Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The Strength of Issues: Using Multiple Measures to Gauge Preference Stability, Ideological Constraint, and Issue Voting

  • STEPHEN ANSOLABEHERE (a1), JONATHAN RODDEN (a2) and JAMES M. SNYDER (a1)
Abstract

A venerable supposition of American survey research is that the vast majority of voters have incoherent and unstable preferences about political issues, which in turn have little impact on vote choice. We demonstrate that these findings are manifestations of measurement error associated with individual survey items. First, we show that averaging a large number of survey items on the same broadly defined issue area—for example, government involvement in the economy, or moral issues—eliminates a large amount of measurement error and reveals issue preferences that are well structured and stable. This stability increases steadily as the number of survey items increases and can approach that of party identification. Second, we show that once measurement error has been reduced through the use of multiple measures, issue preferences have much greater explanatory power in models of presidential vote choice, again approaching that of party identification.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Stephen Ansolabehere is Professor, Department of Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Building E53, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139 (sda@mit.edu).
Jonathan Rodden is Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Stanford University, 616 Serra Street, Encina Hall West, Room 444C, Stanford, CA 94305-6044 (jrodden@stanford.edu), to whom correspondence should be addressed.
James M. Snyder, Jr., is Professor, Departments of Political Science and Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Building E53, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139 (millett@mit.edu).
References
Hide All
Abramowitz, Alan, and Saunders, Kyle. 1998. “Ideological Realignment in the U.S. Electorate.” Journal of Politics 60, 3 (August): 634–52.
Achen, Christopher H. 1975. “Mass Political Attitudes and the Survey Response.” American Political Science Review 69 (Dec.): 1218–23.
Achen, Christopher H. 1983. “Toward Theories of Political Data.” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, ed. Finifter, A.W.. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Rodden, Jonathan, and Snyder, James M. Jr., 2006. “Purple America.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (Spring): 97118.
Butler, D. E., and Stokes, D.. 1974. Political Change in Britain. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.
Campbell, Angus, Miller, Warren, Converse, Philip, and Stokes, Donald. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Brady, David W., and Cogan, John F.. 2002. “Out of Step, Out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members' Voting.” American Political Science Review 96 (March): 127–40.
Carmines, Edward G., and James, A. Stimson. 1980. “The Two Faces of Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 74 (March): 7891.
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter, D. E.. New York: Free Press.
Converse, Philip E. 1980. “Comment: Rejoinder to Judd and Milburn.” American Sociological Review 45 (August): 644– 46.
DeLa O, Ana La O, Ana, and Rodden, Jonathan. 2008. “Does Religion Distract the Poor? Income and Issue Voting Around the World.” Comparative Political Studies 41, 4/5 (April/May): 437–76.
DelliCarpini, Michael X Carpini, Michael X, and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Erikson, Robert S. 1978. “Analyzing One-Variable Three Wave Panel Data: A Comparison of Two Models.” Political Methodology 5 (2): 151–61.
Erikson, Robert S. 1979. “The SRC Panel Data and Mass Political Attitudes.” British Journal of Political Science 9 (Jan.): 89114.
Erikson, Robert S., and Tedin, Kent. 2007. American Public Opinion: Its Origin, Content, and Impact. 7th ed. New York: Wiley.
Erikson, Robert S., MacKuen, Michael B., and Stimson, James A.. 2002. The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Erikson, Robert S., and Wright, Gerald C.. 1993. “Voters, Candidates, and Issues in Congressional Elections.” In Congress Reconsidered, 5th ed., ed. Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Evans, Geoffrey, Heath, Anthony, and Lalljee, Mansur. 1996. “Measuring Left-Right and Libertarian-Authoritarian Values in the British Electorate.” British Journal of Sociology 47 (March): 93112.
Feldman, Stanley. 1988. “Structure and Consistency in Public Opinion: the Role of Core Beliefs and Values.” American Journal of Political Science 32 (May): 416–40.
Feldman, Stanley. 1989. “Measuring Issue Preferences: The Problem of Response Instability.” Political Analysis 1 (1): 2560.
Fiorina, Morris, and Peterson, Paul. 1998. The New American Democracy. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Goren, Paul. 1997. “Political Expertise and Issue Voting in Presidential Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 50: 387412.
Green, Donald, and Citrin, Jack. 1994. “Measurement Error and the Structure of Attitudes: Are Positive and Negative Judgments Opposites?American Journal of Political Science 38, 1 (Feb.): 256–81.
Green, Donald, and Palmquist, Bradley. 1994. “How Stable is Party Identification?Political Behavior 16, 4 (Dec.): 437–66.
Green, Donald, Palmquist, Bradley, and Schickler, Eric. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Heath, Anthony, Evans, Geoffrey, and Martin, Jean. 1994. “The Measurement of Core Beliefs and Values: The Development of Balanced Socialist/Laissez Faire and Libertarian/Authoritarian Scales.” British Journal of Political Science 24 (Jan.): 115–32.
Hurwitz, Jon, and Peffley, Mark. 1987 (Dec.). “How are Foreign Policy Attitudes Structured? A Hierarchical Model.” American Political Science Review 81: 10991120.
Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jackson, John E. 1983. “The Systematic Beliefs of the Mass Public: Estimating Policy Preferences with Survey Data.” Journal of Politics 45 (Nov.): 840–65.
KentJennings, M. Jennings, M.. 1992. “Ideological Thinking Among Mass Publics and Political Elites.” Public Opinion Quarterly 56 (Winter): 419–41.
Judd, Charles M., and Milburn, Michael A.. 1980. “The Structure of Attitude Systems in the General Public: Comparisons of Structural Equation Models.” American Sociological Review 45 (Aug.): 627–43.
Key, V. O. 1966. The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936–1960. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kinder, Donald R. 1998. “Opinion and Action in the Realm of Politics.” In Handbook of Social Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
King, Gary, Honaker, James, Joseph, Anne, and Scheve, Kenneth. 2001. “Analyzing Incomeplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple ImputationAmerican Political Science Review 95, 1 (March): 4969.
Klepper, Steven, and Leamer, Edward E.. 1984. “Consistent Sets of Estimates for Regressions with Errors in All Variables.” Econometrica 52 (Jan.): 163–84.
Kuder, G. F., and Richardson, M. W.. 1937. “The Theory of the Estimator of Test Reliability.” Psychometrika 2 (Sept): 151–60.
Lord, L. M., and Novick, M. R.. 1968. Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Luskin, Robert C. 1987. “Measuring Political Sophistication.” American Journal of Political Science 31 (Nov.): 856–99.
McClosky, Herbert, and Zaller, John. 1984. The American Ethos: Public Attitudes Toward Capitalism and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
McIver, John, and Carmines, Edward. 1981. Unidimensional Scaling Sage University Paper, Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series, 24.
Miller, Warren E., and Shanks, J. Merrill. 1996. The New American Voter. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Moskowitz, Adam N., and Jenkins, J. Craig. 2004. “Structuring Political Opinions: Attitude Consistency and Democratic Competence among the U.S. Mass Public.” Sociological Quarterly 45 (May): 395419.
Mosteller, Frederick. 1968. “Non-Sampling Errors.” In International Encyclopaedia of Statistics, Volume 1. ed. Kruskal, William and Tanur, Judith. New York: Crowell Collier and Macmillan, 208–29.
Norpoth, Helmut, and Milton, Lodge. 1985. “The Difference between Attitutes and Nonattitudes in the Mass Public: Just Measurement?American Journal of Political Science 29 (May): 291307.
Nunnally, J. C., and Bernstein, I. H.. 1994. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1982. “Changes in Americans' Policy Preferences, 1935–1979.” Public Opinion Quarterly 46 (Spring): 2442.
Polsby, Nelson W., and Wildavsky, Aaron. 2000. Presidential Elections: Strategies and Structures of American Politics. Tenth ed. New York: Chatham House.
Saris, Willem, and Sniderman, Paul. 2004. Studies in Public Opinion: Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error, and Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sniderman, Paul, and Piazza, Thomas. 1993. The Scar of Race. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Spector, Paul. 1992. Summated Rating Scale Construction: An Introduction Sage University Paper, Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series, 82.
Wiley, D. E., and Wiley, J. A.. 1970. “The Estimation of Measurement Error in Panel Data.” American Sociological Review 35 (Feb.): 112–16.
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed