Hostname: page-component-546b4f848f-hhr79 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-06-04T10:19:44.966Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

Feed restriction strategy in the growing rabbit. 2. Impact on digestive health, growth and carcass characteristics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2009

T. Gidenne*
INRA; UMR 1289 TANDEM, Tissus Animaux, Nutrition, Digestion, Ecosystème et Métabolisme, Chemin de Borde-Rouge, Auzeville, F-31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France Université de Toulouse; INPT, ENVT, UMR 1289 TANDEM, Tissus Animaux, Nutrition, Digestion, Ecosystème et Métabolisme, France
S. Combes
INRA; UMR 1289 TANDEM, Tissus Animaux, Nutrition, Digestion, Ecosystème et Métabolisme, Chemin de Borde-Rouge, Auzeville, F-31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France Université de Toulouse; INPT, ENVT, UMR 1289 TANDEM, Tissus Animaux, Nutrition, Digestion, Ecosystème et Métabolisme, France
A. Feugier
INRA; UMR 1289 TANDEM, Tissus Animaux, Nutrition, Digestion, Ecosystème et Métabolisme, Chemin de Borde-Rouge, Auzeville, F-31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France Université de Toulouse; INPT, ENVT, UMR 1289 TANDEM, Tissus Animaux, Nutrition, Digestion, Ecosystème et Métabolisme, France
N. Jehl
ITAVI, 28, rue du Rocher, F-75008 Paris, France
P. Arveux
INZO, BP 19, F-02402 Château-Thierry, France
P. Boisot
Evialis, BP 235, F-56006 Vannes, France
C. Briens
CCPA, 14 rue des Beaux Soleils, F-95520 Osny, France
E. Corrent
Trouw Nutrition France, F-95450 Vigny, France
H. Fortune
PRIMEX, Gare de Baud, BP 12, F-56440 Languidic, France
S. Montessuy
TECHNA, BP 10, F-44220 Coueron, France
S. Verdelhan
CYBELIA, groupe GLON, Centre d’affaires l’Odyssée, ZAC Cissé Blossac, F-35170 Bruz, France
Get access


A field enquiry mentioned the potential positive impact of a feed restriction on the health of young rabbits, but no objective information relates the intake to digestive health. The effects of a post-weaning feed restriction strategy were thus studied on digestive health and growth and carcass parameters of the growing rabbit, using a monofactorial design that produces a quantitative linear reduction of the intake, from ad libitum (AL group) to 80%, 70% and 60% of AL. The study was performed simultaneously in six experimental sites, on 1984 growing rabbits (496 per treatment) collectively caged from weaning (34 to 38 days of age, depending on the site) to slaughter (68 to 72 days). The feeding programme was applied as followed: restriction during 21 days after weaning, and then ad libitum till slaughter. During the feed restriction period the growth rate was linearly reduced with the restriction level, by 0.5 g/day for each percent of intake reduction. When returning to ad libitum intake (after 54 days old) a compensatory growth and a higher feed efficiency occurred. Therefore, the impact of the feeding programme on the slaughter weight (SW) was significant (−4.5 g/% of restriction), but relatively moderate: the weight loss of the more-restricted rabbits (60%) reached 7.7% (−200 g) compared to the AL group. Over the whole fattening period, the feed restriction reduced linearly and significantly the feed conversion (FC) (−0.0077 unit/% of restriction). Carcass traits were little affected by the feeding programme, except for a slightly lower decrease of the dressing percentage (mean: 1.2 units between AL and the three restricted groups). On the six experimental sites, mortality and morbidity were always caused by acute digestive disorders, namely diarrhoea and/or caecal impaction. Independent of the treatment, the mortality rate strongly varied according to the site (between 7% and 18% from weaning to 54 days and for the AL group). During feed restriction, the mortality was significantly lower from a restriction threshold of 80% (meanly: −9% compared to AL). The morbidity was also significantly reduced (−6%) for the two most restricted groups (70% and 60%). The favourable effect of a lower intake on health did not persist after returning to ad libitum intake (54 days to slaughter), since mortality and morbidity were not significantly different among the treatments. Such a feeding strategy thus represents a double benefit in terms of feed costs and lower losses of young rabbits.

Full Paper
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Boisot, P, Licois, D, Gidenne, T 2003. Feed restriction reduces the sanitary impact of an experimental reproduction of epizootic rabbit enteropathy syndrome (ERE), in the growing rabbit. In 10èmes Journées de la Recherche Cunicole (ed. G Bolet), pp. 267270. ITAVI Publ., Paris, France.Google Scholar
CIELAB System 1976. CIELAB Colour System, Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. CIE Publications, Paris.Google Scholar
Dalle Zotte, A, Rémignon, H, Ouhayoun, J 2005. Effect of feed rationing during post-weaning growth on meat quality, muscle energy metabolism and fibre properties of biceps femoris muscle in the rabbit. Meat Science 70, 301306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidenne, T 1994. Effets d’une réduction de la teneur en fibres alimentaires sur le transit digestif du lapin. Comparaison et validation de modèles d’ajustement des cinétiques d’excrétion fécale des marqueurs. Reproduction Nutrition Development 34, 295306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidenne, T 2003. Fibres in rabbit feeding for digestive troubles prevention: respective role of low-digested and digestible fibre. Livestock Production Science 81, 105117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidenne, TFeugier, A 2009. Feed restriction strategy in the growing rabbit: 1 – impact on digestion, rate of passage and microbial activity. Animal, under evaluation.Google Scholar
Gidenne, T, Lebas, F 2006. Feeding behaviour in rabbits. In Feeding in domestic vertebrates. From structure to behaviour (ed. V Bels), pp. 179209. CABI publishing, Wallingford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidenne, T, Mirabito, L, Jehl, N, Perez, JM, Arveux, P, Bourdillon, A, Briens, C, Duperray, J, Corrent, E 2004. Impact of replacing starch by digestible fibre, at two levels of lignocellulose, on digestion, growth and digestive health of the rabbit. Animal Science 78, 389398.Google Scholar
Gidenne, T, Jehl, N, Perez, JM, Arveux, P, Bourdillon, A, Mousset, JL, Duperray, J, Stephan, S, Lamboley, B 2005. Effect of cereal sources and processing in diets for the growing rabbit. II. Effects on performances and mortality by enteropathy. Animal Research 54, 6572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gondret, F, Lebas, F, Bonneau, M 2000. Restricted feed intake during fattening reduces intramuscular lipid deposition without modifying muscle fiber characteristics in rabbits. Journal of Nutrition 130, 228233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jolly, CA 2004. Dietary restriction and immune function. Journal of Nutrition 134, 18531856.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larour, G, Jobert, JL, Balaine, L, Eono, F, Klein, MF, Ledein, T, Le Bouquin, SGuittet, M 2002. Enquête épidémiologique analytique sur l’Entérocolite Epizootique du lapin en engraissement. In Journée nationale ITAVI élévage du lapin de chair, 21 nov., Nantes. ITAVI publ. Paris.Google Scholar
Lebas, F, Delaveau, A 1975. Influence de la restriction du temps d’accès à la boisson sur la consommation alimentaire et la croissance du lapin. Annales de Zootechnie 24, 311313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebas, F, Laplace, JP 1982. Mensurations viscérales chez le lapin. 4. Effets de divers modes de restriction alimentaire sur la croissance corporelle et viscérale. Annales de Zootechnie 31, 391430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledin, I 1984. Effect of restricted feeding and realimentation on compensatory growth and organ growth in rabbit. Annales de Zootechnie 33, 3350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Licois, D, Wyers, M, Coudert, P 2005. Epizootic rabbit enteropathy: experimental transmission and clinical characterization. Veterinary Research 36, 601613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maertens, L, Peeters, JE 1988. Effect of feed restriction after weaning on fattening performances and caecal traits of early weaned rabbits. In Deutsche Veterinarmediznische Gesellschaft (ed. HC Löliger), pp. 158–169. 2–4 June, Celle, Germany.Google Scholar
Ouhayoun, J 1998. Influence of the diet on rabbit meat quality. In The nutrition of the rabbit (ed. C De Blas and J Wiseman), pp. 177195. CABI publ., Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Ouhayoun, J, Dalle Zotte, A 1996. Harmonization of muscle and meat criteria in rabbit meat research. World Rabbit Science 4, 211218.Google Scholar
Perrier, G 1998. Influence de deux niveaux et de deux durées de restriction alimentaire sur l’efficacité productive du lapin et les caractéristiques bouchères de la carcasse. In 7 èmes Journées de la Recherche Cunicole, Lyon, France (ed. JM Perez), pp. 179182. ITAVI publ., Paris.Google Scholar
Perrier, GOuhayoun, J 1996. Growth and carcass traits of the rabbit a comparative study of three modes of feed rationing during fattening. In Proceedings of the 6th World Rabbit Congress, vol. 3 (ed. F Lebas), Toulouse, France, 09–12 July, pp. 225–232. AFC publ.Google Scholar
Prohaszka, L 1980. Antibacterial effect of volatile fatty acids in enteric E. coli infections of rabbits. Zentralblatt fuer Veterinarmedizin Reihe B Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series B Infectious Diseases Immunology Food 27, 631639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rolfe, RD 1984. Role of volatile fatty acids in colonization resistance to Clostridium difficile. Infectiology and Immunology 45, 185191.Google ScholarPubMed
Rommers, JM, Meijerhof, R, Noordhuizen, JPTM, Kemp, B 2004. The effect of level of feeding in early gestation on reproductive success in young rabbit does. Animal Reproduction Science 81, 151158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szendrö, Z, Szabo, SHullar, I 1988. Effect of reduction of eating time on production of growing rabbits. Proceedings of the 4th World Rabbit Congress, Budapest, 10–14 October, vol. 3, pp. 104–114.Google Scholar
Tumova, E, Zita, L, Stolc, L 2006. Carcass quality in restricted and ad libitum fed rabbits. Czech Journal of Animal Science 51, 214219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar