Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

Socratic Method and Political Science

  • CHRISTOPHER MECKSTROTH (a1)
Abstract

This article advances a novel theoretical account of what a “method” is and what makes one “rigorous,” and shows how it could advance contemporary debates in political theory and empirical methodology. Plato's Socrates invented the notion of method, and his characteristic practice of immanent refutation through questioning escapes key problems in more familiar views. Socratic method is (1) antifoundational, (2) non-algorithmic, and (3) indirect and relative to competing hypotheses, and it (4) develops its own standards of objectivity from the logic of asking questions. The article reconstructs Socrates’ method from the Platonic texts and shows how it provides reasonable criteria for judgment while remaining critical, sensitive to difference, and open to innovation. Socratic method avoids a forced choice between universalism and particularism in political theory, and it provides a common language for evaluating both quantitative and qualitative methods by drawing out a critical logic of empirical inquiry shared by both.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Christopher Meckstroth is Lecturer on Social Studies, Harvard University, 52 Garden Street, Hilles - Lower Main Level, Cambridge, MA 02138 (meckstroth@fas.harvard.edu).
References
Hide All
Achen, Christopher H. 1982. Interpreting and Using Regression. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Annas, Julia. 1992. “Plato the Skeptic.” In Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, supplemental vol., Methods of Interpreting Plato and his Dialogues, eds. Klagge, James C. and Smith, Nicholas D.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 4372.
Annas, Julia, and Rowe, Christopher. 2002. New Perspectives on Plato: Ancient and Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Arendt, Hannah. 1990. “Philosophy and Politics.” Social Research 57 (1): 73103.
Arendt, Hannah. 1992. Lectures on Kant's Political Philosophy. Ed. Ronald Beiner. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Arendt, Hannah. 2003. “Thinking and Moral Considerations.” In Responsibility and Judgment, ed. Kohn, Jerome. New York: Schocken Books, 159–82.
Aristotle, . 1995. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. Ed. Barnes, Jonathan. 2 vols. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bacon, Francis. [1620] 1994. Novum Organum. Trans. and eds. Urbach, Peter and Gibson, John. Chicago: Carus/Open Court.
Beck, Nathaniel. 2010. “Causal Process ‘Observation’: Oxymoron or (Fine) Old Wine.” Political Analysis 18 (4): 499505.
Beitz, Charles R. 2009. The Idea of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Benhabib, Seyla. 2006. Another Cosmopolitanism. Ed. Post, Robert. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bennett, Andrew. 2010. “Process-tracing and Causal Inference.” In Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, 2nd ed., eds. Brady, Henry E. and Collier, David. Lanham, MD:Rowman and Littlefield, 207–20.
Benson, Hugh H. 1990. “Meno, the Slave Boy, and the Elenchos.” Phronesis 35 (2):128–58.
Benson, Hugh H. 2000. Socratic Wisdom: The Model of Knowledge in Plato's Early Dialogues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blondell, Ruby. 2002. The Play of Character in Plato's Dialogues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boix, Carles. 2003. Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David, eds. 2010. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, 2nd ed.Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Brown, Wendy. 2005. Edgework: Critical Essays on Knowledge and Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bubner, Rüdiger. 1973. Dialektik und Wissenschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Surhkamp.
Bubner, Rüdiger. 1992. Antike Themen und ihre Moderne Verwandlung. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Surhkamp.
Butler, Judith. 1995. “Contingent Foundations.” In Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange, eds. Benhabib, Seyla, Butler, Judith, Cornell, Drucilla, and Fraser, Nancy, with an introduction by Linda Nicholson. New York: Routledge, 3558.
Cartwright, Nancy. 2007. Hunting Causes and Using Them: Approaches in Philosophy and Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clarke, Kevin A. 2005. “The Phantom Menace: Omitted Variable Bias in Econometric Research.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 23 (4): 341–52.
Clarke, Kevin A. 2007. “The Necessity of Being Comparative: Theory Confirmation in Quantitative Political Science.” Comparative Political Studies 40 (7): 886908.
Cohen, Hermann. 1878. Platons Ideenlehre und die Mathematik. Marburg: C. L. Pfeill.
Collier, David, Brady, Henry E., and Seawright, Jason. 2010. “Sources of Leverage in Causal Inference.” In Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, 2nd ed., eds. Brady, Henry E. and Collier, David. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 161–99.
Connolly, William E. 2002. Identity/Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox, expanded ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Descartes, René. 1998. Regulae ad directionem ingenii – Rules for the Direction of the Natural Intelligence: A Bilingual Edition of the Cartesian Treatise on Method. Trans and ed. Heffernan, George. Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.
Euben, J. Peter. 1997. Corrupting Youth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Fearon, James D., and Laitin, David D.. 2008. “Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, eds. Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 756–76.
Fine, Gail. 2003. Plato on Knowledge and Forms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Frank, Jill. 2007. “Wages of War: On Judgment in Plato's Republic.” Political Theory 35 (4): 443–62.
Freedman, David A. 2005. Statistical Models: Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Freedman, David A. 2010. Statistical Models and Causal Inference: A Dialogue with the Social Science. Eds. Collier, David, Sekhon, Jasjeet S., and Stark, Philip B.. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Friedman, Milton. 1953. Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1980. Dialogue and Dialectic: Eight Hermeneutical Studies on Plato. Trans. Christopher Smith, P.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. [1931] 1991. Plato's Dialectical Ethics: Phenomenological Interpretations Relating to the Philebus. Trans. Wallace, Robert M.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Gentzler, Jyl. 1991. “‘συμϕωνεν’ in Plato's Phaedo.” Phronesis 36 (3): 265–76.
Gentzler, Jyl. 2005. “How to Know the Good: The Moral Epistemology of Plato's Republic.” Philosophical Review 114 (4): 469–96.
George, Alexander L., and Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gonzalez, Francisco J. 1998. Dialectic and Dialogue: Plato's Practice of Philosophical Inquiry. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Grote, George. 1888. Plato and the Other Companions of Socrates, 2nd ed. 4 vols. London: John Murray.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Trans. Rehg, William. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2001. “Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles?” Trans. Rehg, William. Political Theory 29 (6): 766–81.
Hall Peter, A. 2003. “Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Research.” In Comparative-Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, eds. Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 373404.
Hegel, G. W. F. 2006. Lectures on the History of Philosophy. Trans. Brown, R. F. and Stewart, J.M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Holland, Paul W. 1986. “Statistics and Causal Inference.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 81 (396): 945–60.
Honig, Bonnie. 2009. Emergency Politics: Paradox, Law, Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Irwin, Terrence. 1995. Plato's Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jackson, John E. 2008. “Endogeneity and Structural Equation Estimation in Political Science.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, eds. Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 404–31.
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. 2011. The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics. New York: Routledge.
Kahn, Charles H. 1996. Plato and the Socratic Dialogue: The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, Immanuel. [1887] 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Eds. and Trans. Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
King, Gary. 1989. Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistical Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kirk, G. S., and Raven, J. E.. 1957. The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History with a Selection of Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kneale, William, and Kneale, Martha. 1962. The Development of Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kubik, Jan. 2009. “Ethnography of Politics: Foundations, Applications, Prospects.” In Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power, ed. Schatz, Edward. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2552.
Laitin, David D. 2005. “The Perestroikan Challenge to Social Science.” In Perestroika! The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science, ed. Monroe, Kristen Renwick. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 115–35.
Lakatos, Imre. 1978. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers, vol. 1, eds. Worrall, John and Currie, Gregory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lear, Jonathan. 2006. “Allegory and Myth in Plato's Republic.” In The Blackwell Guide to Plato's Republic, ed. Santas, Gerasimos. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2543.
Liddell, Henry George, and Scott, Robert. 1996. A Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Lieberman, Evan S. 2005. “Nested Analysis as a Mixed-method Strategy for Comparative Research.” American Political Science Review 99 (3): 435–52.
MacIntyre, Alasdair C. 1981. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Mahoney, James, and Goertz, Gary. 2006. “A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research.” Political Analysis 14 (3): 227–49.
Mahoney, James, and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, eds. 2003. Comparative-Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Markell, Patchen. 1997. “Contesting Consensus: Reading Habermas on the Public Sphere.” Constellations 3 (3): 377400.
Meckstroth, Christopher. 2009. “The Struggle for Democracy: Paradox and History in Democratic Progress.” Constellations 16 (3): 410–28.
Natorp, Paul. [1903] 2004. Plato's Theory of Ideas: An Introduction to Idealism. Trans. Politis, Vasilis and Connolly, John. Sankt Augustin, Germany: Akademia Verlag.
North, Douglass C., and Thomas, Robert Paul. 1973. The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Popper, Karl. [1935] 2002. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge.
Popper, Karl. [1963] 2002. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge.
Popper, Karl. [1966] 2011. The Open Society and Its Enemies, 5th revised ed.New York: Routledge.
Rawls, John. 1999. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ray, James Lee. 2005. “Constructing Multivariate Analyses (of Dangerous Dyads).” Conflict Management and Peace Science 22 (4): 277–92.
Riker, William H. 1982. Liberalism against Populism: A Confrontation between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Robinson, Richard. 1953. Plato's Earlier Dialectic, 2nd ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rogowski, Ronald. 2010. “How Inference in the Social (but Not the Physical) Sciences Neglects Theoretical Anomaly.” In Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, 2nd ed., eds. Brady, Henry E. and Collier, David. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 8997.
Ryle, Gilbert. 2009. “Philosophical Arguments.” In Collected Papers, vol. 2. London: Routledge, 203–21.
Sandel, Michael J. 1982. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sayre, Kenneth M. 1969. Plato's Analytic Method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sayre, Kenneth M. 1992. “A Maieutic View of Five Late Dialogues.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, supplemental vol., Methods of Interpreting Plato and his Dialogues, eds. Klagge, James C. and Smith, Nicholas D.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 221–43.
Schleiermacher, Friedrich. 2001 Dialektik. Ed. Frank, Manfred. 2 vols. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Scott, Gary Alan, ed. 2002. Does Socrates Have a Method? Rethinking the Elenchus in Plato's Dialogues and Beyond. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Sedley, David. 1996. “Three Platonist Interpretations of the Theaetetus .” In Form and Argument in Late Plato, eds. Gill, Christopher and McCabe, Mary Margaret. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 79103.
Sekhon, Jasjeet S., and Titiunik, Rocío. 2012. “When Natural Experiments Are Neither Natural nor Experiments.” American Political Science Review 106 (1): 3557.
Strauss, Leo. 1964. The City and Man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tannenwald, Nina. 1999. “The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of Nuclear Non-use.” International Organization 53 (3): 433–68.
Tarnopolsky, Christina H. 2010. Prudes, Perverts, and Tyrants: Plato's Gorgias and the Politics of Shame. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Van Evera, Stephen. 1997. Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Vlastos, Gregory. 1991. Socrates, Ironist and Moral Philosopher. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Vlastos, Gregory. 1994. Socratic Studies. Ed. Burnyeat, Miles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weber, Max. [1922] 2011. Methodology of Social Sciences. Trans. Shils, Edward A. and Finch, Henry A.. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Weber, Max. 1948. From Max Weber. Eds. Gerth, H. H. and Wright Mills, C.. New York: Routledge.
Wedeen, Lisa. 2002. “Conceptualizing Culture: Possibilities for Political Science.” American Political Science Review 96 (4): 713–28.
Wedeen, Lisa. 2009. “Ethnography as Interpretive Enterprise.” In Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power, ed. Schatz, Edward. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 7593.
Windelband, Wilhelm. [1894] 1980. “Rectorial Address, Strasbourg, 1894.” History and Theory 19 (2): 169–85.
Wolin, Sheldon S. 1969. “Political Theory as a Vocation.” American Political Science Review 63 (4): 1062–82.
Wolin, Sheldon S. 2006. Politics and Vision: Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought, expanded ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Woodruff, Paul. 1986. “The Skeptical Side of Plato's Method.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 40: 2237.
Yanow, Dvora, and Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine, eds. 2006. Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Zuckert, Catherine H. 2009. Plato's Philosophers: The Coherence of the Dialogues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed