Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T17:22:16.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Apparent digestibility of broken rice in horses using in vivo and in vitro methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2013

M. De Marco
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Università di Torino,Via L. Da Vinci 44, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy
P. G. Peiretti
Affiliation:
Istituto di Scienze delle Produzioni Alimentari, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via L. Da Vinci 44, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy
N. Miraglia
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Agricoltura, Ambiente e Alimenti, Università del Molise, Via De Sanctis, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
D. Bergero*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Università di Torino,Via L. Da Vinci 44, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy
Get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the apparent digestibility of broken rice using total collection of feces and the pepsin-cellulase in vitro technique to provide updated and more accurate digestion coefficients for this by-product when fed to horses. The in vivo digestibility trial was consecutively performed, using five adult geldings, weighing 555.6 kg on average. First, hay was given as the only feedstuff, while second, the experimental diet consisted of the same hay plus broken rice at a forage-to-concentrate ratio of 70/30 (on dry matter (DM) basis). Feces were collected over 6 days preceded by a 14-day adaptation period. The digestibility trial was carried out to determine the digestion coefficients for DM, organic matter (OM), CP and gross energy in both diets, while apparent digestion coefficients for the same parameters were calculated for broken rice alone, using the difference between the two sets of results. At the same time, an in vitro trial was carried out using pepsin-cellulase technique on the samples of hay and broken rice tested during the in vivo trial. As expected, supplementation with broken rice increased digestibility according to all the parameters used. The high OM digestion coefficients of broken rice were confirmed both by the calculated in vivo method and by the predicted results of pepsin-cellulase technique (92.6% and 87.1%, respectively), underlining the high digestibility of this by-product when fed to horses.

Type
Full Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) 2004. Official methods of analysis, vol. 2, 18th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Aufrère, J and Michalet-Doreau, B 1988. Comparison of methods for predicting digestibility of feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 20, 203218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Marco, M, Miraglia, N, Peiretti, PG and Bergero, D 2012. Apparent digestibility of wheat bran and extruded flax in horses determined by total collection of feces and acid-insoluble ash as internal marker. Animal 6, 227231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, AD and Hill, J 2005. Nutritional physiology of the horse. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, DJ and Warren, BE 1982. The energy concentration of rice by-products for sheep, pigs and poultry. Animal Production in Australia 14, 676.Google Scholar
INRA 2012. Tables of chemical composition and nutritive value of feeds. In Nutrition and alimentation des chevaux, Chapter 16 (ed. W Martin-Rosset), pp. 551–596. QUAE Editions, Versailles, France.Google Scholar
Julliand, V, De Fombelle, A and Varloud, M 2006. Starch digestion in horses: the impact of feed processing. Livestock Science 100, 4452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin-Rosset, W and Dulphy, JP 1987. Digestibility interactions between forages and concentrates in horses: influence of feeding level – Comparison with sheep. Livestock Production Science 17, 263276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin-Rosset, W 2012. Nutrition et alimentation des chevaux. QUAE Editions, Versailles, France.Google Scholar
McCarthy, RN, Savage, CJ, Jeffcott, LB, Caple, IW, Watson, M and Hutton, K 1989. Recent advances in animal nutrition in Australia. University New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.Google Scholar
McMeniman, NP, Porter, TA and Hutton, K 1990. The digestibility of polished rice, rice pollard and lupin grains in horses. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference Nutrition Society of Australia, 26 November 1990, Adelaide, Australia, pp. 44–47.Google Scholar
Miraglia, N and Tisserand, JL 1985. Prévision de la digestibilité des fourrages destinés aux chevaux par dégradation enzymatique. Annales de Zootechnie 34, 229236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, HC, Masters, DG, Wilmot, MG and Rintoul, AJ 2008. Effect of supplementation with grain, hay or straw on the performance of weaner Merino sheep grazing old man (Atriplex nummularia) or river (Atriplex amnicola) saltbush. Grass and Forage Science 63, 179192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opatpatanakit, Y, Kellaway, RC, Lean, IJ, Annison, G and Kirby, A 1995. Effects of cereal grains on fiber digestion in vitro . Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 46, 403413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team 2012. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Richards, N, Choct, M, Hinch, GN and Rowe, JB 2003. Starch digestion in the equine small intestine: is there a role for supplemental enzymes?. In Nutritional biotechnology in the feed and food industries (ed. TP Lyons and KA Jacques), pp. 461472. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar