Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-zdfhw Total loading time: 0.555 Render date: 2022-08-13T05:36:48.515Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Breeding for robustness: the role of cortisol*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2010

P. Mormède*
Affiliation:
Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, PsyNuGen, F-33076 Bordeaux, France Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, UMR 1286, F-33076 Bordeaux, France
A. Foury
Affiliation:
Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, PsyNuGen, F-33076 Bordeaux, France Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, UMR 1286, F-33076 Bordeaux, France
E. Terenina
Affiliation:
Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, PsyNuGen, F-33076 Bordeaux, France Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, UMR 1286, F-33076 Bordeaux, France
P. W. Knap
Affiliation:
PIC International Group, Ratsteich 31, D-24837 Schleswig, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Robustness in farm animals was defined by Knap as ‘the ability to combine a high production potential with resilience to stressors, allowing for unproblematic expression of a high production potential in a wide variety of environmental conditions’. The importance of robustness-related traits in breeding objectives is progressively increasing towards the production of animals with a high production level in a wide range of climatic conditions and production systems, together with a high level of animal welfare. Current strategies to increase robustness include selection for ‘functional traits’, such as skeletal and cardiovascular integrity, disease resistance and mortality in various stages. It is also possible to use global evaluation of sensitivity to the environment (e.g. reaction norm analysis or canalization), but these techniques are difficult to implement in practice. The hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenocortical (HPA) axis is the most important stress-responsive neuroendocrine system. Cortisol (or corticosterone) released by the adrenal cortices exerts a large range of effects on metabolism, the immune system, inflammatory processes and brain function, for example. Large individual variations have been described in the HPA axis activity with important physiopathological consequences. In terms of animal production, higher cortisol levels have negative effects on growth rate and feed efficiency and increase the fat/lean ratio of carcasses. On the contrary, cortisol has positive effects on traits related to robustness and adaptation. For instance, newborn survival was shown to be directly related to plasma cortisol levels at birth, resistance to bacteria and parasites are increased in animals selected for a higher HPA axis response to stress, and tolerance to heat stress is better in those animals that are able to mount a strong stress response. Intense selection for lean tissue growth during the last decades has concomitantly reduced cortisol production, which may be responsible for the negative effects of selection on piglet survival. One strategy to improve robustness is to select animals with higher HPA axis activity. Several sources of genetic polymorphism have been described in the HPA axis. Hormone production by the adrenal cortices under stimulation by adrenocorticotropin hormone is a major source of individual differences. Several candidate genes have been identified by genomic studies and are currently under investigation. Bioavailability of hormones as well as receptor and post-receptor mechanisms are also subject to individual variation. Integration of these different sources of genetic variability will allow the development of a model for marker-assisted selection to improve animal robustness without negative side effects on production traits.

Type
Review
Information
animal , Volume 5 , Issue 5 , 04 April 2011 , pp. 651 - 657
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This review is based on an invited presentation at the 60th Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production held in Barcelona, Spain, in August 2009.

References

Beilharz, RG 1998. Environmental limit to genetic change. An alternative theorem of natural selection. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 115, 433437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertagna, X, Coste, J, Raux-Demay, MC, Letrait, M, Strauch, G 1994. The combined corticotropin-releasing hormone/lysine vasopressin test discloses a corticotroph phenotype. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 79, 390394.Google ScholarPubMed
Bodin, L, Bolet, G, Garcia, M, Garreau, H, Larzul, C, David, I 2010. Robustesse et canalisation: vision de généticiens. INRA Productions Animales 23, 1122.Google Scholar
Bolet, G, Gaffeau, H, Joly, T, Theau-Clement, M, Faheres, J, Hurtaud, J, Bodin, L 2007. Genetic homogenisation of birth weight in rabbits: indirect selection response for uterine horn characteristics. Livestock Science 111, 2832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, M, Keppens, S, Stalmans, W 1998. Specific features of glycogen metabolism in the liver. Biochemical Journal 336, 1931.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, KI, Nestor, KE 1973. Some physiological responses of turkeys selected for high and low adrenal responses to cold stress. Poultry Science 52, 19481954.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bureau, C, Hennequet-Antier, C, Couty, M, Guémené, D 2009. Gene array analysis of adrenal glands in broiler chickens following ACTH treatment. BMC Genomics 10, 430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canario, L, Billon, Y, Caritez, JC, Bidanel, JP, Laloe, D 2009. Comparison of sow farrowing characteristics between a Chinese breed and three French breeds. Livestock Science 125, 132140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, RN, Paterson, JM, Tworowska, U, Stenvers, DJ, Mullins, JJ, Seckl, JR, Holmes, MC 2009. Hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis abnormalities in response to deletion of 11 beta-HSD1 is strain-dependent. Journal of Neuroendocrinology 21, 879887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chrousos, GP 1998. Stressors, stress, and neuroendocrine integration of the adaptive response – The 1997 Hans Selye Memorial Lecture. In Stress of Life – from Molecules to Man (ed. P Csermely). Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 851, 311335.Google Scholar
Colleau, JJ, Regaldo, D 2001. Setting up the breeding goal of French dairy breeds. In 8th Conference on Ruminant Research, Paris, France, pp. 329–332.Google Scholar
Coste, J, Strauch, G, Letrait, M, Bertagna, X 1994. Reliability of hormonal levels for assessing the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical system in clinical pharmacology. British Journal of Pharmacology 38, 474479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dantzer, R, Mormede, P 1983. Stress in farm animals: a need for reevaluation. Journal of Animal Science 57, 618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Jong, IEM, Oitzl, MS, de Kloet, ER 2007. Adrenalectomy prevents behavioural sensitisation of mice to cocaine in a genotype-dependent manner. Behavioural Brain Research 177, 329339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeRijk, RH 2009. Single nucleotide polymorphisms related to HPA axis activity. Neuroimmunomodulation 16, 340352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Désautés, C, Sarrieau, A, Caritez, JC, Mormede, P 1999. Behavior and pituitary–adrenal function in Large White and Meishan pigs. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 16, 193205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desautes, C, Bidanel, JP, Milan, D, Iannuccelli, N, Amigues, Y, Bourgeois, F, Caritez, JC, Renard, C, Chevalet, C, Mormede, P 2002. Genetic linkage mapping of quantitative trait loci for behavioral and neuroendocrine stress response traits in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 80, 22762285.Google ScholarPubMed
Devenport, L, Knehans, A, Sundstrom, A, Thomas, T 1989. Corticosterone’s dual metabolic actions. Life Sciences 45, 13891396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edens, FW, Siegel, HS 1975. Adrenal responses in high and low ACTH response lines of chickens during acute heat stress. General and Comparative Endocrinology 25, 6473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fevolden, S, Roed, K, Fjalestad, K, Stien, J 1999. Poststress levels of lysozyme and cortisol in adult rainbow trout: heritabilities and genetic correlations. Fish Biology 54, 900910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foury, A, Devillers, N, Sanchez, MP, Griffon, H, Le Roy, P, Mormede, P 2005. Stress hormones, carcass composition and meat quality in Large White × Duroc pigs. Meat Science 69, 703707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foury, A, Tribout, T, Bazin, C, Billon, Y, Bouffaud, M, Gogué, JM, Bidanel, JP, Mormede, P 2009. Estimation of genetic trends from 1977 to 2000 for stress-responsive systems in French Large White and Landrace pig populations using frozen semen. Animal 3, 16811687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foury, A, Geverink, NA, Gil, M, Gispert, M, Hortos, M, Font i Furnols, M, Carrion, D, Blott, SC, Plastow, GS, Mormede, P 2007. Stress neuroendocrine profiles in five pig breeding lines and the relationship with carcass composition. Animal 1, 973982.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garreau, H, Bolet, G, Larzul, C, Robert-Granie, C, Saleil, G, SanCristobal, M, Bodin, L 2008. Results of four generations of a canalising selection for rabbit birth weight. Livestock Science 119, 5562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geverink, N, Foury, A, Plastow, GS, Gil, M, Gispert, M, Hortos, M, Font i Furnols, M, Gort, G, Moisan, MP, Mormede, P 2006. Cortisol-binding globulin and meat quality in five European lines of pigs. Journal of Animal Science 84, 804811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glazier, DD 2009. Trade-offs. In Resource allocation theory applied to farm animal production (ed. WM Rauw), pp. 4460. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Gross, WB 1976. Plasma steroid tendency, social environment and Eimeria necatrix infection. Poultry Science 55, 15081512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross, WB, Siegel, PB 1985. Selective breeding for corticosterone response to social stress. Poultry Science 64, 22302233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guyonnet-Duperat, V, Geverink, N, Plastow, GS, Evans, G, Ousova, O, Croisetiere, C, Foury, A, Richard, E, Mormede, P, Moisan, MP 2006. Functional implication of an Arg307Gly substitution in corticosteroid-binding globulin, a candidate gene for a quantitative trait locus associated with cortisol variability and obesity in pig. Genetics 173, 21432149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, C, Wang, M 2008. Development of 11 beta-HSD1 inhibitors for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Mini-reviews in Medicinal Chemistry 8, 702710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harizi, H, Homo-Delarche, F, Amrani, A, Coulaud, J, Mormede, P 2007. Marked genetic differences in the regulation of blood glucose under immune and restraint stress in mice reveals a wide range of corticosensitivity. Journal of Neuroimmunology 189, 5968.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hazard, D, Liaubet, L, Sancristobal, M, Mormede, P 2008. Gene array and real time PCR analysis of the adrenal sensitivity to adrenocorticotropic hormone in pig. BMC Genomics 9, 101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hennessy, DP, Jackson, PN 1987. Relationship between adrenal responsiveness and growth rate. In Manipulating Pig Production I (ed. APSA Committee), p. 23. Australian Pig Science Association, South Perth, WA, Australia.Google Scholar
Hennessy, DP, Stelmasiak, T, Johnston, NE, Jackson, PN, Outch, KH 1988. Consistent capacity for adrenocortical response to ACTH administration in pigs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 49, 12761283.Google ScholarPubMed
Heo, J, Kattesh, HG, Roberts, MP, Schneider, JF 2003. Plasma levels of cortisol and corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG) and hepatic CBG mRNA expression in pre- and postnatal pigs. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 25, 263273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffman, EC, Wangsness, PJ, Hagen, DR, Etherton, TD 1983. Fetuses of lean and obese swine in late gestation. Body composition, plasma hormones and muscle development. Journal of Animal Science 57, 609620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jouffe, V, Rowe, SJ, Liaubet, L, Buitenhuis, B, Hornsoj, H, Sancristobal, M, Mormede, P, De Koning, DJ 2009. Using microarrays to identify positional candidate genes for QTL: the case study of ACTH response in pigs. BMC Proceedings 3 (S4), S14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kattesh, HG, Charles, SF, Baumbach, GA, Gillespie, BE 1990. Plasma cortisol distribution in the pig from birth to six weeks of age. Biology of the Neonate 58, 220226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klemcke, HG, Christenson, RK 1997. Porcine fetal and maternal adrenocorticotropic hormone and corticosteroid concentrations during gestation and their relation to fetal size. Biology of Reproduction 57, 99106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knap, PW 2005. Breeding robust pigs. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 763773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knap, PW 2009. Robustness. In Resource allocation theory applied to farm animal production (ed. WM Rauw), pp. 288301. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Knap, PW, Su, G 2008. Genotype by environment interaction for litter size in pigs as quantified by reaction norms analysis. Animal 2, 17421747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knap, PW, Rauw, WM 2009. Selection for high production in pigs. In Resource allocation theory applied to farm animal production (ed. WM Rauw), pp. 210229. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Knott, SA, Cummins, LJ, Dunshea, FR, Leury, BJ 2008. Rams with poor feed efficiency are highly responsive to an exogenous adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH) challenge. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 34, 261268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larzul, C, Foury, A, Terenina, E, Billon, Y, Mormede, P 2010. Genetic parameters for ACTH response in pig. In 9th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (ed. 507 German Society for Animal Science), com. 0169. Leipzig, Germany, 1–6 August.Google Scholar
Leenhouwers, JI, Knol, EF, de Groot, PN, Vos, H, van der Lende, T 2002. Fetal development in the pig in relation to genetic merit for piglet survival. Journal of Animal Science 80, 17591770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, LA, Xia, D, Wei, S, Hartung, J, Zhao, RQ 2008a. Characterization of adrenal ACTH signaling pathway and steroidogenic enzymes in Erhualian and Pietrain pigs with different plasma cortisol levels. Steroids 73, 806814.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, LA, Xia, D, Wei, S, Li, X, Parvizi, N, Zhao, RQ 2008b. Diminished expression of ACTH signaling proteins and steroidogenic limiting factors in adrenocortical cells isolated from halothane(nn) pigs. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 35, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marissal-Arvy, N, Lombes, M, Petterson, J, Moisan, MP, Mormede, P 2004. Gain of function mutation in the mineralocorticoid receptor of the Brown Norway rat. Journal of Biological Chemistry 279, 3923239239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marketon, JIW, Glaser, R 2008. Stress hormones and immune function. Cellular Immunology 252, 1626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayor, F, Cuezva, JM 1985. Hormonal and metabolic changes in the perinatal period. Biology of the Neonate 48, 185196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michel, V, Peinnequin, A, Alonso, A, Buguet, A, Cespuglio, R, Canini, F 2007a. Effect of glucocorticoid depletion on heat-induced Hsp70, IL-1 beta and TNF-alpha gene expression. Brain Research 1164, 6371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michel, V, Peinnequin, A, Alonso, A, Buguet, A, Cespuglio, R, Canini, F 2007b. Decreased heat tolerance is associated with hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical axis impairment. Neuroscience 147, 522531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minozzi, G, Guemene, D, Couty, M, Gourichon, D, Minvielle, F, Pinard-van der Laan, MH 2008. Circulating Corticosterone Reaction to Restraint and Adrenocorticotropin Hormone Administration in White Leghorns Selected for Immune Response Traits. Poultry Science 87, 22252230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moisan, MP 2010. Genotype-phenotype associations in understanding the role of corticosteroid-binding globulin in health and disease animal models. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 316, 3541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mormede, P, Courvoisier, H, Ramos, A, Marissal-Arvy, N, Ousova, O, Desautes, C, Duclos, M, Chaouloff, F, Moisan, MP 2002. Molecular genetic approaches to investigate individual variations in behavioral and neuroendocrine stress responses. Psychoneuroendocrinology 27, 563583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mulder, HA, Bijma, P, Hill, WG 2007. Prediction of breeding values and selection responses with genetic heterogeneity of environmental variance. Genetics 175, 18951910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mulder, HA, Bijma, P, Hill, WG 2008. Selection for uniformity in livestock by exploiting genetic heterogeneity of residual variance. Genetics Selection Evolution 40, 3759.Google ScholarPubMed
Mulder, HA, Hill, WG, Vereijken, A, Veerkamp, RF 2009. Estimation of genetic variation in residual variance in female and male broiler chickens. Animal 3, 16731680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Otieno, CJ, Bastiaansen, J, Ramos, AM, Rothschild, MF 2005. Mapping and association studies of diabetes related genes in the pig. Animal Genetics 36, 3642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ousova, O, Guyonnet-Duperat, V, Iannuccelli, N, Bidanel, JP, Milan, D, Genet, C, Llamas, B, Yerle, M, Gellin, J, Chardon, P, Emptoz-Bonneton, A, Pugeat, M, Mormede, P, Moisan, MP 2004. Corticosteroid binding globulin: a new target for cortisol-driven obesity. Molecular Endocrinology 18, 16871696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perreau, V, Sarrieau, A, Mormede, P 1999. Characterization of mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid receptors in pigs: comparison of Meishan and Large White breeds. Life Sciences 64, 15011515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pottinger, TG, Carrick, TR 1999. Modification of the plasma cortisol response to stress in rainbow trout by selective breeding. General and Comparative Endocrinology 116, 122132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Puvadolpirod, S, Thaxton, JP 2000a. Model of physiological stress in chickens 4. Digestion and metabolism. Poultry Science 79, 383390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Puvadolpirod, S, Thaxton, JP 2000b. Model of physiological stress in chickens 3. Temporal patterns of response. Poultry Science 79, 377382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Puvadolpirod, S, Thaxton, JP 2000c. Model of physiological stress in chickens 1. Response parameters. Poultry Science 79, 363369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Puvadolpirod, S, Thaxton, JP 2000d. Model of physiological stress in chickens 2. Dosimetry of adrenocorticotropin. Poultry Science 79, 370376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rauw, WM, Kanis, E, Noordhuizen-Stassen, EN, Grommers, FJ 1998. Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: a review. Livestock Production Science 56, 1533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redei, EE 2008. Molecular genetics of the stress-responsive adrenocortical axis. Annals of Medicine 40, 139148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Remer, T, Maser-Gluth, C, Wudy, SA 2008. Glucocorticoid measurements in health and disease-metabolic implications and the potential of 24-h urine analyses. Mini-reviews in Medicinal Chemistry 8, 153170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ros, M, Sorensen, D, Waagepetersen, R, Dupont-Nivet, M, SanCristobal, M, Bonnet, JC, Mallard, J 2004. Evidence for genetic control of adult weight plasticity in the snail Helix aspersa. Genetics 168, 20892097.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salak-Johnson, JL, McGlone, JJ 2007. Making sense of apparently conflicting data: stress and immunity in swine and cattle. Journal of Animal Science 85, E81E88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SanCristobal-Gaudy, M, Elsen, JM, Bodin, L, Chevalet, C 1998. Prediction of the response to a selection for canalisation of a continuous trait in animal breeding. Genetics Selection Evolution 30, 423451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SanCristobal-Gaudy, M, Bodin, L, Elsen, JM, Chevalet, C 2001. Genetic components of litter size variability in sheep. Genetics Selection Evolution 33, 249271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satterlee, DG, Johnson, WA 1988. Selection of Japanese quail for contrasting blood corticosterone response to immobilization. Poultry Science 67, 2532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siegel, PB, Honaker, CF, Rauw, WM 2009. Selection for high production in poultry. In Resource allocation theory applied to farm animal production (ed. WM Rauw), pp. 230242. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Silver, M, Fowden, AL 1989. Pituitary-adrenocortical activity in the fetal pig in the last 3rd of gestation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology and Cognate Medical Sciences 74, 197206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, D, Waagepetersen, R 2003. Normal linear models with genetically structured residual variance heterogeneity: a case study. Genetical Research 82, 207222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Star, L, Ellen, ED, Uitdehaag, K, Brom, FWA 2008. A plea to implement robustness into a breeding goal: poultry as an example. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics 21, 109125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaxton, JP, Puvadolpirod, S 2000. Model of physiological stress in chickens 5. Quantitative evaluation. Poultry Science 79, 391395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Touma, C, Bunck, M, Glasl, L, Nussbaumer, M, Palme, R, Stein, H, Wolferstatter, M, Zeh, R, Zimbelmann, M, Holsboer, F, Landgraf, R 2008. Mice selected for high versus low stress reactivity: a new animal model for affective disorders. Psychoneuroendocrinology 33, 839862.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Rossum, EFC, Lamberts, SWJ 2004. Polymorphisms in the glucocorticoid receptor gene and their associations with metabolic parameters and body composition. Recent Progress in Hormone Research 59, 333357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veerkamp, RF, Windig, JJ, Calus, MPL, Ouweltjes, W, de Haas, Y, Beerda, B 2009. Selection for high production in dairy cattle. In Resource allocation theory applied to farm animal production (ed. WM Rauw), pp. 243260. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Zhang, SH, Hennessy, DP, Cranwell, PD 1990. Pituitary and adrenocortical responses to corticotropin-releasing factor in pigs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 51, 10211025.Google ScholarPubMed
Zhang, SH, Hennessy, DP, McCauley, I, Cranwell, PD 1993. Adrenocortical ACTH receptors in pigs of differing in vivo response to adrenocorticotropin. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology 104, 4349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, SH, Hennessy, DP, Cranwell, PD, Noonan, GJ, Francis, HJ 1992. Physiological responses to exercise and hypoglycemia stress in pig of differing adrenal responsiveness. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology 103, 695703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Breeding for robustness: the role of cortisol*
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Breeding for robustness: the role of cortisol*
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Breeding for robustness: the role of cortisol*
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *