Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T20:37:03.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of water restriction on growth performance, feed nutrient digestibility, carcass and meat traits of rabbits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2013

F. Bovera ,
A. Lestingi ,
G. Piccolo ,
F. Iannaccone ,
Y. A. Attia  and
A. Tateo
F. Bovera
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Napoli Federico II, Via F. Delpino 1, 80137 Napoli, Italy
A. Lestingi*
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, S.P. Casamassima km 3, 70010 Valenzano (Ba), Italy
G. Piccolo
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Napoli Federico II, Via F. Delpino 1, 80137 Napoli, Italy
F. Iannaccone
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Napoli Federico II, Via F. Delpino 1, 80137 Napoli, Italy
Y. A. Attia
Affiliation:
Arid Land Agriculture Department, Faculty of Meteorology, Environment and Arid Land Agriculture, King Abdulaziz University, PO Box 80208, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia Animal and Poultry Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Damanhour University, Damanhour 22516, Egypt
A. Tateo
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, S.P. Casamassima km 3, 70010 Valenzano (Ba), Italy
*
†E-mail: antonia.lestingi@uniba.it
Get access

Abstract

The study investigates the effects of a post-weaning water restriction on performance, nutrient digestibility, carcass traits and meat quality of 84-day-old rabbits. A total of 1388 weaned rabbits (35 days) were randomly divided into two groups on the basis of BW and sex. The two groups were fed the same diets ad libitum both in the post-weaning (35 to 60 days) and fattening (61 to 84 days) periods. In the post-weaning period, one group (AL) also received drinking water ad libitum, whereas the other (WR) had a water restriction from 35 to 41 days 2 h/day; from 42 to 48 days 2.5 h/day; from 49 to 55 days 3 h/day; and from 56 to 60 days 4 h/day. During the fattening period, both groups had water-free access. Individual live weights and feed intake per cage were recorded weekly for 32 cages randomly chosen per group (64 rabbits) to calculate the BW gain, feed intake and feed conversion ratio (FCR). The apparent digestibility values of nutrients were measured using acid-insoluble ash. Carcass data were collected from 16 rabbits (8 males and 8 females) per group selected for similar final BW in both groups. Mortality from 35 to 60 days was higher in the AL group (10.1% v. 5.2%, for AL and WR, respectively, P < 0.0001). BW gain was higher for the AL group during both the post-weaning (+22.4%, P < 0.01) and the entire period (+7.5%, P < 0.05). Water restriction reduced feed intake both in the post-weaning (−17.4%, P < 0.0001) and in the entire period (−9.9%, P < 0.05). During the fattening period, FCR was lower for the WR group (5.15 v. 5.75 g/g, for WR and AL, respectively, P < 0.05). The apparent digestibilities of dry matter, organic matter, NDF, ADF and cellulose were greater in the restricted rabbits (+4.7%, +4.5%, +10.2%, +18.8% and +12.8%, P < 0.01, P < 0.01, P < 0.05, P < 0.01, P < 0.05, respectively). Perirenal and scapular fat percentages were higher in the AL rabbits (+30.7% and +116.6%, P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively). Water restriction increased saturated fatty acids (C16:0, +12.9%, P < 0.05), lauroleic acid (C12:1, +75.0%, P < 0.01), n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (C20:5, +50.0%, P < 0.01 and C22:5, +16.6%, P < 0.05) and the n-3/n-6 ratio (+28.6%, P < 0.05). The applied water restriction between 35 and 60 days executed during the winter months improved the digestive health of rabbits, with no negative effects on carcass traits, or physical and chemical meat characteristics. However, from the animal welfare point of view, a water restriction can be criticized as a method to restrict feed intake.

Keywords

carcass traitsdigestibilityfatty acid profile of meatdrinking accessrabbit
Type
Nutrition
Information
animal , Volume 7 , Issue 10 , October 2013 , pp. 1600 - 1606
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) 1984. Official methods of analysis, 14th edition. AOAC, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) 2004. Official methods of analysis, 18th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Ben Rayana, A, Ben Hamouda, M, Bergaoui, R 2008. Effect of water restriction times of 2 and 4 hours per day on performances of growing rabbits. In Proceedings of the 9th World Rabbit Congress (ed. G Xiccato, A Trocino and SD Lukfahr), June 10–13, 2008, pp. 541–545, Verona, Italy, Fond. Ini. Zooprofilattiche E Zoot. publ. Brescia Italy. Retrieved June 20, 2012, from http://world-rabbit-science.com/WRSA-Proceedings/Congress-2008-Verona/Papers/N-BenRayana.pdf.Google Scholar
Bergaoui, R, Kammoun, M, Ouerdiane, K 2008. Effects of feed restriction on the performance and carcass of growing rabbits. In Proceedings of the 9th World Rabbit Congress (ed. G Xiccato, A Trocino and SD Lukfahr), June 10–13, 2008, pp. 547–550, Verona, Italy, Fond. Ini. Zooprofilattiche E Zoot. publ. Brescia Italy. Retrieved June 20, 2012, from http://world-rabbit-science.com/WRSA-Proceedings/Congress-2008-Verona/Papers/N-Bergaoui.pdf.Google Scholar
Blasco, A, Ouhayoun, J 1996. Harmonization of criteria and terminology in rabbit meat research. Revised proposal. World Rabbit Science 4, 93–99.Google Scholar
Boisot, P, Duperray, J, Dugenétais, X, Guyonvarch, A 2004. Interest of hydric restriction times of 2 and 3 h per day to induce feed rstriction in growing rabbits. In Proceedings of the 8th World Rabbit Congress (ed. C Becerril and A Pro), pp. 759–764. Colegio de Postgraduados for WRSA, Puebla, Mexico. Retrieved January 30, 2012, from http://world-rabbit-science.com/WRSA-Proceedings/Congress-2004-Puebla/Puebla-2004-a.htm.Google Scholar
Bovera, F, Lestingi, A, Iannaccone, F, Tateo, A, Nizza, A 2012. Use of dietary mannanoligosaccharides during rabbit fattening period: effects on growth performance, feed nutrient digestibility, carcass traits, and meat quality. Journal of Animal Science 90, 3858–3866.Google Scholar
Castellini, C, Dal Bosco, A, Mugnai, C 2002. Effect of caecotrophy on the fatty acid profile of rabbit meat. Progress in Nutrition 4, 125–130.Google Scholar
Dewree, R, Licois, D, Coudert, P, Lassence, C, Vindevogel, H, Marlier, D 2003. L'entéropathie épizootique du lapin (EEL): étude du role des infections par Clostridium perfringens dans l’étio-pathogénie de ce syndrome. In Proceedings of 10èmes Journées de la Recherche Cunicole (ed. ITAVI - AFSSA), November 2003, pp. 251–254, Itavi Service Diffusion Publications, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Di Meo, C, Bovera, F, Marono, S, Vella, N, Nizza, A 2007. Effect of feed restriction on performance and feed digestibility in rabbits. Italian Journal of Animal Science 6, 765–767.Google Scholar
El Maghraby, MMA 2011. Effect of restricted access to drinking water on growth, feed efficiency and carcass characteristics of fattening rabbits. Asian Journal of Animal Sciences 5, 136–144.Google Scholar
European Union 2005. Ban on antibiotics as growth promoters in animal feed enters into effect. Retrieved December 22, 2005, from http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/05/1687&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en.PDF.Google Scholar
Folch, J, Lees, M, Sloane-Stanley, H 1957. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. Journal of Biological Chemistry 226, 497–502.Google Scholar
Gidenne, T, Lebas, F 2006. Feeding behaviour in rabbits. In Feeding in domestic vertebrates. From structure to behaviour (ed. V Bels), pp. 179–209. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Gidenne, T, Combes, S, Fortun-Lamothe, L 2012. Feed intake limitation strategies for the growing rabbit: effect on feeding behaviour, welfare, performance, digestive physiology and health: a review. Animal 6, 1407–1419.Google Scholar
Gidenne, T, Garcia, J, Lebas, F, Licois, D 2010. Nutrition and feeding strategy: interactions with pathology. In Nutrition of the rabbit (ed. C De Blas and J Wiseman), pp. 179–199. CABI Publishing, UK.Google Scholar
Gidenne, T, Combes, S, Feugier, A, Jehl, N, Arveux, P, Boisot, P, Briens, C, Corrent, E, Fortune, H, Montessuy, S, Verdelhan, S 2009a. Feed restriction strategy in the growing rabbit. 2. Impact on digestive health, growth and carcass characteristics. Animal 3, 509–515.Google Scholar
Gidenne, T, Murr, S, Travel, A, Corrent, E, Foubert, C, Bebin, K, Mevel, L, Rebours, G, Renouf, B 2009b. Effets du niveau de rationnement et du mode de distribution de l'aliment sur les performances et les troubles digestifs post-sevrage du lapereau. Premiers résultats d'une étude concertée du réseau GEC. Cuniculture Magazine 36, 65–72.Google Scholar
Gondret, F, Lebas, F, Bonneau, M 2000. Restricted feed intake during fattening reduces intramuscular lipid deposition without modifying muscle fiber characteristics in rabbits. Journal of Nutrition 130, 228–233.Google Scholar
Martignon, MH 2010. Consequences of a feed intake control on digestive physiopathology and on feeding behaviour. PhD thesis, Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse, 194pp. Retrieved January 30, 2012, from http://ethesis.inp-toulouse.fr/archive/00001486/.Google Scholar
Ouhayoun, J 1998. Influence of the diet on rabbit meat quality. In The nutrition of the rabbit (ed. C De Blas and J Wiseman), pp. 177–195. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Ouhayoun, J, Gidenne, T, Demarne, Y 1984. Evolution postnatale de la composition en acides gras des lipids du tissue musculaire chez le lapin en regime hypolipidique. Reproduction Nutrition Development 25, 505–509.Google Scholar
Peiretti, PG, Meineri, G 2008. Effects on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and the fat and meat fatty acid profile of rabbits fed diets with chia (Salvia hispanica L.) seed supplements. Meat Science 80, 1116–1121.Google Scholar
Roe, MT, Pillai, SD 2003. Monitoring and identifying antibiotic resistance in bacteria. Poultry Science 82, 622–626.Google Scholar
Saleh, K, Attia, YA, Younis, H 1996. Effect of feed restriction and breed on compensatory growth, abdominal fat and some production traits of broiler chicks. Archiv Für Geflügelkunde 60, 153–159.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 2000. SAS/STAT users guide: statistics. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Tumova, E, Zita, L, Stolc, L 2006. Carcass quality in restricted and ad libitum fed rabbits. Czech Journal of Animal Science 51, 214–219.Google Scholar
Ulbricht, TL, Southgate, DAT 1991. Coronary heart disease: seven dietary factors. The Lancet 338, 985–992.Google Scholar
Vogtmann, H, Frirter, P, Prabuck, AL 1975. A new method of determining metabolizability of energy and digestibility of fatty acids in broiler diets. British Poultry Science 16, 531–534.Google Scholar