Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T04:36:50.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gastrointestinal tract development in red deer (Cervus elaphus) calves from 1 to 12 months of age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2013

K. J. Hammond ,
S. O. Hoskin ,
N. B. Jopson ,
C. G. Mackintosh ,
G. Hofstra ,
B. R. Thompson  and
D. R. Stevens
K. J. Hammond*
Affiliation:
Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North, New Zealand
S. O. Hoskin
Affiliation:
Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North, New Zealand
N. B. Jopson
Affiliation:
AbacusBio Limited, Private Bag 5585, Dunedin, New Zealand
C. G. Mackintosh
Affiliation:
AgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, New Zealand
G. Hofstra
Affiliation:
AgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, New Zealand
B. R. Thompson
Affiliation:
AgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, New Zealand
D. R. Stevens
Affiliation:
AgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, New Zealand
*
E-mail: kirstyhammond@hotmail.com
Get access

Abstract

This study provides a detailed description of the development of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of farmed red deer (Cervus elaphus) calves over the first 12 months of age. GIT development was measured using a combination of computerised tomography (CT) scanning and traditional slaughter plus dissection techniques. Red deer calves of a known birth date were randomly assigned to two treatment groups. A group of five animals were repeatedly CT scanned at 31, 63, 92, 135, 207, 275 and 351 days of age to identify GIT organs and determine their volume. From a group of 20 animals, subsets of four individuals were also scanned at corresponding ages (except 135 days of age). They were immediately euthanised and dissected after CT scanning to compare CT-scanned results with actual anatomical measurements. Individual organ weights were compared with their respective organ volumes determined by CT scanning and were found to have a strong, positive relationship. The combined rumen and reticulum (RR) CT-scanned volume was compared with its volume determined by the water-displacement technique and this also showed good correlation between the two techniques (R = 0.92). The allometric growth rates of organs, relative to animal live weight gains, in descending order, were the rumen, omasum, reticulum, abomasum, caecum blind sac, kidneys, spleen and liver. The red deer GIT was continuing to grow and develop when the last measurement was taken at 351 days of age. The greatest growth of the RR, when expressed in terms of empty weight, was between 31 and 92 days of age. Compared with sheep and cattle, it appears that the red deer have a similar or greater rate of RR development up until approximately 60 to 90 days of age; however, the final increments of GIT maturity in deer may take longer to complete, with the empty weight of the RR gaining 7.5 g/day between 275 and 351 days of age. CT scanning was validated in this study as a viable technique to follow GIT development in the same animals over time, and it provided novel information on allometric organ growth. The success of CT scanning highlights the potential future use of diagnostic imaging for GIT development studies.

Keywords

deergastrointestinal tractcomputer tomographyrumenorgan growth
Type
Physiology and functional biology of systems
Information
animal , Volume 7 , Issue 11 , November 2013 , pp. 1816 - 1823
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdallah, OY, Shahin, KA, Latif, MA 1982. Allometric growth patterns of the alimentary tract in water-buffalo and Friesian cross-bred cattle. Indian Journal of Animal Science 52, 506–510.Google Scholar
Bajzik, G, Berenyi, E, Biro, S, Bogner, P, Petrasi, Z, Repa, I, Romvari, R, Sugar, L, Takacs, I, Tornyos, G 1998. Cross-sectional CT and MR anatomy atlas of red deer. Pannon Agricultural University, Kaposvar, Hungary.Google Scholar
Baldwin, RL 2000. Sheep gastrointestinal development in response to different dietary treatments. Small Ruminant Research 35, 39–47.Google Scholar
Baldwin, RL, McLeod, KR, Klotz, JL, Heitmann, RN 2004. Rumen development, intestinal growth and hepatic metabolism in the pre- and post-weaning ruminant. Journal of Dairy Science 87, E55–E65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, AS, Garden, KL, Young, MJ, Reid, CW 1987. An atlas of X-ray tomographical anatomy of the sheep. Science Information Publishing Centre, DSIR, Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Davis, CL, Drackley, JK 1998. The development, nutrition, and management of the young calf. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA.Google Scholar
Domingue, BM, Dellow, DW, Wilson, PR, Barry, TN 1991a. Comparative digestion in deer, goats, and sheep. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 34, 45–53.Google Scholar
Domingue, BM, Dellow, DW, Wilson, PR, Barry, TN 1991b. Nitrogen metabolism, rumen fermentation, and water absorption in red deer, goats, and sheep. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 34, 391–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenberger, DO, Toyakawa, K, Barry, TN, Ball, AJ, Suttie, JM 1994. Seasonality in digestion and rumen metabolism in red deer (Cervus elaphus) fed on a forage diet. British Journal of Nutrition 71, 489–499.Google Scholar
Godfrey, NW 1961a. The functional development of the calf 1: growth of the stomach of the calf. Journal of Agricultural Science 57, 173–175.Google Scholar
Godfrey, NW 1961b. The functional development of the calf 2: development of rumen function in the calf. Journal of Agricultural Science 57, 177–183.Google Scholar
Greenwood, RH, Morrill, JL, Titgemeyer, EC, Kennedy, GA 1997. A new method of measuring diet abrasion and its effect on the development of the forestomach. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 2534–2541.Google Scholar
Gunderson, HG, Bendtsen, TF, Korbo, L, Marcussen, N, Moller, A, Nielsen, K, Nyengaard, JR, Pakkenberg, B, Sorensen, FB, Vesterby, A, West, MJ 1988. Some new, simple and efficient stereological methods and their use in pathological research and diagnosis. Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica 96, 379–394.Google Scholar
Heinrichs, J 2005. Rumen development in the dairy calf. Advances in Dairy Technology 17, 179–187.Google Scholar
Hervas, G, Ranilla, MJ, Mantecon, AR, Tejido, ML, Fructos, P 2005. Comparison of sheep and red deer rumen fluids for assessing nutritive value of ruminant feedstuffs. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 85, 2495–2502.Google Scholar
Hoskin, SO 2005. Innovations for deer growth: thinking outside the square. Proceedings of the Deer Branch of the New Zealand Veterinary Association 22, 6–9.Google Scholar
Huxley, J 1972. Problems of relative growth. Dover Publications Inc., New York, USA.Google Scholar
Jopson, NB, Thompson, JM, Fennessy, PF 1997. Tissue mobilization rates in male fallow deer (Dama dama) as determined by computed tomography: the effects of natural and enforced food restriction. British Society of Animal Science 65, 311–320.Google Scholar
Kuehl, RO 2000. Design of experiments: statistical principles of research design and analysis. Duxbury Thomson Learning, Pacific Grove, California, USA.Google Scholar
Leat, WF 1969. Carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in the ruminant during post-natal development. In Physiology and metabolism in the ruminant (ed. A Phillipson), pp. 211–222. Oriel Press Limited, Cambridge, England, UK.Google Scholar
Lyford, SJ 1988. Growth and development of the ruminant digestive system. In The ruminant animal digestive physiology and nutrition (ed. DC Church), pp. 44–63. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry New Zealand 2012. Deer industry New Zealand. Retrieved March 31, 2012, from http://maxa.maf.govt.nz/mafnet/rural-nz/statistics-and-forecasts/farm-monitoring/deer-2001/deer-2001.htm.Google Scholar
Murray, DM, Tulloh, NM, Winter, WH 1977. The effect of three different growth rates on some offal components of cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science 89, 119–129.Google Scholar
Oh, JH, Hume, ID, Torell, DT 1972. Development of microbial activity in the alimentary tract of lambs. Journal of Animal Science 35, 450–459.Google Scholar
Short, HL 1964. Postnatal stomach development of white-tailed deer. The Journal of Wildlife Management 28, 445–458.Google Scholar
Sibbald, AM, Milne, JA 1993. Physical characteristics of the alimentary tract in relation to seasonal changes in voluntary food intake by red deer (Cervus elaphus). Journal of Agricultural Science 120, 99–102.Google Scholar
Singh, M, Yadava, IS, Rao, AR 1973. Stomach development in buffalo calves as influenced by different feeds. Journal of Agricultural Science 81, 55–60.Google Scholar
Statisical Analysis Systems Institute 2006. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, North Carolina, USA.Google Scholar
Tamate, H, McGilliard, AD, Jacobson, NL, Getty, R 1962. Effect of various dietaries on the anatomical development of the stomach in the calf. Journal of Dairy Science 45, 408–420.Google Scholar
Wallace, LR 1948. The growth of lambs before and after parturition in relation to the level of nutrition. Journal of Agricultural Science 38, 93–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardrop, ID, Coombe, JB 1960. The post-natal growth of the visceral organs of the lamb part one. The growth of the visceral organs of the grazing lamb from birth to sixteen weeks of age. Journal of Agricultural Science 54, 140–143.Google Scholar