Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T22:19:18.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strategy and Background in Congressional Campaigns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Patrick J. Sellers
Patrick J. Sellers*
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Common conceptions of the electoral connection often make two assumptions about the behavior of candidates and voters. The first is that candidates focus their campaigns on their records. The second is that voters evaluate candidates on the basis of their campaign messages. This article explores how candidates' backgrounds influence these two components of representation. The main premise is simple: Campaign messages are more effective if they emphasize issues on which candidates have built a record that appears favorable to voters. Consequently, candidates tend to focus on this type of issue when choosing campaign themes. Candidates are less successful in winning favorable evaluations if they stray from their records and make unsubstantiated claims.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 92 , Issue 1 , March 1998 , pp. 159 - 171
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aldrich, John, and Alvarez, R. Michael. 1994. “Issues and the Presidential Primary Voter.” Political Behavior 16(3):289–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael. 1996. Issues and Information in Presidential Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Iyengar, Shanto. 1994. “Riding the Wave and Claiming Ownership over Issues: The Joint Effects of Advertising and News Coverage in Campaigns.” Public Opinion Quarterly 58(2):335–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barone, Michael, and Ujifusa, Grant. 1987. The Almanac of American Politics. Washington: National Journal.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry. 1992. “The Impact of Electioneering in the United States.” In Electioneering: A Comparative Study of Continuity and Change, ed. Butler, David and Ranney, Austin. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Bianco, William. 1994. Trust: Representatives and Constituents. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canon, David. 1993. “Sacrificial Lambs or Strategic Politicians? Political Amateurs in U.S. House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 37(11):1119–41.Google Scholar
Clausen, Aage. 1973. How Congressmen Decide: A Policy Focus. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard. 1996. Senators on the Campaign Trail. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John. 1990. “Information and the Electoral Process.” In Information and Democratic Processes, ed. Ferejohn, John and Kuklinski, James. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, Charles H. 1991. “Eschewing Obfuscation? Campaigns and the Perceptions of U.S. Senate Incumbents.” American Political Science Review 85(12):1193–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Charles H. 1996. “Between 1978 and 1994: The Senate Election and Securing the District.” Presentation at the National Election Studies Research and Development Conference on Congressional Elections, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
Hinich, Melvin J., and Munger, Michael C.. 1992. “A Spatial Theory of Ideology.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 4(12):4–31.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Valentino, Nicholas A., Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Simon, Adam F.. 1997. “Running as a Woman: Gender Stereotyping in Political Campaigns.” In Women, Media, and Politics, ed. Norris, Pippa. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, John, and Kingdon, John. 1992. “Ideology, Interest Group Scores, and Legislative Votes.” American Journal of Political Science 36(08):805–23.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary. 1997. The Politics of Congressional Elections, Fourth Edition. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Peter. 1996. A Guide to Econometrics. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1991. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Mathew. 1995. “The Triumph of Reason: Knowledge and the Foundation of Democracy.” University of California at San Diego. Typescript.Google Scholar
Maddala, G. S. 1983. Limited-Dependent Variables and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Arthur H. 1990. “Public Judgements of Senate and House Candidates.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 15(11):525–42.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E., Kinder, Donald R., Rosenstone, Steven J., and the National Election Studies. 1993. American National Election Study: Pooled Senate Election Study, 1988, 1990, 1992 [computer file] (Study #9580). Conducted by University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies. 2d ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer[, 1993. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1993.Google Scholar
Murphy, James. 1995. “Emergence of Successful Challengers: Who Are They?” Panel at the conference “How to Defeat An Incumbent.” Akron, Ohio.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin. 1978. Choices and Echoes in Presidential Elections. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin, and Shapiro, Robert. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrocik, John R. 1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science 40(08):825–50.Google Scholar
Popkin, Samuel. 1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Riker, William. 1986. The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth. 1972. “The Strategy of Ambiguity: Uncertainty and Electoral Competition.” American Political Science Review 66(06):555–68.Google Scholar
Skaperdas, Stergios, and Grofman, Bernard. 1995. “Modeling Negative Campaigning.” American Political Science Review 89(03):49–61.Google Scholar
Spence, A. Michael. 1974. Market Signaling: Informational Transfer in Hiring and Related Screening Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Westlye, Mark. 1991. Senate Elections and Campaign Intensity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Gerald C. 1993. “Errors in Measuring Vote Choice in the National Election Studies, 1952–1988.” American Journal of Political Science 37(02):291–316.Google Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar