Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T15:11:13.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Two Faces of Issue Voting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Edward G. Carmines  and
James A. Stimson
Edward G. Carmines
Affiliation:
Indiana University
James A. Stimson
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Both implicit democratic norms and the reconstructions provided by theorists of rational choice suggest that issue voters are more sophisticated–educated, informed, and active in politics–than other voters. But some issues are clearly more difficult than others, and the voters who respond to “hard” and “easy” issues, respectively, are assumed to differ in kind. We propose the hypothesis that “easy-issue” voters are no more sophisticated than non-issue voters, and this is found to be the case. The findings suggest a reevaluation of the import of rising and falling levels of issue voting and suggest a prominent role for “easy” issues in electoral realignments.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 74 , Issue 1 , September 1980 , pp. 78 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, John, and Cnudde, Charles (1975). “Probing the Bounds of Conventional Wisdom: A Comparison of Regression, Probit, and Discriminant Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 19: 571–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berelson, Bernard R., Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and McPhee, William N. (1954). Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Election. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, Richard W. (1972). “Popular Control of Public Policy: A Normal Vote Analysis of the 1968 Election.” American Political Science Review 66: 429–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, Richard A., and Page, Benjamin I. (1972). “Comment: The Assessment of Policy Voting.” American Political Science Review 66: 450–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broh, C. Anthony (1973). Toward a Theory of Issue Voting. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E. (1960). The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. (1975). “Public Opinion and Voting Behavior.” In Greenstein, Fred I. and Polsby, Nelson W. (eds.), Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 4. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., Rusk, Jerrold G., and Wolfe, Arthur G. (1969). “Continuity and Change in American Politics: Parties and Issues in the 1968 Election.” American Political Science Review 63: 1083–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Otto A., Hinich, Melvin J. and Ordeshook, Peter (1970). “An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral Process.” American Political Science Review 64: 426–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Frohlich, Norman, Oppenheimer, Joe A., Smith, Jeffrey and Young, Oran R. (1978). “A Test of Downsian Voter Rationality: 1964 Presidential Voting.” American Political Science Review 72:178–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenstein, Fred I. (1970). The American Party System and the American People, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kessel, John H. (1972). “Comment: The Issues in Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 66: 459–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr. (1961). Public Opinion and American Democracy. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr. (1966). The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936–1960. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, Michael (1977). “From Confusion to Confusion: Issues and the American Voter (1956–1972).” American Political Science Review 71: 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKelvey, Richard D., and Zavoina, William (1975). “A Statistical Model for the Analysis of Ordinal Dependent Variables.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 4: 103–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Arthur H., Miller, Warren E., Raine, Alden S., and Brown, Thad H. (1973). “A Majority Party in Disarray: Policy Polarization in the 1972 Election.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Miller, Arthur H., Miller, Warren E., Raine, Alden S., and Brown, Thad H. (1976). “A Majority Party in Disarray: Policy Polarization in the 1972 Election.” American Political Science Review 70: 753–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nie, Norman, Verba, Sidney, and Petrocik, John R. (1976). The Changing American Voter. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin I. (1978). Choices and Echoes in Presidential Elections: Rational Man and Electora Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Brody, Richard A. (1972). “Policy Voting and the Electoral Process: The Vietnam Issue.” American Political Science Review 66: 979–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomper, Gerald (1972). “From Confusion to Clarity: Issues and American Voters, 1956–1968. American Political Science Review 66:415–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prewitt, Kenneth, and Nie, Norman H. (1971). “Election Studies of the Survey Research Center.” British Journal of Political Science 1: 479–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repass, David E. (1971). “Issue Salience and Party Choice.” American Political Science Review 65: 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J., and Wolfinger, Raymond (1978). “The Effect of Registration Laws on Voting Turnout.” American Political Science Review 72: 22–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, David O., Hensler, Carl P., and Speer, Leslie K. (1979). “Whites' Opposition to ‘Busing’: Self-Interest or Symbolic Politics?” American Political Science Review 73: 369–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steeper, Frederick T., and Teeter, Robert M. (1976). “Comment on ‘A Majority Party in Disarray.’” American Political Science Review 70: 806–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimson, James A., and Carmines, Edward G. (1977). “The Continuing Issue in American Politics.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, and Brody, Richard A. (1970). “Participation, Policy Preferences, and the War in Vietnam.” Public Opinion Quarterly 34: 325–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Gerald C. (1976). “Linear Models for Evaluating Conditional Relationships.” American Journal of Political Science 20: 349–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar