1995. One for All: The Logic of Group Conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Huntington Samuel P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Inglehart Ronald, and Welzel Christian. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson Chalmers. 1982. Revolutionary Change. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Karatnycky Adrian. 2005. “Ukraine's Orange Revolution.” Foreign Affairs 84 (2): 3552.
Klandermans Bert. 2010. “Peace Demonstrations or Anti-Government Marches? The Political Attitudes of the Protesters.” In The World Says No To War: Demonstrations Against the War on Iraq, eds. Walgrave Stefaan and Ruchts Dieter. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 98118.
Kuran Timur. 1995. Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Kuzio Taras. 2010. “Nationalism, Identity and Civil Society in Ukraine: Understanding the Orange Revolution.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 43: 285–96.
Lane David. 2008. “The Orange Revolution: ‘People's Revolution’ or Revolutionary Coup?The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 10 (4): 525–49.
Lichbach Marc I. 1995. The Rebel's Dilemma. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Lipset Seymour Martin. 1959. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53 (1): 69105.
Marwell Gerald, and Oliver Pamela. 1993. The Critical Mass in Collective Action: A Micro‐Social Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
McAdam Doug, and Paulsen Ronelle. 1993. “Specifying the Relationship between Social Ties and Social Activism.” American Journal of Sociology 99 (November): 640–67.
McFaul Michael. 2010. “Importing Revolution: Internal and External Factors in Ukraine's Democratic Breakthrough.” In Democracy and Authoritarianism in the Postcommunist World, eds. Bunce Valerie, McFaul Michael, and Stoner-Weiss Kathryn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 329.
Mueller Lisa. 2011. “Democratic Revolutionaries or Pocketbook Protestors? The Comparative Salience of Personal Rule and Famine in the Nigerien Uprisings of 2009.” Paper presented at the Working Group in African Political Economy, Stanford University. http://cega.berkeley.edu/assets/miscellaneous_files/wgape/21_Mueller.pdf (Accessed March 1, 2013).
Myagkov Mikhail, Ordeshook Peter C., and Shakin Dmitry. 2005. “Fraud or Fairytales: Russia and Ukraine's Electoral Experience.” Post-Soviet Affairs 21 (2): 91131.
Olsson-Yaouzis Nicolas. 2010. “Revolutionaries, Despots, and Rationality.” Rationality and Society 22 (3): 283–99.
OSCE Office of Democratic Institutions and Human Rights. 2005. “Ukraine Presidential Election 31 October, 21 November and 26 December 2004.” http://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/ukraine/14674.
Panina Natalya. 2005. Ukrainian Society 1994–2005: Sociological Monitoring. Kyiv: International Center for Policy Studies.
Petersen Roger D. 2001. Resistance and Rebellion: Lessons from Eastern Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Popkin Samuel L. 1979. The Rational Peasant: The Political Economy of Rural Society in Vietnam. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Putnam Robert D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rustow Dankwart A. 1970. “Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model.” Comparative Politics 2 (3): 337–63.
Scott James C. 1976. The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Skocpol Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Slater Dan. 2009. “Revolutions, Crackdowns, and Quiescence: Communal Elites and Democratic Mobilization in Southeast Asia.” American Journal of Sociology 115 (1): 203–54.
Stepanenko Viktor. 2005. “How Ukrainians View Their Orange Revolution: Public Opinion and the National Peculiarities of Citizenry Political Activities,” Demokratizatsiya 13 (4) (Fall): 595616.
Stepanenko Victor. 2006. “Civil Society in Post-Soviet Ukraine: Civic Ethos in the Framework of Corrupted Sociality?East European Politics and Societies 20 (4): 571–97.
Thompson Mark R. 2004. Democratic Revolutions: Asia and Eastern Europe. New York: Routledge.
Thompson Mark R., and Kuntz Philipp. 2004. “Stolen Elections: The Case of the Serbian October.” Journal of Democracy 15 (4): 159–72.
Tilly Charles. 1993. European Revolutions, 1492–1992. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Trotsky Leon. 1932. The History of the Russian Revolution, Vol. 1. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Tucker Joshua A. 2007. “Enough! Electoral Fraud, Collective Action Problems, and Post-Communist Colored Revolutions.” Perspectives on Politics 5 (3): 535–51.
Tullock Gordon. 1971. “The Paradox of Revolution.” Public Choice 11: 8999.
Vachudova Milada Anna. 2005. Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage, and Integration After Communism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Vermunt Jeroen K., and Magidson Jay. 2002. “Latent Class Cluster Analysis.” In Applied Latent Class Analysis, eds. Hagenaars J. A. and McCutcheon A. L.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 88106.
Way Lucan. 2008. “The Real Causes of the Color Revolutions.” Journal of Democracy 19 (July): 5569.
Way Lucan. 2010. “National Identity and Authoritarianism: Belarus and Ukraine Compared.” In Orange Revolution and Aftermath: Mobilization, Apathy, and the State in Ukraine, ed. D'Anieri Paul. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 129–59.
Weinstein Jeremy M. 2007. Inside Rebellion: The Politics of Insurgent Violence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
White Stephen, and McAllister Ian. 2009. “Rethinking the ‘Orange Revolution,’Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 25 (2): 227–54.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 20
Total number of PDF views: 299 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 757 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.