Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T03:34:20.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of 1-week feed restriction on performance, digestibility of nutrients and digestive system development in the growing rabbit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2015

E. Tůmová ,
Z. Volek ,
D. Chodová ,
H. Härtlová ,
P. Makovický ,
J. Svobodová ,
T. A. Ebeid  and
L. Uhlířová
E. Tůmová*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 21 Prague 6-Suchdol, Czech Republic
Z. Volek
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Přátelství 815, Prague, CZ-104 00, Czech Republic
D. Chodová
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 21 Prague 6-Suchdol, Czech Republic
H. Härtlová
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Science, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 21 Prague 6-Suchdol, Czech Republic
P. Makovický
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Science, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 21 Prague 6-Suchdol, Czech Republic
J. Svobodová
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 21 Prague 6-Suchdol, Czech Republic
T. A. Ebeid
Affiliation:
Department of Poultry Production, Kafrelsheikh University, 33516 Kafr El-Sheikh, Egypt
L. Uhlířová
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 21 Prague 6-Suchdol, Czech Republic
*
†E-mail: tumova@af.czu.cz
Get access

Abstract

A 3 to 4 week feed restriction of about 20% to 25% of the free intake is widely applied in rabbit breeding systems to reduce post-weaning digestive disorders. However, a short intensive feed restriction is described in few studies and can be beneficial for growing rabbits due to a longer re-alimentation period. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of ad libitum (AL) and two restriction levels of feeding (50 and 65 g/rabbit per day) applied for 1 week on performance, gastrointestinal morphology and physiological parameters during the restriction and during the re-alimentation period. Rabbits were divided into three experimental groups: AL rabbits were fed AL, R1 rabbits were restricted from 42 to 49 days of age and received 50 g daily (29% of AL) and R2 rabbits were restricted at the same age and were fed 65 g of feed daily (37% of AL). In the 1st week after weaning and in the weeks after restriction, all the groups were fed AL. During the restriction period, daily weight gain (DWG) in R1 significantly dropped to 11% (experiment 1) and 5% (experiment 2) compared with rabbits in the AL group, although they were fed 29% of AL, whereas in the R2 group it decreased to 20% (experiment 1) and 10% (experiment 2). In the week following feed restriction, DWG in the restricted groups increased (P<0.001) to 166% and 148% in R1 and to 128% and 145% in R2. Restricted rabbits in both the experiments reached up to 90% to 93% of the final live weight (70 days) of the AL group. Over the entire experimental period, feed restriction significantly decreased feed intake to 85% to 88% of the AL group; however, the feed conversion ratio was lower (P<0.05) only in experiment 1 (−6% in R1 and −4% in R2). Digestibilities of CP and fat were not significantly higher during the restriction period and during the 1st week of re-alimentation compared with the AL group. Significant interactions between feeding regime and age revealed the shortest large intestine in the AL group at 49 days of age and the longest at 70 days in the AL and R1 groups. Small intestinal villi were significantly higher and the crypts were significantly deeper in the restricted groups. It could be concluded that short intensive feed restriction increased digestible area in the small and large intestines, including the height of villi and depth of crypts, which might be involved in the compensatory growth and defence mechanism.

Keywords

rabbitfeed restrictiongrowthfeed consumptiongastrointestinal tract
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , January 2016 , pp. 1 - 9
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1995. Official methods of analysis, 16th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists 2000. Official methods of analysis, 17th edition. AOAC, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists 2005. Official methods of analysis, 18th edition. AOAC, Maryland, USA.Google Scholar
Boisot, P, Licois, D and Gidenne, T 2003. Feed restriction reduces the sanitary impact of an experimental reproduction of Epizootic Rabbit Enteropathy syndrome (ERE) in the growing rabbit. In Proceedings of 10ème Journées de Recherches Cunicoles Françaises, ITAVI Publishing, Paris, France, pp. 267–270.Google Scholar
Conway, EJ 1957. Microdiffusion analysis and volumetric error, 4th edition. Crosby Lockwood, London, UK.Google Scholar
Dalle Zotte, A, Rémignon, H and Ouhayoun, J 2005. Effect of feed rationing during post-weaning growth on meat quality, muscle energy metabolism and fibre properties of Biceps femoris muscle in the rabbit. Meat Science 70, 301–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Blas, C and Wisemann, J 2010. Nutrition of the rabbit. 325 pp. Cabi Publishing, Walingford, UK.Google Scholar
De Blas, JC 2013. Nutritional impact on health and performance in intensively reared rabbits. Animal 7, 102–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
García, J, Gidenne, T, Falcao-E-Cunha, L and De Blas, C 2002. Identification of the main factors that influence caecal fermentation traits in growing rabbits. Animal Research 51, 165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidenne, T 1997. Caeco-colic digestion in the growing rabbit: impact of nutritional factors and related disturbances. Livestock Production Science 51, 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidenne, T, Combes, S and Fortun-Lamothe, L 2012. Feed intake limitation strategies for the growing rabbit: effect on feeding behaviour, welfare, performance, digestive physiology and health: a review. Animal 6, 1407–1419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gidenne, T, Combes, S, Feugier, A, Jehl, N, Arveux, P, Boisot, P, Briens, C, Corrent, E, Fortune, H, Montessuy, S and Verdelhan, S 2009. Feed restriction strategy in the growing rabbit. 2. Impact on digestive health, growth and carcass characteristics. Animal 3, 509–515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gidenne, T and Feugier, A 2009. Feed restriction strategy in the growing rabbit. 1. Impact on digestion, rate of passage and microbial activity. Animal 3, 501–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grattagliano, I, Vendemaile, G, Caraceni, P, Domenicali, M, Nardo, B, Cavallari, A, Trevisani, F, Bernardi, M and Atomare, E 2000. Starvation impairs antioxidant defense in fatty livers of rats fed a choline-defficient diet. Journal of Nutrition 130, 2131–2136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knudsen, C, Combes, S, Briens, C, Coutelet, G, Duperray, J, Rebours, G, Salaun, J-M, Travel, A, Weissman, D and Gidenne, T 2014. Increasing the digestible energy intake under a restriction strategy improves feed conversion ratio of the growing rabbit without negatively impacting the health status. Livestock Science 109, 96–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledin, I 1984a. Effect of restricted feeding and realimentation on growth, carcass composition and organ growth during the first seven days of realimentation in rabbit. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 34, 54–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledin, I 1984b. Effect of restricted feeding and realimentation on compensatory growth and organ growth in rabbit. Annales de Zootechnie 33, 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makovický, P, Dudová, M, Tůmová, E, Rajmon, R and Vodková, Z 2011. Experimental study of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) on a model of starving chickens: is generalization of steatosis accompanied by fibrosis of the liver tissue? Pathology-Research and Practice 207, 151–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martignon, MH, Combes, S and Gidenne, T 2010. Digestive physiology and hindgut bacterial community of the young rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus): effects of age and short-term intake limitation. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology – Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology 156, 156–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertens, DR 2002. Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fibre in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International 85, 1217–1240.Google ScholarPubMed
Okerman, L 1994. Diseases of domestic rabbits. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Oliveira de, MC, da Silva, RP, Araújo, LS, da Silva, VR, Bento, EA and da Silva, DM 2012. Effect of feed restriction on performance of growing rabbits. Revista Brasileira de Zootechnia 41, 1463–1467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padilha, MTS, Licois, D, Gidenne, T, Carré, B and Fonty, G 1995. Relationships between microflora and caecal fermentation in rabbits before and after weaning. Reproduction Nutrition Development 35, 375–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perez, JM, Lebas, F, Gidenne, T, Maertens, L, Xiccato, G, Parigi-Bini, R, Dalle Zotte, A, Cossu, ME, Carazzolo, A, Villamide, MJ, Carabaño, R, Fraga, MJ, Ramos, MA, Cervera, C, Blas, E, Fernandez, J, Falcao, E, Cunha, L and Bengala Freire, J 1995. European reference method for in vivo determination of diet digestibility in rabbits. World Rabbit Science 3, 41–43.Google Scholar
Persijn, JP and Vanderslik, W 1976. A new method for determination of gamma-glutamyltransferase in serum. Journal of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry 14, 421–427.Google ScholarPubMed
Plavnik, I and Hurwitz, S 1985. The performance of broiler chicks during and following a severe feed restriction at an early age. Poultry Science 64, 348–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 2003. The SAS System for Windows. Cary, NC, USA: Release 9.1.3.Google Scholar
Tůmová, E, Skřivanová, V and Skřivan, M 2003. Effect of restricted feeding time and quantitative restriction in growing rabbits. Archiv für Geflügelkunde 67, 182–190.Google Scholar
Tůmová, E, Zita, L, Skřivanová, V, Fučiková, A, Skřivan, M and Burešová, M 2007. Digestibility of nutrients, organ development and blood picture in restricted and ad libitum fed broiler rabbits. Archiv für Geflügelkunde 71, 6–12.Google Scholar
Van Harten, S and Cardoso, LA 2010. Feed restriction and genetic selection on the expression and activity of metabolism regulatory enzymes in rabbits. Animal 4, 1873–1883.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Harten, S and Cardoso, LA 2012. Changes in the expression of regulatory enzymes associated with anabolic pathways of energy metabolism in wild and New Zealand rabbit during feed restriction. Livestock Science 150, 357–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB and Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar