Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Evaluation of longevity modeling censored records in Nellore

  • D. A. Garcia (a1), G. J. M. Rosa (a2), B. D. Valente (a2), R. Carvalheiro (a1) (a3), G. A. Fernandes Júnior (a1) and L. G. Albuquerque (a1) (a3)...
Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prediction ability of models that cope with longevity phenotypic expression as uncensored and censored in Nellore cattle. Longevity was defined as the difference between the dates of last weaned calf and cow birth. There were information of 77 353 females, being 61 097 cows with uncensored phenotypic information and 16 256 cows with censored records. These data were analyzed considering three different models: (1) Gaussian linear model (LM), in which only uncensored records were considered; and two models that consider both uncensored and censored records: (2) Censored Gaussian linear model (CLM); and (3) Weibull frailty hazard model (WM). For the model prediction ability comparisons, the data set was randomly divided into training and validation sets, containing 80% and 20% of the records, respectively. There were considered 10 repetitions applying the following restrictions: (a) at least three animals per contemporary group in the training set; and (b) sires with more than 10 progenies with uncensored records (352 sires) should have daughters in the training and validation sets. The variance components estimated using the whole data set in each model were used as true values in the prediction of breeding values of the animals in the training set. The WM model showed the best prediction ability, providing the lowest χ 2 average and the highest number of sets in which a model had the smallest value of χ 2 statistics. The CLM and LM models showed prediction abilities 2.6% and 3.7% less efficient than WM, respectively. In addition, the accuracies of sire breeding values for LM and CLM were lower than those obtained for WM. The percentages of bulls in common, considering only 10% of sires with the highest breeding values, were around 75% and 54%, respectively, between LM–CLM and LM–WM models, considering all sires, and 75% between LM–CLM and LM–WM, when only sires with more than 10 progenies with uncensored records were taken into account. These results are indicative of reranking of animals in terms of genetic merit between LM, CLM and WM. The model in which censored records of longevity were excluded from the analysis showed the lowest prediction ability. The WM provides the best predictive performance, therefore this model would be recommended to perform genetic evaluation of longevity in this population.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Present address: Universidade Estadual Paulista ‘Júlio de Mesquita Filho’, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane s/n, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, CEP 14884-900, Brazil. E-mail: lgalb@fcav.unesp.br
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

FF Cardoso , GJM Rosa , RJ Tempelman and RAA Torres Junior 2009. Modelos hierárquicos bayesianos para estimação robusta e análise de dados censurados em melhoramento animal. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 38, 7280.

DZ Caraviello , KA Weigel and D Gianola 2004. Prediction of longevity breeding values for US Holstein sires using survival analysis methodology. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 35183525.

KA Donoghue , R Rekaya and JK Bertrand 2004b. Comparison methods for handling censored records in beef fertility data: field study. Journal of Animal Science 82, 357361.

V Ducrocq 2005. An improved model for the French genetic evaluation of dairy bulls on length of productive life of their daughters. Animal Science 80, 249256.

V Ducrocq and G Casella 1996. A Bayesian analysis of mixed survival models. Genetic Selection Evolution 28, 505529.

V Ducrocq , RL Quaas , EJ Pollak and G Casella 1988. Length of productive life of dairy cows. 2. Variance component estimation and sire evaluation. Journal of Dairy Science 71, 30713079.

F Forabosco , R Bozzi , F Filippini , P Boettcher , JAM Van Arendonk and P Bijma 2006. Linear model vs. survival analysis for genetic evaluation of sires for longevity in Chianina beef cattle. Livestock Science 101, 191198.

DA Garcia , GJM Rosa , BD Valente , R Carvalheiro and LG Albuquerque 2016. Comparison of models for the genetic evaluation of reproductive traits with censored data in Nellore cattle. Journal of Animal Science 94, 22972306.

SF Guo , D Gianola and RRT Short 2001. Bayesian analysis of lifetime performance and prolificacy in Landrace sows using a linear mixed model with censoring. Livestock Production Science 72, 243252.

P Heldelberger and P Welch 1983. Simulation run length control in the presence of an initial transient. Operations Research 31, 11091144.

Y Hou , P Madsen , R Labouriau , Y Zhang , MS Lund and G Su 2009. Genetic analysis of days from calving to first insemination and days open in Danish Holstein using different models and censoring scenarios. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 12291239.

IR Korsgaard , AH Andersen and J Jensen 2002. Prediction error variance and expected response to selection, when selection is based on the best linear predictor – for Gaussian and threshold characters, traits following a Poisson mixed model and survival traits. Genetics Selection Evolution 34, 307333.

R Lubbers , S Brotherstone , VP Ducrocq and PM Visscher 2000. A comparison of a linear and proportional hazards approach to analyse discrete longevity data in dairy cows. Animal Science 70, 197206.

PM Maia , P Madsen and R Labouriau 2013. Multivariate survival models for genetic analysis of longevity traits. Journal of Applied Statistics 41, 12861306.

HHR Neves , R Carvalheiro and SA Queiroz 2012. Genetic parameters for an alternative criterion to improve productive longevity of Nellore cows. Journal of Animal Science 90, 42094216.

JAIV Silva , JP Eler , JBS Ferraz , BL Golden and HN Oliveira 2003. Short communication: Heritability estimate for stayability in Nelore cows. Livestock Production Science 79, 97101.

JAIV Silva , IB Formigoni , JP Eler and JBS Ferraz 2006. Genetic relationship among stayability, scrotal circumference and post-weaning weight in Nelore cattle. Livestock Production Science 99, 5159.

MH Van Melis , JP Eler , GJM Rosa , JBS Ferraz , LGG Figueiredo , EC Matos and HN Oliveira 2010a. Additive genetic relationship between scrotal circumference, heifer pregnancy, and stayability in Nellore cattle. Journal of Animal Science 88, 38093813.

MH Van Melis , HN Oliveira , JP Eler , JBS Ferraz , J Casellas and L Varona 2010b. Additive genetic relationship of longevity with fertility and production traits in Nellore cattle based on bivariate models. Genetics and Molecular Research 9, 176187.

MH Yazdi , PM Visscher , V Ducrocq and R Thompson 2002. Heritability, reliability of genetic evaluations and response to selection in proportional hazard models. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 15631577.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

animal
  • ISSN: 1751-7311
  • EISSN: 1751-732X
  • URL: /core/journals/animal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 24 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 218 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 23rd May 2017 - 26th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.