Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T15:55:35.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A 3-week feed restriction after weaning as an alternative to a medicated diet: effects on growth, health, carcass and meat traits of rabbits of two genotypes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2016

M. Alabiso ,
A. Di Grigoli ,
F. Mazza ,
G. Maniaci ,
F. Vitale  and
A. Bonanno
M. Alabiso
Affiliation:
Dipartimento Scienze Agrarie e Forestali, unità di Produzioni Animali, Università degli Studi di Palermo, viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy
A. Di Grigoli
Affiliation:
Dipartimento Scienze Agrarie e Forestali, unità di Produzioni Animali, Università degli Studi di Palermo, viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy
F. Mazza
Affiliation:
Dipartimento Scienze Agrarie e Forestali, unità di Produzioni Animali, Università degli Studi di Palermo, viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy
G. Maniaci
Affiliation:
Dipartimento Scienze Agrarie e Forestali, unità di Produzioni Animali, Università degli Studi di Palermo, viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy
F. Vitale
Affiliation:
Dipartimento Scienze Agrarie e Forestali, unità di Produzioni Animali, Università degli Studi di Palermo, viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy
A. Bonanno*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento Scienze Agrarie e Forestali, unità di Produzioni Animali, Università degli Studi di Palermo, viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy
*
†E-mail: adriana.bonanno@unipa.it
Get access

Abstract

Feed restriction after weaning is widely used in meat rabbit farms to promote health and reduce mortality, but this practice impacts negatively on rabbit growth and slaughter performance. This study compared a 3-week post-weaning feed restriction with ad libitum medicated feeding, evaluating effects on feed intake, growth, health, carcass and meat quality of rabbits of two genotypes: Italian White pure breed and Hycole hybrid×Italian White crossbred. A total of 512 rabbits at 36 days of age, of both sexes and two genotypes, were divided into four homogeneous groups assigned, from 36 to 57 days of age, to different feeding programmes (FP): restricted non-medicated (R-N), ad libitum non-medicated (L-N), restricted medicated (R-M) and ad libitum medicated (L-M). The diets were medicated with oxytetracycline (1540 mg/kg) and colistin sulphate (240 mg/kg). The restriction, performed by giving 70, 80 and 90 g/day of feed for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd week, was followed by ad libitum feeding in the successive 5 weeks, up to slaughter at 92 days of age. Restricted feeds were ingested at a level of 64% of the feed intake recorded in the ad libitum fed rabbits; it was significantly associated, regardless of medication and rabbit genotype, with a lower feed intake (−22 to −24 g dry matter/day) during the entire experiment, compensatory growth and a lower feed conversion ratio in the ad libitum period, and a lower final live weight (−150 g) than ad libitum feeding (P<0.001). During restriction, mortality was lower in the restricted rabbits (6.25%, 5.47% v. 12.5%, 14.8% for R-N, R-M, L-N and L-M; P<0.05), whereas in the ad libitum period mortality did not differ among the groups (9.23%, 9.90%, 11.0% and 4.59% for R-N, R-M, L-N and L-M). Dressing out percentage was not affected by FP or genotype; heavier carcasses were produced by rabbits fed ad libitum (+100 g; P<0.001) and crossbred rabbits (+122 g; P<0.001). Restriction did not alter meat quality, except for a tendency towards a higher cooking loss and less fat; crossbred meat was higher in L* (+1.3; P<0.01) and b* (+0.51; P<0.05) colour indexes and tenderness (−0.14 kg/cm2; P<0.05) than pure breed meat. Under the conditions of this study, a 3-week restricted feeding after weaning resulted to be a suitable alternative, also for high growth potential genotypes, to the antibiotics to preserve rabbit health. The production of lighter carcasses could be compensated partly by the lower feed conversion ratio showed by restricted rabbits.

Keywords

feed restrictiongenotypesgrowthhealthmeat
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 11 , Issue 9 , September 2017 , pp. 1608 - 1616
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) 2000. Official methods of analysis, 17th edition. AOAC, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.Google Scholar
Blasco, A and Ouhayoun, J 1996. Harmonization of criteria and terminology in rabbit meat research. World Rabbit Science 4, 93–99.Google Scholar
Bovera, F, Lestingi, A, Piccolo, G, Iannaccone, F, Attia, YA and Tateo, A 2013. Effects of water restriction on growth performance, feed nutrient digestibility, carcass and meat traits of rabbits. Animal 7, 1600–1606.Google Scholar
Cavani, C, Petracci, M, Trocino, A and Xiccato, G 2009. Advances in research on poultry and rabbit meat quality. Italian Journal of Animal Science 8, 741–750.Google Scholar
Commission International de l’Eclairage (CIE) 1986. Colorimetry – official recommendations of the international commission on illumination. CIE Publication No. 15.2, CIE Central Bureau, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Dal Bosco, A, Mugnai, C, Mourvaki, E, Cardinali, R, Moscati, L, Paci, G and Castellini, C 2009. Effect of genotype and rearing system on the native immunity and oxidative status of growing rabbits. Italian Journal of Animal Science 8, 781–783.Google Scholar
Dalle Zotte, A 2002. Perception of rabbit meat quality and major factors influencing the rabbit carcass and meat quality. Livestock Production Science 75, 11–32.Google Scholar
Dalle Zotte, A and Szendrő, Zs 2011. The role of rabbit meat as functional food. Meat Science 88, 319–331.Google Scholar
Dalle Zotte, A, Szendrő, K, Gerencsér, Zs, Szendrő, Zs, Cullere, M, Odermatt, M, Radnai, I and Matics, Zs 2015. Effect of genotype, housing system and hay supplementation on carcass traits and meat quality of growing rabbits. Meat Science 110, 126–134.Google Scholar
Dalle Zotte, A, Cullere, M, Rémignon, H, Alberghini, L and Paci, G 2016. Meat physical quality and muscle fibre properties of rabbit meat as affected by the sire breed, season, parity order and gender in an organic production system. World Rabbit Science 24, 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etherington, DE and Sims, TJ 1981. Detection and estimation of collagen. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 32, 359–546.Google Scholar
Fernández-Carmona, J, Cervera, C and Blas, E 1996. Prediction of the energy value of rabbit feeds varying widely in fibre content. Animal Feed Science and Technology 64, 61–75.Google Scholar
Gidenne, T 2000. Recent advances in rabbit nutrition: emphasis on fibre requirements. A review. World Rabbit Science 8, 23–32.Google Scholar
Gidenne, T and Feugier, A 2009. Feed restriction strategy in the growing rabbit. 1. Impact on digestion, rate of passage and microbial activity. Animal 3, 501–508.Google Scholar
Gidenne, T, Combes, S, Feugier, A, Jehl, N, Arveux, P, Boisot, P, Briens, C, Corrent, E, Fortune, H, Montessuy, S and Verdelhan, S 2009. Feed restriction strategy in the growing rabbit. 2. Impact on digestive health, growth and carcass characteristics. Animal 3, 509–515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gidenne, T, Combes, S and Fortun-Lamothe, L 2012. Feed intake limitation strategies for the growing rabbit: effect on feeding behaviour, welfare, performance, digestive physiology and health: a review. Animal 6, 1407–1419.Google Scholar
Hernández, P 2008. Enhancement of nutritional quality and safety in rabbit meat. In Proceeding of 9th World Rabbit Congress, 10–13 June 2008, Verona, Italy, pp. 1287–1299.Google Scholar
International Standard Organization (ISO) 10520 1997. Native starch – determination of starch content – Ewers polarimetric method. International Standard Organization (ISO) 10520, Geneva.Google Scholar
Knudsen, C, Combes, S, Briens, C, Coutelet, G, Duperray, J, Rebours, G, Salaun, JM, Travel, A, Weissman, D and Gidenne, T 2014. Increasing the digestible energy intake under a restriction strategy improves the feed conversion ratio of the growing rabbit without negatively impacting the health status. Livestock Science 169, 96–105.Google Scholar
Kolar, K 1990. Colorimetric determination of hydroxyproline as measure of collagen content in meat and meat products: NMKL collaborative study. Journal-Association of Official Analytical Chemists 73, 54–57.Google Scholar
Matics, Zs, Dalle Zotte, A, Radnai, I, Kovács, M, Metzger, S and Szendrő, Zs 2008. Effect of restricted feeding after weaning on the productive and carcass traits of growing rabbits. In Proceedings of the 9th World Rabbit Congress, 10–13 June 2008, Verona, Italy, pp. 741–746.Google Scholar
Metzger, S, Szendrő, Zs, Bianchi, M, Hullár, I, Fébel, H, Maertens, L, Cavani, C, Petracci, M, Radnai, I and Biró-Németh, E 2009. Effect of energy restriction in interaction with genotype on the performance of growing rabbits: II. Carcass traits and meat quality. Livestock Science 126, 221–228.Google Scholar
Pascual, M, Soler, MD, Cervera, C, Pla, M, Pascual, JJ and Blas, E 2014. Feeding programmes based on highly-digestible fibre weaning diets: effects on health, growth performance and carcass and meat quality in rabbits. Livestock Science 169, 88–95.Google Scholar
Read, T, Combes, S, Gidenne, T, Destombes, N, Grenet, L and Fortun-Lamothe, L 2015. Stimulate feed intake before weaning and control intake after weaning to optimise health and growth performance. World Rabbit Science 23, 145–153.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute (SAS) 2010. SAS/STAT qualification tools user’s guide, version 9.2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Szendrő, Zs, Metzger, S, Febel, H, Hullar, I, Maertens, L, Bianchi, M, Cavani, C, Petracci, M, Biró-Németh, E and Radnai, I 2008. Effect of energy restriction in interaction with genotype on the performance of growing rabbits I: productive traits. Livestock Science 118, 123–131.Google Scholar
Szendrő, Zs, Matics, Zs, Gerencsér, Zs, Nagy, I, Lengyel, M, Horn, P and Dalle Zotte, A 2010. Effect of dam and sire genotypes on productive and carcass traits of rabbits. Journal of Animal Science 88, 533–543.Google Scholar
Tumova, E, Zita, L and Stolc, L 2006. Carcass quality in restricted and ad libitum fed rabbits. Czech Journal of Animal Science 51, 214–219.Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB and Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.Google Scholar
Xiccato, G 1999. Feeding and meat quality in rabbits: a review. World Rabbit Science 7, 75–86.Google Scholar
Xiccato, G, Trocino, A, Filiou, E, Majolini, D, Tazzoli, M and Zuffellato, A 2013. Bicellular cage vs. collective pen housing for rabbits: Growth performance, carcass and meat quality. Livestock Science 155, 407–414.Google Scholar