Koivula, M, Strandén, I, Aamand, GP and Mäntysaari, EA
2016. Effect of cow reference group on validation reliability of genomic evaluation. Animal 10, 1061–1066.
Lillehammer, M, Sonesson, AK and Meuwissen, THE
2016. Use of field data in pig genomic selection schemes – a simulation study. Animal 10, 1025–1032.
Lund, MS, van den Berg, I, Ma, P, Brøndum, RF and Su, G
2016. How to improve genomic predictions in small dairy cattle populations. Animal 10, 1042–1049.
Meuwissen, THE, Hayes, BJ and Goddard, ME
2001. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics
Pszczola, M and Calus, MPL
2016. Updating the reference population to achieve constant genomic prediction reliability across generations. Animal 10, 1018–1024.
Pszczola, M, Strabel, T, Mulder, HA and Calus, MPL
2012. Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population. Journal of Dairy Science
Schöpke, K and Swalve, HH
2016. Review: opportunities and challenges for small populations of dairy cattle in the era of genomics. Animal 10, 1050–1060.
Shumbusho, F, Raoul, J, Astruc, JM, Palhiere, I, Lemarié, S, Fugeray-Scarbel, A and Elsen, JM
2016. Economic evaluation of genomic selection in small ruminants: a sheep meat breeding program. Animal 10, 1033–1041.
Su, G, Ma, P, Nielsen, US, Aamand, GP, Wiggans, G, Guldbrandtsen, B and Lund, MS
2016. Sharing reference data and including cows in the reference population improve genomic predictions in Danish Jersey. Animal 10, 1067–1075.
Wientjes, YCJ, Veerkamp, RF and Calus, MPL
2013. The effect of linkage disequilibrium and family relationships on the reliability of genomic prediction. Genetics