Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 28
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Druckman, James N. and Lupia, Arthur 2016. Preference Change in Competitive Political Environments. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 19, Issue. 1, p. 13.


    Hollibaugh, Gary E. 2016. Presidential Appointments and Public Trust. Presidential Studies Quarterly,


    Kogan, Vladimir Lavertu, Stéphane and Peskowitz, Zachary 2016. Performance Federalism and Local Democracy: Theory and Evidence from School Tax Referenda. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 60, Issue. 2, p. 418.


    Kurdi, Benedek Lozano, Shayn and Banaji, Mahzarin R. 2016. Introducing the Open Affective Standardized Image Set (OASIS). Behavior Research Methods,


    Peterson, Erik 2016. The Rich are Different: The Effect of Wealth on Partisanship. Political Behavior, Vol. 38, Issue. 1, p. 33.


    Preißinger, Maria and Schoen, Harald 2016. It's not always the campaign – Explaining inter-election switching in Germany, 2009–2013. Electoral Studies,


    Simonovits, Gabor 2016. Centrist by Comparison: Extremism and the Expansion of the Political Spectrum. Political Behavior,


    Song, B.K. 2016. Media markets and politicians involved in scandals. The Social Science Journal,


    YASUI, KIYOTAKA and NAKAI, RYO 2016. An Opportunity for Backing Down: Looking for an Electoral Connection to Audience Costs. Japanese Journal of Political Science, Vol. 17, Issue. 02, p. 168.


    Zink, James R. and Dawes, Christopher T. 2016. The Dead Hand of the Past? Toward an Understanding of “Constitutional Veneration”. Political Behavior, Vol. 38, Issue. 3, p. 535.


    Bausch, Andrew W. and Zeitzoff, Thomas 2015. Citizen Information, Electoral Incentives, and Provision of Counter-Terrorism: An Experimental Approach. Political Behavior, Vol. 37, Issue. 3, p. 723.


    Bélanger, Éric and Nadeau, Richard 2015. Issue Ownership of the Economy: Cross-Time Effects on Vote Choice. West European Politics, Vol. 38, Issue. 4, p. 909.


    Christenson, Dino P. and Glick, David M. 2015. Chief Justice Roberts's Health Care Decision Disrobed: The Microfoundations of the Supreme Court's Legitimacy. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 59, Issue. 2, p. 403.


    Dowling, Conor M. and Miller, Michael G. 2015. Can Information Alter Perceptions about Women's Chances of Winning Office? Evidence from a Panel Study. Politics & Gender, Vol. 11, Issue. 01, p. 55.


    Fowler, Anthony and Montagnes, B. Pablo 2015. College football, elections, and false-positive results in observational research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 112, Issue. 45, p. 13800.


    Francis-Tan, Andrew and Mialon, Hugo M. 2015. “A DIAMOND IS FOREVER” AND OTHER FAIRY TALES: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WEDDING EXPENSES AND MARRIAGE DURATION. Economic Inquiry, Vol. 53, Issue. 4, p. 1919.


    Fukumoto, Kentaro and Matsuo, Akitaka 2015. The Effects of Election Proximity on Participatory Shirking: The Staggered-Term Chamber as a Laboratory. Legislative Studies Quarterly, Vol. 40, Issue. 4, p. 599.


    Grose, Christian R. Malhotra, Neil and Parks Van Houweling, Robert 2015. Explaining Explanations: How Legislators Explain their Policy Positions and How Citizens React. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 59, Issue. 3, p. 724.


    Hansen, Kasper M. Olsen, Asmus L. and Bech, Mickael 2015. Cross-National Yardstick Comparisons: A Choice Experiment on a Forgotten Voter Heuristic. Political Behavior, Vol. 37, Issue. 4, p. 767.


    Hellwig, Timothy and Marinova, Dani M. 2015. More Misinformed than Myopic: Economic Retrospections and the Voter’s Time Horizon. Political Behavior, Vol. 37, Issue. 4, p. 865.


