Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

An approach to including protein quality when assessing the net contribution of livestock to human food supply

  • P. Ertl (a1), W. Knaus (a1) and W. Zollitsch (a1)
Abstract

The production of protein from animal sources is often criticized because of the low efficiency of converting plant protein from feeds into protein in the animal products. However, this critique does not consider the fact that large portions of the plant-based proteins fed to animals may be human-inedible and that the quality of animal proteins is usually superior as compared with plant proteins. The aim of the present study was therefore to assess changes in protein quality in the course of the transformation of potentially human-edible plant proteins into animal products via livestock production; data from 30 Austrian dairy farms were used as a case study. A second aim was to develop an approach for combining these changes with quantitative aspects (e.g. with the human-edible feed conversion efficiency (heFCE), defined as kilogram protein in the animal product divided by kilogram potentially human-edible protein in the feeds). Protein quality of potentially human-edible inputs and outputs was assessed using the protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score and the digestible indispensable amino acid score, two methods proposed by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations to describe the nutritional value of proteins for humans. Depending on the method used, protein scores were between 1.40 and 1.87 times higher for the animal products than for the potentially human-edible plant protein input on a barn-gate level (=protein quality ratio (PQR)). Combining the PQR of 1.87 with the heFCE for the same farms resulted in heFCE×PQR of 2.15. Thus, considering both quantity and quality, the value of the proteins in the animal products for human consumption (in this case in milk and beef) is 2.15 times higher than that of proteins in the potentially human-edible plant protein inputs. The results of this study emphasize the necessity of including protein quality changes resulting from the transformation of plant proteins to animal proteins when evaluating the net contribution of livestock to the human food supply. Furthermore, these differences in protein quality might also need to be considered when choosing a functional unit for the assessment of environmental impacts of the production of different proteins.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      An approach to including protein quality when assessing the net contribution of livestock to human food supply
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      An approach to including protein quality when assessing the net contribution of livestock to human food supply
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      An approach to including protein quality when assessing the net contribution of livestock to human food supply
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: werner.zollitsch@boku.ac.at
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

H Aiking 2011. Future protein supply. Trends in Food Science & Technology 22, 112120.

M de Vries and IJM de Boer 2010. Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: a review of life cycle assessments. Livestock Science 128, 111.

P Ertl , H Klocker , S Hörtenhuber , W Knaus and W Zollitsch 2015. The net contribution of dairy production to human food supply: the case of Austrian dairy farms. Agricultural Systems 137, 119125.

W Klöpffer and B Grahl 2014. Life cycle assessment (LCA): a guide to best practice. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany.

S Leser 2013. The 2013 FAO report on dietary protein quality evaluation in human nutrition: recommendations and implications. Nutrition Bulletin 38, 421428.

RA McGregor and SD Poppitt 2013. Milk protein for improved metabolic health: a review of the evidence. Nutrition & Metabolism 10, 46.

C Neumann , DM Harris and LM Rogers 2002. Contribution of animal source foods in improving diet quality and function in children in the developing world. Nutrition Research 22, 193220.

D Nijdam , T Rood and H Westhoek 2012. The price of protein: review of land use and carbon footprints from life cycle assessments of animal food products and their substitutes. Food Policy 37, 760770.

B Pedersen and BO Eggum 1983a. The influence of milling on the nutritive-value of flour from cereal-grains. 1. Rye. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 32, 185196.

B Pedersen and BO Eggum 1983b. The influence of milling on the nutritive-value of flour from cereal-grains. 3. Barley. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 33, 99112.

LP Reynolds , M Wulster-Radcliffe , DK Aaron and TA Davis 2015. Importance of animals in agricultural sustainability and food security. The Journal of Nutrition 145, 13771379.

SM Rutherfurd , AC Fanning , BJ Miller and PJ Moughan 2015. Protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores and digestible indispensable amino acid scores differentially describe protein quality in growing male rats. The Journal of Nutrition 145, 372379.

J Smith , K Sones , D Grace , S MacMillan , S Tarawali and M Herrero 2013. Beyond milk, meat, and eggs: role of livestock in food and nutrition security. Animal Frontiers 3, 613.

HHE van Zanten , H Mollenhorst , CW Klootwijk , CE van Middelaar and IJM de Boer 2015. Global food supply: land use efficiency of livestock systems. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 21, 747758.

RR Wolfe 2015. Update on protein intake: importance of milk proteins for health status of the elderly. Nutrition Reviews 73 (suppl. 1), 4147.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

animal
  • ISSN: 1751-7311
  • EISSN: 1751-732X
  • URL: /core/journals/animal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 124
Total number of PDF views: 505 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 908 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.