Hostname: page-component-5447f9dfdb-lxcff Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-30T14:31:55.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ear tagging in piglets: the cortisol response with and without analgesia in comparison with castration and tail docking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2016

J. Numberger ,
M. Ritzmann ,
N. Übel ,
M. Eddicks ,
S. Reese  and
S. Zöls
J. Numberger
Affiliation:
Clinic for Swine, LMU Munich, Sonnenstrasse 16, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany
M. Ritzmann
Affiliation:
Clinic for Swine, LMU Munich, Sonnenstrasse 16, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany
N. Übel
Affiliation:
Clinic for Swine, LMU Munich, Sonnenstrasse 16, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany
M. Eddicks
Affiliation:
Clinic for Swine, LMU Munich, Sonnenstrasse 16, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany
S. Reese
Affiliation:
Institute for Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, LMU Munich, Veterinärstrasse 13, 80539 Munich, Germany
S. Zöls*
Affiliation:
Clinic for Swine, LMU Munich, Sonnenstrasse 16, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany
*
†E-mail: s.zoels@lmu.de
Get access

Abstract

The objectives of the present study were to compare the cortisol response caused by ear tagging piglets with the distress caused by other known painful husbandry procedures (e.g. castration and tail docking) and to evaluate the effectiveness of analgesia with meloxicam to reduce the cortisol response caused by these procedures. In total, 210 male piglets were randomised to equal numbers (n=30) into one of seven groups: a control group which was only handled (H), an ear tagged group that received no analgesia (ET), an ear tagged group with analgesia (ETM), a castration group with no analgesia (C), a castration group with analgesia (CM), a tail-docked group with no analgesia (TD) and a tail-docked group with analgesia (TDM). The procedures were carried out on day 3 or 4 after farrowing. Five blood samples were taken from each piglet: 30 min before the respective procedure (baseline value), and 30, 60 min, 4 and 7 h after processing, to assess cortisol concentrations. Means as well as the area under the curve (AUC) value were analysed and the effective sizes of the procedures were established. At 7 h after the experimental treatment, cortisol concentrations had returned to base values in all groups. ET evoked a greater cortisol response than H piglets at 30 min (P<0.001) and 60 min (P=0.001). The cortisol response to ET was lower than C at 30 min (P=0.001) but did not differ significantly at the other sample times. The mean cortisol response was similar between ET and TD piglets over all sample times. Taking both intensity and duration of the cortisol response into account (AUC), ET evoked a greater response than TD. Analgesia (ETM) resulted in significantly lower cortisol levels than ET at 30 and 60 min post-procedure. Castration (C) provoked the highest cortisol response of all procedures; a significant analgesic effect (CM) was shown only at 4 h post-procedure. TD resulted in significantly higher cortisol levels than H piglets only at 30 min; analgesia (TDM) significantly reduced the cortisol response at 30 min. We conclude that ear tagging causes a dramatic increase in cortisol levels compared with handling alone in piglets, which suggests that this procedure causes substantial distress. However, further research is needed to confirm these results.

Keywords

castrationcortisolear tagspiglettail docking

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 10 , Issue 11 , November 2016 , pp. 1864 - 1870
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barz, A, Ritzmann, M, Breitinger, I, Langhoff, R, Zols, S, Palzer, A and Heinritzi, K 2010. Examination of different options for combined administration of an NSAID (meloxicam) and iron for piglets being castrated. Tierärztliche Praxis. Ausgabe G, Grosstiere/Nutztiere 38, 23–30.Google Scholar
Bland, M 2007. An introduction to medical statistics. Oxford University Press Inc., New York, USA.Google Scholar
Carroll, JA, Berg, EL, Strauch, TA, Roberts, MP and Kattesh, HG 2006. Hormonal profiles, behavioral responses, and short-term growth performance after castration of pigs at three, six, nine, or twelve days of age. Journal of Animal Science 84, 1271–1278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EFSA 2007. The risks associated with tail biting in pigs and possible means to reduce the need for tail docking considering the different housing and husbandry systems. Retrieved on 16 November 2013 from http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/doc/611.PDF.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection 2015a. Tierschutzgesetz. Retrieved on 8 January 2016 from http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/tierschg/BJNR012770972.html.Google Scholar
Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection 2015b. Viehverkehrsverordnung. Retrieved on 5 January 2016, from http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/viehverkv_2007/BJNR127400007.html.Google Scholar
Gallagher, NL, Giles, LR and Wynn, PC 2002. The development of a circadian pattern of salivary cortisol secretion in the neonatal piglet. Biology of the Neonate 81, 113–118.Google Scholar
Holm, S 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6, 65–70.Google Scholar
Keita, A, Pagot, E, Prunier, A and Guidarini, C 2010. Pre-emptive meloxicam for postoperative analgesia in piglets undergoing surgical castration. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 37, 367–374.Google Scholar
Kilchling, TP 2010. Möglichkeiten zur postoperativen Schmerzreduzierung beim Kupieren der Schwänze von Saugferkeln. Doctoral Thesis, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
Kitchell, RL 1987. Problems in defining pain and peripheral mechanisms of pain. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 191, 1195–1199.Google Scholar
Kluivers, M 2010. Evaluation of pain associated with routine procedures in piglets. 3rd Boehringer Ingelheim Expert Forum on Farm Animal Well-Being, 4 June 2010, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 21–29.Google Scholar
Langhoff, R 2008. Untersuchungen über den Einsatz von Schmerzmitteln zur Reduktion kastrationsbedingter Schmerzen beim Saugferkel. Doctoral Thesis, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
Leslie, E, Hernández-Jover, M, Newman, R and Holyoake, P 2010. Assessment of acute pain experienced by piglets from ear tagging, ear notching and intraperitoneal injectable transponders. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 127, 86–95.Google Scholar
Llamas Moya, S, Boyle, LA, Lynch, PB and Arkins, S 2008. Effect of surgical castration on the behavioural and acute phase responses of 5-day-old piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 111, 133–145.Google Scholar
Marchant-Forde, JN, Lay, DC Jr, McMunn, KA, Cheng, HW, Pajor, EA and Marchant-Forde, RM 2009. Postnatal piglet husbandry practices and well-being: the effects of alternative techniques delivered separately. Journal of Animal Science 87, 1479–1492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellor, DJ and Stafford, KJ 2004. Physiological and behavioural assessment of pain in ruminants: principles and caveats. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 32, 267–271.Google Scholar
Merlot, E, Mounier, AM and Prunier, A 2011. Endocrine response of gilts to various common stressors: a comparison of indicators and methods of analysis. Physiology & Behavior 102, 259–265.Google Scholar
Molony, V and Kent, JE 1997. Assessment of acute pain in farm animals using behavioral and physiological measurements. Journal of Animal Science 75, 266–272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakagawa, S and Cuthill, IC 2007. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 82, 591–605.Google Scholar
Noonan, GJ, Rand, JS, Priest, J, Ainscow, J and Blackshaw, JK 1994. Behavioral observations of piglets undergoing tail docking, teeth clipping and ear notching. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 39, 203–213.Google Scholar
Prunier, A, Mounier, AM and Hay, M 2005. Effects of castration, tooth resection, or tail docking on plasma metabolites and stress hormones in young pigs. Journal of Animal Science 83, 216–222.Google Scholar
Prunier, A, Mounier, L, Le Neindre, P, Leterrier, C, Mormede, P, Paulmier, V, Prunet, P, Terlouw, C and Guatteo, R 2012. Identifying and monitoring pain in farm animals: a review. Animal 7, 998–1010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
QS Quality Scheme for Food 2016. PDF Pig Farming 01.01.16. Retrieved on 8 January 2016 from https://www.q-s.de/documentcenter/dc-agriculture-pig-production.html.Google Scholar
Rault, J-L, Lay, DC Jr and Marchant-Forde, JN 2011. Castration induced pain in pigs and other livestock. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 135, 214–225.Google Scholar
Schmidt, RF 1989. Nociception and pain. In Human physiology (ed. R Schmidt and G Thews), pp. 223–236. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.Google Scholar
Simonsen, HB, Klinken, L and Bindseil, E 1991. Histopathology of intact and docked pigtails. The British Veterinary Journal 147, 407–412.Google Scholar
Sutherland, MA, Bryer, PJ, Krebs, N and McGlone, JJ 2008. Tail docking in pigs: acute physiological and behavioural responses. Animal 2, 292–297.Google Scholar
Sutherland, MA, Davis, BL, Brooks, TA and Coetzee, JF 2012. The physiological and behavioral response of pigs castrated with and without anesthesia or analgesia. Journal of Animal Science 90, 2211–2221.Google Scholar
Sutherland, MA and Tucker, CB 2011. The long and short of it: a review of tail docking in farm animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 135, 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenbergen, R, Friendship, R, Cassar, G, Amezcua, MR and Haley, D 2014. Investigation of the use of meloxicam for reducing pain associated with castration and tail docking and improving performance in piglets. Journal of Swine Health and Production 22, 64–70.Google Scholar
Torrey, S, Devillers, N, Lessard, M, Farmer, C and Widowski, T 2009. Effect of age on the behavioral and physiological responses of piglets to tail docking and ear notching. Journal of Animal Science 87, 1778–1786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Von Borell, E, Baumgartner, J, Giersing, M, Jaggin, N, Prunier, A, Tuyttens, FAM and Edwards, SA 2009. Animal welfare implications of surgical castration and its alternatives in pigs. Animal 3, 1488–1496.Google Scholar
Zhou, B, Yang, XJ, Zhao, RQ, Huang, RH, Wang, YH, Wang, ST, Yin, CP, Shen, Q, Wang, LY and Schinckel, AP 2013. Effects of tail docking and teeth clipping on the physiological responses, wounds, behavior, growth, and backfat depth of pigs. Journal of Animal Science 91, 4908–4916.Google Scholar
Zöls, S, Ritzmann, M and Heinritzi, K 2006. Einfluss von schmerzmitteln bei der kastration männlicher ferkel. Berliner und Münchener Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 119, 193–196.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Numberger supplementary material

Figures S1-S2

Download Numberger supplementary material(File)
File 44 KB