    ×

Sources of Bias in Retrospective Decision Making: Experimental Evidence on Voters’ Limitations in Controlling Incumbents

  • GREGORY A. HUBER (a1), SETH J. HILL (a2) and GABRIEL S. LENZ (a3)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000391
  • Published online: 31 October 2012
Abstract

Are citizens competent to assess the performance of incumbent politicians? Observational studies cast doubt on voter competence by documenting several biases in retrospective assessments of performance. However, these studies are open to alternative interpretations because of the complexity of the real world. In this article, we show that these biases in retrospective evaluations occur even in the simplified setting of experimental games. In three experiments, our participants (1) overweighted recent relative to overall incumbent performance when made aware of an election closer rather than more distant from that event, (2) allowed an unrelated lottery that affected their welfare to influence their choices, and (3) were influenced by rhetoric to give more weight to recent rather than overall incumbent performance. These biases were apparent even though we informed and incentivized respondents to weight all performance equally. Our findings point to key limitations in voters’ ability to use a retrospective decision rule.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Gregory A. Huber is Professor, Department of Political Science and Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University, 77 Prospect Street, P.O. Box 208209, New Haven, CT 06520 (gregory.huber@yale.edu).
Seth J. Hill is Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of California at San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093 (sjhill@ucsd.edu).
Gabriel S. Lenz is Assistant Professor, Charles and Louise Travers Department of Political Science, University of California at Berkeley, 210 Barrows Hall #1950, Berkeley, CA 94720 (glenz@berkeley.edu).
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Adam L. Alter , Daniel M. Oppenheimer, and Jeffrey C. Zemla. 2010. “Missing the Trees for the Forest: A Construal Level Account of the Illusion of Explanatory Depth.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 99 (3): 436–51.

Dan Ariely . 1998. “Combining Experiences over Time: The Effects of Duration, Intensity Changes, and On-line Measurements on Retrospective Pain Evaluations.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 11: 1945.

Dan Ariely , and Ziv Carmon. 2000. “Gestalt Characteristics of Experienced Profiles: The Defining Features of Summarized Events.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 13: 191201.

Dan Ariely , and Gal Zauberman. 2000. “On the Making of an Experience: The Effects of Breaking and Combining Experiences on Their Overall Evaluation.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 13: 219–32.

Alan Baddeley . 1992. “Working Memory.” Science 255 (5044): 556–59.

Hans Baumgartner , Mita Sujan, and Dan Padgett. 1997. “Patterns of Affective Reactions to Advertisements: The Integration of Moment-to-Moment Responses into Overall Judgments.” Journal of Marketing Research 34 (2): 219–32.

Adam J. Berinsky , Gregory A. Huber, and Gabriel S. Lenz. 2012. “Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk.” Political Analysis 20 (3): 351–68.

Timothy F. Brady , and George A. Alvarez. 2011. “Hierarchical Encoding in Visual Working Memory: Ensemble Statistics Bias Memory for Individual Items.” Psychological Science 22 (3): 384–92.

Michael D. Buhrmester , Tracy Kwang, and Samuel D. Gosling. 2011. “Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, yet High-quality, Data?Perspectives on Psychological Science 6 (1): 35.

Gretchen B. Chapman 2000. “Preferences for Improving and Declining Sequences of Health Outcomes.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 13 (2): 203–18.

Shawn A. Cole , Andrew Healy, and Eric Werker. 2011. “Do Voters Appreciate Responsive Governments? Evidence from Indian Disaster Relief.” Journal of Development Economics 97 (2): 167–81.

Kenneth E. Collier , Richard D. McKelvey, Peter C. Ordeshook, and Kenneth C. Williams. 1987. “Retrospective Voting: An Experimental Study.” Public Choice 53 (2): 101–30.

Kenneth Collier , Peter C. Ordeshook, and Kenneth Williams. 1989. “The Rationally Uninformed Electorate: Some Experimental Evidence.” Public Choice 60 (1): 329.

Raymond M. Duch , and Randy Stevenson. 2010. “The Global Economy, Competency, and the Economic Vote.” Journal of Politics 72 (1): 105–23.

Ray C. Fair 1978. “The Effect of Economic Events on Votes for President.” Review of Economics and Statistics 60 (2): 159–73.

Gabriel S Lenz . 2012. Follow the Leader. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Caitlin M. Fausey , and Teenie Matlock. 2011. “Can Grammar Win Elections?Political Psychology 32 (4): 563–74.

John A. Ferejohn 1986. “Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control.” Public Choice 50 (1): 525.

Joseph P. Forgas 2000. “Feeling Is Believing? The Role of Processing Strategies in Mediating Effective Influences on Beliefs.” In Emotions and Beliefs: How Feelings Influence Thoughts, eds. Nico H. Frijda, A.S.R. Manstead, and Sacha Bem. New York: Cambridge University Press, 108–44.

Joseph P. Forgas , and Gordon H. Bower. 1987. “Mood Effects on Person-perception Judgments.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53 (1): 5360.

Barbara L. Fredrickson , and Daniel Kahneman. 1993. “Duration Neglect in Retrospective Evaluations of Affective Episodes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65 (1): 4555.

Daniel Friedman , and Shyam Sunder. 1994. Experimental Methods: A Primer for Economists. New York: Cambridge University Press.

John T. Gasper , and Andrew Reeves. 2011. “Make It Rain? Retrospection and the Attentive Electorate in the Context of Natural Disasters.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (2): 340–55.

Ángel Gómez , Matthew L. Brooks, Michael D. Buhrmester, Alexandra Vázquez, Jolanda Jetten, and William B. Swann Jr. 2011. “On the Nature of Identity Fusion: Insights into the Construct and a New Measure.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 100 (5): 918–33.

Andrew Healy , and Neil Malhotra. 2010. “Random Events, Economic Losses, and Retrospective Voting: Implications for Democratic Competence.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 5 (2): 193208.

Andrew J. Healy , Neil A. Malhotra, and Cecilia H. Mo. 2010. “Irrelevant Events Affect Voters’ Evaluations of Government Performance.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 (29): 12,804–9.

Marc J. Hetherington 1996. “The Media's Role in Forming Voters’ National Economic Evaluations in 1992.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (2): 372–95.

John J. Horton , David G. Rand, and Richard J. Zeckhauser. 2010. “The Online Laboratory: Conducting Experiments in a Real Labor Market.” Experimental Economics 14 (3): 399425.

Christopher K. Hsee , Robert P. Abelson, and Peter Salovey. 1991. “The Relative Weighting of Position and Velocity in Satisfaction.” Psychological Science 2 (4): 263.

Daniel Kahneman , Barbara L. Fredrickson, Charles A. Schreiber, and Donald A. Redelmeier. 1993. “When More Pain Is Preferred to Less: Adding a Better End.” Psychological Science 4: 401–5.

Daniel Kahneman , Peter P. Wakker, and Rakesh Sarin. 1997. “Back to Bentham? Explorations of Experienced Utility.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (2): 375405.

Steven D. Levitt , and John A. List. 2007. “What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World?Journal of Economic Perspectives 21 (2): 153–74.

George F. Loewenstein , and Nachum Sicherman. 1991. “Do Workers Prefer Increasing Wage Profiles?Journal of Labor Economics 9: 6784.

George F. Loewenstein , and Dražen Prelec. 1993. “Preferences for Sequences of Outcomes.” Psychological Review 100 (1): 91108.

Winter Mason , and Duncan J. Watts. 2012. “Collaborative Learning in Networks.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 (3): 764–69.

Rebecca B. Morton , and Kenneth C. Williams. 2010. Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Harvey D. Palmer , and Guy D. Whitten. 2000. “Government Competence, Economic Performance, and Endogenous Election Dates.” Electoral Studies 19 (2): 41326

David G. Rand , Samuel Arbesman, and Nicholas A. Christakis. 2011. “Dynamic Social Networks Promote Cooperation in Experiments with Humans.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 (48): 19193–98.

Donald A. Redelmeier , and Daniel Kahneman. 1996. “Patients’ Memories of Painful Medical Treatments.” Pain 66 (1): 38.

William T. Ross , and Itamar Simonson. 1991. “Evaluations of Pairs of Experiences: A Preference for Happy Endings.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 4 (4): 273–82.

Charles A. Schreiber , and Daniel Kahneman. 2000. “Determinants of the Remembered Utility of Aversive Sounds.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 129 (1): 2742.

Norbert Schwarz , and Gerald L. Clore. 1983. “Mood, Misattribution, and Judgments of Well-being: Informative and Directive Functions of Affective States.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 (3): 513–23.

Nicholas A. Valentino , and David O. Sears. 1998. “Event-driven Political Communication and the Preadult Socialization of Partisanship.” Political Behavior 20 (2): 127–54.

C. Varey , and D. Kahneman. 1992. “Experiences Extended across Time: Evaluation of Moments and Episodes.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 5 (3): 169–85.

Lynn Vavreck . 2009. The Message Matters: The Economy and Presidential Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Kenneth C. Williams 1994. “Sequential Elections and Retrospective Voting.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 6 (2): 239–55.

John Zaller . 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Gal Zauberman , Kristin Diehl, and Dan Ariely. 2006. “Hedonic versus Informational Evaluations: Task Dependent Preferences for Sequences of Outcomes.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 19 (3): 191211.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×